Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for ATMELAT91SAM9G20EKboard

) should definitely reduce the maintenance of drivers. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB

Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] SDHC Support for AT572d940HF-EB

main problem is how to get my 500-1000 email sorting rules over to a new client, so QuoteFix is probably the best choice. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (SDHC support part 1)

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:47 +0200 Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: It's a bit hard to see what your proposal is all about when you create a new file instead of modifying the exising one... If you want to see changes right now

Re: [U-Boot-Users] help in understand the address of standaloneapplications, ARM MCU

of U-Boot and the example program? Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 2/4] U-Boot-V2: ARM: introduceCONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATION

form. Whats the big benefit of beeing able to select where U-boot runs? I could understand if there was a need for a compile time parameter. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

stuff to an board/atmel/common directory to make it easy to clean up for those interested later. Best regards, Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

the flash driver for the DK with CFI driver, and test it... I can use this as the base for an AT91RM9200EK patch. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] Atmel Nordic AB Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden Visit: Kavallerivägen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden Phone +46 (8) 441

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 22:06 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board. Hi Ulf, I do have a few issues with your patch. As you have seen, I started adapting the Atmel changes for the AT91SAM boards, and in doing so I tried to implement (well, quite a lot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash

Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9 boards, but I'm not sure of the older

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash

Le lundi 14 avril 2008 à 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : Le samedi 12 avril 2008 à 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit : Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the standard CFI driver ? It surely

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add build date environment variable

, but they depend on having other things included. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Reorder ARM boards in Makefile

Rearrange ARM boards in Makefile so that ARM926EJ-S boards are no longer under ARM92xT header. Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson diff -urN u-boot.cmp/Makefile u-boot/Makefile --- u-boot.cmp/Makefile 2008-04-12 07:05:14.0 +0200 +++ u-boot

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash

Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN u-boot.cmp/include/flash.h u-boot/include/flash.h --- u-boot.cmp/include/flash.h 2008-04-12 07:05:17.0 +0200 +++ u-boot/include/flash.h 2008-04-12 20:57:51.0 +0200 @@ -241,9

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add build date environment variable

Add environment for the date when U-Boot is built Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN u-boot.cmp/Makefile u-boot/Makefile --- u-boot.cmp/Makefile 2008-04-12 20:56:58.0 +0200 +++ u-boot/Makefile 2008-04-12 21:06:23.0 +0200 @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ export HOSTARCH

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for AT91RM9200EK board

Add support for the AT91RM9200EK Board. Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urN u-boot.cmp/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c u-boot/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c --- u-boot.cmp/board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/at91rm9200ek.c 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ u

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

On Thursday 20 March 2008, Nicolas Ferre wrote: Ulf Samuelsson ulf.samuelsson at atmel.com writes: Too bad. I think it would be a good idea, if they would try to work with the official U-Boot community again. Now with the custodian framework in place, some problems of the past should

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: Would it not be better if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91 Product line Could be, I really don't know. I don't remember seeing Atmel ARM patches posted or reviewed by other Atmel than yourself. They were sent in 3-4 years

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

if the Atmel ARM was handled by the Atmel AT91 Product line Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: Here a short announcement about a change in the U-Boot ARM custodianship: Since the ARM platform is so broad and has multiple vendor specific sub-architectures it seemed necessary to add new U-Boot custodian branches for those

Re: [U-Boot-Users] arm920t RAM relocation broken?

flash, then the code is already relocated and is executing from SDRAM at this point, so the code will crash. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R

Re: [U-Boot-Users] AT91SAM7 port of U-boot?

instead of one, and only 6 serial ports instead of 7. I think it would be much easier to get U-boot running on the SAM9XE. It also has an Ethernet controller so you can do fast downloads. Also, it runs at 200 MHz instead of the ~50 MHz of the SAM7SE. -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:33:47 +0100 Ulf Samuelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In this case, reality and the map differs. NWFPE toolchains built by cross-tool, buildroot, and www.gnuarm.com not sure abnout the last) all bombs when they reach the -msoft-float You mean they don't recognize

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options

treat all warnings as errors)? If so, please supply details. Regards Peter Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] Atmel Nordic AB Mail: Box 2033, 174 02 Sundbyberg, Sweden Visit: Kavallerivägen 24, 174 58 Sundbyberg, Sweden Phone +46 (8) 441 54 22 Fax +46 (8

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

default What will env do without parameters? Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options

the problem, without having to locally *patch* the source. When you are building several u-boots for different ARM chips from the same source you really do not want to patch the source. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson[EMAIL PROTECTED] Atmel Nordic AB

Re: [U-Boot-Users] FW: [PATCH][ARM] Rationalize ARM compiler options

the lowest common architecture option (armv4), whatever the processor implements. Users can change this option locally. At present we have a mixture. Regards Peter Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net

Re: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 Bootstrap in U-boot

(in the AT91SAM9260) and that limits the functionality. U-Boot does not fit, so you have AT91bootstrap. AT91bootstrap needs to run BEFORE U-Boot is started. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

to the AT91RM9200, but I use the special downloading program which I found somewhere and included in the U-Boot-1.1.2 found on buildroot.uclibc.org. Did you try programming from Windows using SAM-BA? Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

Re: [U-Boot-Users] sam9263ek not booting uboot dataflash

with LEDs. You can also try the SAM9263EK U-Boot-1.2.0 built by buildroot at buildroot.uclibc.org. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] spi: Kill spi_chipsel table and introduce spi_setup()

, the SPI is probably already initialized by the AT91 bootstrap which loads U-Boot to SDRAM from the dataflash, so any initialization should maybe be optional. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/5] AT91CAP9 support : board/ files

] Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/5] AT91CAP9 support : board/ files

| 71 ++ board/at91cap9adk/u-boot.lds| 57 I think it would be better if these files were located in the board/atmel/at91cap9adk, instead of board/at91cap9adk Maybe Peter can fix that, it should not be too hard. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/5] AT91CAP9 support : cpu/ files

is different from the Atmel AT91SAM926x U-Boot patches on www.linux4sam.org? The CAP9 is very similar to the AT91SAM9263. Should those chips share drivers? Then it would be better to store the files in cpu/arm926ejs/at91sam926x Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] make the machid configurable via theenvironment (Was: [PATCH] Changed load address and entrypoint for uImage to ZRELADDR + 6MB)

recompilation. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

of it. No, I am referring to code which does exist in the U-Boot tree. - Look how proper quoting can be when the sender of the original mail follows mail standards ... Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson - This SF.net email

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [rfc] new spiflash subsystem

, and you cannot compare two memory areas if the memory area is larger than half the SDRAM size. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson /* * SPI flash driver user interface * * Copyright (c) 2005-2008 Analog Devices Inc. * * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later. */ #include common.h #include config.h

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [patch u-boot git 2/3] better ARM9 compiler options

-option,-mapcs-32,-mabi=apcs-gnu) PLATFORM_RELFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(call cc-option,-malignment-traps,)) Is this correct? ARM926EJ-S is ARMV5 architecture, not ARMV4. Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson