NFS auto-unmounting upon suspend is still important to me. I'm on 12.04
(which is still a supported release, of course).
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Serge Hallyn 30...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
Please reply if this is still an issue in a supported release.
** Changed in: pm-utils
NFS auto-unmounting upon suspend is still important to me. I'm on 12.04
(which is still a supported release, of course).
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Serge Hallyn 30...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:
Please reply if this is still an issue in a supported release.
** Changed in: pm-utils
Hi. It is not an issue for me anymore because I'm using a different
computer with ATI graphics now. I'm using Kubuntu 12.04. I don't have any
issues (especially now that I have firefox-kde-support, which is unrelated,
of course) :-)
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Thomas Hotz
Public bug reported:
This affects me with Kubuntu 12.04 beta 1 64bit installed via Alternate
installer.
Use Rekonq to download and save a file. I tested with some JPEGs and tar.bz2
files.
After downloading, go to Downloads in Rekonq
Choose Open Directory for a downloaded item.
Expected
Public bug reported:
I just installed Kubuntu 12.04 beta 1.
Both Rekong and Firefox don't know how to Open Containing Folder for
downloaded items. They also don't know how open the item itself.
Furthermore, if I manually tell Firefox (in the dialog) to remember the
file associations, that
I hope this is an appropriate question here:
Can someone explain this comment?
Leann Ogasawara on 2011-04-25
Changed in ubuntu-release-notes:
status:In Progress → Fix Released
The status says fix released, yet it doesn't appear to be fixed. Does
that mean the fix is coming or does it
log attached
** Attachment added: output from ubuntu-bug linux --save
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/768353/+attachment/2081265/+files/ubuntu-bug-output-768346.1.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
This bug affects me too.
2.6.35-28-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 1 14:39:03 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maverick
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 270461 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461
Here's a work-around:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13
I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Probably related, and could be a work-around for those having this issue:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316618
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 270461 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461
Here's a work-around:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13
I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Here's a work-around:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13
I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Here's another work-around:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13
I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm running 10.10 and it fails to suspend to RAM if I have used any NFS
shares. Even if no files are currently open, if some files on a share
were previously opened during the current session, Ubuntu will fail to
suspend. If I log out and log back in, I can suspend if I do so before
beginning any
I'm running 10.10 and it fails to suspend to RAM if I have used any NFS
shares. This happens 100% of the time and is easily reproducible. (I'm
using NFS 3.) Even if no files are currently open, if some files on a
share were previously opened during the current session, Ubuntu will
fail to suspend.
I mount my NFS shares via /etc/fstab using entries such as:
10.10.1.1:/home/shared /home/shared nfs auto,rw,noatime 0 0
Is the auto option used there the same as (or related to) the autofs
mentioned in this bug report? I had assumed so, but now I realize I might be
wrong because when I run
Wizzu, thank you. As a next step I will try autofs with your script.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116
Title:
autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to
I have the same problem in Maverick
--
ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
I have the same problem in Maverick
--
ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This issue is affecting me too. I verified that this is the exact
behavior I'm seeing with my iMac 11,1. This issue does not affect all
model iMacs. Mine is a 27 late 2009 model.
Here is how to check the serial number to determine the model.
On the bottom of your iMac stand, you'll find a label
I tested Ubuntu 10.10 daily build as of 2010.09.19 and I still get the
blank screen. (I don't have an adapter to plug in a second screen as
artik suggested above.)
--
New Apple iMac (Core i5) fails to display anything
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542660
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524454 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524454
My experience is exactly the same as comment 18
I quote:
I had this same issue after a reboot.
Ganton's post/link fixed it.
I restarted my laptop because it could not be resumed: only a black screen
with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524454 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524454
When I posted my comment, I got a message that said, Remember, this bug
report is a duplicate of bug #524454. Comment here only if you think the
duplicate status is wrong. So I read bug #524454. That bug does
...@canonical.comwrote:
Hi MountainX,
This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in
it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try
with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are
available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid
FYI, I went to the store today to look at purchasing server support and
the problem I reported last year still exists.
--
Can't purchase support contract through Canonical Store
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335664
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
There is thousands of bugs opened every months and limited ressources
to work on those and smbfs is a power user thing and not something most
users will experience with when using ubuntu
See comment #108:
Don't you want Ubuntu to integrate smoothly into a Windows-centric environment?
See Bug
Regarding comment #61, this is working great! But my package manager
keeps asking me to upgrade wine and wine gecko. How do I prevent this?
Thanks.
--
[Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I solved the question I asked in comment #63. I just opened Synaptic
package manager, found wine, and then used the Package menu to lock the
package. I ran the update tool and it no longer asked me to upgrade
wine.
--
[Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895
You
My solution was to make a USB installer:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7255204postcount=18
--
Install Fails - Jaunty beta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Lundin, how similar is your hardware to mine? I have an Asus A8N5X
motherboard.
--
Install Fails - Jaunty beta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I agree - it is probably not a coincidence that our motherboards so are
similar. They both use the nvidia nforce chip set and have other
similarities (such as same CPU socket). I presume this error only
happens on certain hardware.
Now that we have two examples of this error, maybe someone will
Tyler - Thanks!!! That works.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7963718postcount=13
I installed ies4linux and MS Money 2003 Deluxe and Business as before and now
the 100% CPU utilization bug is fixed. Online banking works. :)
Now there is just one more bug to fix: get rid of my dependence
I see the 100% CPU usage from wineserver on Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 with both
wine 1.0.1 and wine 1.1.29. I have also reproduced it with ies4linux
2.99.0 and 2.99.0.1.
I can reproduce this when running ie6 under wine directly. However, the
more troubling problem is that it happens when running
I did a clean install of wine 1.1.29 and this time I did not use
ies4linux. I used winetricks to install ie6. However, I cannot get MS
Money 2003 to work because of missing encryption components. At the
moment I'm not geting 100% CPU load, but I'm also not able to connect to
online banking so I
aeromojito, I'm running amd64. The fix from Tyler Wagner won't work on
64 bit.
--
[Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
So far, so good. I just opened 12 relatively large PDF files and I did
not experience the problem. Please allow me to test for the next couple
weeks and if the problem doesn't appear, then we can close this issue.
--
Can't open multiple large PDF files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327
You
Thanks for following up. I have just managed to get Jaunty installed. It
was by far the most challenging Ubuntu installation ever for me. But I
have it running now, so I will test this and report back... (I may need
to take a rest from the computer for a day or so after this intense
process of
The steps Pedro Pedruzzi describes
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
keyring/+bug/328127/comments/29) are identical to the steps that
originally produced the bug for me. (However, I did not go as far as he
did to reproduce it again after rebooting.)
--
gnome-keyring-daemon
Oh, I should have checked this before posting my last comment.
myu...@myserver:~$ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK
myu...@myserver:~$
Maybe that's why I'm not having a problem any more?
(for context, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/328127/comments/23
where I mention that
After I rebooted, I have never seen the problem again. I'm not sure why
it was transient in my case. And I didn't do anything (afaik) to resolve
it, but it is gone.
--
gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127
You received
I have the problem on a brand new Jaunty AMD64 install. As Johnathon
wrote, I can reproduce the error and also can use the setting of
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 to temporarily bypass it.
To reproduce, I open a terminal and type ssh myu...@myserver.
I do this command many times per day to different servers
I get the same error with the Jaunty release.
** Attachment added: jaunty_failed_install_syslog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26186779/jaunty_failed_install_syslog.txt
--
Install Fails - Jaunty beta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750
You received this bug notification because you are
FROM http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=791693highlight=.gvfspage=2
This is the official solution:
sudo aptitude reinstall gvfs gvfs-backends gvfs-bin gvfs-fuse libgvfscommon0
Is that true?
--
other users don't have access to .gvfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361
You received this
I will be upgrading to Jaunty after the release. I'll try it then.
--
Can't open multiple large PDF files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Maybe this is the same issue as my problem:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7063842#post7063842
I purchased a new hard drive for my laptop and did a clean install of
Jaunty beta (amd64, alternate installer). The install went fine --
better than any Ubuntu installation ever.
After the
Maybe this is the same issue as my problem:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7063842#post7063842
I purchased a new hard drive for my laptop and did a clean install of
Jaunty beta (amd64, alternate installer). The install went fine --
better than any Ubuntu installation ever.
After the
You can extract it by going back to the main menu and selecting save
debug logs.
It is not possible to navigate in the installer when this error happens.
The installer presents two choices: go back or continue. Neither choice
will move away from the screen showing the error.
The only way I have
Public bug reported:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6983082#post6983082
I have tried to install 6 times without success.
1. I have burned two CDs and they both validate as good.
2. Both CDs stop at exactly the same point in the installation on this
computer. See info below.
