Hello Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:02:02 +0100
Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
+++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/fdt.c
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ extern void ft_qe_setup(void *blob);
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
-#if defined(CONFIG_BOOTCOUNT_LIMIT) defined(CONFIG_MPC8360)
Dear Macpaul Lin,
In message AANLkTikh-0JvLqGm2gk3F70cg3z8=lvt5ggrfqutu...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I'm not sure if this way I use make-asm-offset is correct.
First I add the OFFSET marco of ftsmc020 into lib/asm-offsets.c.
The file lib/asm-offsets.c becomes
We should probably split
Dear Po-Yu Chuang,
In message 1301301782-1644-1-git-send-email-ratbert.chu...@gmail.com you
wrote:
From: Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com
It seems __bss_end__ is not a true convention for all toolchains,
at least not for PPC. Using _end for standalone programs might be
the simplest
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 201103281934.20704...@denx.de you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
please pull this CFI fix:
The following changes since commit cb815e5ff979e36d68df130a810d34de4bf93289:
Prepare v (2011-03-27 21:50:07 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message alpine.lfd.2.00.1103290743460.6...@right.am.freescale.net you
wrote:
[ Pull in one other HW / SoC related fix in for v2011.03 ]
The following changes since commit cb815e5ff979e36d68df130a810d34de4bf93289:
Prepare v (2011-03-27 21:50:07 +0200)
are available
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lei Wen [mailto:adrian.w...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:36 PM
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: Lei Wen; Heiko Schocher; Wolfgang Denk;
Kim,
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:18:38 +0100
Andre Schwarzandre.schw...@matrix-vision.de wrote:
sorry to bother you again, but I again stumbled over the discussed USB
init issue :
nack, 837x has a usb controller at IMMR+0x23000.
yes - but offset 0x00-0xff is explicitly reserved regarding to
On Mar 29, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
From: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Acked-by: Andy Fleming aflem...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
drivers/net/tsec.c | 234
Hi Wolfgang
2011/3/31 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de:
Dear Macpaul Lin,
We should probably split architecture and/or board specific additions
like these into separate files in the respectice architecture / board
directories. Eventually we add make targets for these, then; for now
it's probably
On Mar 15, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
From: Laurentiu TUDOR laurentiu.tu...@freescale.com
We utilize the compatible string to find the node to add fsl,liodn
property to. However P3041 P5020 don't have fsl,p4080-pcie
compatible for their PCIe controllers as they aren't backwards
Dear Macpaul Lin,
In message AANLkTi=umWPj8zK+AvL6H8EarhbqSxN2G=8itxxzg...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
There are lots of register offset is widely been used both in
lowlevel_init and C environment.
Yes, there is a lot os mess that piled up over the years. It will
take time to clean this up.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
The current FreeScale MPC-8xxx DDR SPD interpreter is using full 64-bit
integer divide operations to convert between nanoseconds and DDR clock
cycles given arbitrary DDR clock frequencies.
Since all of the inputs to this are 32-bit
On Mar 15, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
The numeric constants in the switch statements are replaced by #defines
added to the common ddr_spd.h header. This dramatically improves the
readability of the switch statments.
In addition, a few of the longer lines were cleaned up, and
V2:
rename the previous pxa_i2c to mvi2c, since this driver would be shared
by many other Marvell platforms.
V3:
Clean the code sytle issue
V4:
add and* and or* to make set bit operation generic
Also make i2c definition included in the ifdef
V5:
Fix code style issue of the first patch
V6:
Add i2c_clk_enable in the cpu specific code, since previous platform it,
while new platform don't need. In the pantheon and armada100 platform,
this function is defined as NULL one.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
Changelog:
V2:
NO CHANGE
V3:
clean code sytle issue
V4:
V5:
V6:
NO
Add i2c support to dkb board with pantheon soc.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
Changelog:
V2:
NO CHANGE
V3:
clean code sytle issue
Add i2c clock enable code include in I2C configure define block
V4:
make i2c definition included in the ifdef
V5:
NO CHANGE
V6:
Move the
For better sharing with other platform other than pxa's,
it is more convenient to put the driver to the common place.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
Changelog:
v2: rename previous pxa_i2c to mvi2c.
