attached is a proposed fix
** Patch added: "killall-with-65-arguments-kills-all-proce.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psmisc/+bug/1507681/+attachment/4500472/+files/killall-with-65-arguments-kills-all-proce.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
killall in Precise is supposed to limit the number of arguments to 64,
but due to a fencepost error, 66 arguments will be blocked but 65 is
not.
With 65 arguments, the behavior varies, but in some cases will send a
signal to random processes.
# ps xa | wc -l
164
# mkdir
Public bug reported:
killall in Precise is supposed to limit the number of arguments to 64,
but due to a fencepost error, 66 arguments will be blocked but 65 is
not.
With 65 arguments, the behavior varies, but in some cases will send a
signal to random processes.
# ps xa | wc -l
164
# mkdir
attached is a proposed fix
** Patch added: "killall-with-65-arguments-kills-all-proce.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psmisc/+bug/1507681/+attachment/4500472/+files/killall-with-65-arguments-kills-all-proce.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This was fixed in 2012, but the fix never made it into Precise. Would
it be possible to release this? The change to the Precise package is
minimal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks Brian. It's not in proposed yet, but the package itself extracts
fine.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:20 PM Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello Gregory, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spice into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
Thanks Brian. It's not in proposed yet, but the package itself extracts
fine.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:20 PM Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello Gregory, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spice into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
The impact on Trusty users is that if they need to extract the sources
in order to view them or rebuild them, they would not be able to. In my
case I needed to rebuild the source. The binary packages themselves are
fine.
The chance of regression in this case is very minimal if the missing
The impact on Trusty users is that if they need to extract the sources
in order to view them or rebuild them, they would not be able to. In my
case I needed to rebuild the source. The binary packages themselves are
fine.
The chance of regression in this case is very minimal if the missing
Public bug reported:
The source package for spice contains a malformed patch such that dpkg-
source cannot extract it. This is fixed in later releases by removing
the specific patch, but it would be useful for the Trusty package to be
fixed.
$ apt-get source spice
Reading package lists... Done
Public bug reported:
The source package for spice contains a malformed patch such that dpkg-
source cannot extract it. This is fixed in later releases by removing
the specific patch, but it would be useful for the Trusty package to be
fixed.
$ apt-get source spice
Reading package lists... Done
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
** Changed in: dillo (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
Dillo SSL Support is immature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63983
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
If people are using
12 matches
Mail list logo
