[Bug 1856294] Re: programs in "Installed (local or obsolete)"

2022-05-15 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Option "3rd party" certainly is applicable here. However I do not understand the "deactivated from the sources" remark. Option "proposed" sound rather convoluted to me. Probably the "loaded then unloaded from the archive" is another occurence of the same underlying problem. I have learnt to live

[Bug 1962036] Re: dbus was stopped during today's jammy update, breaking desktop

2022-04-04 Thread DLCBurggraaff
With this fix my upgrade Xubuntu 20.04.4 => 22.04 completed. There was a non-fatal hiccup for Firefox converting to snap. Reviewing the new instance ... :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1856294] Re: programs in "Installed (local or obsolete)"

2021-07-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
At the moment my list is: balena-etcher-electron libc-bin libc-dev-bin libc6 libc6-dbg libc6-dev libc6:i386 locales python-hamcrest python-incremental python-requests python-twisted-bin python-twisted-core python-twisted-web python-urllib3 securebott-db virtualbox-6.1 Of these packages only the

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
It definitely is the initramfs. After successfully mounting the root filesystem (sda10) the following messages are displayed: -- /scripts/init-bottom/udev: line 25: nuke: not found -- done. -- init: line 303: run-init: not found -- Target filesystem does not have requested /sbin/init. -- init:

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Closed as "user error" => "invalid" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860683 Title: initramfs hang after today's updates To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Package changed: ubuntu => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860683 Title: initramfs hang after today's updates To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Should I set the package to "initramfs" or "ext?fs" -- I do not know. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860683 Title: initramfs hang after today's updates To manage notifications

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Description changed: Xubuntu 18.04.3 updated yesterday (Jan 22, 2020). - Today's updates cause initramfs to hang. + Today's (Jan 23, 2020) updates cause initramfs to hang. Luckily I can restore my Jan 19, 2020 backup. I assume the ext{2,3,4} updates to be the culprit. Anyone else

[Bug 1860683] [NEW] initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Xubuntu 18.04.3 updated yesterday (Jan 22, 2020). Today's updates cause initramfs to hang. Luckily I can restore my Jan 19, 2020 backup. I assume the ext{2,3,4} updates to be the culprit. Anyone else having this problem? :D ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1860683] Re: initramfs hang after today's updates

2020-01-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
After restoring my Jan 19, 2020 backup excluding e2fslibs, e2fsprogs and libext2fs2 when updating gave no problems. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860683 Title: initramfs hang

[Bug 1856294] [NEW] programs in "Installed (local or obsolete)"

2019-12-13 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: The only entry in the "Installed (local or obsolete)" tab was (as it should be) Oracle's VirtualBox. However, some time ago network-manager and its friends were added to that tab. And today pulseaudio and its friends are added too. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 673489] Re: xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2018-09-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Confirmed. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 Title: xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - waiting for resume device - message : random: crng init

2018-08-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
What about applying the first answer in the link in post #11 ? :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - waiting for resume device -

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - waiting for resume device - message : random: crng init

2018-07-06 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Summary changed: - Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init + Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - waiting for resume device - message : random: crng init -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1767822] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : TigerVNC gives a black screen in the viewer

2018-05-11 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Actually using the tightvncserver or vnc4server packages also give a black/grey screen in the viewer ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767822 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : TigerVNC gives

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-05-04 Thread DLCBurggraaff
SOLVED !!! As per https://askubuntu.com/questions/1029598/xubuntu-18-04 -kernel-takes-long-to-boot/1029993 : During boot messages it would say that it timed out waiting for resume device *). Check in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume if there is UUID in it like RESUME=some-uuid remove uuid and

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-05-04 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Or is it simply waiting on /dev/random ? :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-05-03 Thread DLCBurggraaff
For a correct understanding: this re-initializing of the root and swap partitions is the verification step of my backup procedure -- and my restore procedure of course. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-05-01 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I have a strong suspicion that the delay at boot is caused by the swap and/or root partition(s) being re-initialized and therefore getting a new UUID ... :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1685794] Re: Boot delayed for about 90 seconds until 'random: crng init done'

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Cheered too soon: after a few reboots the problem is back. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685794 Title: Boot delayed for about 90 seconds until 'random: crng init done' To

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
... too soon ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Cheered too son: after a few reboots the problem is back. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To manage

[Bug 1767822] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : TigerVNC gives a black screen in the viewer

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "This is the ~/.xsession-errors file -- see the 2nd part of it." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tigervnc/+bug/1767822/+attachment/5130209/+files/xsession-errors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1767822] [NEW] Xubuntu 18.04 : TigerVNC gives a black screen in the viewer

