On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:44:48AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So back to the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:22:31PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
list of board
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:44:48AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93A8F58D-8C13-4F72-AFF3-
cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So back to the
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
In
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360 board? Freescale or
Logic PD? And who is the vendor for the ADS5121?
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201712x68658ddfk3c18298deb82b...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I
suspect we have less than 100 vendors. Maybe as few as 60.
There is many vendors which have just a single board; also,
There is many vendors which have just a single board;
Like the ST nomadik8815 I maintain.
Just adding an additional directory level for a single entry does
not make much sense to me.
So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
or leave it as is? (more nomadik boards will be
So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
or leave it as is?
Argh!
I mean: leave it alone in its own vendor-dir or move it up one level?
I got the idea vendor dirs were preferred anyway (as suggested by JC),
but Wolfgang's last message suggests the opposite.
Sorry for
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360
Jon Smirl wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendor is.
Companies and product lines get bought, names change...
IMHO, architecture
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904210833u79f3d4dfv2db7449162462...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Everyone will know
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendor is.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message
9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
list of board names?
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So
Dear Kumar,
In message aea791b2-2bc0-49f7-9152-acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list
with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum
grouping / structuring.
IMHO there should be several
On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar,
In message AEA791B2-2BC0-49F7-9152-
acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong
list
with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case
insensitive) of the board name.
like this: = board name =
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the
highlevel picking a board implies ARCH and other settings.
However this seems like a lot of boards in one list.. To get a rough
order of magnitude
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala
ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the
highlevel picking a board implies ARCH and other settings.
However this seems like a lot of boards
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the
highlevel picking a
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
In chatting
25 matches
Mail list logo
