Public bug reported:
Old wine to the new bottles. I am experiencing the same issue as in
#1228352:
If I choose a launcher icon with application running on different
workspace the workspace won't switch. (Menu for an app will appear on
upper bar.)
1) Release
Ubuntu 16.04
2) Compiz version
Happens to me too from time to time.
12.04LTS Encrypted home folder.
Sometimes left running for extended periods.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791208
Title:
Evolution is still
It is possible there was already a copy in the destination folder -
impossible to know now. Trying again with Firefox open crashed
Evolution (closed it) without triggering an Ubuntu error message. The
source entry will be deleted having confirmed there is a destination
copy.
Email me if I can
Has just happened to me on 12.04LTS (encrypted home folder) after an
extended period of non-use. Bug #822479 refers?
Triggered by trying to move a contact from one address book to another
(coincidentally prehaps, to the last address book on the alphabetically
sorted list)
Reproduced giving a
Thanks.
We can only do what we can do!
DrC
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:30 +, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
Your thoughts are well understood, DrC.
I suppose one possibility would be to make Google Earth available in the
Canonical Partners repository in the same way as e.g. Skype. That way
count me as yet another respondent on
that score.
Thanks for being there.
DrC
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268297
Title:
Topics not covered by help. (Improve this guide)
To manage
Public bug reported:
1. By its very nature resolving #327770 might solve this too. I didn't
find the How To.
2. Context - I am trying to install Google World. If that is not a
supported process, and if you deliberately do not support the Google
install it would be nice to have a pointer
with no argument. Nothing.
After re-reading the help I used ps to find the PID (hardly a user
facility!) used the PID as the argument.
May I suggest a drop down package selector based on the applications
using the largest open files in user space could help the reporting
process.
Thanks
DrC
ProblemType
on the applications
using the largest open files in user space could help the reporting
process.
Thanks
DrC
PS Is it deliberately hard to find how to report a bug on opening a new
Launchpad window? I failed, and only got here by using 'open in a new
window on the bug report you opened automativcally
Whilst reporting these issues the application has come back to life -
either unravelled itself or been kicked by something!
Cheers
DrC
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305
Title
The issues with Help have been reported as bug #1249315
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305
Title:
Soffice Calc freezes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Slow learner! It has happened again with a selection of cells I 'Special
Pasted' into a report on a second Calc window. Both windows froze up
when I wen to save the second sheet.
Hmm ... Could be relevant - both target files were opened over a Samba
connection. The client symptoms might be a
Yes - the otherwise very reliable server also freezes when Calc locks
up.
From a different workspace:
Could not display smb://workgroup;cwsup@172.16.90.48/cwsup/.
Error: Invalid argument
Please select another viewer and try again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Oops - PDFs open OK. OF was a mistype.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249305
Title:
Soffice Calc freezes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Yes - seems to be LibreOffice-Samba. PDFs in the same folder open OF
but when clicked on a calc document, after a long delay LibreOffice Calc
returned invalid parameter. (screenshot)
** Attachment added: Ubuntu screenshot - .png
No problem accessing OOo text documents on a different SAMBA server (no
calc documents there) so it really does seem to be a Calc-Samba issue.
The original SAMBA server was quite badly bogged down in that other
processes (eg Adobe-PDF accesses) were slow but all seems to be working
OK now. Final
here so I'm afraid since the task is sorted I
have to go out. Unless there's something from you asking otherwise I
will be rebooting Ubuntu on my return.
Thanks for all you guys do - hope I'm helping ...
DrC
** Attachment added: tar-gz of the previous version of files and the eventual
updated
Can be closed - an installation issue on an old version - not seen
since.
Possibly a hardware issue - the hardware concerned is no longer in use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366923
PS - I tried it at home on the Unity GUI and it was OK, which may
explain the lack of deafening complaints. It is only on the classic
GUI, which the work system reverted to because the hardware was not
capable enough.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OK - tried that, looked at the recorded video and the cursor was visible
on the recording even though it wasn't on the screen while the recording
was being made.
