[Bug 1864298] Re: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3"

2020-09-10 Thread Mrten
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864298 Title: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3" To manage

[Bug 1864298] Re: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3"

2020-09-10 Thread Mrten
Same for xenial (with a different warning of course): [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000509 2020] [:notice] [pid 22739] ModSecurity for Apache/2.9.0 (http://www.modsecurity.org/) configured. [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000529 2020] [:notice] [pid 22739] ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.5.1"; loaded

[Bug 1555171] Re: systemd does not shut down rsyslog

2018-06-04 Thread Mrten
expected behaviour: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815862#10 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #815862 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815862 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1746995] Re: regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails

2018-02-08 Thread Mrten
Hi, After a few kicks and reboots I'll say that it does not work. The strace is much different though, but it trips over a message that's in Florian's patch. 14151 lstat(".gfid/f55c143a-83a5-4ca0-a833-95ff8e30ff32", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0666, st_size=3257, ...}) = 0 14151 stat(".gfid",

[Bug 1746995] Re: regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails

2018-02-05 Thread Mrten
I do now: 11051 geteuid() = 0 11051 getegid() = 0 11051 umask(0) = 022 11051 umask(022)= 0 11051 brk(NULL) = 0x55f0d0a14000 11051 brk(0x55f0d0a35000) =

[Bug 1746995] [NEW] regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails

2018-02-02 Thread Mrten
Public bug reported: Since somewhere in the Jan 14-18 range my glusterfs georeplication reports Faulty. Georeplication uses rsync internally, and tracking this this down leads to an exit code 3 out of rsync. I have no stacktraces myself, but I found this report about the same problem:

[Bug 1186532] Re: Missing version information libmysqlclient18 on Debian Wheezy

2015-06-10 Thread Mrten
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186532 Title: Missing version information

[Bug 782116] Re: Package OpenNTPd does not install

2013-09-20 Thread Mrten
This isn't really a bug in the openntpd package, it's a result of the fact that the 'ntp' package and the 'openntpd' package use the same filename for the daemon. I'm willing to bet that each and every one of you here first had 'ntp' installed and then upgraded to 'openntpd'. 'ntp' leaved an

[Bug 391151] Re: xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy)

2013-06-13 Thread Mrten
I suppose it wasn't possible, but hey! there's Precise, xdelta3 passes its selftest there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391151 Title: xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64

[Bug 743677] Re: attempt to ban ip: global name 'time' is not defined

2013-03-05 Thread Mrten
Trivial patch from upstream: https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743677 Title: attempt to ban ip: global name 'time' is not defined To

[Bug 1134873] Re: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors

2013-03-01 Thread Mrten
I understand the reason for the openssl 1.0.1e release is exactly this corruption. http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES Can we upgrade to 1.0.1e like debian has? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1134873] Re: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors

2013-03-01 Thread Mrten
Thanks for clarifying! For the unsuspecting newcomer: Username/pass for rt.openssl.org is guest/guest. I had looked at the upstream bug but hit the login-wall and looked no further. This time I googled some more and found http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html . -- You received this bug

[Bug 714904] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre-up.d)

2011-06-21 Thread Mrten
Re #14: I have tested natty (apt-get purge ifenslave-2.6; apt-get install ifenslave-2.6) and bonding works now without additional up and down clauses in the /etc/network/interfaces file. Relevant section of /etc/network/interfaces (two servers connected back- to-back with each other): auto bond0

[Bug 714904] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre-up.d)

2011-06-21 Thread Mrten
Indeed I had read so elsewhere and have tried that but I couldn't get bond0 up then. But the second part of your second sentence woke me up just now: Instead of just 'ifup bond0' and be done the command I have to do is 'ifup bond0 ifup eth1 ifup eth2 ifup eth3' :) Thanks! -- You received

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2011-02-11 Thread Mrten
Installed yesterday, tested today and works as it should. ** Tags added: verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2011-02-11 Thread Mrten
Installed yesterday, tested today and works as it should. ** Tags added: verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 536803] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939!

2010-07-13 Thread Mrten
same here, using lucid, kernel 2.6.32-22-server -- kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 536803] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939!

