Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message
CALButCJXJE+mo_W5=kyt8bto4e36-i5ajmcgre-cg0fyp1r...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
A revised version of the spec (sorry, I would have used reply-to but
something went amiss with gmail
Hi All,
Here's a quick-and-dirty specification for a patch tracking tool...
PatchTrack is designed to help alleviate some of the load from custodians
manging a email based work flow accepting patches from a large community
of contributors
Functionality:
- Monitor an electronic mailing list,
Hi Marek,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Patchwork is GPL'd and, in my personal opinion, gets fairly close to what
we might need. Maybe we could take Patchwork and modify it to suit our
needs?
Maybe ... where're the sources?
git clone
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Yes - But see above. If the build infrastructure is building with all the
repos applied we will get instant feedback that a repo is out-of-step with
mainline rather than waiting for Wolfgang
Hi Kim Marek,
On 07/21/2012 07:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:30:49 +0200
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
as promised, here are my expanded notes from the BoF meeting at LSM2012
last week. It was a pleasure to get some core developers into one room
Hi Scott,
On 07/21/2012 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/20/2012 04:34 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi Kim Marek,
On 07/21/2012 07:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:30:49 +0200
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
as promised, here are my expanded notes from
Hi All,
On 07/21/2012 11:27 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[snip]
And Jenkins... well, we have been using this for some time internally
to run test builds for U-Boot. I can tell you a thing or two about
it, and Marek
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme,
In message 5005562e.6070...@gmail.com you wrote:
I think U-Boot has reached the point that purely manual patch management is
not longer cutting the mustard.
100% agreed. The problem I see is that
Hi Lund,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
... but it looks like you still have some GPL-3 gremlins lurking. this
must
be sorted out before we can consider the code for merging. i suspect
simply
changing version 3 to version 2 isn't the right
Hi Stefan,
On 07/17/2012 08:37 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 01:11:01 Graeme Russ wrote:
It was discussed whether to do some automatic merging of these
per-custodian trees into a central next, but majority of people believed
that the patch handling process should remain
On 07/17/2012 10:10 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Maybe it's time to seriously look at a gerrit + jenkins based solution?
Here's a good demo video:
http://alblue.bandlem.com/2011/02/gerrit-git-review-with-jenkins-ci.html
___
U-Boot mailing list
U
Hi Detlev,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
* Conflict resolution: setting up a moderator procedure for
unhappy submitters
A recent occurence on the mailing list where contributers were sent
through multiple rounds of patch submissions for non-obvious
Hi Allen
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Allen Martin amar...@nvidia.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 03:15:36AM -0700, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Allen,
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:17:19 -0700, Allen Martin amar...@nvidia.com wrote:
[snip]
And I forgot to mention, the code bloat from
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Allen Martin amar...@nvidia.com wrote:
Disable sibling call optimization based on binutils version. This is
to work around a bug in the assember in binutils versions 2.22.
Branches to weak symbols can be incorrectly optimized in thumb mode to
a
Hi Lund,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Do I have to do anything special at this point, or can I assume everything
is going according to plan?
I've had a quick look - the intrusion into common code is minimal
(additions to Makefiles) so the risk to
Hi Sughosh
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Christian,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Christian Riesch
christian.rie...@omicron.at wrote:
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi,
While
Hi Prabhakar
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Prabhakar Kushwaha
prabha...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Mike/Graeme.
Please help me in closing review related comments on this patch.
I can't offer any comments either way regarding -gdwarf-2 as I have
never done any runtime debugging of U-Boot
I
Hi Stephen,
On 06/07/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
The Raspberry Pi model B uses the BCM2835 SoC, has 256MB of RAM, contains
an SMSC 9512 USB LAN/Hub chip, and various IO connectors. For more details,
see http://www.raspberrypi.org/.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
Hi Jongman,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jongman Heo jongman@gmail.com wrote:
(!timeout) condition check in mmc_send_status() can never be met,
because do-while loop ends up with negative timeout value, -1.
Fix it by using pre-decrement.
Signed-off-by: Jongman Heo
()
Regards,
Graeme
P.S. Please stop top-posting
Thanks and Regards,
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: Graeme Russ [mailto:graeme.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 June 2012 05:21
To: Sandeep Kumar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] facing issues with malloc in U-Boot
Hi
Hi Sandeep,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Sandeep Kumar
sandeep.ku...@open-silicon.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am facing issues with malloc in U-Boot while trying to allocate some
memory. Here are the prints which I am getting after enabling the debug.
U-Boot 2011.12 (May 31 2012 -
Hi Prabhakar,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Prabhakar Kushwaha
prabha...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
This patch has been pending for a very long time. No review comments has
been provided.
Mike Frysinger posted a comment on May 14, 2012:
[quote]
no real information here as to what
Hi Jorgen,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Yes, that is exactly what you should do.
But before you post them, make sure you run them through checkpatch.pl
first and resolve/explain any errors or warnings
Wow, ohhweee this will take a little while.
Hi Jorgen,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Uninitialized global and static variables reside in .bss and are set
to zero during relocation. Initialised globals and static variables go
into .data
Alas, I know from experience that Microsoft's C
Hi Jorgen,
On May 22, 2012 4:31 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
I stand corrected, going over the files now for the patching, nearly all
ZFS related files (headers, and internals) are GPLv3. The GRUB specific
files (the files interfacing with the GRUB API) appear to be GPLv2.
Hi Jorgen,
On May 22, 2012 5:34 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
That is a problem. U-Boot is nominally GPLv2+ which would allow inclusion
of GPLv3 code but there are significant portions of U-Boot which are
GPLv2
(Linux kernel code for example) which is a blocker :(
Hi Jorgen,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
commit bc192bb0716b02b2b711dc2df62ed15e1160ea50
Author: Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net
Date: Wed May 23 01:55:02 2012 +
[snip]
commit bea9588d98f52d95a325f3b71a7ae448242c7b64
Author: Jorgen
Hi Jorgen,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
What are all these commit references? Are they from an external git-repo?
If so I think the commit message might make more sense if you simply
summarise what you have done to adapt the original source code
Hi Jorgen,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net
---
Makefile | 2 +-
You just committed a major ML no-no
Always out a revision summary below the --- (even if it's a 'no change')
Hi Jorgen
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Slowly getting the hang of github and u-boot. I took a fork of u-boot
20120520, and merged in the EXT4 patched.
In addition to Samsung's work;
* Fix minor string ext2-ext4
* 'unsigned' sectors for
Hi Jorgen,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Work based on current u-boot repository;
https://github.com/lundman/u-boot/compare/upstream...upstream-zfs
These patches will likely not get reviewed and definitely will not get
merged unless that are
Hi Jorgen,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
These patches will likely not get reviewed and definitely will not get
merged unless that are posted to the mailing list
Ok, is it better if I use git format-patch and send them on the list?
Yes, that is
Hi Jorgen,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
GRUB ZFS booting sources are based on the GRUB GPL sources, provided by
Sun to GRUB.
Hmm, I know that GRUB is GPLv3+ - Is the ZFS code GPLv3+ or was that
released under a different version?
(I know the ZFS
Hi Jorgen Lundman,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jorgen Lundman lund...@lundman.net wrote:
Yay, so the ext4 works for you? Why wasn't ext4 merged? Can you post the
reasoning (maybe links to gmane or something?)
I have no idea. I just needed ext4 support, and saw someone had done the
and Graeme Russ to CC for OMAP4 and x86 signoff, although
/drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu is not under my control - I think this is
used mostly by PPC. But I do have a couple of questions/comments
it's a trivial change.
Hmm, int abs(in v) is in prim_ops.c and not declared static
Hi Jorgen Lundman,
On 05/07/2012 11:03 PM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
Did you miss my message of Wed, 02 May?
