Hi Simon,
On 08/01/12 09:39, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Gururaja,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja
gururaja.heb...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:05:40, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Hebbar, Gururaja,
[snip]
_after_ the list has been created - If this breaks
Hi Gururaja,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja
gururaja.heb...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:05:40, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Hebbar, Gururaja,
[snip]
_after_ the list has been created - If this breaks dependencies that's
your problem ;). It is up to you as
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme,
In message 4f02da64.60...@gmail.com you wrote:
[snip]
INIT_FUNC(cpu_init_f, f, fred, blah, foo);
Generates the string:
f:cpu_init_f:fred:blah:foo
and we can parse each of the elf archives to
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme,
In message 4f02da64.60...@gmail.com you wrote:
[snip]
INIT_FUNC(cpu_init_f, f, fred, blah, foo);
Generates
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme,
In message
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:29:48, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message calbutclvdsigmpwt04+-aqpdvj_zx9zzkbxh+ifcsxdxabd...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Can we get rid of the 'f' parameter? If we invent a prerequisite
called 'relocated' or something like that, to act as a barrier, then
maybe the order can be defined just like any
Dear Hebbar, Gururaja,
In message 1bafe6f6c881bf42822005164f1491c305c...@dbde01.ent.ti.com you wrote:
Well I kind of like see that a particular init function is explicitly a
pre- or post- relocation function. But yes, having barrier pre-requisites
would achieve the same effect.
This
Hi Wolfgang,
On 03/01/12 01:49, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f019abb.9010...@gmail.com you wrote:
Which got me to thinking, what if we had an initcall macro which included
the dependency information. Imagine this rough example:
...
INITCALL(display_banner, banner,
Dear Graeme,
In message 4f02da64.60...@gmail.com you wrote:
INITCALL(display_banner, banner, dram,board_early)
Which says that the display_banner() function, when completed fulfils the
'banner' dependency, and requires both the 'dram' and 'board_early'
dependencies to be fulfilled in
Hi Graham,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On 03/01/12 01:49, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f019abb.9010...@gmail.com you wrote:
Which got me to thinking, what if we had an initcall macro which included
the
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme,
In message 4f02da64.60...@gmail.com you wrote:
[snip]
One thing comes to mind: it would be nice if we can find a way that
the INIT_FUNC definitions behave similar to weak functions - if an
Dear Simon Glass,
In message capnjgz3aoyvypa93ecbmyqhcaazcbphfcyhxyya1ax+9_ue...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I have been thinking if there is a way we can avoid the
post-processing perhaps by specifying two function parameters to the
macro (the init function to call and its prerequisite) and
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message
capnjgz3aoyvypa93ecbmyqhcaazcbphfcyhxyya1ax+9_ue...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I have been thinking if there is a way we can avoid the
post-processing perhaps by specifying two
Hi All,
I've been thinking about the renaissance of the arch-independent
initialisation sequence that has been generating a somewhat 'warm'
discussion lately and had a thought based on a comment passed on by
Wolfgang from Detlev:
basicly what we are trying to solve is a dependency issue: each
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4f019abb.9010...@gmail.com you wrote:
Which got me to thinking, what if we had an initcall macro which included
the dependency information. Imagine this rough example:
...
INITCALL(display_banner, banner, dram,board_early)
Which says that the display_banner()
16 matches
Mail list logo
