Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] am33xx: add CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DEVICE_WIDTH to determine NAND device bus-width

2013-10-01 Thread Mark Jackson
On 25/09/13 06:23, Pekon Gupta wrote: NAND driver needs to know bus-width of the connected NAND device, in order to perform proper I/O and initialize itself. Currently there is no CONFIG option to provide this information to NAND driver. - SPL NAND driver does not have framework to parse ONFI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/4] ARM: AM33xx: Move s_init to a common place

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Jackson
On 23/08/13 11:55, Mark Jackson wrote: On 23/08/13 11:25, Lokesh Vutla wrote: Hi Mark, On Friday 23 August 2013 02:58 PM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 30/07/13 06:18, Lokesh Vutla wrote: From: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de s_init has the same outline for all the AM33xx based board. So making

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/4] ARM: AM33xx: Move s_init to a common place

2013-08-23 Thread Mark Jackson
On 30/07/13 06:18, Lokesh Vutla wrote: From: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de s_init has the same outline for all the AM33xx based board. So making it generic. This also helps in addition of new Soc with minimal changes. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvu...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Heiko

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/4] ARM: AM33xx: Move s_init to a common place

2013-08-23 Thread Mark Jackson
On 23/08/13 11:25, Lokesh Vutla wrote: Hi Mark, On Friday 23 August 2013 02:58 PM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 30/07/13 06:18, Lokesh Vutla wrote: From: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de s_init has the same outline for all the AM33xx based board. So making it generic. This also helps in addition

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Add Nanobone board support

2013-08-21 Thread Mark Jackson
On 14/08/13 10:24, Mark Jackson wrote: NanoBone Specification: --- CPU: TI AM335x Memory: 256MB DDR3 64MB NOR flash 256MB NAND flash 128KB FRAM Ethernet: 2 x 10/100 connected to SMSC LAN8710 PHY USB: 1 x USB2.0 Type A I2C: 2Kbit EEPROM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/4] ARM: AM33xx: Move s_init to a common place

2013-08-21 Thread Mark Jackson
On 30/07/13 08:34, Heiko Schocher wrote: Hello Lokesh, Am 30.07.2013 07:18, schrieb Lokesh Vutla: From: Heiko Schocherh...@denx.de s_init has the same outline for all the AM33xx based board. So making it generic. This also helps in addition of new Soc with minimal changes. There's a new

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Add Nanobone board support

2013-08-14 Thread Mark Jackson
(Microchip MCP23017) Expansion connector: 6 x UART 1 x MMC/SD 1 x USB2.0 Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v4: - Tweaked after comments from Tom Rini - LEDs now initialised Changes in v3: - Rebased on TI U-Boot Changes in v2: - Tweaked after comments from Tom Rini

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] am335x: NOR support

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 30/07/13 14:28, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:12:57PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, This series adds NOR support to am335x_evm, along with a few generic changes to make gpmc clearer (for per-board things like different NOR chips, etc). This series depends on the last

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] am335x: NOR support

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 13/08/13 16:00, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2013 10:57 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 30/07/13 14:28, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:12:57PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: Hey all, This series adds NOR support to am335x_evm, along with a few

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] am335x: NOR support

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 13/08/13 16:11, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2013 11:06 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/08/13 16:00, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2013 10:57 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 30/07/13 14:28, Tom Rini wrote

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] am335x: NOR support

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 13/08/13 16:20, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/08/13 16:11, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2013 11:06 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/08/13 16:00, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/13/2013 10:57 AM, Mark Jackson wrote

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add Nanobone board support

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Jackson
(Microchip MCP23017) Expansion connector: 6 x UART 1 x MMC/SD 1 x USB2.0 Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v3: - Rebased on TI U-Boot Changes in v2: - Tweaked after comments from Tom Rini MAINTAINERS |4 + board/newflow/nanobone/Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add NanoBone board support

2013-08-12 Thread Mark Jackson
On 11/08/13 19:34, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On 22/04/13 13:46, Mark Jackson wrote: NanoBone Specification: --- CPU: TI AM335x Memory: 256MB DDR3 64MB NOR flash 256MB NAND flash 128KB FRAM Ethernet

