[Bug 510591] Re: avahi-browse makes host completion ugly and slow

2012-02-11 Thread MestreLion
Too bad the patch entirely removed avahi-browser , instead of using upstream techniques (strict timeout, silent subshell, etc) to make it work properly (or minize the issues). Now ssh tab completion is *useless*, since ~/.ssh/known_hosts is hashed and /etc/hosts is usually empty. avahi-brower was

[Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org

2012-02-08 Thread MestreLion
** Also affects: maverick-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 Title: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted

[Bug 589496] Re: bash --rcfile does not behave as documented

2012-02-06 Thread MestreLion
This patch fixes the behaviour of --rcfile. It was also reported in both Debian and upstream. But since Ubuntu is usually much more responsive, the fix could be patched in Ubuntu until either Debian or GNU merges. Also, to speed things up, everyone interested could voice their opinion in GNU's

[Bug 315820] Re: mkvinfo-gui launches text version.

2012-02-02 Thread MestreLion
At least in Maverick, I don't have any menu item for mkvinfo, unfortunately. But I do agree with OP: if there is a binary called mkvinfo-gui, than it should *always* open the GUI version, regardless of command line arguments. For the text version there is already the binaries mkvinfo- text and

[Bug 609216] Re: Please add example files to package

2012-02-02 Thread MestreLion
For those using Lucid or Maverick, here is the solution: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1382201 version=$(mkvinfo --version | cut -d' ' -f2 | cut -d'v' -f2) wget http://www.bunkus.org/videotools/mkvtoolnix/sources/mkvtoolnix-${version}.tar.bz2; tar -xf mkvtoolnix-${version}.tar.bz2

[Bug 609216] Re: Please add example files to package

2012-02-02 Thread MestreLion
** Attachment added: Install examples and GUI Guide in Maverick and Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mkvtoolnix/+bug/609216/+attachment/2709319/+files/install-guide-examples-maverick-lucid.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 701870] Re: enable globstar by default

2012-02-01 Thread MestreLion
This would also make rm ** deletes all files recursively, and I guess most users would not like finding that out the hard way ;) ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 196484] Re: [hardy] flashplayer (firefox) should not store the data to /tmp

2012-02-01 Thread MestreLion
At least for version 11 (but possibly froom 10.2 too), lash uses ~/.adobe and ~/.macromedia for its data ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 589496] Re: bash --rcfile does not behave as documented

2012-01-31 Thread MestreLion
Debian bug #516152 is from 2009, and #343673 from 2006 ... none of them are fixed, so I don't think they care. This is not an irrelevant package we are talking about, its a flaw in invocation of something critical like bash. Is there any chance this could be patched ASAP in Ubuntu and then the

[Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake

2012-01-28 Thread MestreLion
@Carlos Silva: Handbrake's official PPA at https://launchpad.net/~stebbins/+archive/handbrake-releases still misses an Oneiric and Precise package. Oneiric is out for 3 months now, I wonder if that archive is inactive? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 899119] [NEW] Help menu shows repeated items

2011-12-02 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: The items... Get Help Online Translate This Application Report a Problem ... appear 3 times in the Help menu ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: synaptic 0.75.2ubuntu8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.22-generic 3.0.6 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic

[Bug 899119] Re: Help menu shows repeated items

2011-12-02 Thread MestreLion
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899119 Title: Help menu shows repeated items To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 898057] [NEW] Autocreated ~/.gtkrc-2.0 boolean values causes Gtk-Message errors

2011-11-30 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: After installing and using LXAppearance (0.4.1+git20100809-0ubuntu1) in Linux Mint 10 64bits (based on Ubuntu Maverick 10.10), all GTK+ apps started via terminal shows the following errors: Gtk-Message: /home/rodrigo/.gtkrc-2.0:13: failed to retrieve property

[Bug 731363] Re: Aisleriot solitaire not showing background texture

2011-11-30 Thread MestreLion
@Scott: But was there any particular reason for the support to be removed? I doubt anyone but the original developers would have the knowledge to add the support back in. Is there any way to contact upstream devs and kindly ask this feature? Maverick, Natty and now Oneiric have a plain

[Bug 638845] Re: No native controls

2011-11-29 Thread MestreLion
Even compiling from source (either from GIT or PPA), the widgets still look like windows. Is there any way to make Unetbootin use native, GTK+ widgets? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher

2011-11-25 Thread MestreLion
This bug also affects Maverick... any change the fix can be cherry- picked to it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175874 Title: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable -

[Bug 34629] Re: Left-click clears PRIMARY buffer selection (Copy-paste with middle-button/mouse wheel fails)

2011-11-25 Thread MestreLion
I have this bug too (on Maverick) My 2 cents: - gedit clears the primary *only* if the selection was made on gedit itself! (yes, this seems absurd, i know) Steps to reproduce: - Select something in Firefox (double or triple click this very line). Alt+Tab to gedit. Middle-click. Pastes fine -

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2011-11-24 Thread MestreLion
@ Youp.net (#1550): ... but what if I wanted to start an excel like program? [...] there's no way (for a newbee) to find the launching command. You can just type spreadsheet, or calc, which is exactly what an Excel-like program is. All programs in Ubuntu can be found by category or function.

[Bug 893904] [NEW] Version 11.1.102.55 for amd64, being native x64, should not depend on nspluginwrapper

2011-11-23 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: This new version of Flash plugin is already native 64 bits, correct? But package still depends on nspluginwrapper From control file: Depends: nspluginwrapper (= 0.9.91.4-2ubuntu1) [amd64], To avoid installing an unneeded package (or worse, triyng to use a 32bit wrapper for

[Bug 642792] Re: ALT+PrtSc not recognised: breaks built-in screenshot function

2011-11-23 Thread MestreLion
Florian Sievers (#31) is right: in a clean Maverick install, 'cat /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq' (or 'sudo sysctl -a | grep kernel.sysrq') shows kernel.sysrq=0 , but in fact sysrq's are enabled (and eating up Alt+PrtScn). If i set it as 'sudo sysctl -w kernel.sysrq=0', supposedly it wouldn't change

[Bug 367037] Re: Error while burning - some files may be corrupted on the disc

2011-11-20 Thread MestreLion
@lopthopman (#26): I just said that you are experiencing a different issue than what is reported here. This bug here is for false alarms, when copy is OK but Brasero calculares checksum incorrectly and thus reports burning errors. If you are actually getting coasters, this should be reported in

[Bug 731363] Re: Aisleriot solitaire not showing background texture

2011-10-01 Thread MestreLion
What was the rationale in this change? Aisleriot looks gorgeous in Lucid, with the background texture that looks like a real cassino card table velvet... and now in Maverick (and above) it looks so... dull and plain. Why was background support removed? Any fair reason? -- You received this bug

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-08-24 Thread MestreLion
Any chance this can be cherry-picked to maverick backports or updates? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816804 Title: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default

[Bug 804397] Re: xdg-open depends on gnome-open, but it's not on the CD

2011-08-06 Thread MestreLion
@alexol: xdg-open does not rely on gnome-open anymore (since lucid i guess)... it only uses is as a fallback. In a default ubuntu install xdg-open uses gvfs-open to launch files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 739790] Re: cannot access trash:// computer:// network://

2011-08-03 Thread MestreLion
@Aleck: this is NOT the same bug. That bug happened when nautilus migrated from GnomeVFS to gvfs/GIO. And this one is about something else: @Nikolaus: this happened because gnome migrated (again) the settings for opening URIs (http:// , ftp:// , magnet:, mailto:, etc). Back in Maverick, gnome

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-28 Thread MestreLion
Question: if this patch gets approved and merged upstream, what should i do to make it cherry-picked all the way to Maverick ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816804 Title: gvfs-open

