Hi Marek,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Robert Schwebel r.schwe...@pengutronix.de
csb226 xscale/pxa
innokom xscale/pxa
Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for
longer time to fix. (here I have some feeling
Hi Marek,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:44:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
board/denx/m28evk/power_init.c | 913
++
Shouldn't the power library functions go into
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/? They are not m28evk specific and should be
re-usable by other MX28
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:42:31AM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
It sounds like you might be looking at using U-Boot for booting a x86
PC. If this is the case, maybe you should take a look at coreboot
(http://www.coreboot.org/)
For what it's worth: we have a beginning of x86 support in Barebox
://git.denx.de/git/u-boot-v2.git
Note also that there is now a separate mailing list for v2:
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
Regards,
Robert Schwebel
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:05:41PM +0200, Johann Steinbrecher wrote:
which patches are required in order to get a lcd support for the imx27
during the boot up? Is this function already supported? Is there a patch
that initialized the LCD and DMA controller?
u-boot-v2 has initial support for
Hi Remy,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:49:31PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:
Freescale isnt alone here, so when/if u-boot goes GPLv3, please dont do your
own thing in a vacuum. there will be others who would support a GPLv2
split,
so we might as well collaborate. u-boot-v2 looks fairly
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+#define CONFIG_BOARDINFOPhytec Phycore mpc5200b tiny
Too long. Please be terse.
The official name of the board is phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:18:14AM +0200, brice.wal...@ulp.u-strasbg.fr
wrote:
J've seen that U-Boot V2 supports different MX27 CPU boards. Is U-Boot
supported on Freescale i.MX27 PDK board?
The tree contains support for the MX27ADS but not for the PDK; however,
it is not very well tested
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:22:31PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:12:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
How can you possibly ever change the API for the flash driver with 201
different flash drivers in the tree without marking something as broken?
Well, *if* we wanted to change the API, that would be a reason to get
rid of the old
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[stupid attempt of a flame war deleted]
For the audience which is wondering about what's going on here, I have
no idea.
The idea behind B-Boot-v2 is: U-Boot itself is a *great* bootloader from
the user's poing of view. It is the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
political position because it is a *good* one.
This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
lutionary path - this may include
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:59:41PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
What's the summary of features that v2 has that v1 doesnt?
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-v2.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=HEAD
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:56:53AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
We have even Blackfin support in v2, and that for almost all of the
time it is actually there. Sure - if you need feature completeness,
you'll have to stay with v1. Our aim is a sane design, and I'm still
not convinced that
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:49:38AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you aim for feature completeness, use v1 and don't care about v2.
v2 is for people who care about *design*.
so v2 is good for thinking about things while v1 is good for people
who want to do real work. if that's the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't
what you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it.
my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it as
a practical example. we've talked
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:54:41PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it
was made publicly visible nearly two years ago it did not collect much
of a community around it.
Right; part of the reason is it was always something we used to
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to
the table and get it into u-boot v1? ive never personally looked at
v2, but if it means i need to redo all of my Blackfin core/board code,
that doesnt sound very
Hi Jerry,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:19:19PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
k...@koi8.net wrote:
OK, this is _NOT_ just multiple I2C adapters... The entire thing is
fundamentally broken.
One supposed to have _THE_ device and only this device is somehow supported.
Now it is USB. Each
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:25:16PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
k...@koi8.net wrote:
OK, this is _NOT_ just multiple I2C adapters... The entire thing is
fundamentally broken.
One supposed to have _THE_ device and only this device is
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:18:45PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
I suppose you didn't look in the right place. We don't even have support
for i2c and spi in v2 :-)
Ah, that's that forked one! Sorry, my bad... I thought about the new version
of a legacy one that just shuffled source files to
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:25:57PM -0700, k...@koi8.net wrote:
OK, thanks. Cloning now :)
OK, got a look at it. Looks promising but it is in very early stage yet... I
wouldn't say in pre-conception stage, but definitely on a very beginning of
the first trimester :)
Well, you are free to
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Jens Scharsig wrote:
I'm start with a port for a new customer board with NOR-flash only.
Our customer don't like use AT91Bootstrap.
I look at the source, but don't found any initialization code for
AT91SAM926x.
My question:
Are there any plans
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:04:56PM -0600, John Jeffers wrote:
In ~/u-boot-v2/board/pcm038/env/config
(and in most other boards in v2)
the following is found:
/+
autoboot_timeout=3
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:20:57PM +0100, kenneth johansson wrote:
Only print out the target name during make.
For old style set V=1
Signed-off-by: kenneth johansson kenn...@southpole.se
Sidenote: u-boot-v2 uses the standard Linux build system and has quiet
operation as the default case.
the posted patches.
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
. Code incredients tend to rot quickly when not
being served freshly from a rcs repository.
Using the Sugo alla Bolognese we can give a name for each file of the
toolchain...
So it might be an innovative model, thanks, we'll reconsider! 8-)
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http
have some compatiblity
issues with our users then :)
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121
,
built with OSELAS.Toolchain-1.1.1. You can compile such a toolchain
yourself easily with ptxdist, look here for the details:
http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/toolchain/index_en.html
rsc
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science
29 matches
Mail list logo