V3: change previous name from pxa_i2c to mv_i2c
clean code style issue exist in
Add the ability to support multiple i2c bus for mv_i2c
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
Changelog:
V2:
NO CHANGE
V3:
clean code style issue
V4:
V5:
V6:
NO CHANGE
drivers/i2c/mv_i2c.c | 36 +++-
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Add i2c support to aspenite board with Armada100 soc.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
Changelog:
V2:
NO CHANGE
V3:
clean code style issue
V4:
V5:
NO CHANGE
V6:
Move the CONFIG_CMD_I2C define place
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/armada100/cpu.c| 16 +++
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c
b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c
index ee7ef0f..02d069c 100644
---
From: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
Add documentation for the serdes hwconfig option, which is used to specify
the status of SerDes banks two and three for the SERDES8 erratum work-around.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
From: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
Remove the SERDES8 erratum work-around code that only applied to P4080 rev1,
which is not supported by this version of U-Boot.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
The numeric constants in the switch statements are replaced by #defines
added to the common ddr_spd.h header. This dramatically improves the
readability of the switch statments.
In addition, a few of the longer lines were cleaned up, and
Dear Macpaul Lin,
Please keep the mailing list on Cc: (re-added)
In message aanlktinyjhogra7zavuqxwbyrkwnqomcbfwijg_+3...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I repeat again: I consider this manual unrolling of the nested structs
a Bad Thing. You should have separate offsets for each of the nested
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Adding support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
ARMV7: MMC SPL Boot support for SMDKV310 board
Makefile
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
---
Makefile| 11 ++-
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 104 +++
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org
---
board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile| 46 +++
board/samsung/smdkv310/config.mk
Dear Kim Kumar,
are you aware that a number of 83xx boards don't build any more?
I see errors like these:
Configuring for MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33 - Board: MPC8313ERDB, Options:
SYS_33MHZ,NAND_U_BOOT
ppc_6xx-ld: cannot open linker script file u-boot.lds: No such file or
directory
make[1]: ***
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear sywang,
In message E20D124831AF42E094DEFD4F59B45E9E@sywangPC you wrote:
how does Linux call the function from u-boot?
Simply: it does not.
When Linux starts running, U-Boot is gone and dead; nothing of it
survives the boot of Linux except for the parameters passed to the
Linux kernel.
Hi all,
In message 20110331091915.d9b19edf...@gemini.denx.de I wrote:
are you aware that a number of 83xx boards don't build any more?
I see errors like these:
Configuring for MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33 - Board: MPC8313ERDB, Options:
SYS_33MHZ,NAND_U_BOOT
ppc_6xx-ld: cannot open linker script
1. Enhance ftsmc020 according to datasheets.
2. Fix relocation related declaration.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin macp...@andestech.com
---
Changes for v2:
- Remove assembly register offsets for support lowlevel_init.S.
- The nested structure of register offsets has been rewrote.
- Fix
Dear Macpaul Lin,
In message 1301570307-13852-1-git-send-email-macp...@andestech.com you wrote:
1. Enhance ftsmc020 according to datasheets.
2. Fix relocation related declaration.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin macp...@andestech.com
...
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail (and its
1. Enhance ftsmc020 according to datasheets.
2. Fix relocation related declaration.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin macp...@andestech.com
---
Changes for v2:
- Remove assembly register offsets for support lowlevel_init.S.
- The nested structure of register offsets has been rewrote.
- Fix
Ah, I didnt see it was already in next
On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:13, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Andy Fleming wrote:
From: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Acked-by: Andy Fleming
Commit 6dc1ece Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL modified a
number of Makefiles in a way that broke out-of-tree builds. The
problem was that $(nandobj) was used before it got defined.
