Just an idea: the case and environment Hontvári József Levente
(hontvari) mentioned on 2013-04-13 should be easy to recreate, and could
be used to track down the problem with this indexer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I don't have an optical drive any more, maybe others have also got rid
of them too, and there's no one left to trace down this bug. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371002
Title:
It still persists. Just tried it with the updated Acrobat Reader (9.5.4)
from the package acroread 9.5.4-1precise1.
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The main problem for me is that lots of packages depend on some packages
that need to be removed for the upgrade. There the upgrade would delete
wine, acroread, steam, nvidia-current, etc. lots of essential (for me at
least) packages. I believe that it is due to some wrong dependencies,
since eg.
Confirmed, working on my primary screen, not working on my secondary
screen: Ubuntu 12.04.2, Acroread 9.4.7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481345
Title:
Body does not maximize when
I have been using blueproximity again since October and have never
noticed any memory leak. It might have been fixed in the tools used by
blueproximity, so I set this bug to Invalid.
** Changed in: blueproximity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
** Changed in: blueproximity
I installed it again as I recently moved to a new workplace where I
could really make use of it. I had my old config in my home, so it was
easy to get it up and running. :)
I will monitor the memory usage of blueproximity and report if I see it
raising wildly.
--
You received this bug
I think the solution would be to have a libwmf version which does not
depend on defoma files. However, as I saw on the page of libwmf (which
is part of wvWare, see http://sourceforge.net/projects/wvware/), it has
not been in development since 2005. I doubt that they would release a
new version
I can confirm the bug on 11.10, but luckily the workaround works for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629153
Title:
wmf2XXX tools fail due to defoma font issue
To manage
It needs fixing, I never said that it's unnecessary. I just concluded
that I can currently work around this bug on my system, but I'll have
problems doing so when I upgrade Ubuntu.
Is this an Ubuntu or Debian specific bug, or does it come from upstream?
--
You received this bug notification
I did the same, just deleted the oneconf service from synaptics, since I never
used either oneconf or software-center. I'm sure the memory leak could be
tracked down, but I had no interest in doing that.
Welcome back, my memory! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Will this fix be part of oneiric-proposed or oneiric-backports?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906078
Title:
Selection won't move to next line with the right arrow
To manage
12 matches
Mail list logo