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add NanoBone board support

2013-08-11 Thread Mark Jackson
On 22/04/13 13:46, Mark Jackson wrote: NanoBone Specification: --- CPU: TI AM335x Memory: 256MB DDR3 64MB NOR flash 256MB NAND flash 128KB FRAM Ethernet: 2 x 10/100 connected to SMSC LAN8710 PHY USB: 1 x USB2.0 Type A I2C: 2Kbit EEPROM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-07-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 11/07/13 14:06, Mark Jackson wrote: On 18/06/13 13:11, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/06/13 15:43, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/05/13 19:28, Tom Rini wrote: From: Steve Kipisz s-kipi...@ti.com NOR requires that s_init be within the first 4KiB of the image so that we can perform the rest

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-07-11 Thread Mark Jackson
On 18/06/13 13:11, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/06/13 15:43, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/05/13 19:28, Tom Rini wrote: From: Steve Kipisz s-kipi...@ti.com NOR requires that s_init be within the first 4KiB of the image so that we can perform the rest of the required pinmuxing to talk with the rest

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-07-11 Thread Mark Jackson
On 11/07/13 14:28, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On 18/06/13 13:11, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/06/13 15:43, Mark Jackson wrote: Okay ... I've now got NOR booting rebased to master using the patch set below. This doesn't include my board code

[U-Boot] AM335x: env_{flash,nowhere} compile conflict

2013-07-11 Thread Mark Jackson
I'm struggling to work out why I get the following compile error:- arm-linux-ld.bfd -r -o /home/mpfj/uboot/u-boot/spl/common/libcommon.o /home/mpfj/uboot/u-boot/spl/common/cmd_nvedit.o /home/mpfj/uboot/u-boot/spl/common/console.o /home/mpfj/uboot/u-boot/spl/common/dlmalloc.o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-18 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 15:43, Mark Jackson wrote: On 13/05/13 19:28, Tom Rini wrote: From: Steve Kipisz s-kipi...@ti.com NOR requires that s_init be within the first 4KiB of the image so that we can perform the rest of the required pinmuxing to talk with the rest of NOR that we are found on. When

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 13/05/13 19:28, Tom Rini wrote: From: Steve Kipisz s-kipi...@ti.com NOR requires that s_init be within the first 4KiB of the image so that we can perform the rest of the required pinmuxing to talk with the rest of NOR that we are found on. When NOR_BOOT is set we save our environment in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 15:49, Tom Rini wrote: snip Did you copy the parts that setup the pinmuxing in s_init for NOR? This bit ? #ifdef CONFIG_NOR_BOOT asm(stmfd sp!, {r2 - r4}); asm(movw r4, #0x8A4); asm(movw r3, #0x44E1); asm(orrr4, r4, r3, lsl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 16:01, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/17/2013 10:59 AM, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/06/13 15:49, Tom Rini wrote: snip Did you copy the parts that setup the pinmuxing in s_init for NOR? This bit ? #ifdef CONFIG_NOR_BOOT asm(stmfd sp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 15:59, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/06/13 15:49, Tom Rini wrote: snip Did you copy the parts that setup the pinmuxing in s_init for NOR? This bit ? #ifdef CONFIG_NOR_BOOT asm(stmfd sp!, {r2 - r4}); asm(movw r4, #0x8A4); asm(movw r3

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 17:01, Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Mark, On 17.06.2013 17:23, Mark Jackson wrote: snip One question ... the SPL code has:- ... gd = gdata; ... But there seems to be no similar assignment when in NOR boot mode. I'm no expert in the internal workings of u-boot, so

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/7] am335x_evm: Add support to boot from NOR.

2013-06-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/06/13 18:04, Kipisz, Steven wrote: snip I'll look at that thanks. But I've taken a slightly different approach, and added the following to the start of s_init() ... void s_init(void) { unsigned short *p = (unsigned short*)0x0800; while (1) { int

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tools/fw_env: use fsync to ensure that data is physically stored

2013-05-22 Thread Mark Jackson
On 21/05/13 18:34, Michael Heimpold wrote: Hi Wolfgang Denx, Closing a file descriptor does not guarantee that the data has been successfully saved to disk, as the kernel might defer the write. What is the exact problem you are trying to fix? I mean, when exactly does adding the sync play

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-22 Thread Mark Jackson
On 16/04/13 20:22, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:14:13PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: snip +static struct cpsw_platform_data cpsw_data = { + .mdio_base