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-28 Thread MestreLion
** Patch added: Patch gvfs-open so exit code = 1 when it fails to open any file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/816804/+attachment/2237738/+files/0001-gvfs-open-655470.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-28 Thread MestreLion
Updated patch, with cosmetic changes (spacing, line breaks, commit message) ** Patch added: Patch gvfs-open so exit code = 1 when it fails to open any file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/816804/+attachment/2237872/+files/0001-gvfs-open-655470.patch -- You received this

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-28 Thread MestreLion
** Patch removed: Patch gvfs-open so exit code = 1 when it fails to open any file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/816804/+attachment/2237738/+files/0001-gvfs-open-655470.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 816804] [NEW] gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-27 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: gvfs-open exits with error code 0 (success) even when there is error. The following conditions should exit with error code 0: - File is not found - File is found, but default application for opening it is not registred Examples: $ gvfs-open nofile.txt || echo NOT FOUND!

[Bug 527295] Re: why duplicate pastebinit?

2011-07-27 Thread MestreLion
May I add WebBoard to the list? Its an yet another pastebin app that could be merged with both nautilus-pastebin and pastebinit IMHO, this would be the ideal solution for Pastebin integration into desktop: - CLI (from pastebinit) - Nautilus integration (from nautilus-pastebin) - Panel Applet

[Bug 816804] Re: gvfs-open exit code is 0 when file is not found and no default application is registred

2011-07-27 Thread MestreLion
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #655470 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655470 ** Also affects: gvfs via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655470 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 808295] [NEW] When listing keys, --keyid-format option is ignored when --with-colons is used

2011-07-10 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: The following commands output identical results: gpg --list-keys --with-colons gpg --list-keys --with-colons --keyid-format 0xshort KeyID field is always shown with 16 digits (long format). --keyid-format is being ignored. However, without --with-colons, the keyID format

[Bug 808295] Re: When listing keys, --keyid-format option is ignored when --with-colons is used

2011-07-10 Thread MestreLion
** Bug watch added: GnuPG Bugs #1354 https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1354 ** Also affects: gnupg via https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1354 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 797633] Re: seahorse-plugins should prompt for X restart after being installed

2011-07-09 Thread MestreLion
Yes, this is really confusing behavior... after installing, i went crazy looking for the context menus... it was very frustrating they were not there. Since sometimes it takes days for a user to restart his system, and there is no mention that a restart is needed (not even in the docs!), most

[Bug 793777] Re: q4wine conflicts with wine1.3 package

2011-07-09 Thread MestreLion
Hi Boris, What is the procedure to update an Ubuntu repository? This link was above: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates I did this already (for backports, since this is an upgrade and not a fix): https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/806937 But.. Version 0.118 is

[Bug 367037] Re: Error while burning - some files may be corrupted on the disc

2011-07-08 Thread MestreLion
@lopthman: this bug is about a false alarm, not actual burning problem. Also, for developers, my comment on a duplicate bug may help find the answer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/385540/comments/2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 793777] Re: q4wine conflicts with wine1.3 package

2011-07-06 Thread MestreLion
Boris, Could you please contact whoever is responsible for Ubuntu so they can add more recent versions to Maverick and Natty? The current version for Maverick is still 0.118, and that is more than 1 year old. Maverick repository could be updated to v0.120 or (preferably) v0.121 The will be no

[Bug 494082] Re: no Trash folder for root user

2011-07-03 Thread MestreLion
I've also noticed this in both 10.04 Lucid and 10.10 Maverick. The root user HAS a trash folder (at /root/.local/share/Trash), with the info and files subfolders. The problem is.. clicking trash at Nautilus (as root) gives the error Sorry, could not display all the contents of trash: Operation

