Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

2023-02-06 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Adrian, On 6/2/23 22:25, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi Greg! On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 22:02 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: I wish I had a 54415 based board in my collection. Would make it so much easier to keep the kernel working on it :-( Maybe we can find one to buy for you. I would

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

2023-02-06 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Angelo, On 6/2/23 22:59, Angelo Dureghello wrote: Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 1:02 PM Greg Ungerer wrote: I wish I had a 54415 based board in my collection. Would make it so much easier to keep the kernel working on it :-( Regards Greg I can solder here one additional stmark2

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

2023-02-06 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Adrian, On 6/2/23 22:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 13:25 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 22:02 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: I wish I had a 54415 based board in my collection. Would make it so much easier to keep the kernel working

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

2023-02-06 Thread Greg Ungerer
On 6/2/23 18:14, Angelo Dureghello wrote: Hi John, On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 4:55 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 17:22 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: FWIW, m68k is still a very actively maintained architecture in the Linux kernel and userland with even

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

2023-01-30 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Tom, On 31/1/23 05:31, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:10:36PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Eero, On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 8:02 PM Eero Tamminen wrote: On 30.1.2023 18.34, Tom Rini wrote: That's great to hear. While I started my life on m68k machines, I never did get

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: remove cm4008 and cm41xx board support

2015-02-12 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Masahiro, On 12/02/15 11:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote: Hi Greg, On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:12:25 +1000 Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 10/02/15 17:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote: These are still non-generic boards. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: remove cm4008 and cm41xx board support

2015-02-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Masahiro, On 10/02/15 17:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote: These are still non-generic boards. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com Cc: Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com I have only seen this one patch, and the message above doesn't really give me much of a clue what

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm: cm4008, cm41xx: set gd-ram_size in dram_init

2012-07-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
? If the cm4008/cm41xx board maintainer (as per MAINTAINERS, this is Greg Ungerer, Cc:) green-lights it, then I'm ok for pulling it in. I have no problem with them. I have only done a visual inspection of the revised patches in the mail archives, and not tested them on the real hardware. I would suggest

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] KS8695: convert KS8695 eth driver to CONFIG_MULTI_ETH

2011-09-12 Thread Greg Ungerer
On 09/12/2011 05:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday, September 10, 2011 04:40:34 Greg Ungerer wrote: --- a/include/netdev.h +++ b/include/netdev.h +int ks8695_eth_initialize(bd_t *bis); so you say the func needs bd_t* ... --- a/board/cm4008/cm4008.c +++ b/board/cm4008/cm4008.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH] CM4008: fix signedness of env bootargs string pointer

2011-09-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
The pointer to the flash based bootargs should be a char *, not unsigned. Fixes: cm4008.c: In function ‘env_flash_cmdline’: cm4008.c:67: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of ‘setenv’ differ in signedness Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com --- board/cm4008/cm4008

[U-Boot] [PATCH] CM41xx: fix signedness of env bootargs string pointer

2011-09-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
The pointer to the flash based bootargs should be a char *, not unsigned. Fixes: cm41xx.c: In function ‘env_flash_cmdline’: cm41xx.c:67: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of ‘setenv’ differ in signedness Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com --- board/cm41xx

[U-Boot] [PATCH] KS8695: convert KS8695 eth driver to CONFIG_MULTI_ETH

2011-09-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
Trivial conversion of the ks8695eth driver to a CONFIG_MULTI_ETH type driver. Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com --- board/cm4008/cm4008.c|4 board/cm41xx/cm41xx.c|4 drivers/net/ks8695eth.c | 42 -- include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] KS8695: move TIMER_ definitions before code use

2011-09-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Wolfgang, On 09/10/2011 08:32 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Greg, In message1315570750-472-1-git-send-email-greg.unge...@opengear.com you wrote: Move the TIMER_ definitions before they are used in KS8695 timer.c code. Fixes: Could you please also fix the remaining warnings: Sure

Re: [U-Boot] Breakage of cm4008, cm4116, cm4148 boards

2011-09-09 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Wolfgang, On 09/09/2011 01:21 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: now that w estart to build systems more systematically it turns out that the cm4008, cm4116, and cm4148 boards maintained by you are broken, for example: Configuring for cm4008 board... timer.c: In function 'timer_init': timer.c:37:

[U-Boot] [PATCH] KS8695: move TIMER_ definitions before code use

2011-09-09 Thread Greg Ungerer
it appears in.) timer.c:38: error: ‘TIMER_PULSE’ undeclared (first use in this function) Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer greg.unge...@opengear.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/ks8695/timer.c | 16 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/ks8695

[U-Boot] [PATCH] CM4000: fix missing RAM definitions for OpenGear boards

2011-09-09 Thread Greg Ungerer
is reported only once board.c:227: error: for each function it appears in.) board.c: In function ‘board_init_f’: board.c:270: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR’ undeclared (first use in this function) board.c:303: error: ‘CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE’ undeclared (first use in this function) Signed-off-by: Greg

[U-Boot] [PATCH] CM4000: fix broken flash base for OpenGear boards

2011-09-09 Thread Greg Ungerer
Use _bss_start_ofs as the size of the boot loader code+data that we want to protect in the flash. This replaces use of the no longer defined _armboot_start. Fixes: flash.c: In function ‘flash_init’: flash.c:75: error: ‘_bss_start’ undeclared (first use in this function) flash.c:75: error: (Each

Re: [U-Boot] mcf5307, timer 2 issue loading linux

2011-08-03 Thread Greg Ungerer
to? The second instruction into running uClinux is: movew #0x2700, %sr which will disable all interrupts - excepting anything set to the non-maskable level 7. Regards Greg Greg Ungerer -- Principal EngineerEMAIL