If we track it down we might have a bug report for recordmydesktop ...
Sorry for the delay - the problem environment involves a part
Public bug reported:
May be my graphics card if others are not seeing it. Please tell me if
you need more info.
Problem is that whilst I can see the x- and y- markers as I move the
mouse, the arrow2 pointer is only visible intermittently, and then only
when I am over a 'handle' or other feature
Oops - I should make it clear it is the Select pointer that does not
show. If I choose an object type to draw the cross hairs render as I
would expect.
DrC
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
This is not solely Ubuntu - also happens on my WinXP box with different
hardware. I don't have an account on their bug tracker (and would
prefer not to open one because of their privacy arrangements) so would
you mind processing it please? Just don't bother looking through
Ubuntu first.
Can't
Public bug reported:
See screen shots - Ubuntu 10.04 (LTS) is up to date.
Chris
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Firefox Print Preview curtailed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: tgz with screenshots showing page url, problem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281/+attachment/1710460/+files/FirefoxPreviewBug.tar.gz
--
Firefox Print Preview curtailed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281
You received this bug notification because you are a
Just checked on an old Windows system - different curtailment point.
Firefox 3.0.5 on Windows XP SP2
** Attachment added: gif showing a later curtailment point on a different
system
Pretty much the same on XP-SP3 with 256Mb RAM.
Seems to be a when-to-get-a-new-page issue. If I print preview it at
30% zoom I see a lot more of the 'second' page on the second sheet.
Confirmed in all three environments.
--
Firefox Print Preview curtailed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666281
Lucid seems good and solid. Have the developers done anything like
tidying up that might have cleaned out the bug? If so, I would be
comfortable closing it.
--
evolution crashes when backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Oops - misunderstanding ...
The problem appeared - possibly as a result of a recent update. It
affected the output from xrandr, and that, or some other effect of the
problem meant I had an effectively unusable system.
I have seen the same effect before on earlier versions - and had to
reinstall
From Kurt: Are you still affected by this bug?
The system seemed to be working OK again. I've quarantined it pro tem
in case there is anything it may still have that is of interest. If
nobody shows any interest in its present state I'll put it back in
service and see what happens.
I am still
Public bug reported:
may relate to #500687
System - a reference lucid system from 10.04 lucid CD downloaded late
July, all updates, no tweaks, mostly working to local servers but
inevitably with a bit of local work accumulation.
Following the latest update which included an X- package, my
Attached log files
** Attachment added: recent /var/log files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500630/+files/Xorg-logs.tar.gz
--
Reduced screen resolution choices after update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581
You received this bug notification because you are
Hmmm.. Changing to guest account gives me all the screen
resolutions again, with the top one active at 60Hz.
** Attachment added: screenshot of good resolutions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500651/+files/Screenshot.png
--
Reduced screen resolution choices
Thinking out loud - Guest session does not go through the login process.
There is also a new log file .
** Attachment added: New log file created during guest session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500705/+files/guest-session-new-log-files.tar.gz
--
Reduced
OK - more checks ... in the course of which something reset itself ...
Switching to other accounts and back showed they were unaffected. They still
had the high res options..
Browsing hidden files in home of the affected account (the first user created
and the user first logged on to after
** Attachment added: working-again-logs.tar.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/620581/+attachment/1500928/+files/working-again-logs.tar.gz
--
Reduced screen resolution choices after update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620581
You received this bug notification because you are a
And finally, just to prove to myself I am not dreaming
e...@lucid-eddy:~$ xrandr --verbose
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 800 x 600, maximum 1440 x 1050
default connected 800x600+0+0 (0x115) normal (normal) 0mm x 0mm
Identifier: 0x108
Timestamp: 16713730
OK - I have just tried Lucid and discovered the promote - demote buttons
which do it for me.