[Bug 702093] Re: Root Nautilus does not access Trash

2011-02-19 Thread MestreLion
Very annoying bug, and its there for at least 9.04 One could still purge the files by manually deleting the contents or /root/.local/share/.Trash But restoring the files requires one to manually read the info/xxx.trashinfo contents to know the original location of the trashed file. Why cant the

[Bug 422012] Re: Protected files hidden by Trash

2011-02-19 Thread MestreLion
8 months since bug was confirmed. Any news on it? By the way, where ccan i find the rationale / specification on this expunged folder? Is it for big files, other-users files, both, none, something else? Last but not least: shouldnt these files be deleted on reboot? -- You received this bug

[Bug 545107] Re: Help button doesn't launch help

2011-02-17 Thread MestreLion
It is still present on 10.10 Maverick. If upstream was fixed almost 1 year ago, shouldnt Update Manager have already download the fix / updated package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 357218] Re: Ubuntu wallpaper called warty-final-ubuntu.png is made with Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh

2011-02-10 Thread MestreLion
After reading all the (excelent) discussion here, my 2 cents are: - I agree this is not actually a bug... but it is *extremely* embarassing for Ubuntu/Cannonical to have something as iconical as its default wallpaper done in 1 - Another OS, 2 - Using proprietary software, specially since Ubuntu

[Bug 94065] Re: init: add non-destructive means to disable a job

2010-12-29 Thread MestreLion
slightly embarassinng? Youre being very kind... Its a complete shame for Upstart not to have ANY means to disable services at startup. More incredibly is that Ubuntu (and even Debian) is now migrating to it. So now we are back to the old days of manually editing scripts? Hows that ANY

[Bug 385540] Re: Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
** Attachment added: brasero-session.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27726485/brasero-session.log ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27726486/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27726487/ProcMaps.txt **

[Bug 385540] [NEW] Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero After burning a CD from an ISO file, Brasero reports an error saying checksum from ISO file and burned CD do not match. (Some files may be corrupted on the disc). However, CD is fine and all files were burned correctly. I did a manual

[Bug 385540] Re: Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
After studying the log and doing some tests, i think ive spotted the error: Brasero is passing the wrong number of sectors to the readom command (that looks like its the one brasero uses to read the burned cd to calculate the checksum). These log lines should says it all (some lines were omitted

[Bug 385540] Re: Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/brasero/ubuntu -- Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 385540] Re: Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
** Branch unlinked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/brasero/ubuntu -- Brasero calculates wrong checksum after burn ISO to CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 371065] Re: system monitor crazy speed update

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 205362 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205362 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 205362 system monitor update interval is not in seconds -- system monitor crazy speed update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371065 You received this bug

[Bug 205362] Re: system monitor update interval is not in seconds

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
Some hints that might help debugging: The FIRST and SECOND refreshes happens at the correct interval. Steps to reproduce: - Open up System Monitor and switch to Resource tab - Set the interval to 10,00 (using the buttons, not keyboard - theres another bug associated with keyboard input) - Click

[Bug 205362] Re: system monitor update interval is not in seconds

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
Question: as this problem was already forwarded / upstreamed, should i double-post my comments at bugzilla too ? Im not sure how the process works... I dont have a bugzilla account, and even if i had, im not sure if double-posting would be the correct procedure... but i also dont like to post

[Bug 205362] Re: system monitor update interval is not in seconds

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
Last but not least, this bug seems to be closely related to #93847 and its various duplicates... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system- monitor/+bug/93847 Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor In fact, all those bugs may be just a symptom of this one: a refresh 10 times

[Bug 219548] Re: Xorg constant 70% CPU load

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 205362 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205362 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 93847 Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 205362 system monitor update interval is not in seconds --

[Bug 280693] Re: system monitor consumes a lot

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 205362 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205362 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 93847 Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 205362 system monitor update interval is not in seconds --

[Bug 93847] Re: Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor

2009-06-10 Thread MestreLion
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 205362 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205362 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 205362 system monitor update interval is not in seconds -- Excessive CPU usage by Gnome System Monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93847 You received

<    1   2