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Xubuntu 18.04 : TigerVNC gives a black screen in the viewer. In Xubuntu 16.04 I used the TigerVNC 1.8.0 debs as provided by upstream (https://bintray.com/tigervnc/stable/tigervnc/1.8.0#files/ubuntu-16.04LTS%2Famd64). For Xubuntu 18.04 however upstream points to the Ubuntu

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
As I reported in #1685794 installing cryptsetup{,-bin} resolved my problem. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To

[Bug 1685794] Re: Boot delayed for about 90 seconds until 'random: crng init done'

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I had the same problem (or a problem like the one at hand). In posts #12 through #15 the user commenting out a line in hist /etc/cryptsetup file resolved the problem. As I did not have that file I installed the cryptsetup{,-bin} packages and rebooted: problem resolved! :D -- You received this

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Hmm, I found #1685794 ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I already saw this symptom with the betas, but did not report it then because it was mentioned in the pertinent releasenotes -- for as far as I remember, that is. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1767782] Re: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I already saw this symptom with the betas. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767782 Title: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1767782] [NEW] Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot - random: crng init

2018-04-29 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Xubuntu 18.04 : delay during boot Apr 29 11:59:01 riposo kernel: [3.151964] sd 5:0:0:3: [sdg] Attached SCSI removable disk Apr 29 11:59:01 riposo kernel: [3.155746] sd 5:0:0:1: [sde] Attached SCSI removable disk Apr 29 11:59:01 riposo kernel: [ 32.221209] random:

[Bug 1765395] [NEW] Please update TigerVNC to version 1.8.0

2018-04-19 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 18.04 beta2: Plese update TigerVNC to version 1.8.0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: tigervnc-common 1.7.0+dfsg-8ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-generic 4.15.15 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu5

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
It looks like /run/systemd/generator/-.mount is the culprit. However, whatever I try issuing "sudo systemctl mask -.mount" fails with a "systemctl: invalid option -- '.'" error message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "/run/systemd md5" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4878270/+files/run.systemd.1691158.tar.xz.md5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "sosreport md5" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4878268/+files/sosreport-DBurggraaff.1691158-20170517154949.tar.xz.md5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "/run/systemd" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4878269/+files/run.systemd.1691158.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "sosreport" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4878267/+files/sosreport-DBurggraaff.1691158-20170517154949.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I should also mention that the symptom started recently. I am not sure exactly when but it did not occur before the last 3 or so kernel updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691158

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Now imagine what happens when sda5 is mounted "behind my back" on /boot and a new kernel is installed by the Software Updater: the new kernel ends up on sda5 and the /vmlinuz and /initrd.img "system" symlinks point the new files. On a reboot Grub does not mount sda5: the "system" symlinks point

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-17 Thread DLCBurggraaff
"/boot != EFI partition. You should not be placing kernels in teh UEFI partition." My root filesystem (sda10 in this case) contains the kernels, the sda5 EFI partition does not. My sda10 partition does not contain a /boot/efi directory, so I created one and rebooted: sda5 is still mounted on

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
*Correction*: As e.g. reboots after a kernel upgrade fail I explicitely umount /dev/sda5 in rc.local -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691158 Title: systemd mounts efi partition, but

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
As e.g. kernel upgrades fail I explicitely umount /dev/sda5 in rc.local -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691158 Title: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto" To

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
root@riposo:~/works# fdisk /dev/sda Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.27.1). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sda: 223.6 GiB, 240057409536 bytes, 468862128 sectors Units: sectors of 1 *

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "/etc/fstab" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4877601/+files/fstab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691158 Title:

[Bug 1691158] Re: systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: "/var/log/messages" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1691158/+attachment/4877602/+files/messages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691158

[Bug 1691158] [NEW] systemd mounts efi partition, but /etc/fstab says "noauto"

2017-05-16 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Systemd mounts /dev/sda5 on /boot despite the fact that /etc/fstab says: /dev/sda5 /boot ext2 noauto,relatime 0 0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: systemd 229-4ubuntu17 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1659331] Re: user background disappears

2017-01-26 Thread DLCBurggraaff
By reviewing the /etc/lightdm/* files once again I noticed that I had a lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf.dpkg-new file and that lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf was a symlink pointing to somewhere else *). After renaming the dpkg-new file to lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf the solid blue background was gone. Instead

[Bug 1659331] [NEW] user background disappears

2017-01-25 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: For some users lightdm displays the user's background for a second or two and then shows a solid blue background. Login etc. is OK. I have seen this behavior for over a year now (so things already started with 14.04) on several boxes. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 1610187] Re: 14.04.5 startx and xinit do not start from command line