Going back to my bug report - my (intuitive to me) method still doesn't
work on Lucid.
Going back to the original software version the results are the same -
it does work now that I know how to work it!
Screen shot target was current window.
First try at a screen shot was unsatisfactory due transparency issues not
visible on the original. The unwelcome shadows were from the screen shot
dialogue which had overlapped the original window.
Second try involved moving the target to the extreme
Oops - beta version. Forgot to say. Can't get to details at the moment
but ask me later if necessary.
--
gnome-screenshot crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532842
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
OK - did a bit of an experiment. Taking care to keep all windows within
the screen boundary and a smaller target window -
Next try - crashed again.
Then thought - I hadn't actually clicked in the target window to make it
current. Did so, then inadvertently did a full screen screen shot -
which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
I got an error report when saving a server-hosted OpenOffice file. I saved the
file locally then tried to drag and drop the local file onto the samba share.
The error while copying simply showed success in teh more details option.
The file had
** Attachment added: Screenshot with Ubuntu version details
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36513024/SambaLocking.png
--
Unhelpful message when file is locked
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493359
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
OK - if it happens again and I can remember I haven't seen it
lately.Chris
--
yelp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451164
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
From 493359 - (duplicate sorry!) Ubuntu accessing a file on a Debian-Samba
share:
I have seen this when a file is opened by two clients if one tries to update it
while the other is still connected. After the initial problem is reported by
OpenOffice a subsequent attempt to drag and drop after
OK - but log.smbclient is 618.8 Mb.I have grep-ed it down to show
that there is no match in the log for the file names that were not
backed up. The upload includes the 200 lines preceding the occurrence
of each file that was backed up from the directory in question. If 200
isn't enough I can
** Attachment added: tgz of info from 27Nov backup
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36269290/27Nov09.tar.gz
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
OK - but log.smbclient is 618.8 Mb.I have grep-ed it down to show
that there is no match in the log for the file names that were not
backed up. The upload includes the 200 lines preceding the occurrence
of each file that was backed up from the directory in question. If 200
isn't enough I can
** Attachment added: tgz of info from 27Nov backup
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36269290/27Nov09.tar.gz
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Attached.
Cheers - and thanks.
Chris
** Attachment added: tgz of test run once with debug level 9 both log files
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36110268/26Nov09.tar.gz
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug
Attached
Cheers
Chris.
** Attachment added: tgz of test as requested with logs
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36111942/26Nov09.tar.gz
--
Samba session request failure when using IP address
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Oops - I had forgotten there are two threads. The last upload belongs
with 437944 - I have posted it there as well so this one can be deleted.
I will run the backup with the same log level tomorrow (Friday) assuming
I remember... but it really will be really big - there are a lot of
files in the
Attached.
Cheers - and thanks.
Chris
** Attachment added: tgz of test run once with debug level 9 both log files
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36110268/26Nov09.tar.gz
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug
Attached
Cheers
Chris.
** Attachment added: tgz of test as requested with logs
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36111942/26Nov09.tar.gz
--
Samba session request failure when using IP address
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Oops - I had forgotten there are two threads. The last upload belongs
with 437944 - I have posted it there as well so this one can be deleted.
I will run the backup with the same log level tomorrow (Friday) assuming
I remember... but it really will be really big - there are a lot of
files in the
Was this a one time problem?
Yes.
The problem appeared on accepting the first routine invitation to
update. After collecting the evidence, System-Administration-Update
Manager ran successfully with no user input other than default
responses.
I think there have been further routine updates. If
I was collecting screenshots for Gnome bug 556932 (q.v.) including Help-
About Gnome and Help-About-Ubuntu details.
