[Bug 1570981] Re: No login option present after installing unity8-desktop-session-mir on Ubuntu Gnome

2016-04-15 Thread Darren Worrall
gdm, so no /var/log/lightdm.log - if its not supported in gdm at all then it's a feature request I guess! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570981 Title: No login option present after

[Bug 1570981] [NEW] No login option present after installing unity8-desktop-session-mir on Ubuntu Gnome

2016-04-15 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Fresh 16.04 desktop installation from the current nightly builds of Ubuntu Gnome remix, I install unity8-desktop-session-mir, logout (rebooted as well) but I only have 'System Default', 'Gnome' and 'Gnome Classic' offered to me ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04

[Bug 1106821] Re: RPAFproxy_ips are not properly filtered out

2013-03-28 Thread Darren Worrall
Can we get this SRU'd into 12.04 Sergey? This is a regression from 10.04 and its hurting us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106821 Title: RPAFproxy_ips are not properly filtered out

[Bug 1106821] Re: RPAFproxy_ips are not properly filtered out

2013-03-15 Thread Darren Worrall
What's the next step on this Sergey? Can we get an updated package into -proposed for testing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106821 Title: RPAFproxy_ips are not properly filtered

[Bug 1106821] Re: RPAFproxy_ips are not properly filtered out

2013-02-27 Thread Darren Worrall
The patch in #1 applies cleanly and works fine here, we're testing it with real traffic behind a couple of layers of proxy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106821 Title:

[Bug 930540] Re: Mismatching module name in .conf for libapache2-mod-rpaf 0.6-2

2012-07-20 Thread Darren Worrall
Using IfModule rpaf_module (as per debian) is also fine for Lucid fwiw. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930540 Title: Mismatching module name in .conf for libapache2-mod-rpaf 0.6-2

[Bug 790538] Re: cron gives Module is unknown in syslog, stops working

2011-05-31 Thread Darren Worrall
Just to confirm that restarting cron was enough for us as well, affects at least 10.04 and 10.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790538 Title: cron gives Module is unknown in syslog,

[Bug 659075] [NEW] Please backport 'clear' into lucid - puppet claims support for it

2010-10-12 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libaugeas-ruby Puppet in lucid claims to support the augeas clear command, and indeed the puppet provider is aware of it, but the ruby bindings in Lucid (0.2) do not support it - the feature was added in 0.3 (which is in maverick) Given that Lucid is an

[Bug 659075] Re: Please backport 'clear' into lucid - puppet claims support for it

2010-10-12 Thread Darren Worrall
** Description changed: Binary package hint: libaugeas-ruby Puppet in lucid claims to support the augeas clear command, and indeed the puppet provider is aware of it, but the ruby bindings in Lucid (0.2) do not support it - the feature was added in 0.3 (which is in maverick) Given

[Bug 654166] [NEW] Unable to connect to 5ghz 802.11n network after maverick upgrade

2010-10-03 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-firmware My Intel 6200N, using the iwlagn module, can no longer connect to an 802.11n 5Ghz AP. Logs below: Oct 2 19:19:45 arrandale NetworkManager[1078]: info Activation (wlan0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Oct 2 19:19:45 arrandale

[Bug 430768] Re: telepathy-butterfly crashed with AssertionError in send()

2010-10-01 Thread Darren Worrall
Getting this on maverick consistently by changing my default gateway. apt-cache policy telepathy-butterfly telepathy-butterfly: Installed: 0.5.14-1 Candidate: 0.5.14-1 Version table: *** 0.5.14-1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages 100

[Bug 625394] [NEW] Should puppet-master require, suggest or recommend activerecord?

2010-08-27 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet Just experimenting with upgrading to 2.6(.1~rc2-0ubuntu1) on maverick. I installed puppetmaster-passenger (which works great btw), copied over my configs and manifests, and it complained that storeconfigs = true could not be used without

[Bug 625394] [NEW] Should puppet-master require, suggest or recommend activerecord?

2010-08-27 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet Just experimenting with upgrading to 2.6(.1~rc2-0ubuntu1) on maverick. I installed puppetmaster-passenger (which works great btw), copied over my configs and manifests, and it complained that storeconfigs = true could not be used without

[Bug 536942] Re: --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-08-09 Thread Darren Worrall
** Tags added: verification-done -- --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vm-builder in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 536942] Re: --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-08-09 Thread Darren Worrall
** Tags added: verification-done -- --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 536942] Re: --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-08-02 Thread Darren Worrall
Fwiw, the package in lucid-proposed (0.12.4-0ubuntu0.1) fixes this issue for me. Would love to see it promoted to -updates -- --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 536942] Re: --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-08-02 Thread Darren Worrall
Fwiw, the package in lucid-proposed (0.12.4-0ubuntu0.1) fixes this issue for me. Would love to see it promoted to -updates -- --firstboot option broken in 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 556333] [NEW] Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in

2010-04-06 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm When more than 1 user is logged in, selecting 'Restart' from the power menu on gdm does not do anything and returns no error. When restarting from within a session when more than 1 user is logged, a dialog is thrown asking for elevated privileges to

[Bug 556333] Re: Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in

2010-04-06 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43230665/Dependencies.txt -- Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556333 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 556333] Re: Shutdown/Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in

2010-04-06 Thread Darren Worrall
Just to confirm this is the same with shutdown as well. Tested in my D820 laptop and in a Virtualbox VM. ** Summary changed: - Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in + Shutdown/Restart from gdm fails silently with 2+ users logged in -- Shutdown/Restart from gdm fails silently

[Bug 550491] [NEW] Docky auto launches even when 'start when computer starts' is not selected

2010-03-28 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: docky Docky is not currently obeying the 'start when computer starts' check box. I have the checkbox enabled, and it starts fine - but when other users log in, docky starts, but when you go into docky's settings for that user, 'start when computer

[Bug 550491] Re: Docky auto launches even when 'start when computer starts' is not selected

2010-03-28 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42312525/Dependencies.txt -- Docky auto launches even when 'start when computer starts' is not selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550491 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 537307] Re: polkitd crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_message_iter_append_basic()

2010-03-18 Thread Darren Worrall
** Visibility changed to: Public ** Tags added: need-amd64-retrace ** Visibility changed to: Private ** Visibility changed to: Public -- polkitd crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_message_iter_append_basic() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537307 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 317056] Re: Allow F5 keyboard shortcut for Refresh

2010-03-17 Thread Darren Worrall
Seeing as Ryan accepted this already, I've uploaded a branch which changes the default refresh key to F5, but retains the existing shortcut as well for those that are used to it. You can remove that if you think it unnecessary :) ** Branch linked: lp:~dazworrall/gwibber/f5refresh -- Allow F5

[Bug 539126] [NEW] [Ambiance] Link text in Firefox awesomebar hard to read

2010-03-15 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-artwork Using lucid on my laptop, with the new ambiance theme, the blue link text in Firefox's awesome bar - set against a dark background - is hard to read at anything other than a perfect viewing angle. The affect isn't as pronounced on my

[Bug 538170] [NEW] pptp connection broken after karmic-lucid upgrade

2010-03-12 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager-pptp After upgrading from karmic to lucid, configuring or connecting to PPTP VPN servers using the network manager applet fails with: There was a problem launching the authentication dialog for VPN connection type

[Bug 534343] Re: Lucid: Editing VPN(C) connections fails

2010-03-12 Thread Darren Worrall
I see the same thing, you also get it when trying to connect (I had existing connection entries before upgrading). It appears as if the ui components have been separated, if you install network-manager-vpnc- gnome it should fix your problem (it did mine). It should really be handled during the

Re: [Bug 538170] [NEW] pptp connection broken after karmic-lucid upgrade

2010-03-12 Thread Darren Worrall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/03/10 17:16, Darren Worrall wrote: Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager-pptp After upgrading from karmic to lucid, configuring or connecting to PPTP VPN servers using the network manager applet fails

[Bug 136303] Re: Thunderbird doesn't open http link in firefox

2010-03-11 Thread Darren Worrall
Seeing the same here, tested with http, https, and ftp links x64 build thunderbird: Installed: 3.0.1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0.1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0.1+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages 100

[Bug 523058] Re: Gwibber-service (2.29.1~bzr604-0ubuntu2~daily1~karmic) : IndentationError

2010-02-17 Thread Darren Worrall
Ken has fixed this in trunk, patch attached if anyone wants it (it just indents the docstring). ** Patch added: gwibber-indentationerror-r605.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39301903/gwibber-indentationerror-r605.patch ** Changed in: gwibber Status: New = Fix Committed ** Branch

[Bug 479226] Re: Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

2009-11-09 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35424342/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35424343/XsessionErrors.txt -- Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

[Bug 479226] [NEW] Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

2009-11-09 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open5 When logged in as a domain user - who has root permission via sudoers - policykit dialogs prompt for the password of a different local user, rather than who I'm currently logged in as. local user fooadmin domain user foo Not sure which

