[Bug 1240983] Re: Can't upgrade from quantal to saucy

Thanks Brian, I will do that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240983 Title: Can't upgrade from quantal to saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1240983] [NEW] Can't upgrade from quantal to saucy

Public bug reported: When I try to upgrade from quantal to saucy it fails with Can't calculate upgrade. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.192.13 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-31.46-generic 3.8.13.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-31-generic x86_64

[Bug 417757] Re: [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

Is there a list of routers that work? -- [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 417757] Re: [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

or what can a consumer look for to find a router that works? -- [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 417757] Re: [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups

Would there be any advantage to installing DD-WRT or some such to a problem router? -- [karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417757 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 470823] Re: seahorse-agent assert failure: ERROR:iop-profiles.c:606:IOP_generate_profiles: assertion failed: (obj (obj-profile_list == NULL) obj-orb)

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34956029/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34956030/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34956031/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Reinstalling with guided partitioning did not fix the problem, so it wasn't XFS. -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Here's my whole process, using the latest Karmic RC and the RC UEC images: This is how I packaged the RC images : nimbusad...@nimbus:~$ euca-bundle-image -i karmic-uec-amd64-vmlinuz-virtual --k ernel true Checking image Tarring image Encrypting image Splitting image... Part:

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Sure. euca-attach-volume -i i-500E09A7 -d /dev/sdb vol-329904A4 VOLUME vol-329904A4 euca-describe-volumes VOLUME vol-329904A4 1 AUUEC available 2009-10-23T12:53:53.061Z [Fri Oct 23 09:27:01 2009][003011][EUCADEBUG ] DescribeNetworks(): done [Fri Oct 23 09:27:01

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

I figured out the problem. I was looking at the web interface, under configuration in the Storage Controller section, the IP address there was my public IP address and the ethernet device was my public ethernet interface. When I changed the IP address to my private IP address and private IP

[Bug 459194] [NEW] SC must be re-registered to the private NIC/IP after installation

Public bug reported: After UEC installation on a system with a separate physical NIC that attaches to the private network that the NCs (node controllers) are on, the user must change the registration of the SC (storage controller) to use the private interface/IP. This can be done from the web

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Reinstalling with guided partitioning did not fix the problem, so it wasn't XFS. -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Here's my whole process, using the latest Karmic RC and the RC UEC images: This is how I packaged the RC images : nimbusad...@nimbus:~$ euca-bundle-image -i karmic-uec-amd64-vmlinuz-virtual --k ernel true Checking image Tarring image Encrypting image Splitting image... Part:

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Sure. euca-attach-volume -i i-500E09A7 -d /dev/sdb vol-329904A4 VOLUME vol-329904A4 euca-describe-volumes VOLUME vol-329904A4 1 AUUEC available 2009-10-23T12:53:53.061Z [Fri Oct 23 09:27:01 2009][003011][EUCADEBUG ] DescribeNetworks(): done [Fri Oct 23 09:27:01

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

I figured out the problem. I was looking at the web interface, under configuration in the Storage Controller section, the IP address there was my public IP address and the ethernet device was my public ethernet interface. When I changed the IP address to my private IP address and private IP

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 459194] [NEW] SC must be re-registered to the private NIC/IP after installation

Public bug reported: After UEC installation on a system with a separate physical NIC that attaches to the private network that the NCs (node controllers) are on, the user must change the registration of the SC (storage controller) to use the private interface/IP. This can be done from the web

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

My host systems use XFS filesystem - could this cause this problem? -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

My host systems use XFS filesystem - could this cause this problem? -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Invalid = Incomplete ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

I am still having this problem. I am using the latest uec-image from 10-20. If I do a lsmod | grep acpiphp I get acpiphp25180 0 so the module is running. I'm no longer using a bridge on my CC - I am using the setup from 10-19 daily server ISOs. I've tried euca-attach-volume

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Invalid = Incomplete ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

I am still having this problem. I am using the latest uec-image from 10-20. If I do a lsmod | grep acpiphp I get acpiphp25180 0 so the module is running. I'm no longer using a bridge on my CC - I am using the setup from 10-19 daily server ISOs. I've tried euca-attach-volume

[Bug 452185] [NEW] can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Public bug reported: When I try euca-attach-volume -i instanceid -d devicename scvolumename it returns scvolumename but when I ssh into the instance, I can't access the scvolume, it doesn't show up under /dev, fdisk /dev/devicename doesn't work. and if I do euca-describe-volumes the volume

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

This is with package version 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu2 -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Actually, since my interface to the private subnet is a bridge as required according to the cc.log for MANAGED-NOVLAN which is the default setup using the server CDs, I was told by nekro_ in the #eucalyptus channel that vblade/aoe won't export across a linux bridge :( so I am thinking if you use

[Bug 452185] [NEW] can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Public bug reported: When I try euca-attach-volume -i instanceid -d devicename scvolumename it returns scvolumename but when I ssh into the instance, I can't access the scvolume, it doesn't show up under /dev, fdisk /dev/devicename doesn't work. and if I do euca-describe-volumes the volume

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

This is with package version 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu2 -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance

Actually, since my interface to the private subnet is a bridge as required according to the cc.log for MANAGED-NOVLAN which is the default setup using the server CDs, I was told by nekro_ in the #eucalyptus channel that vblade/aoe won't export across a linux bridge :( so I am thinking if you use

[Bug 434043] Re: euca-run-instances emi-xxxxxxxx -k key doesn't start an instance

I think this has been fixed. -- euca-run-instances emi- -k key doesn't start an instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 434036] Re: euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available

This appears to be fixed. -- euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 434043] Re: euca-run-instances emi-xxxxxxxx -k key doesn't start an instance

I think this has been fixed. -- euca-run-instances emi- -k key doesn't start an instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 434036] Re: euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available

This appears to be fixed. -- euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 425043] Re: package quickly 0.2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Last time I tested with the latest updates in karmic it seems to be fixed. -- package quickly 0.2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425043 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 434043] Re: euca-run-instances emi-xxxxxxxx -k key doesn't start an instance

** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca-run-instances emi- -k key doesn't start an instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 434036] Re: euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available

** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 434043] Re: euca-run-instances emi-xxxxxxxx -k key doesn't start an instance

** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca-run-instances emi- -k key doesn't start an instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 434036] Re: euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available

** Also affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca-describe-availability-zones verbose doesn't report the types of instances available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 423391] Re: release.py crashed with HTTPError in exchange_request_token_for_access_token()

I think you fixed it. It updates fine now. Thanks -- release.py crashed with HTTPError in exchange_request_token_for_access_token() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 425653] Re: midori assert failure: midori: /build/buildd/nspluginwrapper-1.2.2/src/npw-rpc.c:1225: do_recv_NPObject: Assertion `npobj != ((void *)0)' failed.

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31437015/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31437016/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31437017/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 425043] [NEW] package quickly 0.2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: quickly Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch) Release:9.10 apt-cache policy quickly quickly: Installed: 0.2.2 Candidate: 0.2.2 Version table: *** 0.2.2 0 500 http://ubuntu.osuosl.org karmic/universe Packages

[Bug 425043] Re: package quickly 0.2.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31380392/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31380393/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31380394/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment