On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:57 -0700, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Haiying Wang,
Does CONFIG_TPL_UBOOT make sense to you if I replace
CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT
with it?
I cannot answer this. Don't understand any of this.
Maybe you can re-think this again and try to make it less complex, and
the
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1290525198.1932.3.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Please use only one such name (CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT).
CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT is used as CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT in Makefile and header
file.
CONFIG_TPL_BOOT is used as CONFIG_NAND_SPL in header file.
I'm sorry, but I
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:04 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message 1290525198.1932.3.ca...@haiying-laptop you wrote:
Please use only one such name (CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT).
CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT is used as CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT in Makefile and header
file.
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
This patch introduces the third program loader(TPL) to load the final uboot
image after the spl code. Once the CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT is defined,
the CONFIG_TPL_BOOT is enabled to generate the u-boot-tpl.bin. There are two
examples to use tpl:
1. NAND
Dear haiying.w...@freescale.com,
In message 1290462446-1459-3-git-send-email-haiying.w...@freescale.com you
wrote:
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
This patch introduces the third program loader(TPL) to load the final uboot
image after the spl code. Once the CONFIG_SYS_TPL_BOOT
5 matches
Mail list logo