hi,
On Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 11:56:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
I have netbsd running on hawkboard, but i do not boot it using the
bootm command, but use the go command instead. I will try to build a
netbsd image with the u-boot header and give it a try with bootm. Need
a day or two
Hi Sughosh,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.comwrote:
hi,
On Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 11:56:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
I have netbsd running on hawkboard, but i do not boot it using the
bootm command, but use the go command instead. I will try to
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.comwrote:
hi Tom,
On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
snip
Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write
some
sandbox tests for the other image types today and post my
Hi,
On Jul 10, 2013 11:04 PM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi Tom,
On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
snip
Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if
hi Tom,
On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
snip
Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write some
sandbox tests for the other image types today and post my results. I guess
this bootm code has built up over a long time and it is hard to know
Hi Sughosh,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.comwrote:
hi Tom,
On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
snip
Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write
some
sandbox tests for the other image types today and
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On
[snip]
I will tidy up my tests and submit these also at some point. Coverage now
includes FIT and legacy images, with bootm commands and subcommands. For
the record there is still a lot of test code missing:
(sorry, sent the last email by mistake - here is a list that I compiled
when writing
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013
Important, but I really want to see real-world booting in a case or two.
Unfortunately I don't have any ARM boards that work out of the box with
NetBSD.
There 'seems' to be a pre-built freebsd arm port...
https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/BeagleBone
NM.. they are using the 'bootelf'
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Tom,
On
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
The use of a local variable means that the reset of cmd_bootm.c does not
in fact use the same image structure, so
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
The use of a local variable means that the reset of
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
command. This causes unpredictable
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
The use of a local variable means that the reset of cmd_bootm.c does not
in fact use the same image structure, so remove this.
Also manually set the OS type to Linux, since this is
21 matches
Mail list logo