See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/130638/focus=130671
Unfortunately there is no legal (license-conforming) way to include
ZFS code into U-Boot and distribute
it alone'(tm) and test cases
are fairly trivial. You can even mock-up the input file in vi :)
And is a shell based implementation going to be any easier to understand,
modify, debug, etc?
+/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2012
+ * Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can
These have been floating around for a while waiting for 2012.04
The first patch touches on the common makefiles, but it is only
examples/standalone/Makefile that really needs to be checked for
cross-platform issues
Graeme Russ (5):
x86: Fix compilation on 64-built built machines
x86: Forward
So it can be used as a type in struct global_data and remove an ugly typecast
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c |2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h |4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/lib/board.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/board.c b/arch/x86/lib/board.c
index 100ac1e..8c8b6fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/board.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/board.c
@@ -169,9 +169,6
Putting global data on the stack simplifies the init process (and makes it
slightly quicker). During the 'flash' stage of the init sequence, global
data is in the CAR stack. After SDRAM is initialised, global data is copied
from CAR to the SDRAM stack
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r
ilog2 is required by AHCI driver
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index c7a38f2..5a7e4cb 100644
--- a/arch
Hi Andy,
On 04/29/2012 10:25 PM, Andy Pont wrote:
Hi Graeme,
Graeme Russ (5):
x86: Fix compilation on 64-built built machines
Shouldn't this be 64-bit build machines?
Yep - Thanks
Regards,
Graeme
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Hi Wolfgang,
On 04/26/2012 10:18 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message
calbutckzc7cwoaql4b+mjndczgyzas0jpfzzf7q9psdhe_j...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Any plan to add Kconfig or any other way to configure u-boot?
Not that I am aware of, but I would support anyone who
Hi Charles,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Charles Manning
mannin...@actrix.gen.nz wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2012 00:25:55 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Charles Manning,
In message 201204261028.44543.mannin...@actrix.gen.nz you wrote:
yaffs went through a large reformat a while ago meaning
Hi Henry,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:21 AM, hong zhang henryzhan...@yahoo.com wrote:
List,
make menuconfig does not work for u-boot under panadaboard.
Old mailing list said because of no Kconfig in u-boot tree.
Correct - new mailing list says the same thing ;)
Any plan to add Kconfig or any
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Tom Rini,
In message 20120423202619.GG31450@bill-the-cat you wrote:
And why did _nobody_ complain during the -rc cycle?
To try and say what Stephan said, differently, what do we need to do in
the future
on
Fire away ;)
Regards,
Graeme
Graeme Russ (3):
init_func: Add fundamental framework
init_func: Add x86 support
init_func: Use for eNET board
Makefile | 34 +-
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c |3 +
arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_sdram.c |3 +
arch/x86/cpu/sc520
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
Makefile | 34 ++-
common/Makefile |2 +
config.mk|2 +
doc/README.INIT_FUNC | 65 +++
include/init_func.h | 37 ++
tools/Makefile |6 +
tools/mkinitseq.c| 1512
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds | 23 +++
arch/x86/lib/board.c| 10 +++---
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/x86/cpu/u-boot.lds
index fe28030..b88fd57 100644
Signed-off-by: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c |3 +++
arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_sdram.c |3 +++
arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c |2 ++
arch/x86/lib/init_helpers.c | 14 ++
arch/x86/lib/init_wrappers.c | 11
Gabriel,
Can you please trim the subject by removing the 'Documentation about ...'
bit. This information belongs in the source code files or, better yet,
in doc/README.MINI2440
Regards,
Graeme
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Ilya Averyanov,
2012/4/20 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
Dear Gabriel Huau,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Gabriel Huau,
---
+ /* some delay between
Hi Andy,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:11 AM, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
1) I have a concern that barebox is not mainstream enough yet.
[snip]
2) I have a feeling we will always be porting everyone's bsp (that
already has a working u-boot) to barebox.