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-22 Thread Mark Jackson
On 22/04/13 11:04, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 20:22, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:14:13PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: snip +static struct cpsw_platform_data cpsw_data

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-22 Thread Mark Jackson
(Microchip MCP23017) Expansion connector: 6 x UART 1 x MMC/SD 1 x USB2.0 Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v2: - Tweaked after comments from Tom Rini MAINTAINERS |4 + board/newflow/nanobone/Makefile | 46 ++ board/newflow/nanobone

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-19 Thread Mark Jackson
On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: snip +config_ddr(303, MT41J128MJT125_IOCTRL_VALUE, ddr3_data, + ddr3_cmd_ctrl_data, ddr3_emif_reg_data, 0); And are you unable to run at 400MHz here? Or just weren't aware

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-18 Thread Mark Jackson
On 18/04/13 07:05, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 23:12:51, Mark Jackson wrote: On 17/04/13 06:27, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: Mark, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 20:32:34, Mark Jackson wrote: snip diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1614b91..7778883 100644

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-17 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/04/13 06:27, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: Mark, On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 20:32:34, Mark Jackson wrote: snip diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1614b91..7778883 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -710,6 +710,10 @@ Ilko Iliev il...@ronetix.at PM9263

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove duplicate / unused #defines on AM335x boards

2013-04-17 Thread Mark Jackson
Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk --- include/configs/am335x_evm.h | 10 ++ include/configs/pcm051.h |4 +--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h index ef00306..5739422 100644

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-16 Thread Mark Jackson
) Expansion connector: 6 x UART 1 x MMC/SD 1 x USB2.0 Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- MAINTAINERS |4 + board/newflow/nanobone/Makefile | 46 ++ board/newflow/nanobone/board.c | 337 +++ board/newflow

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-16 Thread Mark Jackson
On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: [snip] +static struct emif_regs ddr3_emif_reg_data = { + .sdram_config = MT41J128MJT125_EMIF_SDCFG, + .ref_ctrl = MT41J128MJT125_EMIF_SDREF, + .sdram_tim1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-16 Thread Mark Jackson
On 16/04/13 20:14, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: snip +#defineCONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCTOTAL(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCBYTES * \ +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCSTEPS) + +#define

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add NanoBone board support

2013-04-16 Thread Mark Jackson
On 16/04/13 20:27, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 08:25:17PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 20:14, Mark Jackson wrote: On 16/04/13 16:48, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: snip +#defineCONFIG_SYS_NAND_ECCTOTAL

Re: [U-Boot] How do I use AM335x eth1 rather than eth0 ? [SOLVED]

2013-04-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 12/04/13 11:56, Mark Jackson wrote: We have a dual Ethernet board (based on the BeagelBone) but with both Ethernet ports connected. I'm wanting to use eth1 (rather than eth0), so in my board.c file, I changed:- static struct cpsw_slave_data cpsw_slaves

Re: [U-Boot] How do I use AM335x eth1 rather than eth0 ? [SOLVED]

2013-04-13 Thread Mark Jackson
On 12/04/13 11:56, Mark Jackson wrote: We have a dual Ethernet board (based on the BeagelBone) but with both Ethernet ports connected. I'm wanting to use eth1 (rather than eth0), so in my board.c file, I changed:- static struct cpsw_slave_data cpsw_slaves

[U-Boot] How do I use AM335x eth1 rather than eth0 ?

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Jackson
We have a dual Ethernet board (based on the BeagelBone) but with both Ethernet ports connected. I'm wanting to use eth1 (rather than eth0), so in my board.c file, I changed:- static struct cpsw_slave_data cpsw_slaves[] = { { .slave_reg_ofs = 0x208,

[U-Boot] How do I use AM335x eth1 rather than eth0 ?

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Jackson
We have a dual Ethernet board (based on the BeagelBone) but with both Ethernet ports connected. I'm wanting to use eth1 (rather than eth0), so in my board.c file, I changed:- static struct cpsw_slave_data cpsw_slaves[] = { { .slave_reg_ofs = 0x208,

Re: [U-Boot] How do I use AM335x eth1 rather than eth0 ?

