[Bug 1452644] Re: vivid NFSd does not start due to systemd ordering cycle

2015-05-17 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
I am getting the same problem here, but using the open-iscsi initiator (which - of course - depends on the network being initialized): Found ordering cycle on sysinit.target/start [3.657825] systemd[1]: Found dependency on open-iscsi.service/start [3.657827] systemd[1]: Found dependency

[Bug 1429098] Re: systemd[1]: ureadahead.service failed.

2015-05-17 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
So, is this a problem of the 4.0 kernel itself or the kernel configuration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429098 Title: systemd[1]: ureadahead.service failed. To manage

[Bug 1429098] Re: systemd[1]: ureadahead.service failed.

2015-05-17 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
In my case, I see the following: ureadahead[275]: ureadahead: Error while tracing: No such device systemd[1]: Stopped Read required files in advance. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 966734] Re: nfs4+idmap does not map uids correctly when using AUTH_SYS

2015-05-12 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
Just wanted to add my findings to this as I was also curious to get user/group mapping to work without the need of a Kerberos server. However, what I saw especially in comments and documentation from upstream is that this was never designed to work that way. Instead, the idmapper only works in

[Bug 1451775] Re: Unable to configure sm-notify

2015-05-05 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
Ah, OK. Thank you for pointing me into the right directions and sorry for not looking into the latest release. As I have some LTS clients I will apply the configuration file change there. Again, thank you for your time! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1451775] [NEW] Unable to configure sm-notify

2015-05-05 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
Public bug reported: I want to configure sm-notify to use a pre-configured port (at least) for communication, so that I can open up my iptables rules specifically. In the current situation, the upstart job for statd just calls exec sm- notify without providing any environment variables for

[Bug 1451775] Re: Unable to configure sm-notify

2015-05-05 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
I would advocate for the following change: 1.) Add a new option like SMNOTIFY_OPTS to /etc/default/nfs-common 2.) Modify /etc/init/statd.conf to do exec sm-notify $SMNOTIFY_OPTS instead Then, I could set SMNOTIFY_OPTS=-p 1234 to have a well-known port on the clients. -- You received this bug