Dear Grant Erickson,
In message 02a515f3-ccd2-4635-ad38-07de542a4...@gmail.com you wrote:
That makes sense; however, I have deployed boards in the field for
which an in-place X-Loader update isn't trivial and for which
interoperability is key. In light of that, are you willing to accept
the
On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 12/22/2011 12:28 PM, Grant Erickson wrote:
Only attempt to configure and add DRAM at chip select 1 if the board has
configured more than one bank of DRAM.
This prevents boards that have CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS set to 1 from getting an
incorrect
On 01/04/2012 09:10 AM, Grant Erickson wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 12/22/2011 12:28 PM, Grant Erickson wrote:
Only attempt to configure and add DRAM at chip select 1 if the board has
configured more than one bank of DRAM.
This prevents boards that have
On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 01/04/2012 09:10 AM, Grant Erickson wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 12/22/2011 12:28 PM, Grant Erickson wrote:
Only attempt to configure and add DRAM at chip select 1 if the board has
configured more than one bank of DRAM.
On 12/22/2011 12:28 PM, Grant Erickson wrote:
Only attempt to configure and add DRAM at chip select 1 if the board has
configured more than one bank of DRAM.
This prevents boards that have CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS set to 1 from getting an
incorrect DRAM size.
Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson
Only attempt to configure and add DRAM at chip select 1 if the board has
configured more than one bank of DRAM.
This prevents boards that have CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS set to 1 from getting an
incorrect DRAM size.
Signed-off-by: Grant Erickson maratho...@gmail.com
Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