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Jackson
On 12/04/13 17:05, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:56:57AM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: We have a dual Ethernet board (based on the BeagelBone) but with both Ethernet ports connected. I'm wanting to use eth1 (rather than eth0), so in my board.c file, I changed:- snip

[U-Boot] Build failure on am335x_evm

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Jackson
arm-linux-ld.bfd: error: required section '.rel.plt' not found in the linker script arm-linux-ld.bfd: final link failed: Invalid operation make[1]: *** [u-boot] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mpfj/u-boot/u-boot' make: *** [am335x_evm] Error 2 Any ideas ? Cheers Mark JACKSON

Re: [U-Boot] Build failure on am335x_evm

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Jackson
On 11/04/13 14:13, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:58:19AM +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: On the current git master, I get the following build failure:- snip What rev are you on? 98f9200 should have fixed this issue. Fixed ... I needed to do a make distclean when I switched compiling

Re: [U-Boot] Regarding Kernel not starting

2013-03-08 Thread Mark Jackson
On 08/03/13 09:56, Ramesh K Khokhani wrote: Hi Friends, I have successfully run u-boot our my custom board but I can't run kernel. Problem is that I have saved uImage.bin at NOR location 0x80 and load into DRAM:0x4100. Here u-boot can get kernel info and print into UART consol but

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Jackson
On 04/03/13 00:27, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Mark Jackson, In message 5130c537.8000...@mimc.co.uk you wrote: Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define V_MPUCLK desired clock freq in Hz

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Jackson
Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define CONFIG_SYS_MPUCLK desired clock freq in Hz Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v3: - Changed from V_MPUCLK

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Jackson
On 04/03/13 11:14, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Mark Jackson, In message 51346856.8020...@mimc.co.uk you wrote: Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define CONFIG_SYS_MPUCLKdesired clock freq

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-04 Thread Mark Jackson
Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define CONFIG_SYS_MPUCLK desired clock freq in MHz Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v4: - Now defined as MHz (not Hz) Changes

Re: [U-Boot] Remounting UBI image leads to ECC errors

2013-03-02 Thread Mark Jackson
On 26/02/13 15:11, Mark Jackson wrote: We have a custom made AM335x board I'm working on and I have encountered a problem when mounting an ubifs image from nand. If I ... (1) Write an ubifs image to nand (2) Mount the ubifs image (3) Repeat step (2) ... this then corrupts the ubifs image

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Jackson
Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define V_MPUCLKdesired clock freq in Hz Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/clocks_am33xx.h |4 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Jackson
Allow AM335x MPU core clock speed to be specified in the board config file. To use, add the following to the board's config file:- #define V_MPUCLKdesired clock freq in Hz Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- Changes in v2: - Tweaked after comments from Peter Korsgaard

[U-Boot] Remounting UBI image leads to ECC errors

2013-02-26 Thread Mark Jackson
We have a custom made AM335x board I'm working on and I have encountered a problem when mounting an ubifs image from nand. If I ... (1) Write an ubifs image to nand (2) Mount the ubifs image (3) Repeat step (2) ... this then corrupts the ubifs image. Below is a full log. Can anyone help ?

[U-Boot] AM335x PLL configuration

2013-02-23 Thread Mark Jackson
All the current TI AM335x boards currently appear to start with an MPU clock of 550MHx and a core clock of 1GHz, based on #defines in include/asm/arch-am33xx/clocks_am33xx.h I assume most people then pass control over to (eg) cpufreq once Linux boots. However I would like to just boot up at the

Re: [U-Boot] AM335x : failure to boot SPL from NAND

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Jackson
On 19/02/13 14:55, Mark Jackson wrote: On 18/02/13 14:54, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:43:47PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: On 15/02/13 21:13, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:54:23PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: I'm trying to diagnose why our AM335x based CPU board

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Initialise correct GPMC WAITx irq for AM33xx

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Jackson
Currently WAIT0 irq is reset and then WAIT1 irq is enabled. Fix it such that WAIT0 irq is enabled instead. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/mem.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/mem.c b

Re: [U-Boot] AM335x : failure to boot SPL from NAND

2013-02-19 Thread Mark Jackson
On 18/02/13 14:54, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:43:47PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: On 15/02/13 21:13, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:54:23PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: I'm trying to diagnose why our AM335x based CPU board (based on the AM335x Starter Kit) can boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Allow AM33xx boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Jackson
Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so AM33xx based boards can register GPMC chip selects. Changes in V3: - Fix line wrapping Changes in V2: - Indicate this is for AM33xx (not OMAP2) Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/sys_proto.h |2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Allow AM33xx boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Jackson
On 17/02/13 20:11, Peter Korsgaard wrote: Mark == Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk writes: Mark Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so AM33xx based boards can Mark register GPMC chip selects. Mark Changes in V2: Mark - Indicate this is for AM33xx (not OMAP2) Mark Signed

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Allow AM33xx boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Jackson
Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so AM33xx based boards can register GPMC chip selects. Changes in V4: - Fix checkpatch errors (TAB - space mangling) Changes in V3: - Fix line wrapping Changes in V2: - Indicate this is for AM33xx (not OMAP2) Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Allow AM33xx boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Jackson
On 18/02/13 11:01, Peter Korsgaard wrote: Mark == Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk writes: Mark Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so AM33xx based boards can register GPMC chip selects. Mark Changes in V3: Mark - Fix line wrapping Mark Changes in V2: Mark - Indicate

Re: [U-Boot] AM335x : failure to boot SPL from NAND

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Jackson
On 15/02/13 21:13, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:54:23PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: I'm trying to diagnose why our AM335x based CPU board (based on the AM335x Starter Kit) can boot SPL and U-Boot from an MMC card, but is unable to boot from NAND (connected to CS0). Following

[U-Boot] AM335x : failure to boot SPL from NAND

2013-02-14 Thread Mark Jackson
sequence, and where I might look to help debug the problem ? Regards Mark JACKSON ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Allow OMAP2 boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-12 Thread Mark Jackson
On 12/02/13 17:01, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:29:03PM +, Mark Jackson wrote: Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so OMAP2 boards can register GPMC chipselects. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/sys_proto.h |2

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Allow AM33xx boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-12 Thread Mark Jackson
Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so AM33xx based boards can register GPMC chip selects. Changes in V2: - Indicate this is for AM33xx (not OMAP2) Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/sys_proto.h |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Allow OMAP2 boards to setup GPMC chipselects.

2013-02-11 Thread Mark Jackson
Expose the enable_gpmc_cs_config() function so OMAP2 boards can register GPMC chipselects. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@newflow.co.uk --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/sys_proto.h |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/sys_proto.h b/arch

[U-Boot] Latest u-boot-atmel git hangs on AVR32 board

2011-06-13 Thread Mark Jackson
Hi Our MIMC200 board has been using 2009.08 for some time, so I thought I would take a look at the latest git version to keep our boards more up-to-date. I have checked out the u-boot-atmel branch, and done:- $ make mimc200_config $ make Everything compiles, but when I try the image, I only

[U-Boot] [PATCH] avr32 portmux : fix incorrect port mask

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Jackson
The portmux peripheral pin selection code used when setting up the MACB1 ethernet port has a small (but critical !!) typo. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/at32ap

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] avr32 portmux : fix incorrect port mask

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Jackson
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:49:00 +0100 Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote: The portmux peripheral pin selection code used when setting up the MACB1 ethernet port has a small (but critical !!) typo. It does? Where is this fixed in the patch? Not sure what

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] avr32 portmux : fix incorrect port mask

2009-10-19 Thread Mark Jackson
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:35:40 +0100 Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote: Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:49:00 +0100 Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote: The portmux peripheral pin selection code used when setting up the MACB1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] memcpy: copy one word at a time if possible

2009-10-09 Thread Mark Jackson
Chris Moore wrote: I agree wholeheartedly with the idea but shouldn't it be more like this (untested) code : void * memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count) { char *d8, *s8; unsigned long *dl = dest, *sl = src; In here, would it be overkill to add byte copying

Re: [U-Boot] unable to configure eth0 on DM6446 using filesystem

2009-10-07 Thread Mark Jackson
rohan tabish wrote: Hye guys i am trying to put linux on my custom board DM6446.I am done with the UBL,U-BOOT ,uImage(kernel) and the filesystem. Have refrred the busybox as my file system.I am using the open source code from git.Here is what i get snip The ethernet works well in the

