On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:07:38AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Markus,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Both patches passed my usual sequoia regression test, so I added both
to the USB custodian repository.
If nobody reports any regressions I intend to send Wolfgang a
Dear Markus,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Both patches passed my usual sequoia regression test, so I added both
to the USB custodian repository.
If nobody reports any regressions I intend to send Wolfgang a pull
request in upcoming merge window.
What's the state about this
Dear Remy,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:23:20AM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:
This is version 2 of these series!
Only patch 1 of 2 has changed, some pedantic Coding Style issues updated that
were not detected by Linux/scripts/checkpatch.pl.
The USB OHCI init procedure sets the maximum message
This is version 2 of these series!
Only patch 1 of 2 has changed, some pedantic Coding Style issues updated that
were not detected by Linux/scripts/checkpatch.pl.
The USB OHCI init procedure sets the maximum message length the wrong way.
A max of 64 bits should not be done by writing '64' in
4 matches
Mail list logo
