Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Do not copy elf section to same adress

2011-04-11 Thread Matthias Weisser
Hi Am 19.01.2011 12:03, schrieb Matthias Weisser: When an elf section is already at the right position (e.g. after image decompression by bootm) there is no need to copy it. This saves some ms when bootig an elf image. Changes since V1 - Fixed style issues Signed-off-by: Matthias

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Do not copy elf section to same adress

2011-04-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Matthias Weisser, In message 1295435020-14190-1-git-send-email-weiss...@arcor.de you wrote: When an elf section is already at the right position (e.g. after image decompression by bootm) there is no need to copy it. This saves some ms when bootig an elf image. Changes since V1 -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Do not copy elf section to same adress

2011-04-11 Thread Matthias Weisser
Am 11.04.2011 21:59, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: Dear Matthias Weisser, In message 1295435020-14190-1-git-send-email-weiss...@arcor.de you wrote: When an elf section is already at the right position (e.g. after image decompression by bootm) there is no need to copy it. This saves some ms when

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Do not copy elf section to same adress

2011-04-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Matthias Weisser, In message 4da360a9.10...@arcor.de you wrote: I can't come up with an example where this may produce a problem but who knows which exotic hardware is out there which expects that a memcpy with identical src and dst addresses is executed exactly in that way. But maybe