On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:07:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:47:33 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:59:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood
On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end to go
away? If that's the way the list mechanism works, the mechanism
needs fixing.
Yes, that's how the mechanism works.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end to go
away? If that's the way the list mechanism works, the
On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
Why would eliminating all individual callbacks cause start/end
to go
away? If
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/12/2013 10:30:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 06:35:04PM -0600, Scott Wood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 03/12/2013 12:02:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:47:33 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 01:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:06:53 -0500, Scott Wood
scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 03/12/2013 12:02:56
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent the
functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will look at
the list. This caused several SPL builds (e.g. P2020RDB-PC_NAND) to
break due to size
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries prevent
the
functions from being garbage-collected, even though nothing will
look at
the list. This caused several SPL builds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries
prevent the functions from being
On 03/08/2013 02:59:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2013 03:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:27:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:51:05AM -, Scott Wood wrote:
SPL doesn't write to the environment. These list entries
12 matches
Mail list logo