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
---
nand_spl/board/amcc/acadia/Makefile
Dear Alex,
the mpq101 board support is broken in recent versions of U-Boot:
Configuring for mpq101 board...
ppc_85xxDP-ld: u-boot: section .ppcenv lma 0xfffc overlaps previous sections
Can you please have a look?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:
Dear Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 16:52 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Commit 6dc1ece Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL modified a
number of Makefiles in a way that broke out-of-tree builds. The
problem was that $(nandobj) was used before it got defined.
What is out-of-tree builds? Why
Hi,
My name is Mrs Michelle wife to Mr Richard Jones Moore,I came across your
resume on Career Network saying you need employment.I\'ll need your services as
a personal assistant for my business within the
. We just moved in to town a couple of days ago before embarking on a trip
sponsored
Hi,
moving to latest U-Boot introduces some issues with the environment.
Setup:
- PowerPC based boards (52xx / 83xx)
- Environments are in flash with redundancy
Dumping flash the environments with dd and using hexdump shows :
- crc32 - flags Data (first entry beginning with 'a').
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:19:15 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Kumar,
are you aware that a number of 83xx boards don't build any more?
I see errors like these:
Configuring for MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33 - Board: MPC8313ERDB, Options:
SYS_33MHZ,NAND_U_BOOT
ppc_6xx-ld: cannot
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1301583985.1991.4.camel@haiying-laptop you wrote:
What is out-of-tree builds? Why did LDFLAGS_FINAL patch break it? the
out-of-tree building means that you store all build results in some
other directory, outside of the source tree. See item 3 under Notes at
Dear Andre Schwarz,
In message 4d949e22.5090...@matrix-vision.de you wrote:
moving to latest U-Boot introduces some issues with the environment.
Which board would that be? I don't see this on any board I tested.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20110331103141.80162901.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:19:15 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Kumar,
are you aware that a number of 83xx boards don't build any more?
I see errors like these:
Configuring
Wolfgang,
Dear Andre Schwarz,
In message4d949e22.5090...@matrix-vision.de you wrote:
moving to latest U-Boot introduces some issues with the environment.
Which board would that be? I don't see this on any board I tested.
it is mvblm7 (=MPC8343) and a new MPC8377 based one waiting for
the
Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by
byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the responding
register according to CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
README |5
drivers/serial/ns16550.c |
Dear Lei Wen,
In message 1301586774-25447-1-git-send-email-lei...@marvell.com you wrote:
Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by
byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the responding
register according to CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE.
Can you please
Dear Andre Schwarz,
In message 4d94a250@matrix-vision.de you wrote:
Which board would that be? I don't see this on any board I tested.
it is mvblm7 (=MPC8343) and a new MPC8377 based one waiting for
the merge window to open.
I'm using a gcc-4.3.3 from OpenEmbedded/Angstrom ... if
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:38:18 +0200
Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
Hello Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:01:57 +0100
Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
cc: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com
cc: Holger Brunck
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:40:17 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
In message 20110331103141.80162901.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:19:15 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Kim Kumar,
are you aware that a number
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 17:37 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
$(nandobj) was defined in those Makefiles in that way before applying
LDFLAGS_FINAL patch. Why could the out-of-tree builds passed before
applying LDFLAG_FINAL patch?
Have a look at the changes introduced by your commit, and you
Wolfgang,
Which board would that be? I don't see this on any board I tested.
it is mvblm7 (=MPC8343) and a new MPC8377 based one waiting for
the merge window to open.
I'm using a gcc-4.3.3 from OpenEmbedded/Angstrom ... if this matters at all.
Can you please try and use anothe rtool chain,
This patch adds support for the PI7C9X442SL PCIe EHCI host controller
from Pericom.
Tested at P4080DS eval board from Freescale.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Trübenbach ralf.truebenb...@men.de
Cc: Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net
---
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:21:09 -0500
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:40:17 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
In message 20110331103141.80162901.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote:
Scott, please push this commit upstream to fix out of source tree
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:51:30 -0500
Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:21:09 -0500
Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:40:17 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
In message
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:52:31 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Commit 6dc1ece Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL modified a
number of Makefiles in a way that broke out-of-tree builds. The
problem was that $(nandobj) was used before it got defined.
