Dear Christian Riesch,
In message cabklobrl2bhkmjh9nccv1uq-cbfjisuidk8joe8dsaoekqi...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I don't like this change. What exactly is wrong with using the timer
here? It is probably much more random that the (so-called)
un-initialized memory you suggest to use
Currently eth_random_enetaddr() seeds the random number generator with
get_timer(0). Some boards might want to use other sources for the seed,
therefore move the call of srand() to the board specific code.
Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at
Cc: Michael Walle
Dear Christian Riesch,
In message 419e5c6e-b2ef-44c2-a4c1-bb25c50fc...@mary.at.omicron.at you wrote:
Currently eth_random_enetaddr() seeds the random number generator with
get_timer(0). Some boards might want to use other sources for the seed,
therefore move the call of srand() to the board
Hello Wolfgang,
Thank you for your comments.
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Christian Riesch,
In message
419e5c6e-b2ef-44c2-a4c1-bb25c50fc...@mary.at.omicron.atjavascript:;
you wrote:
Currently eth_random_enetaddr() seeds the random number generator with
4 matches
Mail list logo