Having successfully captured the shots I needed, on closing the windows
I got a Yelp crash message from Apport which I duly tried to process
And got the attached screen shot
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
See attached screen shot. It looks as though the upgrade left some old
incompatible packages in place.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Nov 5 21:08:23 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: update-manager 1:0.126.6
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192870/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192871/XsessionErrors.txt
--
First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848
You
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35192928/Screenshot.png
--
First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Update Manager subsequently ran normally from the System-Administration
menu.
--
First update of 9.10 after upgrade from 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-utils
Dupe of 262315 - my route here did not recognise it.
The attached data from ubuntu-bug relates to a reported 55 seconds to
complete.
This on Karmic recently updated (by invitation from update manager) from
Jaunty.
Version details on
** Attachment added: 55seconds.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34886832/55seconds.png
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34886833/Dependencies.txt
--
Error in Sudoku time keeping.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469116
You received this bug notification
quote Why do you open a bug if you know it's a duplicate? /quote
Last time I had a similar error message I did not have the presence of
mind to keep the 'elapsed time' message on screen. I just cleared the
dialogue and went to Help - report a bug. I realised later that the
collected
Confirmed - still wrong in Karmic. I got 56 seconds reported total and
elapsed times (both the same - that bit is as I expected) which is just
not possible for the game with all the notes I made. See screenshot!
** Attachment added: screenshot.png
And Jaunty, again after using clear track.
** Attachment added: Jaunty.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33977891/Jaunty.png
--
sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103466
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Sorry - I don't know. This is a new backup protocol following two bad
experiences with tape mechanisms, so I have only been doing it for a
couple of months, and only on this version.
If there is still a gutsy box around at work I will try the test script
on that next week.
Chris
--
Samba
Sorry - I don't know. This is a new backup protocol following two bad
experiences with tape mechanisms, so I have only been doing it for a
couple of months, and only on this version.
If there is still a gutsy box around at work I will try the test script
on that next week.
Chris
--
Samba
Chuck - see the upload.
The test script (called test) first uses the netbios name redirecting
its output to the file ntserver3, then uses the IP address redirecting
its output to file IP91.249. I ran it three times.
The netbios calls all worked as I would expect, and as you can see on
the file
On Hardy...
It happened again - after using the track clear buttons a few times.
** Attachment added: screenshot.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33760942/Screenshot.png
--
sudoku sometimes fails to show scores when game finished
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103466
You received this bug
Backup still showing the same problem of Access Denied. There is
nothing in /var/log/samba. Smb.conf log level says it is for logging
samba server errors, and I'm only using the client. Have I been looking
at the wrong config file (I can't see one for smbclient) or is there a
log file
Backup still showing the same problem of Access Denied. There is
nothing in /var/log/samba. Smb.conf log level says it is for logging
samba server errors, and I'm only using the client. Have I been looking
at the wrong config file (I can't see one for smbclient) or is there a
log file
Sorry for the delay - day job intruded.
The server event log has nothing near the time in question, and nothing I can
relate to Access Denied.
No problem with /dev/sda size - except my geriatric amnesia.
To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have the server name; name
resolution
Sorry for the delay - day job intruded.
The server event log has nothing near the time in question, and nothing I can
relate to Access Denied.
No problem with /dev/sda size - except my geriatric amnesia.
To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have the server name; name
resolution
Assuming 'this' is the Access Denied issue...
I will check the server event log in the morning. The backup concerned is
multi-gigabyte and takes nearly five hours. Needless to say it runs overnight.
I will run it tomorrow with debug level 3 assuming my aged memory cells
remember after work
Assuming 'this' is the Access Denied issue...
I will check the server event log in the morning. The backup concerned is
multi-gigabyte and takes nearly five hours. Needless to say it runs overnight.
I will run it tomorrow with debug level 3 assuming my aged memory cells
remember after work
The smbclient -L test consistently gives an error message when addressing my
server by its IP address. I will open this as a separate bug.
To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have an entry for the server.
Access by name used a name resolution service.
--
Access Denied but TSC
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
smbclient -L consistently throws session request errors when addressing a
Windows2003 server by its IP address.