[Bug 479226] Re: Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

2009-11-09 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35424342/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35424343/XsessionErrors.txt -- Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

[Bug 479226] [NEW] Cannot authenticate using PolicyKit dialogs with domain credentials, prompts for local user

2009-11-09 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open5 When logged in as a domain user - who has root permission via sudoers - policykit dialogs prompt for the password of a different local user, rather than who I'm currently logged in as. local user fooadmin domain user foo Not sure which

[Bug 417757] Re: [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

2009-10-20 Thread Darren Worrall
My results are a little different. At the moment I'm using a draytek router, and am indeed suffering slow resolution in all my apps. Running the snippet above: for i in `cat /etc/resolv.conf | grep ^nameserver | cut -f2 -d' '`; do dig @$i www.microsoft.com ; done Is very quick though. I

[Bug 452272] Re: Build failures for 3.5.1-0ubuntu3

2009-10-16 Thread Darren Worrall
Builds for me as well. The powerpc build failed in the end, so somehow we've got broke amd64 powerpc and lpia -- Build failures for 3.5.1-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 450082] Re: UbuntuOne does not automatically connect on startup

2009-10-15 Thread Darren Worrall
I started a fresh this morning after a bit of a turbulent time with the client (ie, rm -r ~/.config/ubuntuone rm -r ~/.local/share/ubuntuone rm -r ~/cache/ubuntuone) I (re)authorised my machine, connected and synced without issue, but the client doesn't autoconnect on startup. All I have in

[Bug 438414] Re: This installation has not been configured properly for Software Updates.

2009-10-15 Thread Darren Worrall
I dont know if this is the right place to report this, but the amd64 build failed: dh_install: eclipse-platform missing files (usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.help.source_*), aborting make: *** [binary-install/eclipse-platform] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot

[Bug 452272] [NEW] Build failures for 3.5.1-0ubuntu3

2009-10-15 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse 3.5.1-0ubuntu2 built successfully on amd64, i386, lpia and powerpc: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/3.5.1-0ubuntu2/ So far, for 3.5.1-0ubuntu3, only i386 has built successfully:

[Bug 438414] Re: This installation has not been configured properly for Software Updates.

2009-10-15 Thread Darren Worrall
Noted for future, thanks :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/452272 -- This installation has not been configured properly for Software Updates. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 427234] Re: Update to pylint 0.18.1

2009-10-05 Thread Darren Worrall
Will this make it into Karmic, even as a SRU? I'd be willing to have a go at packaging, if I knew where to start :) -- Update to pylint 0.18.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

Re: [Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-09-29 Thread Darren Worrall
The GPU is largely irrelevant (other than being an nVidia card), the bug stems from an erratum, at least affecting the Intel T2500. The nVidia driver was relying on certain behaviours in the kernel pertaining to the CPU which changed in 2.6.30. 2009/9/29 Alex Murray murray.a...@gmail.com Just

[Bug 141494] Re: Flash not responding to mouse clicks with Xgl/Compiz

2009-09-19 Thread Darren Worrall
It's flash in the ubuntu repo's using nspluginwrapper, at least for me anyway. I've never installed the 64bit alpha direct from Adobe. -- Flash not responding to mouse clicks with Xgl/Compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 429920] Re: Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled

2009-09-16 Thread Darren Worrall
Fix works for me, thanks. -- Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 429920] [NEW] Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled

2009-09-15 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz After updating this morning and rebooting, my menu bar has turned transparent. It still functions (see attached images), and if I disable compiz, it returns to view. $ sudo lshw -c DISPLAY *-display description: VGA

[Bug 429920] Re: Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled

2009-09-15 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: trans.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31830136/trans.png -- Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 429920] Re: Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled

2009-09-15 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment added: transmenu.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31830144/transmenu.png ** Tags added: regression-potential -- Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 429920] Re: Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled

2009-09-15 Thread Darren Worrall
If you disable/enable compiz that also clears it up -- Menubar goes transparent with compiz enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 141494] Re: Flash not responding to mouse clicks with Xgl/Compiz

2009-09-11 Thread Darren Worrall
** Tags added: regression-potential -- Flash not responding to mouse clicks with Xgl/Compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 420308] Re: [regression] Cannot enable Compiz from gnome-appearance-properties

2009-09-04 Thread Darren Worrall
Fwiw, if I login with a freshly created user account, compiz starts fine. -- [regression] Cannot enable Compiz from gnome-appearance-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 420308] Re: [regression] Cannot enable Compiz from gnome-appearance-properties