Which should not
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote:
Wolfgang corresponded with me over the weekend asking me to (in the
interest of being fair) repost this message to the U-Boot list as well
to allow you the opportunity to expound upon the benefits of U-Boot
Hi Prabhakar,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Prabhakar Lad
prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jaehoon,
[snip]
There is no consistency for the #define CONFIG_S5P_SDHCI,
few have been assigned to value 1, And looking at the patchset
the value of it is not used if I am not
until you find the commit that caused the breakage
- Post that commit ID to the mailing list and somebody should get around to
looking at it
Thanks for your attention.
Your welcome,
Regards,
Graeme
Regards,
Allyson
2012/4/13 Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com mailto:graeme.r
list_head
in U-Boot. It took a while to get used to it's sematics, but the Linux
kernel list data structure is incredible
Regards,
Graeme
commit 1567e349f774d93e25b3ab2da01cab5e11632916
Author: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
Date: Sun Apr 8 22:09:42 2012 +1000
initcall: Some testing
diff
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f86cdf0.2030...@gmail.com you wrote:
This patch is a little heads-up for my upcomming INIT_FUNC patch series
This is the INIT_FUNC 'engine' - It processes a file which consists
Hi Wolfgang, Detlev
But, tsort works on paired entries, while INIT_FUNC allows functions to
have multiple dependencies. So to use tsort, I will need to process the
list to produce entry pairs - That should be a pretty simple operation.
Well the solution appears to be trivial anyway:
Hi Allyson,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Allyson allyson...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
My name is Allyson,
I need put u-boot on my board with ARM 920t (at91rm9200)
When I build u-boot-1.1.6 it is worked ok, but if I build u-boot-2011 don't
work.
I need help ... please!
And we will
Hi Guys,
This may be a really dumb question, but what is the best way to enable
GCC debugging information in u-boot.bin
The intention is to look at using Lauterbach
Regards,
Graeme
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On 04/03/2012 09:35 AM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi Jocke
And I really need to check, but I have a sneaking suspicion that as the
code currently stands in U-Boot/x86 dereferencing a NULL pointer won't
cause an exception. In x86, U-Boot configures all protected mode segments
to be 4GB starting
Hi Joakim,
On Apr 2, 2012 4:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:
b) The code calling malloc(0
On 04/02/2012 05:40 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 09:17:44:
Hi Joakim,
On Apr 2, 2012 4:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va
On Apr 3, 2012 6:57 AM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 22:28:46:
From: Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com
On 04/02/2012 05:40 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Hi Grame
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:19:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Introduce arch_early_init_r() function, which can be useful for doing
early initialization after relocation has happened.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
Hi Jocke
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04/02 22:59:57:
On Apr 3, 2012 6:57 AM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
wrote:
Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote on 2012/04
Hi Marek,
On 04/01/2012 05:27 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Thursday 15 March 2012 03:52:45 Marek Vasut wrote:
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
-static void bootm_start_lmb(void)
-{
#ifdef CONFIG_LMB
+static void boot_start_lmb(bootm_headers_t
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit c008b6f6dd6b8965e9a7654ffbce75bb9ff7a3b5:
Prepare v2012.04-rc1 (2012-03-31 00:13:05 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git master
Simon Glass (1):
x86: Remove dead code in eNET
Hi Wolfgang,
On 03/31/2012 10:40 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Hi everybody,
after long struggeling we finally have a -rc1.
Please help testing, so we can fix the remaining issues before the
release, which I decided to shift to April 21, 2012.
I just sent a pull request for an outstanding x86
Graeme Russ wrote:
On 22/10/10 06:51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
have u-boot return an error.
