Chips supported:-
1. 88E6161 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6165 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6132 3 port gbe swtich with 2 integrated PHYs
Platform specific configuration supported
default and router port vlan config supported
Note: This driver is supported and
Hello Mike,
Please take a look at the CDC branch in u-boot-usb.
Patches to add more boards/devices or other improvements are welcome.
feel free to yell at me for not reading some README, but any plans on merging
back into mainline ?
Of course, but there are still some cleanups pending for
On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Hi all,
I've upload on the u-boot-arm tree in kconfig branch
some patch on which I work to all us to use Kconfig
It's a dev branch not all patch are perfect
but it will be nice if other could
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it
was made publicly visible nearly two years ago it did not collect much
of a community around it.
Right; part of the reason is it was always something we used to
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to
the table and get it into u-boot v1? ive never personally looked at
v2, but if it means i need to redo all of my Blackfin core/board code,
that doesnt sound very
On Apr 19, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it
was made publicly visible nearly two years ago it did not collect
much
of a community around it.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 19, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it
was made publicly visible nearly two years ago
hi stefan,
i made just changed few things in yosemite files and it worked for
me.
you have mentioned to use UART2 device as stdin/stdout/... in my
default environment...
where can i mention my default stdin and stdout
Thanks Regards,
Prathika R
Stefan Roese wrote:
On Friday 17
Hi Prafulla,
Sorry for dragging this out... you've made a lot of good changes
already, and are almost there.
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
Chips supported:-
1. 88E6161 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6165 6 port gbe swtich with 5 integrated PHYs
2. 88E6132 3 port gbe swtich with 2
Hi Prafulla,
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
snip
+#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.5.44
+#define CONFIG_SERVERIP192.168.5.30
+#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
please remove the IP params
Why ?
Because these values are only relevant to your
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:49 Sun 12 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
From: David Brownell dbrown...@users.sourceforge.net
Chips without the EMAC controller won't need the utilities
it uses to read an Ethernet address from EEPROM; so don't
include them needlessly.
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 23:15 Thu 16 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
From: David Brownell dbrown...@users.sourceforge.net
Make the U-Boot dm9000 driver read addresses from EEPROM just
like Linux does ... read six bytes, instead of reading twelve
bytes and then
Timur Tabi wrote:
Change netdev.h to use CONFIG_ULI526X instead of CONFIG_ULI526.
CONFIG_ULI526X
is used everywhere else, so that's the correct macro name. Without this fix,
Ethernet will not work on the Freescale MPC8610 HPCD.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
---
On Saturday 18 April 2009 23:13:58 Peter Tyser wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 14:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 15:41:22 Peter Tyser wrote:
+unsigned int i2c_get_bus_speed(void)
+ __attribute((weak, alias(__def_i2c_get_bus_speed)));
__attribute__ ?
On Sunday 19 April 2009 15:50:46 Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to
the table and get it into u-boot v1? ive never personally looked at
v2, but if it means i need to redo
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090417053017.gd31...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
On 20:15 Tue 14 Apr , Dirk Behme wrote:
Remove remaining legacy NAND defines for Beagle, EVM, Overo and Pandora.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
---
For
16 matches
Mail list logo
