Wolfgang,
I tried the following versions on our old board and found that
booting linux stops working from 1.3.2-rc1. So, some change between
1.3.1 and 1.3.2-rc1 is causing my problem. Can you give me any
pointers as to where to look?
1.0.0: works
1.2.0: works
1.3.0: works
1.3.1: works
1.3.2-rc1
各位老总：您们好！
诚祝：您们在2008年里；有鼠不尽的快乐！鼠不尽的收获！鼠不尽的钞票！
鼠不尽的幸福！鼠不尽的美满生活！愿： 您们阖家欢乐！幸福安康！
我公司可以长期提供：出口报关单，核销单，等等一系列手续；代理：出口
报关，商检，境内外运输..等等；还可以代办：出口欧盟许可证，欧盟产地证；
并且还有（广州国际贸易交易会）的摊位可以转让；价格特别优惠；有意者请来邮件
或来电联系。谢谢合作！
电话：0755-81153047。
> >> Vyas Ashish wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Group,
> >>>
> >>> I have a at91sam9261ek evaluation Kit from Atmel and I
> >>> want to bring
> >>> up the UBoot on that. When I got the board, I also got
> >>> UBoot binary
> >>> which can be flashed and verified. However, I did not get
> >>> the source
> Signed-off-by: Antonio R. Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/board/atmel/at572d940hfeb/atmel_mci.c
> b/board/atmel/at572d940hfeb/atmel_mci.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..065a85b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/board/atmel/at572d940hfeb/atmel_mci.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,869 @@
> +/*
> + * (C)
> Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Vyas Ashish wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Group,
>>>
>>> I have a at91sam9261ek evaluation Kit from Atmel and I want to bring
>>> up the UBoot on that. When I got the board, I also got UBoot binary
>>> which can be flashed and verified. However, I did not get the source
>>> code.
Vyas Ashish wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I have a at91sam9261ek evaluation Kit from Atmel and I want to bring up
> the UBoot on that. When I got the board, I also got UBoot binary which
> can be flashed and verified. However, I did not get the source code. The
> code has to be purchased seperately
On 6/13/08 7:45 AM, Stuart Wood wrote:
> I'm having some new problems with my jffs2 root file system when it is
> mounted the first time from small page nand flash.
> I'm pretty sure its some sort of configuration problem but the web
> hasn't helped so far.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> The jffs2 image is bein
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 13:32 Thu 05 Jun , Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>> Philip Balister wrote:
> Is everything fine with the patch now?
I did not see any negative reaction to your 5th version[1], so its
up to the custodian now. What do you say Jean-Christo
Sorry for the initial incomplete post..
I'm having some new problems with my jffs2 root file system when it is
mounted the first time from small page nand flash.
I'm pretty sure its some sort of configuration problem but the web
hasn't helped so far.
NAND Flash,
erase block = 0x4000 (16K)
This patch is the first step in cleaning up net/eth.c, by moving Ethernet
initialization to CPU or board-specific code. Initial implementation is
only on the Freescale TSEC controller, but others will be added soon.
Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This time around, instead of a
Please ignore. It's wrong. Sorry for the noise!
Ben
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch is the first step in cleaning up net/eth.c, by moving Ethernet
> initialization to CPU or board-specific code. Initial implementation is
> only on the Freesca
I'm having some new problems with my jffs2 root file system when it is
mounted the first time from small page nand flash.
I'm pretty sure its some sort of configuration problem but the web
hasn't helped so far.
NAND Flash,
erase block = 0x4000, page size
The jffs2 image is being built with this c
This patch is the first step in cleaning up net/eth.c, by moving Ethernet
initialization to CPU or board-specific code. Initial implementation is
only on the Freescale TSEC controller, but others will be added soon.
Signed-off-by: Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This time around, instead of a
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:24 -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to port U-Boot to MX31PDK board, but I getting a problem
> related to lowlevel initialization to boot from NAND flash memory.
