[Bug 1232354] Re: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox

2020-01-24 Thread JanCeuleers
I originally reported this issue but can no longer reproduce it ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354 Title: Crash

[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot

2020-01-24 Thread JanCeuleers
Many years later I can no longer reproduce this ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365 Title: mdadm does not add

[Bug 1858317] Re: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option

2020-01-05 Thread JanCeuleers
Evidence that --offroot is being used by systemd during boot: Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[430]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental /dev/sdc1 --offroot' failed with exit code 1. Jan 04 10:26:22 dracor systemd-udevd[428]: Process '/sbin/mdadm --incremental /dev/sdb1 --offroot' failed

[Bug 1858317] Re: man mdadm does not document the --offroot option

2020-01-05 Thread JanCeuleers
I experienced and reported this issue on Ubuntu 16.04, but have now verified that it also affects Ubuntu 18.04.3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858317 Title: man mdadm does not

[Bug 1858317] [NEW] man mdadm does not document the --offroot option

2020-01-05 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: I can see in the logs that systemd incrementally assembles mdadm arrays using the --incremental and --offroot options, yet the --offroot option is not documented in the mdadm manpage. I can see it here though: https://linux.die.net/man/8/mdadm ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1021699] Re: fetchmail: IDLE - multiple daemons should be started

2020-01-01 Thread JanCeuleers
Here is a way (untested by me) to do what Andreas suggests: https://marek.dopiera.pl/2018/10/03/fetchmail-imap-idle-systemd- generators/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021699 Title:

[Bug 1855296] Re: Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72

2019-12-12 Thread JanCeuleers
A few days in I have now had a chance to reboot this machine once more into the -72 kernel, and I was unable to reproduce the issue. ** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1855296] [NEW] Kernel regression: pvrusb2 tuners do not come online in 4.15.0-72

2019-12-05 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Following the linux 4.15.0-72-generic kernel update my Hauppauge 1950 tuners no longer work. This is a production machine, so I did not have time to troubleshoot and had to quickly recover by rebooting into the previous kernel version (which is 4.15.0-70). ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1648846] Re: Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable

2018-03-12 Thread JanCeuleers
I cannot reproduce the issue at present. But it's strange that I encountered a problem in 2016 which was fixed upstream in 2009. Anyway, let's close this for now. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1744995] [NEW] Spectre kernel update crashes hard

2018-01-23 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: This kernel update crashes my old machine (Intel Core i3-540, H55 chipset) solid on boot. It needs to be powercycled. Selecting the previous kernel (3.13.0-139) in grub revives the machine. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-141-generic

[Bug 1627114] Re: WiFi is not detected for Intel Dual BandWireless-AC 3168

2017-12-06 Thread JanCeuleers
I know that this is an old ticket etc, but: I also have this card and use it in a laptop that's running Ubuntu 16.04. Meanwhile it's 16.04.3 rather than .1, but that's by the by. The card works fine for me using the Hardware Enablement kernel. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack

[Bug 1648846] [NEW] Chromium ignores no_proxy environment variable

2016-12-09 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: I need the proxy to be bypassed for a number of sites. These sites are listed in the no_proxy environment variable. However, this is ignored by Chromium. There does not appear to be any way in Chromium (nor in the system proxy settings) to specify sites for which the proxy

[Bug 1575248] Re: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update"

2016-11-26 Thread JanCeuleers
# fwupdmgr refresh Failed to download https://s3.amazonaws.com/lvfsbucket/downloads/firmware.xml.gz.asc: SSL handshake failed Yet that link works in a browser. Related? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1634572] Re: APCUPSD does not send killpower command to UPS (only happens on Ubuntu 16.04)

2016-11-11 Thread JanCeuleers
According to discussion on the apcupsd-users mailing list [1] this issue is OS-specific rather than being a problem in upstream apcupsd. Specifically it is believed that this issue is due to Ubuntu shutting down USB before the killpower command is issued to the UPS, which which it is no longer

[Bug 1443590] Re: Not updated to latest upstream

2015-04-16 Thread JanCeuleers
** Description changed: - I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer) - did against Debian: + I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (upstream lirc + maintainer) did against Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199

[Bug 1443590] [NEW] Not updated to latest upstream

2015-04-13 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: I am filing the same bug against Ubuntu as Alec Leamas (lirc maintainer) did against Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777199 ===begin=== The lirc sources used (0.9.0-pre1) is now very old (2011), lagging two major and several minor releases behind

Re: [Bug 827669] Re: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized

2014-09-07 Thread JanCeuleers
On 09/07/2014 12:38 PM, Ruben Rocha wrote: Hi guys On 12.04 it is a bit tricky for the driver to install ok because the one on the fprint repo replaces the one of the deb package. Try this: sudo apt-get remove libfprint0 install the deb again sudo apt-get install fprintd

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread JanCeuleers
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]:

[Bug 826873] Re: ATOM refclock driver not compiled into ntpd

2014-04-25 Thread JanCeuleers
According to [1], the fix is to ensure that the ppstools package is installed on the system used to build the ntp package, as that is the package that provides the timepps header file that the ntpd build system needs in order to enable pps support. [1]:

[Bug 827669] Re: [138a:0018] Validity Sensors fingerprint reader not recognized

2014-02-22 Thread JanCeuleers
Thank you very much. This package however requires glibc 2.17 whereas my 12.04.4 LTS system only has 2.15. Would you be able to make available a package that works on the other currently supported Ubuntu versions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1232354] Re: Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox

2013-11-06 Thread JanCeuleers
Actually, the crash happens when anything is dragged in Firefox: - attempt at reconfiguring the toolbars - dragging a link - ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232354 Title: Crash

[Bug 1232354] [NEW] Crash when dragging bookmark in Firefox

2013-09-27 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: When I try and drag a bookmark on Firefox's bookmarks toolbar, lightdm crashes and I'm taken back to the login screen. janc@mordor:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Release:12.04 janc@mordor:~$ apt-cache policy lightdm lightdm: Installed:

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-07 Thread JanCeuleers
The released 2.6.32-43-generic (with the corresponding compat-wireless package) has now been running for nearly 39 hours, so I'm going to go ahead and remove the -43 compat-wireless package and reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-07 Thread JanCeuleers
The released 2.6.32-43-generic kernel crashed after about 5 hours uptime while the corresponding compat-wireless package was not also installed. So I think that this validates the hypothesis that the determining factor is the presence of the compat-wireless package (i.e. whether or not newer ath9k

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-06 Thread JanCeuleers
I have now purged all -43 and -44 kernels (i.e. the released -43 kernel and all test kernels v1 through v5), then reinstalled the released -43 kernel, and also pulled in the compat-wireless package for -43. After rebooting the machine has stayed up overnight. Luis and I both had a theory about

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-04 Thread JanCeuleers
I can now explain one class of differences between the modules loaded under -42 versus -44. I am using the compat-wireless package, a version of which does not yet exist for the -44 kernel (or at least: I hadn't installed it). The two ath9k-related modules which are not being loaded under -44 but

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-04 Thread JanCeuleers
I ran the lsmod commands just after a fresh reboot, so this doesn't seem to be it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-04 Thread JanCeuleers
I guess I need to wait for a compat-wireless package to become available that corresponds with the -44 ABI. Although I can start by installing the -43 compat-wireless package and test that with the v1-v3 kernels you previously built for me (just to see whether the results are any different from

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-02 Thread JanCeuleers
I'm really sorry, but this kernel (v5) is BAD. But I noticed that for some reason a different set of modules is being loaded. I have no idea why. I attach a file that shows the differences between the first column of lsmod's sorted output under each kernel (-42 and -44 v5). Why are a lot more