3. Using
Release Candidate 2 for StoreBackup Version 3.0 is available as of Tue
03 Mar 2009 09:53:15 PM UTC. Is it too late for Jaunty?
--
Please update to storeBackup 2.0 in jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hi - I am trying to determine if this issue applies to me. Is this the
right place to ask some questions? (newbie)
My system:
$ uname -a: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ dpkg -s cryptsetup
Package: cryptsetup
Status: install ok installed
Architecture: amd64
Version:
I think I might be experiencing problems from this issue
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=6802296postcount=14
the Ubuntu installer think my drive is hd0, the live CD shows it as hd4
(sde) and grub sees it as hd1.
Is this the same issue described here? Thanks
--
hard drive mount letters
This exact problem is happening to me with 8.10 64bit and an Areca 1220.
I have reinstalled about a dozen times. If I put the /boot partition on
a drive on the Areca controller, Ubuntu will not boot. If I put the boot
partition on another drive, no problem.
I would like to know why I am still
Bryce, thank for your reply. Due to having so many problems with
keyboard layout (especially in remote desktop to Windows servers), my
solution is going to be a different keyboard (maybe
http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html).
--
[CAPSLOCK] Swap Ctrl and Capslock - capslock key
Thank you for your interest in this bug. Are you sure you want me to
attach 8 to 10 large PDF documents here? In my experience it does not
matter which PDF documents I open. After a certain number of large
documents are open, Evince refuses to open any more, even if I have
plenty of system memory
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
When I try to open multiple PDF documents in Evince Document Viewer (the
default app), after several documents are open, Evince fails to load the
next one. This always happens, but the hang point (number of docs)
depends on the size of the docs.
Public bug reported:
I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.04 on my T61p thinkpad. Afterwards the screen
fonts were all huge, making the appearance of Ubuntu (all menus and all
applications, including text in documents) very ugly and not user
friendly.
I found that the problem was related to a setting of 146
Pardon me for asking my question a second time. I appreciate anyone
pointing me to a source of info that will tell me which hardware is NOT
subject to this bug. I'm willing to change hardware to keep Ubuntu.
My problem sounds identical to Andy Rabagliati's. For example, I see
endlessly repeating
Thanks CrazyTerabyte and Andy Rabagliati.
What does lsusb say ?
lsusb
Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0aec:3260 Neodio Technologies Corp. 7-in-1 Card Reader
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0b33:0700 Contour Design, Inc.
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 05f3:0203 PI Engineering, Inc.
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 045e:0040
I have the nVidia chipset in an Asus A8N5X motherboard. I had to turn
off USB 2.0 support in the bios to work around this bug.
Since it does not sound like a resolution for this bug is to be expected
soon, I think I will purchase a new motherboard. How can I find out
which motherboards will *not*
I have not experienced this bug in the last several months. I consider
it resolved.
--
Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213472
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Yes, this remains an issue. (I also have related issues with rdesktop,
but I suppose that is a different bug.)
I'm running the release version of Hardy with current updates.
Thank you.
** Attachment added: /var/log/Xorg.0.log and lspci -vvnn
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18442946/logs.zip
@alexsott
Your error messages look the same as mine. I would also like to know if our
issue is the same as this bug. I assumed it was.
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'm seeing slow disk transfers with Hardy (8.4.1) on a server. Windows
2003 server on older/slower hardware is performing better. I need to
improve the Ubuntu server performance! :)
Here are some examples of hdparm results on my Ubuntu Hardy server.
These are from a RAID-5 array on an LSI
I was able to install Hardy beta with a fully encrypted file system. I
do not remember the details of how I solved all my problems, but it
wasn't easy. However, everything is working now. You can mark this bug
report as solved. Thank you.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
regarding compiz, see this forum thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5040473
A Hardy user in that thread confirmed that the issue happens without
compiz enabled.
--
display error when using switch user feature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234824
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
See this forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5040473
I had been working in Hardy with several applications open. A family
member came along and switched to their user account
I am experiencing this bug in Ubuntu Hardy. I have the nVidia chipset in
an Asus A8N5X motherboard. I had to turn off USB 2.0 support in the
bios. I would like to get USB 2.0 back. This is a desktop computer so
suspend/resume isn't used. Is the autosuspend=0 workaround still
applicable to me?
Bart Verwilst - bug 218726 seems different because in the present bug it
is not possible to open a terminal and kill the compiz process on the
machine being affected.
--
compiz randomly freezes X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I have been experimenting with enabling and disabling various compiz
plugins too. After I made my previous comment here (2008-04-05) I
disabled several of my favorite plugins. One of those plugins I disabled
was the animation plugin. After disabling those plugins I have not had
any more of the
I just reported a crash as Bug #218987
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/218987
I think it might be the same as this bug. I will try to reproduce using
the steps listed here.
--
firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948
You
I would like to see this in Hardy. (I guess it is too late.)
--
[needs-packaging] awn-extras-applets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: MarkAllUpgrades.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13382135/MarkAllUpgrades.txt
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: udev = update-manager
** Also affects: udev
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Not all updates can be installed- Hardy,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: volumeid
Using Hardy beta which was clean-installed from the alternate CD with an
encrypted file system. Have been getting automatic updates daily without
any problems. Two days ago Update Manager gave me the message:
Not all updates can be installed
sources.list
** Attachment added: sources.list.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13382407/sources.list.txt
--
Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216402
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Resolved!
I followed the advice in these 3 forum threads:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751615 - Delete volumeid?
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751904 - Anybody having a hard time
updating their initramfs today?
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751775 - 2.6.24-16
I am not sure which debugging packages to install. (I'm running Hardy.)
Do I need xserver-xorg-core-dbg? And which package is compiz
debugging? Is is compiz-dev? (Synaptic doesn't list anything with
compiz and debug both in the name.) Thanks.
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
I am seeing this bug with Hardy beta (all updates current as of this
date) and Sun Java 6. The java app in question is MoneyDance personal
finance software.
The windows are drawn without content about 30% of the time. Repeatedly
closing and re-opening an affected window or dialog box will
I voted under bug 6632124. Here is my info:
The windows are drawn without content about 30% of the time. Repeatedly
closing and re-opening an affected window or dialog box will eventually
bring up one that has content.
This bug happens only when extra visual effects (compiz) are enabled.
When no
correction
use:
sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap
--
Keyboard Layout Options Bugging In Terminal Server Client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
correction -
wrong: sudo loadkeys /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap
right: sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap
--
keyboard layout changes are problematic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
The line above that says sudo loadkeys /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap should
use xmodmap instead of loadkeys
--
Incorrect keys sent to Windows Server by tsclient
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
correction
use:
sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap
--
tsclient doesn't use keyboard layout settings and sends wrong keys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Background: The confirmation dialog to install new software darkens
(shades) the entire screen while the dialog is active.
Problem: screen remains dark and confirmation dialog remains on screen
after clicking OK to dismiss the dialog.
Expected behavior: After dismissing the
screen shot attached.
** Attachment added: ScreenNotRefreshedAfterShadingForConfirmationDialog.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13176939/ScreenNotRefreshedAfterShadingForConfirmationDialog.png
--
Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software
I have been experiencing the exact same things in Hardy beta with all
updates applied.
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
xsession errors
** Attachment added: xsession-errors
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137422/xsession-errors
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
lspci
** Attachment added: lspci
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137429/lspci
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Xorg.0.log
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137437/Xorg.0.log
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
how do I reopen this bug report?
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
btw, I am not the original reporter. My situation however, is the same.
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
See this similar bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/176589
The problem lives in Hardy. How do we reopen this bug? Or should we just
point it to the other bug report? (I'm a newbie.)
--
Compiz locks screen randomly on ubuntu gutsy
my kernel info:
2.6.24-14-generic
i386 Hardy beta
Pyry - what is your kernel now?
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Xorg.0.log
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137617/Xorg.0.log
--
compiz randomly freezes X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
lspci
** Attachment added: lspci
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137612/lspci
--
compiz randomly freezes X
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same problem here on Ubuntu Hardy beta. Ctrl-Alt-Backspace has no effect
and Ctrl-Alt-Del has no effect. Ctrl-Alt-F1 and all other keys or key
combinations have no effect.
However, I am able to connect to my frozen/locked desktop computer by
ssh from my laptop. Top shows compiz.real at 100% CPU.
I have attached the missing info that the original reporter did not
attach. With that I am reopening the bug. Hope that is OK.
** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058
You received this bug
When compiz.real is the process consuming 99-100% CPU, how do we get a
backtrace? I see some info on backtracing for Xorg here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingXorg
If someone tells me how to do it in the context of this (compiz-
related?) bug, I will do it. Thanks.
--
Compiz-fusion makes the
** Also affects: sambaserver
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Can you provide the bug number for the other bug report? I would like to
understand how I missed seeing it.
My experience as a new user is that reporting bugs is difficult. For
example, I searched trying to find if this bug had already been reported
and I couldn't find it. I am not criticizing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tsclient
In Ubuntu Hardy I have used the keyboard preferences to change keyboard
layout options. Those layout options are not used by tsclient 0.150
(Terminal Server Client) and therefore it sends the wrong keys to the
Windows server.
** Affects:
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