Is NULL what you consider to be an error
yes
Besides, is not free(NULL) valid (does nothing) as well?
yes, free(NULL) should work fine per POSIX
-mike
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Marek,
Bottom line is, we could do either and we would be 100% compliant with the
C standard
The question is, what would be more onerous. Since the majority of U-Boot
developers
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:
b) The code calling malloc(0) is making a perfectly legitimate assumption
based on how glibc handles malloc(0)
not really. POSIX says malloc(0
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:
b) The code calling malloc(0) is making a perfectly legitimate assumption
based on how glibc handles malloc(0)
not really
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote:
b) The code calling malloc
Hi Manjunatha Rob
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2012 08:13 AM, manjunatha wrote:
Dear Rob Herring/ Wolfgang,
As discussed in earlier mail chain, our current ext4 implementation is
capable enough to list(ls) and read(load) ext2 partitons
Hi Viktor,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Viktor Křivák viktor.kri...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Timur Tabi,
2012/3/27 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de:
Dear Timur Tabi,
Marek Vasut wrote:
Agreed, but I expected there was some dead code and that was the point I
was trying to express ;-)
Well,
Hi Marek,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hi Viktor,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Viktor Křivák viktor.kri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Timur Tabi,
2012/3/27 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de:
Dear Timur Tabi,
Marek Vasut wrote
Marek,
Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when
there is no longer anything to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
And:
Not all that is simple is perfect. However, all that is perfect is simple
-- Unkown
:)
Hi Simon,
On 03/24/2012 05:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Simon Glass s
Hi Simon,
On 03/25/2012 10:10 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
[snip]
arch/asm/global_data.h:
#define HAS_ARCH_GD
struct arch_global_data {
...
};
include/global_data.h:
#include arch
Hi Dirk,
On 03/22/2012 07:40 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Superseded:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/135813/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/136834/
Updated patch applied instead:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-imx.git;a=commit;h=8682aba7da2af2842296710acca7c03fcebafd5c
Updated
Hi Dirk,
On 03/22/2012 07:31 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Waiting: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/136789/
Assigned to Wolfgang and changed state to 'Under Review' (seemed most
appropriate status)
Regards,
Graeme
___
U-Boot mailing list
Hi Marek,
On 03/22/2012 05:45 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados,
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect
a rather large amount of cruft.
I occasionally jump onto patchwork and do a little housekeeping
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass s...@google.com wrote:
I am going to have a similar problem in the SPL soon - how to deal
with panic(). Advice gratefully accepted.
Take a leaf out of the Linux x86 source
arch/x86/boot/main.c - This is the start of the 16-bit
Hi Stephen, Wolfgang,
On 03/21/2012 08:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
CAPnjgZ0jYpHSNG354=f4mdvj0tt5-6jdcxpeg1y70v5dwby...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
We have standard ways of telling the Linux kernel what the console
port is - the console= boot argument has been
Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados,
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect
a rather large amount of cruft.
I occasionally jump onto patchwork and do a little housekeeping by marking
updated patches as 'Superceeded' and anything applied by Wolfgang as
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
This patch adds support for console output in the event of a panic() before
the console is inited. The main purpose of this is to deal with a very early
panic() which would otherwise cause a silent hang.
A new
Hi Stephen, Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
This works together with a kernel change that looks at the
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
OK, so what about in panic():
- If gd-have_console is not set:
o call the board specific setup_panic_uarts
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephen, Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 03/20/2012 02:13 PM
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
We cannot select the UART via CONFIG
Hi Simon
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
And we are talking about one board vendor taking a SoC and using UARTA
for the panic output and another board
Hi Stehpen,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:17
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
This avoids a compiler warning about unused variables.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
---
board/eNET/eNET.c | 5 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-By: Graeme Russ
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
We can use the declarations of __bss_start and _end from this header
instead of declaring them locally.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
---
Changes in v4:
- Use asm/sections.h instead of
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
We want to unify the global_data structure. Most fields are common across
architectures, but there are a fair number of SOC-specific additions. It
isn't clear how best to deal with these, but for now we just use
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
We want to unify the global_data structure. Most fields are common across
architectures, but there are a fair number of SOC-specific additions. It
isn't clear how best to deal with these, but for now we just use
201 - 300 of 1517 matches
Mail list logo