Fix this.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
2011/3/31 Trübenbach, Ralf ralf.truebenb...@men.de:
This patch adds support for the PI7C9X442SL PCIe EHCI host controller
from Pericom.
Tested at P4080DS eval board from Freescale.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Trübenbach ralf.truebenb...@men.de
Cc: Remy Bohmer li...@bohmer.net
---
Applied to
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Commit 6dc1ece Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL modified a
number of Makefiles in a way that broke out-of-tree builds. The
problem was that $(nandobj) was used before it got defined.
Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Signed-off-by:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110331112109.12162...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
I don't see the above error with top-of-tree:
$ CROSS_COMPILE=~/ppc-tc-4.5/bin/powerpc-linux-gnu- ./MAKEALL
MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33
Configuring for MPC8313ERDB_NAND_33 - Board: MPC8313ERDB, Options:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110331212629.ga17...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Commit 6dc1ece Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL modified a
number of Makefiles in a way that broke out-of-tree builds. The
problem was that $(nandobj) was
The u-boot recipe in Poky (OE core) fails to build u-boot for powerpc.
I've tested the following versions:
v2010.09
v2010.12
v2011.03
All versions fail with:
$ make ARCH=powerpc
CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/poky/1.0/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/ppc603e-poky-linux/powerpc-poky-linux-
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
The u-boot recipe in Poky (OE core) fails to build u-boot for powerpc.
I've tested the following versions:
v2010.09
v2010.12
v2011.03
All versions fail with:
$ make ARCH=powerpc
I have an MPC8323ERDB that I am trying to update from an older version of
u-boot to 2010.12 and am having trouble saving the environment with
saveenv. I turn on the debug in env_flash.c and can see the failure is at
line 271 near the beginning of the saveenv() routine where we are trying to
Thanks for your reply very much.
In my scenario, I want to write the panic info into the flash, but the panic
is caused by interrupt routine, I cannot access the flash, so I think that
if the flash-write function from u-boot can be called, the issue should be
resolved.
Any other comments?
I ran into this, too, but it went away when I updated my compiler. It
looks like the beginning was set a little too close to the end?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Alex,
the mpq101 board support is broken in recent versions of U-Boot:
Configuring for
This is a Delivery Status Notification (DSN).
I was unable to deliver your message to
aardee...@rediffmail.com.
I said
(end of message)
And they gave me the error;
552 suspicious virus code detected in executables attached, message not
accepted (#5.3.4)
Reporting-MTA: dns; etexusa.com
Dear Charles Krinke,
In message aanlktikjfqlx4lra7bzsaq2njy0ehinh+evwe8cso...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
up_data = (end_addr + 1 - ((long)flash_addr + CONFIG_ENV_SIZE));
debug(2 Data to save 0x%lx end:%lx new:%lx\n, up_data, end_addr,
flash_addr);
if (up_data) {
if
Dear sywang,
In message E1A60D3A6B5245C9B642C3CC81EACF61@sywangPC you wrote:
In my scenario, I want to write the panic info into the flash, but the panic
If the system panics, you must not assume that there is any working
code left that is capable of writing to flash memory.
is caused by
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Lei Wen,
In message 1301586774-25447-1-git-send-email-lei...@marvell.com you wrote:
Some hardware would dysfunctional if only access the register by
byte. This patch is tend to recover original access the
Dear Lei Wen,
In message AANLkTi=bbs7wzcbsh26hb0y_gvxzhteqspovzkkn1...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Can you please explain on what board, and with which tool chain, you
see any problems?
I test on Marvell pxa955 (MG1) board, with android 4.4.0 toolchain.
The pxa955's ns16550 register's IER
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Lei Wen,
In message AANLkTi=bbs7wzcbsh26hb0y_gvxzhteqspovzkkn1...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Can you please explain on what board, and with which tool chain, you
see any problems?
I test on Marvell
71 matches
Mail list logo
