Hi Detlev
On 09/09/11 13:09, Detlev Zundel wrote:
Hi,
Dear Dave Aldridge,
In message 1314877212-31552-1-git-send-email-fovs...@gmail.com you wrote:
If CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 is defined then 32 bit memory
mapped access will be used to read/write the uart registers.
This is especially
Hi,
Dear Dave Aldridge,
In message 1314877212-31552-1-git-send-email-fovs...@gmail.com you wrote:
If CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 is defined then 32 bit memory
mapped access will be used to read/write the uart registers.
This is especially useful for SoC devices that implement 16550
Hi Wolfgang
On 07/09/11 22:22, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Dave Aldridge,
In message 1314877212-31552-1-git-send-email-fovs...@gmail.com you wrote:
If CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 is defined then 32 bit memory
mapped access will be used to read/write the uart registers.
This is especially
Dear Dave Aldridge,
In message 1314877212-31552-1-git-send-email-fovs...@gmail.com you wrote:
If CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 is defined then 32 bit memory
mapped access will be used to read/write the uart registers.
This is especially useful for SoC devices that implement 16550
compatible
If CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 is defined then 32 bit memory
mapped access will be used to read/write the uart registers.
This is especially useful for SoC devices that implement 16550
compatible uarts but that have peripheral access width constraints.
Signed-off-by: Dave Aldridge fovs...@gmail.com
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Dave Aldridge fovs...@gmail.com wrote:
#if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE) || (CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE ==
0)
#error Please define NS16550 registers size.
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32)
+#define UART_REG(x) unsigned int x;
Shouldn't this
Hi Tabi Timur-B04825
On 01/09/11 16:39, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Dave Aldridge fovs...@gmail.com wrote:
#if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE) || (CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE
== 0)
#error Please define NS16550 registers size.
+#elif
7 matches
Mail list logo