Re: [U-Boot] Virtual addresses, u-boot, and the MMU

2009-09-04 Thread Mark Jackson
Becky Bruce wrote: snip This is where Detlev's comment about using the chance to define a cache API comes into play. Yes, we probably should create a set of functions like enable_data_cache(address, size); and disable_data_cache(address, size); which would turn on resp. off the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] atngw100: Use virtual address in CONFIG_ENV_ADDR

2009-09-01 Thread Mark Jackson
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: snip Right...I'm beginning to doubt that anyone is familiar enough with the u-boot code, since everyone seems to have their own opinion about how things are supposed to work. To summarize, here are the possible ways to fix the problem as I see it: - Use virtual

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] atngw100: Use virtual address in CONFIG_ENV_ADDR

2009-08-28 Thread Mark Jackson
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: Ever since the CFI driver was rewritten to use virtual addresses, thus eliminating the whole point of the map_physmem() macro, ATNGW100 has been broken like this: How about other boards (like the MIMC200) ? Aren't *all* AVR32 boards affected in this way ? Mark

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] atngw100: Use virtual address in CONFIG_ENV_ADDR

2009-08-28 Thread Mark Jackson
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: Mark Jackson mpfj-l...@mimc.co.uk wrote: Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: Possibly, but NGW100 is the only one which I've seen reports about. STK1000 is safe since it doesn't use the CFI driver. I did kinda report this in the thread JFFS2 scanning bug, and the triple

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MIMC200: set default fbmem value

2009-08-17 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch adds a default bootargs fbmem value to the CONFIG_BOOTARGS string for the MIMC200 board. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- include/configs/mimc200.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/mimc200.h b/include/configs

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MIMC200: reduce LCD pixclock

2009-08-11 Thread Mark Jackson
[Resent to add CC u-b...@lists.denx.de] The initial pixclock for the MIMC200 board is wrong (and causes screen corruption due to DMA underruns). This patch simply reduces the pixel clock to fix the problem. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- board/mimc/mimc200/mimc200.c |2

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add AVR32 LCD support

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Jackson
The standard U-Boot BMP and Splash-screen features should just work. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/clk.c |5 + cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c | 90 + include/asm-avr32/arch-at32ap700x/chip-features.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add 16bit colour support in lcd.h

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch adds support for LCD_COLOR16 in include/lcd.h. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- include/lcd.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/lcd.h b/include/lcd.h index f054cac..0d6549c 100644 --- a/include/lcd.h +++ b/include/lcd.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove static declaration from gunzip_bmp()

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch removes the static declaration from gunzip_bmp() Without it, the gunzip_bmp() function is not visible to common/lcd.c and fails to compile with an error. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- common/cmd_bmp.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add LCD support to MIMC200 board

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch updates the MIMC200 files to enable the LCD. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- board/mimc/mimc200/mimc200.c | 34 ++ include/configs/mimc200.h| 16 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch allows the guard time parameter to be set in the Atmel LCDC driver. By default, the previous value of 1 is used, unless the setting is defined elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2

[U-Boot] [PATCH ... resent] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-22 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch correctly sets up the guard time parameter in the Atmel LCDC driver. This works on the AVR32 platform, but needs to be tested under the AT91 platform which shares the same code base. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c |5 +++-- 1 files

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH ... resent] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-22 Thread Mark Jackson
Mark Jackson wrote: This patch correctly sets up the guard time parameter in the Atmel LCDC driver. This works on the AVR32 platform, but needs to be tested under the AT91 platform which shares the same code base. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- drivers/video

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-22 Thread Mark Jackson
Anatolij Gustschin wrote: Mark Jackson wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: ... does not apply Sorry ... does that mean the patch fails in some way, or that this patch is not relevant ? a...@wker:~/git/u-boot$ patch -p1 --dry-run ~/devel/u-boot-video/\[U-Boot\]\ \[PATCH

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel LCD driver GUARDTIME fix

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch correctly sets up the guard time parameter in the Atmel LCDC driver. This works on the AVR32 platform, but needs to be tested under the AT91 platform which shares the same code base. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c |5 +++-- 1 files

[U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch

2009-06-04 Thread Mark Jackson
I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main Denx (non-AVR32) git. It consists of the following changes:- cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/clk.c |5 + cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c | 90 +

Re: [U-Boot] Best way to submit this patch

2009-06-04 Thread Mark Jackson
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 08:29 -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: Mark Jackson wrote: I'm planning to submit a patch to add LCD support to the current main Denx (non-AVR32) git. snip Hi Mark, Don't agonize over it, just post the patch. The number of electrons you kill by asking for direction

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add AVR32 LCD support

2009-06-04 Thread Mark Jackson
#define CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN1 #endif The standard U-Boot BMP and Splash-screen features should just work. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/clk.c |5 + cpu/at32ap/at32ap700x/portmux.c | 90

Re: [U-Boot] JFFS2 scanning bug

2009-04-30 Thread Mark Jackson
On 14/03/09 00:59, Ilya Yanok wrote: Hi Mark, snip I'll prepare the patch and will post it in some days. (We can just drop the above two lines and it should work but the most clean way would be to calculate sector_size after flash_init() and then just use that value but that means a lot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix JFFS2 NOR sector size routine

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Jackson
On 11/03/09 18:29, Scott Wood wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:54:20AM +, Mark Jackson wrote: diff --git a/common/cmd_jffs2.c b/common/cmd_jffs2.c index d0a7cea..2f3b3a9 100644 --- a/common/cmd_jffs2.c +++ b/common/cmd_jffs2.c @@ -1814,7 +1814,12 @@ static inline u32

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Fix JFFS2 NOR sector size routine

2009-03-11 Thread Mark Jackson
This patch fixes the JFFS2 scanning code when not using CONFIG_JFFS2_CMDLINE. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- common/cmd_jffs2.c |7 ++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_jffs2.c b/common/cmd_jffs2.c index d0a7cea..2f3b3a9 100644

Re: [U-Boot] JFFS2 scanning bug

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Jackson
On 26/02/09 14:48, Ilya Yanok wrote: Hi Mark, Mark Jackson wrote: I've just updated from v2008.10 to v2009.01 on my AVR32 board (MIMC200). JFFS2 no longer works (it hangs at Scanning JFFS2 FS:, so I've done a git bisect, and here's the result:- [snip] Is this a known problem

Re: [U-Boot] JFFS2 scanning bug

2009-02-26 Thread Mark Jackson
On 26/02/09 15:46, Ilya Yanok wrote: Hi Mark, Don't you have JTAG debugger so you could find where exactly it hangs? Or you can try adding debugging printf's to the source... I can't reproduce your problem myself so that info would be useful. Regards, Ilya. I do have a JTAG unit, but it'll

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v2] Setup extra MIMC200 chip selects

2009-02-13 Thread Mark Jackson
Added code to setup the extra Flash and FRAM chip selects as used on the MIMC200 board. V2 moves the init code from the common cpu.c file into the board specific setup file. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- board/mimc/mimc200/mimc200.c | 14 ++ 1 files changed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Setup extra MIMC200 chip selects

2009-02-06 Thread Mark Jackson
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Mark Jackson, In message 492a8d60.3090...@mimc.co.uk you wrote: Added code to setup the extra Flash and FRAM chip selects as used on the MIMC200 board. Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson m...@mimc.co.uk --- cpu/at32ap/cpu.c | 14 ++ 1 files changed, 14

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add 16bpp BMP support

2009-02-01 Thread Mark Jackson
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Guennadi Liakhovetski, In message pine.lnx.4.64.0901302206180.4...@axis700.grange you wrote: platform-specific types and code. So, looking at this your patch - do we really need the one more CONFIG_ define for CONFIG_BMP_16BPP? What are the drawbacks of adding

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add 16bpp BMP support

2009-01-30 Thread Mark Jackson
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Mark Jackson, In message 49817e75.7060...@mimc.co.uk you wrote: snip Or have I misunderstood the bmp format and the existing code ? I don't know - I'm just asking because the 16 bpp case is different from the 1 and 8 bpp cases where the operands are swapped

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add 16bpp BMP support

2009-01-29 Thread Mark Jackson
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Mark Jackson, In message 497f1732.6050...@mimc.co.uk you wrote: This patch adds 16bpp BMP support to the common lcd code. Use CONFIG_BMP_16BPP and set LCD_BPP to LCD_COLOR16 to enable the code. At the moment it's only been tested on the MIMC200 AVR32 board

  1   2   >