Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dennis, In message 20131206180955.32ba9...@adria.ausil.us you wrote: Yes, it appears some vendors favoured this name. I'm temptted to add that these very vendors often tend to define thier own ways without caring what the community has been using before ;-) That doesn't make it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dennis Gilmore, In message 1386296295-28658-3-git-send-email-den...@ausil.us you wrote: - fdt_addr=0x1100\0 \ + fdt_addr=0x1110\0 \ + fdt_addr_r=0x1120\0 \ Why would you need fdt_addr and fdt_addr_r ? This makes no sense. Two different values would only be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:59:05 +0100 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de escribió: Dear Dennis Gilmore, In message 1386296295-28658-3-git-send-email-den...@ausil.us you wrote: - fdt_addr=0x1100\0 \ + fdt_addr=0x1110\0 \ + fdt_addr_r=0x1120\0 \ Why would you need fdt_addr and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dennis Gilmore, In message 20131206084854.0e0da...@adria.ausil.us you wrote: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de escribi=F3: Dear Dennis Gilmore, =20 In message 1386296295-28658-3-git-send-email-den...@ausil.us you wrote: - fdt_addr=0x1100\0 \ + fdt_addr=0x1110\0 \ +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:26:51PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Dennis Gilmore, In message 20131206084854.0e0da...@adria.ausil.us you wrote: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de escribi=F3: Dear Dennis Gilmore, =20 In message 1386296295-28658-3-git-send-email-den...@ausil.us you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message 20131206162854.GX420@bill-the-cat you wrote: But this is crap. The meaning of these variables has been wel-defined for a long, long time. fdt_addr is the FDT address in NOR flash (or similar memory except system RAM); fdt_addr_r is the FDT address when loaded to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:37:59PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Tom, In message 20131206162854.GX420@bill-the-cat you wrote: But this is crap. The meaning of these variables has been wel-defined for a long, long time. fdt_addr is the FDT address in NOR flash (or similar memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Hi Wolfgang, El Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:37:59 +0100 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de escribió: Dear Tom, In message 20131206162854.GX420@bill-the-cat you wrote: But this is crap. The meaning of these variables has been wel-defined for a long, long time. fdt_addr is the FDT address in NOR

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message 20131206221307.GD420@bill-the-cat you wrote: I think it's actually OK to omit the _r in NOR-less systems. The number of devices with actual NOT flash is decreasing, and if you can be sure that there is no such memory device available, then it is just overhead to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dennis, In message 20131206164420.36e5f...@adria.ausil.us you wrote: fdtaddr is highly prevalent in the configs Yes, it appears some vendors favoured this name. I'm temptted to add that these very vendors often tend to define thier own ways without caring what the community has been

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-06 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Hi Wolfgang, El Sat, 07 Dec 2013 00:16:16 +0100 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de escribió: Dear Dennis, In message 20131206164420.36e5f...@adria.ausil.us you wrote: fdtaddr is highly prevalent in the configs Yes, it appears some vendors favoured this name. I'm temptted to add that these

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- include/configs/wandboard.h | 40 +++- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/wandboard.h b/include/configs/wandboard.h index e9c7e64..02d8968 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Robert Nelson
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- include/configs/wandboard.h | 40 +++- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/wandboard.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:47:43 -0600 Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com escribió: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us --- include/configs/wandboard.h | 40 +++- 1 file

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Robert Nelson
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: El Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:47:43 -0600 Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com escribió: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:01:13 -0600 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió: El Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:47:43 -0600 Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com escribió: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] port wandboards to use the generic distro configs

2013-12-05 Thread Robert Nelson
Why all the non-generic ext2load's? use just load, then it'll work with both fat, ext2/3/4 btrfs... Regards, the pxe code requires you specify the filesystem for the sysboot command, and as /boot needs to be ext ive kept it consistent. Ive also not narrowed down the option to enable