Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-02-20 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Wolfgang, Am Dienstag 03 Januar 2012, 15:46:09 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: The linkstations don't have a (populated) serial port. There is no way to access an unmodified board other than using the netconsole. If you want to recover from a bad environment setting or an empty environment, you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-08 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Wolfgang, Am Dienstag 03 Januar 2012, 00:55:41 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: +#define CONFIG_ETHADDR 02:00:01:00:00:00 ... +#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.11.150 +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP192.168.11.1 +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0 NAK. We

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-08 Thread Michael Walle
Am Dienstag 03 Januar 2012, 15:46:09 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: Dear Michael, In message b96abc7f27f132b4b00377ddd9ca632d.squir...@ssl.serverraum.org you wrote: The linkstations don't have a (populated) serial port. There is no way to access an unmodified board other than using the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Michael, In message 201201030132.02862.mich...@walle.cc you wrote: If Buffalo is the vendor, then why do you add this to the Marvell vendor directory? I was just guessing. It is a Marvell SoC and marvell SoC boards of other vendors are in the Marvell/ directory, too. But i'm also

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-03 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, January 3, 2012 09:09, Wolfgang Denk wrote: NAK. We do not allow such static network configurations. i've already guessed that ;) you may remember our lengthy discussions about the board which don't have a dedicated NVRAM for the ethernet address. Well, this is such a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Michael, In message b96abc7f27f132b4b00377ddd9ca632d.squir...@ssl.serverraum.org you wrote: The linkstations don't have a (populated) serial port. There is no way to access an unmodified board other than using the netconsole. If you want to recover from a bad environment setting or an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-03 Thread Michael Walle
Am Dienstag 03 Januar 2012, 15:46:09 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: Dear Michael, In message b96abc7f27f132b4b00377ddd9ca632d.squir...@ssl.serverraum.org you wrote: The linkstations don't have a (populated) serial port. There is no way to access an unmodified board other than using the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-02 Thread Michael Walle
This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle mich...@walle.cc Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- MAINTAINERS |4 + board/Marvell/lsxl/Makefile | 50

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Michael Walle, In message 1325545909-17678-1-git-send-email-mich...@walle.cc you wrote: This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. If Buffalo is the vendor, then why do you add this to the Marvell vendor directory?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-02 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Wolfgang, quick answer ;) In message 1325545909-17678-1-git-send-email-mich...@walle.cc you wrote: This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. If Buffalo is the vendor, then why do you add this to the Marvell vendor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-01-02 Thread Michael Walle
On Tue, January 3, 2012 00:55, Wolfgang Denk wrote: +#define CONFIG_ETHADDR 02:00:01:00:00:00 ... +#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.11.150 +#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.11.1 +#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0 NAK. We do not allow such static