Dear Jean,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 18:29 Wed 05 Nov , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Dear Jean,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 18:29 Wed 05 Nov , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
Dear Jean,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message [EMAIL
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The attribute .weak works only if the file where is the weak function
is not in a library.
This method of build will not generate a library evenif it's still called
libat91.a, it will generate a pre-built
On 12:45 Tue 28 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I've found that weak functions are only
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 22:20 Mon 27 Oct , Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting
function is in a file
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct
Hi Ilko,
Ilko Iliev wrote:
snip
I tried several variants to make the function lowlevel_init() weak but
without success.
If there is no other solution for the problem could you commit my patch.
Without this patch I can't post the patch for our PM9261 and PM9263 boards.
I've found that
Dear Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:27 Mon 27 Oct , Ben Warren wrote:
Hi Ilko,
Ilko Iliev wrote:
snip
I tried several variants to make the function lowlevel_init() weak but
without success.
If there is no other solution for the problem could
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting
function is in a file (not archive) that has strongly-linked symbols.
Admittedly, I've only done this with C code but expect that the
Dear Ilko,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On 09:27 Mon 27 Oct , Ben Warren wrote:
...
I've found that weak functions are only overwritten if the overwriting
function is in a file (not archive) that has strongly-linked symbols.
Admittedly, I've only done this with C code but
Dear Mr. Denk,
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn
lowlevel_init() into a weak function that can be redefined by board
specific code?
The lowlevel_init() is an assembler function called from another
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Mr. Denk,
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn
lowlevel_init() into a weak function that can be redefined by board
specific code?
The
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Mr. Denk,
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Maybe instead of adding mor #ifdef'ery here, we can turn
lowlevel_init() into a weak function that can be
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Mr. Denk,
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Dear Mr. Denk,
Dear Ilko
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 16:01 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:07 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:12 Wed 22 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote:
This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644
--- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S
+++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#include config.h
#include version.h
-#ifndef
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644
--- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S
+++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S
@@ -27,7
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ilko Iliev,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
This patch allows to have an at91 board specific lowlevel_init.S
Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
index ec6ad5d..7882e89 100644
--- a/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/lowlevel_init.S
+++
20 matches
Mail list logo