This patch has been awaiting review from AppArmor Developers for a while
now.
Any suggestions on how to move it along?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665535
Title:
WebRTC
** Branch unlinked: lp:~henn/firefox/fix-for-1665535
** Branch linked: lp:~henn/apparmor/fix-for-1665535
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665535
Title:
WebRTC webcam support broken
** Branch linked: lp:~henn/firefox/fix-for-1665535
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665535
Title:
WebRTC webcam support broken in firefox due to apparmor
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
In order to use sites that make use of WebRTC's webcam support, firefox
needs access to the /dev/videoN device. When I applied the latest
firefox update over the last week, apparmor was set to enforcing mode,
which broke sites that use WebRTC, like https://talky.io.
$
Public bug reported:
After upgrading from Ubuntu wily (15.10) to xenial (16.04, LTS), the
NetworkManager control applet (nm-applet) ceased to show up.
While running wily and even prior, I had modified /proc's "hidepid" argument to
be 2, in accordance with hardening best practices in order to
FYI - I and others I know have hit this crash on at least 4 different
machines using intel graphics after upgrading to 15.10.
Please let me know if there's something I can do to assist in tracking
down the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
One thought after reading the discussions here and on ubuntu-doc:
rather than maintaining a duplicate of SHA256SUMS{,.gpg} on the wiki,
would it be possible to link to an ubuntu-maintained version that is
protected by https?
GPG-verifying the SHA256SUMs is great, however a user may not yet
Doug: What I believe is important in this case is that the hashes are:
a) somewhere easy for downloaders to find (ideally, linked to from the download
page) so that users can verify that they have the correct file and
b) protected by https in order to decrease the chances that the hashes were
Public bug reported:
Could SHA256 and/or SHA512 hashes please be included on the Ubuntu
Hashes page (currently located at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuHashes ?
Currently, only MD5 is included, and this is the only https-protected
official page I could find with the hashes. As can be