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-10-01 Thread JanCeuleers
Assuming I've managed to install the correct package from -proposed: Linux skr03 2.6.32-44-generic #98-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 17:32:45 UTC 2012 i586 GNU/Linux the new kernel is BAD (it crashed after an hour and 10mins) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-26 Thread JanCeuleers
By the way, I just noticed that I should have mentioned the presence in the box of a wireless adapter as well. Since the box is a broadband router it also acts as a wireless access point, using an ath9k card. No offload options (TSO, GSO) are active on this interface. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-25 Thread JanCeuleers
I can confirm that the box is stable when running -42. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-23 Thread JanCeuleers
v4 seems to behave similarly to v3: it also crashed after many hours, i.e. after a longer period than the released -43 package and the v1 and v2 packages did. But it still crashed. Once again I'm back on -42. I think I now need to stay on this package for a couple of days just to make sure that

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-22 Thread JanCeuleers
v3 has stayed up overnight, which leads me to suspect that it is GOOD. I can't be categorical about this you understand: if it freezes it is certain to be bad, but if it doesn't it might merely not yet have crashed. So I'll leave it running and report back tomorrow. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-22 Thread JanCeuleers
Right. I'm glad I qualified my previous statement. It crashed after about 20 hours, which is much longer than than it took v1 and v2 to crash before. Could be coincidence, who knows. Going back to the -42.96 package now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-22 Thread JanCeuleers
I am indeed not using ecryptfs. I am using GSO (generic segmentation offload) on one of the ethernet interfaces (the one that faces the LAN). Whereas the box has four ethernet interfaces I'm using only two. One faces the LAN (eth3), the other faces the VDSL modem (eth2), across which I set up a

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-21 Thread JanCeuleers
The v2 kernel is also BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-21 Thread JanCeuleers
By the way: I may be able to test a few more kernels than one per day over the weekend. If this is a practical proposition, could you prepare three or four packages in one go? Please only do so if it's not too much trouble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1052861] [NEW] After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: I upgraded the kernel on this machine to linux-image-2.6.32-43-generic yesterday, and the machine has locked up solid three times since. This is a broadband router (Soekris net5501) without video or keyboard. I am monitoring the serial console and no messages are output when

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
I am the original bug reporter. I can confirm that reverting to the previous kernel package (linux- image-2.6.32-42-generic, version 2.6.32-42.96) returns the machine to stability. This is my broadband router, and my wife and I work from home a lot. I can test kernels for you, but only overnight

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
Looking at the security notice that describes this kernel update I see that one of the changes is to do with TCP segmentation offload. Some additional information therefore. This machine has four Ethernet interfaces: root@skr03:~# lspci | grep Ethernet 00:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA

[Bug 1052861] Re: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime

2012-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
The v1 kernel you gave me to test is BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052861 Title: After upgrade to new kernel version, machine crashes after a few hours of uptime To manage

[Bug 496681] Re: Rhythmbox does not save playlist on iPod

2012-06-24 Thread JanCeuleers
@cometdog: In the iPod's Sync menu, first disable syncing with all of your playlists. Sync. Then re-enable syncing with all of your playlists and sync again. That did it for me (Rhythmbox 2.96 on Ubuntu 12.04 and a 30GB 4th-gen iPod). -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1014985] [NEW] Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing

2012-06-19 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Podcasts are not being synced to my ipod (30GB 4th gen). That is: Banshee's GUI says that it transfers the files across, but then they do not show up in the Podcasts menu, neither in Banshee nor on the device itself. Please refer to the debug output: this is the full output

[Bug 1014985] Re: Banshee System.NullReferenceException while syncing

2012-06-19 Thread JanCeuleers
** Attachment added: Full output of banshee --debug (start banshee, sync ipod, quit banshee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014985/+attachment/3195636/+files/banshee.debug.out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 989532] [NEW] Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers

2012-04-27 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Thunderbird fails to connect to the POP and SMTP servers. These servers reside on the same subnet. There are no error messages to speak of; the connections just time out. This is not a firewall problem. I have verified that I can connect to the POP and SMTP servers using

[Bug 989532] Re: Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers

2012-04-27 Thread JanCeuleers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989532 Title: Thunderbird does not connect to POP nor SMTP servers To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 799144] [NEW] Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf

2011-06-18 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: i8kutils If i8kmon is started with --nouserconfig, then it reads its configuration from /etc/i8kmon.conf, rather than /etc/i8kmon as suggested by the manpage (last paragraph in section CONFIGURATION). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10

[Bug 799144] Re: Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf

2011-06-18 Thread JanCeuleers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799144 Title: Manpage error: i8kmon's global configuration file is /etc/i8kmon.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 614993] Re: 10.04 - 10.10 upgrade fails: pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks: xserver-xorg-video-v4l demoted to universe

2011-03-20 Thread JanCeuleers
I added also-affects update-manager because this problem has clearly not yet been fully resolved, despite the fix-released state on a number of affected packages. ** Also affects: update-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 666468] Re: User interface language changed to French

2011-03-07 Thread JanCeuleers
Reproduced in Maverick Meerkat. Sorry, but it is not a reasonable request to a user to reproduce in an as-yet-unreleased distro. ** Changed in: xcfa (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 722146] [NEW] Upgrade fails while calculating changes

2011-02-20 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager While trying to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, update-manager fails with the following error message: Could not determine the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. Please report this bug in the

[Bug 722146] Re: Upgrade fails while calculating changes

2011-02-20 Thread JanCeuleers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722146 Title: Upgrade fails while calculating changes -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 722146] Re: Upgrade fails while calculating changes

2011-02-20 Thread JanCeuleers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 614993 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614993 Confirmed: this is indeed a duplicate of bug 614993. This did not jump out at me when I filed the bug though. Perhaps this is a problem worth fixing? ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 614993

[Bug 697770] [NEW] Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage

2011-01-05 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ureadahead Two problems on the manpage: (1) the word content in the second sentence explaining the --daemon option should read contend. So the sentence becomes This is ignored when reading on rotational hard drives, since it's important for

[Bug 697770] Re: Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage

2011-01-05 Thread JanCeuleers
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697770 Title: Typo on manpage; broken bug reporting link on manpage -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 666468] [NEW] User interface language changed to French

2010-10-25 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xcfa The user interface language has inexplicably and unexpectedly changed to French (from English). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: xcfa 3.7.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname:

[Bug 666468] Re: User interface language changed to French

2010-10-25 Thread JanCeuleers
-- User interface language changed to French https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 484698] Re: ntp package should not install a drift file

2010-05-22 Thread JanCeuleers
Carlos, Please can you return the status to Triaged? I'm unable to do so myself. Thanks, Jan C de-Avillez wrote: argh, wrong bug ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Also affects: ntp via

[Bug 484698] Re: ntp package should not install a drift file

2010-05-22 Thread JanCeuleers
Carlos, Please can you return the status to Triaged? I'm unable to do so myself. Thanks, Jan C de-Avillez wrote: argh, wrong bug ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #514318 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514318 ** Also affects: ntp via

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2010-02-09 Thread JanCeuleers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 Actually, the bug has been fixed when Ubuntu 9.10 adopted upstream stable kernel release 2.6.31.7 in the form of linux-image-2.6.31-17. See bug #480144 Ubuntu has since issued further kernel updates which

[Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel

2009-12-14 Thread JanCeuleers
I successfully installed and booted this kernel on a machine having a National Semiconductor SC1200 PATA controller: 00:12.2 IDE interface: National Semiconductor Corporation SCx200, SC1100 IDE controller (rev 01) The previous 2.6.31 kernel would crash at boot. So I conclude that the issue

Re: [Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel

2009-12-10 Thread JanCeuleers
Martin, Martin Pitt wrote: Accepted linux into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! **

[Bug 480144] Re: [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel

2009-12-08 Thread JanCeuleers
Also fixes bug #454575 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/454575): [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot -- [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-12-08 Thread JanCeuleers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480144 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480144 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480144 [Karmic] Update to 2.6.31.6 Stable Kernel -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-12-05 Thread JanCeuleers
Fix released upstream in 2.6.31.6 -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 484698] [NEW] ntp package should not install a drift file

2009-11-18 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart.

[Bug 484698] [NEW] ntp package should not install a drift file

2009-11-18 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp The drift file (in Ubuntu its default location is /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift) contains ntpd's estimate of the system's drift relative to UTC, expressed in ppm. This file is generated by ntpd, and its purpose is to speed up convergence following restart.

[Bug 160002] Re: apparmor should have a 'usr' tunable

2009-10-28 Thread JanCeuleers
The recent change of description of this bug suggests a particular solution to the problem, which I think is incomplete. The problem occurs on my machine because, although /usr is located on the root filesystem, several of the directories under /usr are soft links to targets on a different

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-10-25 Thread JanCeuleers
In case the fix does not make it to you via -stable in time for the karmic release, here it is. Obtained from linux-next thusly: # git show 6d4f950e9ea15816c6a4f266ce6b9e438346771e fix-14227.patch ** Attachment added: fix-14227.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34357961/fix-14227.patch

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-10-23 Thread JanCeuleers
Not fixed in the Karmic Release Candidate -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-10-23 Thread JanCeuleers
Turns out the fix hadn't been submitted to stable. Jeff Garzik has now done so. -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 454575] [NEW] [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-10-18 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic Kernel oops on boot into karmic generic kernel. Same thing happens on -386 kernel. Hardware: Soekris net4801. [4.668423] CR2: 73627653 [8.038252] ---[ end trace 0a414785c1792278 ]--- [8.093818] Kernel

[Bug 454575] Re: [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot

2009-10-18 Thread JanCeuleers
A patch has been posted on lkml: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=125484259025909w=2 -- [karmic][sc1200] kernel 2.6.31-14-generic oops on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 454094] [NEW] Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb

2009-10-17 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager When trying to upgrade to karmic beta, the following is the last bit of output: --begin-- Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade: gdm: reloading...done. dovecot: stopping...starting...done. cron:

[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb

2009-10-17 Thread JanCeuleers
** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840413/apt.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb

2009-10-17 Thread JanCeuleers
** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840433/main.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 454094] Re: Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb

2009-10-17 Thread JanCeuleers
** Attachment added: xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33840453/xorg_fix_intrepid.log -- Errors were encountered while processing libpam-modules_1.1.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 119294] Re: OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock

2009-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock? -- OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 119294] Re: OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock

2009-09-19 Thread JanCeuleers
@igorsh: is there a 64-bit CPU that supports Padlock? -- OpenSSL should support VIA PadLock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

2009-07-15 Thread JanCeuleers
Filed bug #399883 against intrepid-backports so that an explicit decision can be made on whether to backport this fix to intrepid. -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

2009-07-11 Thread JanCeuleers
I have now upgraded this system to jaunty from intrepid while running the hardy kernel. I confirm that the kernel included with intrepid (Linux soekris 2.6.28-13-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 30 19:49:51 UTC 2009 i586) works with the sc1200 disk controller. So: fixed in jaunty. Question mark

[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

2009-07-07 Thread JanCeuleers
I won't have time to test this for a few days, but my concerns are as follows: - intrepid (8.10) is currently a necessary step on the upgrade path from 8.04 LTS to 9.04 LTS; - 8.10 does not boot on a system that depends on an sc1200 disk controller; - the work-around is to boot the 8.04 LTS

