[Bug 341310] Re: JBD: barrier-based sync failed on dm-0:8 disabling barriers

2011-03-04 Thread Alexey Maximov
any news about fixing this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341310 Title: JBD: barrier-based sync failed on dm-0:8 disabling barriers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot

2010-04-25 Thread Alexey Maximov
installed debian squeeze same way, bb ubuntu from this server. we need stable betas and releases. -- debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot

2010-04-24 Thread Alexey Maximov
Rechecked with latest snapshot. same effect with soft raid 5 + lvm2 (my /boot on USB flash drive, my / on LVM2 over softraid5) unable to boot and find / and lvm2 PV not serious for production release and even LTS label. NB. _same_ simple installation with 8.04 same way etc works OK, but 10.04

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot

2010-04-24 Thread Alexey Maximov
can anyone check this bug, please? -- debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot

2010-04-22 Thread Alexey Maximov
so installation md+lvm2 on servers was broken completely, should I try check it again with RC build ? is there any reasonable changes in this installer part ? ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Installer Team (ubuntu-installer) -- debian-installer

[Bug 559887] [NEW] debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot

2010-04-10 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer so the problem is: I have HP310 G5 (sata software raid in bios turned off) im trying install ubuntu on softraid (mdadm) and as result I have 2 critical bugs (regressions since 8.04) i did dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=10M on both

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable too boot

2010-04-10 Thread Alexey Maximov
3. after install I unable to boot due to some plymouth or some other crap problems, cant detect why, but boot freezes. Im ready to write simple video movie about this problem. -- debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559887

[Bug 559887] Re: debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable too boot

2010-04-10 Thread Alexey Maximov
its a release critical problem. ( sadly. was tested with lucid current iso ** Summary changed: - debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable too boot + debian-installer lucid soft raid1+lvm2 incorrect part sizes and unable boot -- debian-installer lucid soft

[Bug 537262] Re: plymouth pid missing from OMITPIDS and terminated by sendsigs

2010-03-13 Thread Alexey Maximov
status update: tnow did aptitude update aptuitude full-upgrade did 3 reboots in row,and make some tests after. every time I rebooting after I get final message Could not write bytes (broken pipe) and laptop rebooting. sometime after reboot I'm staying at textmode console 1 but gdm loaded and

[Bug 537262] [NEW] does not terminate at computer shutdown

2010-03-11 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: plymouth have no ideas about ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 11 12:58:13 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /sbin/plymouthd InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100310) MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer

[Bug 537262] Re: does not terminate at computer shutdown

2010-03-11 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40782774/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40782775/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40782776/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 519641] Re: gdm/x fails to start with error Broken Pipe at boot in Xubuntu

2010-03-11 Thread Alexey Maximov
I have this bug with Ubuntu (not xubuntu) and this is terrible, waiting for fix -- gdm/x fails to start with error Broken Pipe at boot in Xubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-10 Thread Alexey Maximov
should I report this to upstream mozilla or so something else to fix this bug, how can I help? Pplz, any ideas about usability current FF ? I have 4 laptops with installed 10.04 (snapshot 10-mar). all 4 laptops in use with 4 girls. They are just simple surfing webpages and cry about stability.

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-10 Thread Alexey Maximov
hmm, binary compiled ff 3.0 from 8.04 works well, its only 3 packages..so its not a problem related to components I think. -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 519641] Re: gdm/x fails to start with error Broken Pipe at boot in Xubuntu

2010-03-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
any fix or workaround to this bug ? its annoying , ideas please -- gdm/x fails to start with error Broken Pipe at boot in Xubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-08 Thread Alexey Maximov
reproducible crash, maybe javascript exploit, I do not know, you can flag it correct, but now I'm failed with 10.04, for me firefox totally unusable now. maybe this bug because flashplayer. maybe bad compiled code. who know -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-08 Thread Alexey Maximov
status update: 1. now i did aptitude update aptitude full-upgrade aptitude purge flashplugin-nonfree 2. i have checked that flash .so was removed and not exists any more in my system 3. i did reboot my laptop 4. started firefox -g and cleared my personal data (cache, history,cookies) and

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-08 Thread Alexey Maximov
any ideas about this bug, huh? at this point i rate firefox too unstable even for alpha, its unusable for me, and google chrome works well but not ff... sadly but only one release was pretty stable it was 8.04, is it possible to install firefox from 8.04 to 10.04 with any easy way? --

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-08 Thread Alexey Maximov
status update 2: 1. aptitude purge firefox* 2. installed firefox from hardy directly (just for test) 3.0.18+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 3. now all works well and stable. -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533357 You received this bug

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-08 Thread Alexey Maximov
roflmao... just for test, i tried FF 3.0 from lucid repos! amazing, but it crashes too well, and there is no debug symbols for 3.0 in the repo... is it possbile to bad gcc code (compilator problem) ? so, at this point, binary ff from hardy works stable, any other versions dont -- firefox-bin

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV

2010-03-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
I can reproduce it with http://mail.ru reading my mail... watch my stacktrace now (firefox-bin:3225): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead [New Thread 0xa6dffb70 (LWP 3255)] [Thread 0xa6dffb70 (LWP 3255) exited] (firefox-bin:3225): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
just check it plz, my managers unable to use mozilla now, too many crashes.. ALSO, one more problem now, after executing sudo aptitude install firefox-dbg now my Apport service UNABLE to detect and register firefox crashes automatically.. crap -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Visibility changed to: Private -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 533435] [NEW] f-spot hangs after exporting pictures to local folder

2010-03-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: just hangs totally ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- f-spot hangs after exporting pictures to local folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 533357] Re: firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace

2010-03-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
i cant do that yet due to bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/533591 in apport ** Tags added: apport-collected -- firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV and stacktrace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 507881] Re: Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab

2010-03-04 Thread Alexey Maximov
also, I need to get USB in the VirtualBox worked well, please advice -- Lucid alpha 2 fails to start up unless you remove /proc/bus/usb from the fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 532413] [NEW] pidgin tray icon looks ugly with new ubuntu artwork and have white bg

2010-03-04 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin new artwork come to 10.04 and has been applied. piding icon looks ugly. change it plz ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 5 06:53:53 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/pidgin InstallationMedia: Error: [Errno

[Bug 532413] Re: pidgin tray icon looks ugly with new ubuntu artwork and have white bg

2010-03-04 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40222487/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40222488/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40222489/ProcStatus.txt -- pidgin tray

[Bug 531499] [NEW] some kernel bug with ath9k after hibernate

2010-03-03 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: I have asus K52F laptop, im trying hibernate it. sometime its works, sometime doesnt. probably there is more problems, with btusb for example supp...@kiev-asus-1:~$ uname -a Linux kiev-asus-1 2.6.32-15-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 2 02:24:17 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux [

[Bug 531499] Re: some kernel bug with ath9k after hibernate

2010-03-03 Thread Alexey Maximov
supp...@kiev-asus-1:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu lucid (development branch) all latest updates -- some kernel bug with ath9k after hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531499 You received this bug

[Bug 529825] [NEW] aptitude crashed

2010-02-28 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: supp...@ubuntu:~$ sudo aptitude install stressapptest Чтение списков пакетов... Готово Построение дерева зависимостей Чтение информации о состоянии... Готово Чтение информации о расширенных состояниях Инициализация состояний пакетов... Готово Следующие

[Bug 529305] [NEW] asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04

2010-02-27 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: Hi, I got K52F laptop from asus with i3 cpu and w/o any os installed. Ubuntu 9.10 didn't have any video driver for it, so I have installed 10.04 apha3 Im unable to use sleep/hibernate. it hangs/black screen.. if this is possible, try contact asus team and get proper dsdt,

[Bug 529305] Re: asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04

2010-02-27 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: DSDT http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39870501/dsdt.dsl.gz -- asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 529305] Re: asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04

2010-02-27 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: DMESG http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39870511/dmesg.txt.gz -- asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 529305] Re: asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04

2010-02-27 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: LSPCI output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39870516/lspci.txt.gz -- asus K52F - unable to sleep or hibernate with Lucid 10.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529305 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 522014] [NEW] kernel bug 2.6.31-17-server with hung_task_timeout_secs

2010-02-14 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: 5.542790] usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 [5.611076] IRQ 56/cciss0: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs [5.611095] cciss0: 0x323a at PCI :06:00.0 IRQ 56 using DAC [5.612430] blocks= 4294967296 block_size=

[Bug 54180] Re: [rfe] sshd ought to support 'none' cipher

2010-01-25 Thread Alexey Maximov
I want to see this in ubuntu 10.04, i need none cipher in my enterprise env. please add none patch -- [rfe] sshd ought to support 'none' cipher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh

[Bug 381766] Re: nbd-server no config file

2010-01-25 Thread Alexey Maximov
same problem, ltsp on amd64 are broken -- nbd-server no config file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 54180] Re: [rfe] sshd ought to support 'none' cipher

2010-01-25 Thread Alexey Maximov
I want to see this in ubuntu 10.04, i need none cipher in my enterprise env. please add none patch -- [rfe] sshd ought to support 'none' cipher https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 511169] Re: some kernel problems

2010-01-22 Thread Alexey Maximov
its Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS linux-image-2.6.24-24-server 2.6.24-24.60 -- some kernel problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 511169] [NEW] some kernel problems

2010-01-22 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: some strange in my dmesg [10107037.651702] swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020 [10107037.651705] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-24-server #1 [10107037.651716] [c01785fb] __alloc_pages+0x2ab/0x380 [10107037.651725] [c0196277]

[Bug 511169] Re: some kernel problems

2010-01-22 Thread Alexey Maximov
my sysctl.conf net.core.rmem_default=16777216 net.core.rmem_max=16777216 net.core.wmem_default=16777216 net.core.wmem_max=16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 65536 16777216 net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 2500 net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=reno

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
thats impossible for Hardy LTS . there is no executable file named mountall http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contentskeywords=mountallmode=exactfilenamesuite=hardyarch=any Primary we need to get a fix for 8.04 LTS, not only for Karmic. I will check Karmic status now... -- boot

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
lol, rebooting with init=/bin/bash recovery mode. commented fstab line. did reboot, ctrl+D and got nice registers. -- boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
nice registers if init=/bin/bash and mount / -o remount,rw if you do reboot and ctrl+D ** Attachment added: Снимок экрана 2009-10-09 в 10.41.06.png

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
i have added wrong fstab line,now checking it. r...@ubuntu:~# mount -a mount: special device /dev/sdh5 does not exist r...@ubuntu:~# grep sdh /etc/fstab /dev/sdh5 /mnt ext4errors=remount-ro 0 2 r...@ubuntu:~# r...@ubuntu:~# uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.31-11-server

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
so, i restored original mountall 1.7, its now booted successfully. so you have wrong mountall in the ppa. attaching files. -- boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: mountall_before.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33347037/mountall_before.log -- boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Attachment added: mountall_after.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33347093/mountall_after.log -- boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 441144] Re: boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem

2009-10-09 Thread Alexey Maximov
what about ubuntu 8.04 LTS ??? %( -- boot fails if fsck fails on non-fhs filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 436130] Re: no /proc/self/mountinfo in an OpenVZ VPS

2009-10-06 Thread Alexey Maximov
so, this mean that I unable to run VE with 9.10 on ubuntu LTS 8.04 with openvz kernel.. any ideas about this? we have 2.6.24 in LTS (even not 2.6.26 as in Debian Lenny) :( -- no /proc/self/mountinfo in an OpenVZ VPS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436130 You received this bug notification

[Bug 441144] [NEW] ubuntu boot process will die if you put incorrect line to the /etc/fstab (initscripts)

2009-10-03 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: 1. add one line to the /etc/fstab , for example: /dev/sdh1 /mntext3relatime,errors=remount-ro 0 2 2. set FSCKFIX=no /etc/default/rcS 3. reboot it 4. if /dev/sdh1 not exist in the system, the server will stop boot and ask me to enter root pass 5. enter

[Bug 441144] Re: ubuntu boot process will messy die if you put incorrect line to the /etc/fstab (initscripts)

2009-10-03 Thread Alexey Maximov
** Summary changed: - ubuntu boot process will die if you put incorrect line to the /etc/fstab (initscripts) + ubuntu boot process will messy die if you put incorrect line to the /etc/fstab (initscripts) -- ubuntu boot process will messy die if you put incorrect line to the /etc/fstab

[Bug 360629] Re: Removal of /etc/init.d/loopback breaks some environments (e.g. OpenVZ)

2009-09-26 Thread Alexey Maximov
Scott James Remnant you are totally wrong :( now its a hack /etc/init.d/networking case $1 in start) ADD THIS LINE [ -d /var/run/network ] || mkdir /var/run/network -- Removal of /etc/init.d/loopback breaks some environments (e.g. OpenVZ)

[Bug 360629] Re: Removal of /etc/init.d/loopback breaks some environments (e.g. OpenVZ)

2009-09-26 Thread Alexey Maximov
now inside VPS we haven't udev at all. its not required to be run inside, so if you will not fix this bug, *.* hosters will ignore new ubuntu release. -- Removal of /etc/init.d/loopback breaks some environments (e.g. OpenVZ) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360629 You received this bug

[Bug 376447] [NEW] ubuntu 8.04 latest + desktop effects enabled

2009-05-14 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: r...@pc-152:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04.2 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy r...@pc-152:~# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller (rev 10)

[Bug 141324] Re: systemsettings-kde: crash when double-clicking printer

2008-02-13 Thread Alexey Maximov
Confirmed on gutsy and hardy many workstations ... -- systemsettings-kde: crash when double-clicking printer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for kde-systemsettings in ubuntu. --

[Bug 145207] Re: showFoto crashes on exit

2008-02-13 Thread Alexey Maximov
still crashing after editing photos (resize) etc.. gutsy/hardy i386 have you a full debug version for testing ? -- showFoto crashes on exit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 191533] [NEW] udev do not uses ldap groups (plugdev) for ldap users

2008-02-13 Thread Alexey Maximov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev 1. Im uses ldap+samba+pam_mount and all my users take /home from server 2. after login im checking id user = it show me plugdev group membership 3. on workstation in /etc/group user is not a member of plugdev (group resolved and taken from ldap,