2009-09-04 Thread Darren Worrall
The fix has worked for me, thanks :) -- [regression] Cannot enable Compiz from gnome-appearance-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-08-14 Thread Darren Worrall
I emailed Doug over at Gentoo to confirm where/how it was fixed - nVidia have fixed the issue in the latest 185 driver. We have a PPA with that latest driver (https://launchpad.net/~nvidia-vdpau/+archive/ppa - 185.18.31) but unfortunately that driver is broken as per

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-08-13 Thread Darren Worrall
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-08-13 Thread Darren Worrall
The bug in Gentoo has been marked as FIXED: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274672#c9 Please upgrade to the in tree 185.x.y series for a resolution. Has a fix been made available upstream? I didn't spot a patch in gentoo- commits, but I couldn't find a way to search the list either.

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-26 Thread Darren Worrall
They're tracking this bug in Gentoo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274672 Doug Goldstein commented: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274672#c8 The patch is a copy and paste of the patch posted by Christian from NVIDIA. He however clearly states in his post that its a hack and not

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-26 Thread Darren Worrall
I'm not clever enough to know if the change in the kernel constitutes a bug. Just commenting that, according to Doug's discussions, they're planning to fix it in the driver regardless. Afaik, this hasn't been filed in kernel's bugzilla - if you think it needs to, then by all means. -- Compiz

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-24 Thread Darren Worrall
After a chat in #ubuntu+1 and finding someone else on the forum with the same problem - and the same card (GeForce Go 7400), changing this to nvidia-graphics-drivers http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1187783 ** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) = nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) **

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-24 Thread Darren Worrall
@PRGUY85 I get a slightly different effect than that. What software did you use to capture the video, I'll try the same :) -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-24 Thread Darren Worrall
A kernel regression is less likely I think, you'd see problems all over the shop I'd bet. Same problem on 2.6.31 as well as 2.6.30. Anyway, the guys in #ubuntu+1 suggested the driver as culprit, and they're way smarter than I am :D Do you have the same graphics card as us? (try 'sudo lshw -class

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-23 Thread Darren Worrall
Not sure if it's right but I'm assigning to compiz - if it's not right I figure you guys can help me work out where it needs to be. ** Package changed: ubuntu = compiz (Ubuntu) -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461 You received this bug

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-23 Thread Darren Worrall
Ok, steps to reproduce. System started with binary nvidia module loaded, visual effects off Log in to desktop execute compiz.real --replace Attaching Xorg.log... ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29418720/Xorg.0.log -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-23 Thread Darren Worrall
.. and a tail -f of .xsession-errors started just after login, and stopped after I kill the compiz process to get the use of my desktop back (the whole file is massive) ** Attachment added: xerrors.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29418806/xerrors.log -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-23 Thread Darren Worrall
And finally the output of executing 'compiz': Checking for Xgl: not present. xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log Detected PCI ID for VGA: Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present. Checking for non power of two support: present. Checking

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-22 Thread Darren Worrall
Seeing the same here, fresh Karmic build from the daily cd's. Reproduce: Install the binary driver using the 'Hardware Drivers' app Reboot as prompted after you log in (GDM appears to perform fine), screen draws are incomplete, or very very slow. Screenshot attached is just after login, the

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-22 Thread Darren Worrall
Should add that setting Visual Effects to 'None' makes the desktop usable, though obviously with no compiz. -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-22 Thread Darren Worrall
Seeing the same here, fresh Karmic build from the daily cd's. Reproduce: Install the binary driver using the 'Hardware Drivers' app Reboot as prompted after you log in (GDM appears to perform fine), screen draws are incomplete, or very very slow. Screenshot attached is just after login, the

[Bug 391461] Re: Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel

2009-07-22 Thread Darren Worrall
** Attachment removed: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29396506/Screenshot.png -- Compiz Slow on Karmic w/ NVIDIA and 2.6.30 Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 360553] Re: 'Open With' Nautilus list is unsorted

2009-06-11 Thread Darren Worrall
I was going to suggest the same as Ricardo - A handful(max 5?) of likely candidates, a separator, and the remaining applications - each list sorted independently. -- 'Open With' Nautilus list is unsorted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360553 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 377904] [NEW] App name in application.ini incorrect

2009-05-18 Thread Darren Worrall
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.5 After reporting a bug at Mozilla https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493442, Mikhail Stepura discovered what we believe to be a packaging error. In /usr/lib/firefox-3.5b5pre/application.ini, under [App], 'Name' currently is