2010-07-13 Thread Mrten
Er, scratch that. -- kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-06-29 Thread Mrten
This bug blocks the upgrade of our server farm to Lucid since we're importing databases on a daily basis. Is there a place that I can track progress of this 6-line patch? What is the usual path? Or can I please please please get an update? If this takes four months, then I'll look for a

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-06-18 Thread Mrten
Chuck, any ideas on the timeline for the inclusion of the fix for this bug? There has been a security upgrade since you made the fix available in your ppa, so we're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place... Thanks! -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-06-18 Thread Mrten
Chuck, any ideas on the timeline for the inclusion of the fix for this bug? There has been a security upgrade since you made the fix available in your ppa, so we're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place... Thanks! -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-26 Thread Mrten
Seems to work, thanks! r...@miho:/home/mrten# apt-cache policy mysql-server mysql-server: Installed: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Candidate: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Version table: *** 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-26 Thread Mrten
Seems to work, thanks! r...@miho:/home/mrten# apt-cache policy mysql-server mysql-server: Installed: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Candidate: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Version table: *** 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages

[Bug 573436] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0

2010-05-18 Thread Mrten
This affects imap.ini and mcrypt.ini, too. PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/imap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 --

[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice

2010-05-18 Thread Mrten
Ahh, so you have FIVE PPA's. apt-get upgraded, rebooted, no change. r...@lida:/var/log/munin# apt-cache policy munin-node munin-node: Installed: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 0 500

[Bug 573436] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0

2010-05-18 Thread Mrten
This affects imap.ini and mcrypt.ini, too. PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/imap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 --

[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice

2010-05-18 Thread Mrten
Ahh, so you have FIVE PPA's. apt-get upgraded, rebooted, no change. r...@lida:/var/log/munin# apt-cache policy munin-node munin-node: Installed: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 0 500

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-17 Thread Mrten
This one? http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 ** Bug watch added: MySQL Bug System #49479 http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification

[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice

2010-05-17 Thread Mrten
I can help out here, I've still got two servers that I didn't touch after upgrade from hardy to lucid. However, I don't see a recent munin or munin-node in your PPA. -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-17 Thread Mrten
This one? http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 ** Bug watch added: MySQL Bug System #49479 http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification

[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice

2010-05-17 Thread Mrten
I can help out here, I've still got two servers that I didn't touch after upgrade from hardy to lucid. However, I don't see a recent munin or munin-node in your PPA. -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-10 Thread Mrten
** Patch added: patch taken from mysql commit log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48235687/tmp.patch -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-10 Thread Mrten
** Patch added: patch taken from mysql commit log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48235687/tmp.patch -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 576949] [NEW] [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43

2010-05-07 Thread Mrten
Public bug reported: LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication when there are keywords or braces in columnnames. This is a known bug in mysql: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479, which is fixed in 5.1.43. However, Lucid LTS has 5.1.41. Would it be possible to include the (very simple) patch

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2009-07-28 Thread Mrten
This is 8.04.3 LTS, looking at apt-cache policy I see I've pulled nagios3 as backport from rogerw's ppa (mentioned in bug 240764). -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2009-07-28 Thread Mrten
This is 8.04.3 LTS, looking at apt-cache policy I see I've pulled nagios3 as backport from rogerw's ppa (mentioned in bug 240764). -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2009-07-27 Thread Mrten
This bug affects nagios3 as well, the patch from comment #4 fixes the issue. -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. --

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2009-07-27 Thread Mrten
This bug affects nagios3 as well, the patch from comment #4 fixes the issue. -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 391151] [NEW] xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy)

2009-06-23 Thread Mrten
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xdelta3 $ xdelta3 test xdelta3: testing random_numbers... success xdelta3: testing decode_integer_end_of_input... success xdelta3: testing decode_integer_overflow... success xdelta3: testing encode_decode_uint32_t.

[Bug 136835] Re: smartd says not capable of SMART self-check while smartctl works

2009-01-20 Thread Mrten
I see this on hardy, but not on all hardies I manage. It's a SAMSUNG HE103UJ though, and I have no register values logged. -- smartd says not capable of SMART self-check while smartctl works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 254326] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU #1 stuck for 11s -- Ubuntu 8.04.1 Kernel 2.6.24-19

2008-12-21 Thread Mrten
There is an issue with the D945GCLF: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11976 -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU #1 stuck for 11s -- Ubuntu 8.04.1 Kernel 2.6.24-19 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530

2008-12-07 Thread mrten
** Description changed: - After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10 alpha 6, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. + After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. I did not have this problem with 8.04, it appeared after the upgrade.

[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530

2008-10-21 Thread mrten
After a recent update, suspend is working again, but still no progress with the closing screen problem. -- No action when closing screen on HP 530 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530

2008-10-11 Thread mrten
Hello I'm a bit dissapointed over the lack of feedback on this bug. This is a regression, it has been confirmed by other HP 530 users, but still no-one has shown any interest in fixing this bug. I'm monitoring this bug, so if any developers want information or whatever from me, just tell. I'm

[Bug 277534] [NEW] No action when closing screen on HP 530

2008-10-03 Thread mrten
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10 alpha 6, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. I did not have this problem with 8.04, it appeared after the upgrade. What should happen: Closing the laptop lid/screen should turn of the screen while on AC-power, or