[Bug 395579] Re: sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

2009-07-07 Thread JanCeuleers
Feel free to change back to incomplete if you disagree that the issue needs to be resolved in 8.10 only on the strength of the facts presented thus far ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

2009-07-06 Thread JanCeuleers
Files attached as requested. First: apt.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738902/apt.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

2009-07-06 Thread JanCeuleers
apt-term.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738937/apt-term.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

2009-07-06 Thread JanCeuleers
main.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738949/main.log -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

2009-07-06 Thread JanCeuleers
xorg_fix_intrepid.log ** Attachment added: /var/log/dist-upgrade/xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28738958/xorg_fix_intrepid.log ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

[Bug 355619] Re: Upgrade from 7.10 to 8.04: DHCP server missing

2009-07-06 Thread JanCeuleers
I apologise, the attachments I just added are related to another bug of mine, not to this-one. Please discard these attachments. I no longer have the requested information, because since upgrading this machine to hardy I have further upgraded it to januty. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)

[Bug 395579] [NEW] sc1200 ide controller not supported in intrepid

2009-07-04 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: My Soekris net4801 won't boot after the upgrade from hardy to interpid: it can't find the root partition. I think that this is the case because neither version of the disk controller module (drivers/pci/sc1200, drivers/ata/pata_sc1200) is supported in the generic config. I

[Bug 382060] [NEW] system-health error message: Specified sensor(s) not found!

2009-05-31 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: The report produced by /etc/cron.daily/system-health contains the error message Specified sensor(s) not found! on my system, instead of the sensors report. This is the case because /usr/bin/system-health invokes /usr/bin/sensors with parameter lm79-isa-*. This parameter is

[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-21 Thread JanCeuleers
Here's my feeble attempt at diagnosing this: mythbuntu-control-centre_0.10-0ubuntu1_all.deb is not the smoking gun, but it does contain the following in data/usr/share/pycentral/mythbuntu-control-centre/site-packages/MythbuntuControlCentre/changer.py: def

[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-21 Thread JanCeuleers
Here is the full list of deb files I searched through, just in case you can point me to files I should also have inspected: libmyth-0.20_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb libmyth-dev_0.20.2-0ubuntu10_i386.deb mytharchive_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_i386.deb mytharchive-data_0.20.2-0ubuntu2_all.deb

[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-21 Thread JanCeuleers
I'm afraid I'm not able to actually fix this ** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu) Assignee: JanCeuleers (jan-ceuleers) = Mario Limonciello (superm1) -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 343204] [NEW] Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-16 Thread JanCeuleers
Mario, I will attempt to identify the cause of the mode squashing of this file. It will be a fez days before I have a chance to look at this though. Thanks, Jan -- Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343204 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 343204] [NEW] Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-15 Thread JanCeuleers
Public bug reported: My frontend machine runs mythfrontend as user frontend, not as user mythtv. I believe that this is a supported configuration. User frontend is a member of group mythtv. This is however not enough for user frontend to be able to read /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt, since it has mode

[Bug 343204] Re: Mode of /etc/mythtv/mysql.txt should be 660

2009-03-15 Thread JanCeuleers
Mario, Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, trying 9.04 is not an option for me right now; this is a production system which has many version dependencies outside of mythtv. If you believe that this problem has been solved in recent versions of mythtv (or mythbuntu) then I'm happy. Meanwhile

[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot

2009-02-10 Thread JanCeuleers
I have been advised on the linux-raid mailing list [1] that this problem is more likely to be caused by mkinitrd than by mdadm, and that I should therefore file a bug against initramfs-tools. [1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raidm=123421650832520w=2 ** Also affects: initramfs-tools Importance:

[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot

2009-02-01 Thread JanCeuleers
I'm sorry for having let this bug linger for such a long time. I think I have now found the proper solution to this problem. Restating the problem: I have six disks, four of which are served by a sata-sil24 controller, the other two being served by a sata-via controller. The active partitions of

  1   2   >