>
> The problem is because cpu/arm1136/start.S waste so much space with
> IRQ/FIQ hand
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>
> Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>> Steven A. Falco wrote:
>>> My text-editor (vim) has a bit of trouble syntax-highlighting the
>>> cmd_nvedit.c
>>> file, because it apparently does not parse C ifdef/else/endif. The
>>> following
>>> patch does not change the behavior of the code
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> The silent console as currently implemented is not silent if a board has been
>> newly manufactured. I.e., some messages are printed prior to being able to
>> set
>> the "silent" environment variable the first time.
>>
>> Th
Hi,
I am trying to port U-Boot to MX31PDK board, but I getting a problem
related to lowlevel initialization to boot from NAND flash memory.
The problem is because cpu/arm1136/start.S waste so much space with
IRQ/FIQ handling and stack initialization then lowlevel_init function
is placed at 0x400 p
Hi Haavard,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Haavard Skinnemoen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ben Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I propose to wrap both the 'board/$(BOARDDIR)/lib$(BOARD).a' and
>> 'cpu/$(CPU)/lib$(CPU).a' arguments to ld in
>> --whole-module/--no-whole-module in order to ac
Hi Wolfgang,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> I've played around a bit more and found that if I move my function to
>> an existing file containing functions called from elsewhere, my code
>> gets linked in.
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> My text-editor (vim) has a bit of trouble syntax-highlighting the
>> cmd_nvedit.c
>> file, because it apparently does not parse C ifdef/else/endif. The following
>> patch does not change the behavior of the code at all, but does allow the
>> edit
Hi,
In the 'include/configs/ocotea.h" file:
8<-
#define CFG_PCI_MEMBASE 0x8000 /* mapped pci memory */
8<--
28F128K18
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php__
Hi Group,
I have a at91sam9261ek evaluation Kit from Atmel and I want to bring up
the UBoot on that. When I got the board, I also got UBoot binary which can
be flashed and verified. However, I did not get the source code. The code
has to be purchased seperately, which I do not want to do. I wan
"Ben Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose to wrap both the 'board/$(BOARDDIR)/lib$(BOARD).a' and
> 'cpu/$(CPU)/lib$(CPU).a' arguments to ld in
> --whole-module/--no-whole-module in order to accomplish this goal. We
> definitely don't want to do this across the board because image size
>
>> patch for branch mtd-2.6.22.1 on git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git
>>
>> nand read(.jffs2|.e|.i) skips bad blocks during read.
>> write(.jffs2|.e|.i) skips bad blocks during write
>> nand read will read 0xff for bad block.
>> Update documentation.
>> ---
>
> Can I get a Signed-off-by?
>
"Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, this is not the way we work. We submit patches that can be
> > reviewed, not chunks of code that the reviewer has to anayze with
> > additional, unnecessary efforts.
>
> Antonio submits a working patchset which is structured in the
> same manne
Dear Sir/Miss,
When I migrate u-boot-1.1.3 to LPC2294, the board and terminal can not
display any information of u-boot-1.1.3, whether or not my serial port
have problem? Because I study u-boot just now, I do not know how to
study it and solve the problems that when I migrate it to LPC2294 board,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>> If you want to see changes right now,
>> then just replace the existing file with the Diopsis file and do a
>> diff.
>
> No, this is not the way we work. We submit patches that can be
> reviewed, not chunks of code that the r
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I found that above is an intended space to indicate that the instruction
> is in the delay slot. I think it's probably a good old convention in
> MIPS assembly programming, and would like to leave it as it is, IMHO.
Indeed. If it has a deeper meaning,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I've played around a bit more and found that if I move my function to
> an existing file containing functions called from elsewhere, my code
> gets linked in. Further research shows that a 'feature' of ld is that
> it won't pull in a module that only
Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
>> +andia1, 0xff/* spread fillword */
>> +LONG_SLLt1, a1, 8
>> +or a1, t1
>> +LONG_SLLt1, a1, 16
>> +#if LONGSIZE == 8
>> +or a1, t1
>> +LONG_SLLt1
31 matches
Mail list logo