2016-08-06 Thread DLCBurggraaff
One additional observation: -- ; login as root ; startx -- :1 succeeds whereas -- ; login as burdi01 ; startx -- :1 fails :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1610187] [NEW] 14.04.5 startx and xinit do not start from command line

2016-08-05 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: After upgrading Xubuntu 14.04.4 to 14.04.5 startx and xinit no longer start from command line. E.g.: -- -- login -- startx -- :1 gives [43.309] (EE) Fatal server error: [43.309] (EE) parse_vt_settings: Cannot open /dev/tty0 (No such file or

[Bug 1553483] Re: Can't install 'xubuntu-core'

2016-07-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
This report was for using 16.04 *Beta1* for upgrading Xubuntu from 14.04.4, which beta, as I found out after reporting, was not suitable for upgrading. A few days ago I upgraded Xubuntu from 14.04.4 to 16.04.1 successfully. This issue can be closed. Thkx. :D -- You received this bug

[Bug 1584488] Re: lightdm: error found when loading /root/.profile

2016-07-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Resolved with 16.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1584488 Title: lightdm: error found when loading /root/.profile To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1584488] [NEW] lightdm: error found when loading /root/.profile

2016-05-22 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Lightdm on Ubuntu 16.04, also with Ubuntu-Mate 16.04 and Xubuntu 16.04 but *not* with Lubuntu 16.04 When logging in via Other > root a popup is shown reading: -- Error found when loading /root/.profile -- mesg: ttyname failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device -- As result the

[Bug 1553483] Re: Can't install 'xubuntu-core'

2016-03-07 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I just happened to read http://xubuntu.org/news/xubuntu-16-04-lts- beta-1/ where is said: Please note! No upgrade testing was undertaken during this milestone. There are issues currently when upgrading to Xenial Xerus. This release is not suitable for upgrading. :( -- You received this bug

[Bug 1553483] Re: Can't install 'xubuntu-core'

2016-03-06 Thread DLCBurggraaff
To verify that the "libsexy" problem was still there I restored my pre- upgrade situation and ran "sudo update-manager -d" again: the libsexy problem was still there. I then restored my pre-upgrade situation once more, in "Software & Updates" changed the Download server from

[Bug 1553483] Re: Can't install 'xubuntu-core'

2016-03-06 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I forgot to mention that to come this far I created the /etc/update- manager/release-upgrades.d/unauth.cfg as mentioned in #1550022 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553483 Title:

[Bug 1553483] [NEW] Can't install 'xubuntu-core'

2016-03-05 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Upgrading from Xubuntu 14.04.4 to 16.04 Beta1 using "sudo update-manager -d". In step 2 "Setting new software channels" I get a popup reading: -- Can't install 'xubuntu-core' -- It was impossible to install a required package. Please report this bug ... After closing this

[Bug 1296106] Re: startx -- :1 black screen

2014-03-25 Thread DLCBurggraaff
And finally I remembered what I did for 12.04 two years ago: amend /etc/X11/xinitrc to read: #!/bin/sh # /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc # set variables, invoke global X session script STARTUP=/usr/bin/startxfce4 DESKTOP_SESSION=xubuntu . /etc/X11/Xsession -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1296106] [NEW] startx -- :1 black screen

2014-03-22 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: I have two Xubuntu 14.04 Beta1 installations: A: upgraded from Xubuntu 12.04.4 B: installed from the Xubuntu 14.04 Beta1 desktop CD. Both Installations are up-to-date. To do a user switch I hit e.g. Ctrl+Alt+F2, login as e.g. burdi01 and issue startx -- :1. Initially both

[Bug 772342] [NEW] gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 0000000000418f7c

2011-04-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Xubuntu 11.04 + nautilus 2.32.2.1 gvfs-backends 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gvfs-backends 1.8.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64

[Bug 772342] Re: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 0000000000418f7c

2011-04-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772342 Title: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 00418f7c -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 772342] Re: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 0000000000418f7c

2011-04-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
This only happens when xfering on A a file *to* B, not when xfering on B the same file from A. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772342 Title: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip

[Bug 772342] Re: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 0000000000418f7c

2011-04-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Connected via Nautilus to an other box also running Xubuntu 11.04 as ftp://root@hostname. Drag a file from the Nautilus local window to the Nautilus ftp window. At the end of the xfer the ftp window changes to a this computer window. The xfer hangs. In the /var/log/messages I see (each entry

[Bug 772342] Re: gvfsd-ftp[1571]: segfault at a8 ip 0000000000418f7c

2011-04-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
@Kai Jauch I am not sure whether or not this is a duplicate of #744821, that is why I submitted the bug at hand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772342 Title: gvfsd-ftp[1571]:

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2011-04-21 Thread DLCBurggraaff
After upgrading to 11.04 I still see this symptom ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680834 Title: Update Manager does not clear cache -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2011-04-21 Thread DLCBurggraaff
After upgrading to 11.04 I still see this symptom. And the workaround still works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 Title: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2011-01-25 Thread DLCBurggraaff
-ColorCursor=# +ColorCursor= Gives a black cursor with the character under it in white - in other words brings back the original behavior. The commit linked to speaks of highlight and reverse - which I cannot correlate these to fields in the preferences dialog. -- You received this

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2011-01-05 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Yesterday there were updates! I applied them via the update manager on my Xubuntu 10.10 upgraded from 10.04, my clean installed Xubuntu 10.10 and my clean installed Ubuntu 10.10. In all three cases the updates were still in /var/cache/apt/archives afterwards ... -- You received this bug

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-12-28 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I revived my Xubuntu 10.04 x86_64 (updated 86 packages) and saw that /var/cache/apt cache was empty afterwards. The update-manager version was 1:0.134.11. I then upgraded to Xubuntu 10.10 x86_64, cleared the cache and expected to have a number of updates. As it turns out the upgrade is to the

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-12-26 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Dear Charlie, Is it reproducible? I do not know, all my three machines exhibit the symptom, but two of those are clones of the first one. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? As an update from 10.04 to 10.10 did not work for me this time round I did a clean install.

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-11-30 Thread DLCBurggraaff
burd...@riposo:~$ ls -l /E/Linback/ total 6718985 . -rw-rw-r-- 1 root plugdev 1104668912 2010-11-26 18:14 linux50.tgz -rw-rw-r-- 1 root plugdev 1151115299 2010-11-30 11:20 linux51.tgz . burd...@riposo:~$ Forgot the apt-get clean for linux51 again. Grrr ... -- Update Manager does not

[Bug 680834] [NEW] Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-11-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Xubuntu 10.10 + Nautilus + Gedit As the Update Manager no longer clears /var/cache/apt as it did with previous [X]Ubuntu releases I have to run apt-get clean before making a backup. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package:

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-11-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
-- Update Manager does not clear cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 680834] Re: Update Manager does not clear cache

2010-11-24 Thread DLCBurggraaff
For as far as I can see there are no hints in the /var/log files. ** Attachment added: var.log.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/680834/+attachment/1743277/+files/var.log.tar.gz -- Update Manager does not clear cache https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680834

[Bug 673489] [NEW] maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfce4-terminal Xubuntu 10.10 xfce4-terminal cursor is opaque or rather not inverting the character under it. With black text and a black cursor on a white background the character under the cursor is not visible. Changing the cursor to light-grey makes

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
-- maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Screenshot.new.black.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/+bug/673489/+attachment/1728974/+files/Screenshot.new.black.png -- maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 You received this bug

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Screenshot.new.grey.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/+bug/673489/+attachment/1728975/+files/Screenshot.new.grey.png -- maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 You received this bug

[Bug 673489] Re: maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Screenshot.old.black.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/+bug/673489/+attachment/1728976/+files/Screenshot.old.black.png -- maverick xfce4-terminal cursor opaque / not inverting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673489 You received this bug

[Bug 673503] [NEW] maverick gnome-screenshot does not grab active window

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils Xubuntu 10.10 gnome-screenshot --interactive does not grab the active window - the take screenshot window disappears and nothing happens. Grabbing the whole desktop or an area works. Actually I found that the current Lucid gnome-screenshot

[Bug 673503] Re: maverick gnome-screenshot does not grab active window

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
-- maverick gnome-screenshot does not grab active window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 673503] Re: maverick gnome-screenshot does not grab active window

2010-11-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I just found that the problem is related to the grab delay being 0 seconds, with 1 seconds the active window is grabbed alright. -- maverick gnome-screenshot does not grab active window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-11-03 Thread DLCBurggraaff
In a freshly installed Xubuntu 10.10 (from the desktop CD) and all updates applied, but no personal settings yet: burd...@riposo:~$ env | grep TERM TERM=xterm COLORTERM=Terminal burd...@riposo:~$ -- Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621927

[Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-11-03 Thread DLCBurggraaff
The above is in Terminal 0.4.5, on a console it is: burd...@riposo:~$ env | grep TERM TERM=linux burd...@riposo:~$ In both instances I can run top and friends. -- Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621927 You received this bug notification

[Bug 604797] Re: [maverick] windows move off the bottom of the display and then the panel flickers

2010-10-23 Thread DLCBurggraaff
I have seen this symptom since Lubuntu's early days. I also see it with mandriva(-based) guests. -- [maverick] windows move off the bottom of the display and then the panel flickers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 621927] Re: Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable

2010-10-03 Thread DLCBurggraaff
xfce4-terminal is affected as well. I think it is better to state [ $TERM = dumb ] export TERM=xterm in /etc/bash.bashrc - applies to all users and does not affect the consoles. -- Embedded Terminal Emulator isn't giving a TERM variable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621927 You received

[Bug 641354] Re: virt-manager.py crashed with SIGSEGV in dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set_value()

2010-10-02 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Virt-manager close while start virtual machine or when close looks like the symptom I experience. After starting virt-manager and connecting the VM is indicated as running. Double clicking on its entry brings up the VM window. This is the pertinent part of my /var/log/messages file: Oct 2

[Bug 595650] Re: After the last updates USB printers connected via HPLIP (or libusb in general) stopped working

2010-08-31 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Beste Gerard, For as far as I am aware the problem this thread is about only occurred for 10.04 and 10.10, not 9.10. So whatever problem you had may or may not be the problem at hand. Having said that, the resolution to the problem at hand was a fix to 10.04, not 10.04 by itself. It is

[Bug 604312] [NEW] Local printer and scanner not connected with cups 1.4.3

2010-07-11 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups Xubuntu Lucid + Nautilus + Gedit See the attached screenshot. Before the latest cups update (1.4.3) I had the Local Printers 4th entry (HP LaserJet 3020 USB 00CNBF091211 HPLIP (HP LaserJet 3020)) selected. Printing and scanning (xsane) was ok.

[Bug 604312] Re: Local printer and scanner not connected with cups 1.4.3

2010-07-11 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Add Printer - CUPS 1.4.3 - Mozilla Firefox.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51731879/Screenshot-Add%20Printer%20-%20CUPS%201.4.3%20-%20Mozilla%20Firefox.png ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51730849/BootDmesg.txt **

[Bug 604312] Re: Local printer and scanner not connected with cups 1.4.3

2010-07-11 Thread DLCBurggraaff
When I boot Karmic on this machine printing and scanning is ok. -- Local printer and scanner not connected with cups 1.4.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 600760] Re: Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering

2010-07-10 Thread DLCBurggraaff
For reasons unknown my anti-alias setting was reset. The effect was more noticable in firefox than e.g. nautilus. Invalidating this bug ... ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600760 You

[Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi)

2010-07-07 Thread DLCBurggraaff
@hariprasad It looks like most (all but you?) people after switching off the Assistive Technologies no longer experience the slowdown. In other words, your problem may be something completely different. I would recommend opening a new bug. Kind regards, Dick -- Nautilus is very slow in list

[Bug 600760] [NEW] Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering

2010-07-01 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox Xubuntu 10.04 + Nautilus + Gedit Firefox since its 3.6.6 version renders the fonts less than sharply. I know less than optimal font rendering has been reported before, but this time things are clearly related to the 3.6.6 version - with 3.6.4

[Bug 600760] Re: Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering

2010-07-01 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51246019/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51246020/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt

[Bug 600760] Re: Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering

2010-07-01 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Correction: With Firefox 3.6.*3* things were ok. For as far as I am aware the Ubuntu Firefox version jumped from 3.6.3 to 3.6.6. -- Firefox 3.6.6 less than sharp font rendering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 587556] Re: nautilus slow start after boot

2010-06-18 Thread DLCBurggraaff
The symptom disappeared as automagically as it appeared !?! ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- nautilus slow start after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 587556] [NEW] nautilus slow start after boot

2010-05-30 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Xubuntu Lucid + Nautilus + Gedit I reboot from a session with 1 Nautilus and 1 Terminal window and log in as the same user. Until recently it took 10 seconds before the Terminal window came up, immediately followed by a split-second

[Bug 587556] Re: nautilus slow start after boot

2010-05-30 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49391572/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49391573/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- nautilus slow start after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587556 You received this

[Bug 587556] Re: nautilus slow start after boot

2010-05-30 Thread DLCBurggraaff
Subsequent Nautilus starts (from this or another user) are immediate. Actually I am not sure Nautilus is the culprit here: When rebooting from a session with only a Terminal window (or no window at all) the wallpaper kludge also happens after 35 (10 +25) seconds. I had a look at Applications

[Bug 587556] Re: nautilus slow start after boot

2010-05-30 Thread DLCBurggraaff
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Session and Startup.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49392580/Screenshot-Session%20and%20Startup.png -- nautilus slow start after boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

  1   2   >