Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I've send a new patch that introduce an improve of the clock on at91
which give you the calculated main_clock based on the main crystal and the
lowlevel settings
I was looking for that patch in git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git,
but couldn't find it there
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I've send a new patch that introduce an improve of the clock on at91
which give you the calculated main_clock based on the main crystal and the
lowlevel settings
I was looking for that patch in
On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote:
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
I've send a new patch that introduce an improve of the clock on at91
which give you the calculated main_clock based on the main crystal and the
lowlevel settings
I was looking for
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote:
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
Where can I find that patch?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837
Thanks.
Is it interesting to loose time calculating PLL values at each boot when
these
On 16:46 Fri 03 Apr , Detlef Vollmann wrote:
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr , Eric BENARD wrote:
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
Where can I find that patch?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837
Thanks.
Is it interesting to loose
Eric BENARD wrote:
Detlef Vollmann a écrit :
I probably agree. (Well, not completely, as I'd like to get rid
of at91bootstrap completely and let U-Boot be the original boot
code, but that's future.)
check Ilko Iliev's patch for pm9263 which integrates at91bootstrap's
features in
But the config file for afeb9260 sets it to a value of 8598,
and I can't change that as I don't know that board, but it's
near enough to 1 to accept that.
And I noticed that only because I had the check there in the
first place, so it didn't compile with MAKEALL when I only
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 02:58 Wed 25 Feb , Detlef Vollmann wrote:
/*
+ * This code essentially ignores the settings of AT91_MASTER_CLOCK
+ * and CONFIG_SYS_HZ, so we just bail out if they're not set to
+ * the canonical values.
+ */
+#if (CONFIG_SYS_HZ != 1000)
Dear Detlef Vollmann,
In message 49b97998.2080...@vollmann.ch you wrote:
+#if (CONFIG_SYS_HZ != 1000)
+#error CONFIG_SYS_HZ must be set to 1000 for this CPU
+#endif
no need please remove
As I already wrote in another message, I don't think so.
All current boards that use U-Boot on that
On 02:58 Wed 25 Feb , Detlef Vollmann wrote:
Change at91 CPUs based on arm926ejs to return milliseconds
from get_timer and get_ticks. Also changes in the value of
CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000 in all board configs using these CPUs.
This will not compile on boards using these CPUs with a
10 matches
Mail list logo