(spawned from Ubuntu bug - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 and
attached screenshot for serve details)
To check consistency
** Attachment added: SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32542103/SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz
--
Samba session request failure when using IP address
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
The smbclient -L test consistently gives an error message when addressing my
server by its IP address. I will open this as a separate bug.
To avoid red herrings, my /etc/hosts file did not have an entry for the server.
Access by name used a name resolution service.
--
Access Denied but TSC
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
smbclient -L consistently throws session request errors when addressing a
Windows2003 server by its IP address.
(spawned from Ubuntu bug - see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041 and
attached screenshot for serve details)
To check consistency
** Attachment added: SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32542103/SessionRequestFailure.tar.gz
--
Samba session request failure when using IP address
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I routinely use its IP address when accessing this server from my Ubuntu
box. Windows, of course, uses DNS or netbios name resolution.
I ran the smbclient -L test twice - once in each mode. I did this in a
few spare moments at work, and have only just looked in detail at the
results.
The two
Oops - My screenshot shows that both TSC and OOo were using the server
name. I have probably put HBS_NTserver3 in my hosts file... I will
check that also.
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you
I routinely use its IP address when accessing this server from my Ubuntu
box. Windows, of course, uses DNS or netbios name resolution.
I ran the smbclient -L test twice - once in each mode. I did this in a
few spare moments at work, and have only just looked in detail at the
results.
The two
Oops - My screenshot shows that both TSC and OOo were using the server
name. I have probably put HBS_NTserver3 in my hosts file... I will
check that also.
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
smbclient backup script reports access denied on all files in one folder of a
large Server2003 share.
Navigate to the offending MS Word file - no problem.
Click to open it (with OOo 3.0) and get access denied.
(Same message if I load writer and
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing pretty well everything.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32379834/Screenshot-7.png
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
smbclient backup script reports access denied on all files in one folder of a
large Server2003 share.
Navigate to the offending MS Word file - no problem.
Click to open it (with OOo 3.0) and get access denied.
(Same message if I load writer and
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing pretty well everything.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32379834/Screenshot-7.png
--
Access Denied but TSC confirms it should not be.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436041
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Same bug back in Karmic alpha-5 default installation.
--
cannot set number or name of workspaces from workspace switcher applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Yes - on tonight's download of Karmic alpha-5. See screenshot of the
result of trying to set level 1 numbered, and level 2 as bullets.
** Attachment added: screenshot .png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31731821/Karmic.png
--
OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
** Attachment added: tar-gz of .odt and screenshot
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30926958/bullet-bug.tar.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30926959/Dependencies.txt
--
OOo does not nest bullets with different formats
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
Type text of document with numbered list.
Edit one of the numbered entries to insert a level 2 bulleted list at the end
of the entry.
Try all ways to get the level one list numbered and the level 2 list
bulleted
Selecting the whole
Oops - sorry. Didn't realise I was on both systems. It all seems fine
now - thanks for all you guys do.
--
evolution crashes when backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-games
My problem was an excessively long reported time taken. The active time
looked OK. I have added my report to the Gnome bug 556932 which
mentions both types of timing errors. This report may be a duplicate
of launchpad #282315 if the too
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29551882/Dependencies.txt
--
Error recording start time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405025
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I tried it today at school on Jaunty - no problem seen. NB this is a
different single email account.
On my current (LTS) Hardy, if I backup choosing not to restart Evolution
after the backup. the backup apparently does not happen, and on restart
I get the Evolution appears to have exited
Apologies - I missed the preceding post.
I have to either build a Jaunty bx or wait until I return to work...
I should have the answer in a day or two.
--
evolution crashes when backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
A newly downloaded image (Linux ubuntu 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP
Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux) has loaded the live image
today without issue.
The original problem was almost certainly a CD read issue, and the only
useful input is the observation that the read checks failed,
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
