Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] bootm: Move to using a function pointer table for the boot os function

Dear Kumar Gala, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: One that we should implement, I think. So this means introducing CONFIG_BOOT_RTEMS, CONFIG_BOOT_NETBSD, and CONFIG_BOOT_LINUX. ACK. Should these be enabled in all board configs by default? I recommend to enable only

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] bootm: Move to using a function pointer table for the boot os function

Dear Kumar Gala, In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: This removes a bit of code and makes it easier for the upcoming sub bootm command support to call into the proper OS specific handler. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ... @@ -119,6 +119,22 @@ int do_bootelf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] bootm: Move to using a function pointer table for the boot os function

On Oct 19, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 13:07 Sun 19 Oct , Kumar Gala wrote: This removes a bit of code and makes it easier for the upcoming sub bootm command support to call into the proper OS specific handler. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL