[Bug 920055] Re: Package fails at dpkg postinst during installation

2012-04-03 Thread Neil Wilson
** Branch linked: lp:~neil-aldur/ubuntu/precise/iptables-persistent/fix- for-967018-905517 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920055 Title: Package fails at dpkg postinst during

[Bug 905517] Re: package iptables-persistent 0.5.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-04-03 Thread Neil Wilson
** Branch unlinked: lp:~neil-aldur/ubuntu/precise/iptables-persistent /fix-for-967018-905517 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905517 Title: package iptables-persistent 0.5.3 failed to

[Bug 970128] Re: ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 fails to scan networks

2012-04-01 Thread Neil Wilson
Testing with mainline 3.4.0-030400rc1-generic #201203312035 SMP Sun Apr 1 00:36:22 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Apr 1 20:54:38 acer-aspire-5536 NetworkManager[956]: info WiFi now disabled by radio killswitch Apr 1 20:54:38 acer-aspire-5536 NetworkManager[956]: info (wlan0): device

[Bug 970156] Re: [Lenovo N100] ethernet overrun errors during TCP transfer when ACPI switched on

2012-04-01 Thread Neil Wilson
Adding nolapic_timer to the boot line makes the overruns go away, but the side effects are problematic. The laptop fan stays on all the time and there are intermittent races in the GUI interface that slow it down to a crawl. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 970128] Re: ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 fails to scan networks

2012-04-01 Thread Neil Wilson
I've had constant problems with this wireless adapter on several APs. With the Apple Airport it is intermittent whether it picks it up on the scan and it never authenticates. With other APs (the previous netgear I had) there was intermittent disconnects for no good reason, and it never worked with

[Bug 970107] [NEW] Cannot connect to crash database... nonnumeric port: 'text'

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: While trying to report any bug on checkbox from this system. Fails to launch Launchpad with this error nonnumeric port: 'text' ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: checkbox 0.13.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic 3.2.13 Uname: Linux

[Bug 970107] Re: Cannot connect to crash database... nonnumeric port: 'text'

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970107 Title: Cannot connect to crash database... nonnumeric port: 'text' To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 970128] [NEW] ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 fails to scan networks

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: 9280 is failing to scan and connect to Apple Airport network Wireless kill switch is erratic and often disables the wireless completely. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-3.2.0-21-generic 3.2.0-21.34 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 970128] Re: ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 fails to scan networks

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970128 Title: ieee80211 phy0: Atheros AR9280 Rev:2 fails to scan networks To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 765843] Re: Intermittent mount failure after growroot

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765843 Title: Intermittent mount failure after growroot To manage

[Bug 556312] Re: libvirt/kvm relationships (suggest vs. recommend)

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: libvirt Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: libvirt Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #508606 = None ** Changed in: libvirt Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 433189] Re: snd-hda-intel: spurious response messages in dmesg - causes crackle

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** No longer affects: linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433189 Title: snd-hda-intel: spurious response messages in dmesg - causes crackle To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 407034] Re: Acer Aspire 5536 - ALC888 unknown (too big adjustment 32)

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** No longer affects: linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407034 Title: Acer Aspire 5536 - ALC888 unknown (too big adjustment 32) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 34144] Re: sis 760 AGP broken on amd64

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: xorg-server Importance: Medium = Undecided ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: xorg-server Remote watch: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #8840 = None ** Changed in: xorg-server Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 970156] [NEW] [Lenovo N100] ethernet overrun errors during TCP transfer when ACPI switched on

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: Still getting ethernet overrun errors in Ubuntu Precise on the RT 8139 ethernet driver. Details as bug #401891 $ ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1b:38:08:7f:d3 inet addr:192.168.0.110 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0

[Bug 970156] Re: [Lenovo N100] ethernet overrun errors during TCP transfer when ACPI switched on

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #13830 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13830 ** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13830 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 401891] Re: [Lenovo N100] ethernet overrun errors during TCP transfer when ACPI switched on.

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** No longer affects: linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401891 Title: [Lenovo N100] ethernet overrun errors during TCP transfer when ACPI switched on. To manage notifications

[Bug 390198] Re: M-Audio Transit - firmware out of date

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: madfuload (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390198 Title: M-Audio Transit - firmware out of date To manage notifications about this

[Bug 234222] Re: [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100

2012-03-31 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234222 Title: [hardy-regression] not retaining brightness - Lenovo N100 To manage

[Bug 967018] [NEW] package iptables-persistent 0.5.3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-28 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: On upgrade from lucid to precise. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: iptables-persistent 0.5.3ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.33-generic 3.2.12 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date:

[Bug 967018] Re: package iptables-persistent 0.5.3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-03-28 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967018 Title: package iptables-persistent 0.5.3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned

[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-18 Thread Neil Wilson
I should point out that the resize2fs in precise does the same thing even if you don't specify the size: For example do $ cp tiny xxl $ dd if=/dev/zero of=xxl bs=1 count=0 seek=1310720M $ resize2fs xxl When I looked at the code I couldn't see an explicit check in there. -- You received this

[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-18 Thread Neil Wilson
Similarly with lvm and kpartx Although on something with big enough real disks I only have: resize2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 956870] [NEW] growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: If the number of blocks in a disk is greater than the maximum size of a signed 32-bit integer then growpart will fail in the initramfs. This is because the 'test' function in busybox gives the incorrect answer with large numbers. Since the busybox test function works fine

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
** Also affects: klibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: precise ** Also affects: busybox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
** No longer affects: klibc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
The initramfs uses a different version of busybox to standard (in package busybox-initramfs) - located in /usr/lib/initramfs- tools/bin/busybox Running this version of busybox does exhibit the error on a normal server. Checking the config in the package it appears that CONFIG_FEATURE_TEST_64 is

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
The description of the busybox-initramfs package is wrong - as the binary is no longer statically linked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug

[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug with big disks

2012-03-16 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug with big disks To manage

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
Yep, There's two bugs here. I'll make this one the 'resize' bug and raise another for the growpart failure once I've worked out what is going on there. My initial thoughts was to have cc_resize_fs.py check the existing filesystem to see what its limits were and then resize to the smaller of

[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
The workaround is to create a 128M journal via mkfs.ext4 -J size=128 which is the size of journal generally created on a 20G disk anyway. This costs 24k blocks (96M) on a 1G partition - which is about 10% of the free blocks available. When you do this Oneiric's resize2fs now appears to

[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
Same problem on precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
Online resize still fails: ubuntu@srv-eej0z:~$ sudo resize2fs /dev/loop0 resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) Filesystem at /dev/loop0 is mounted on /mnt; on-line resizing required old_desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 80 Performing an on-line resize of /dev/loop0 to 335544320 (4k) blocks. resize2fs:

[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
Similarly with online resizing: $ cp tiny xxl $ dd if=/dev/zero of=xxl bs=1 count=0 seek=1310720M $ sudo losetup /dev/loop0 xxl $ sudo e2fsck /dev/loop0 e2fsck 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) /dev/loop0: clean, 11/65536 files, 12635/262144 blocks $ sudo mount /dev/loop0 /mnt $ sudo resize2fs /dev/loop0

[Bug 956038] [NEW] resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: If you resize a 1G partition to more than 1T the filesystem becomes corrupted offline and errors on-line. resize2fs does not check the maximum size of the filesystem before initiating the resize. To reproduce: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=tiny bs=1 count=0 seek=1G $ mkfs.ext4 -F

[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
The use case here is expansion of the root partition of a virtual machines from a small core image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond

[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image

2012-03-15 Thread Neil Wilson
I've logged bug #956038 for the failure of resize2fs to check the maximum size of the filesystem. The workaround is to allocate the maximum number of resize blocks with: mkfs.ext4 -J size=128 -E resize=4294967295 -F tiny The '2^32-1' number is to workaround faults in older versions of 'mke2fs'.

[Bug 955272] [NEW] growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: I'm getting failures with growpart and resize2fs with very large disks. Above about 768Gb the online resizing in resize2fs fails - due to the lack of allocated blocks on the original filesystem. The maximum appears to be 201326592 blocks And with terabyte disks, the

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
** Also affects: cloud-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
Package: cloud-initramfs-growroot 0.4ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
2012-03-14 17:43:34,263 - cc_resizefs.py[DEBUG]: resizing root filesystem (type=ext4, maj=253, min=1) 2012-03-14 17:46:35,813 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: Failed to resize filesystem (['resize2fs', '/tmp/tmpjdcY6H']) 2012-03-14 17:46:35,813 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: output=Filesystem at

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
Similarly on precise: 2012-03-14 18:11:00,708 - __init__.py[DEBUG]: handling resizefs with freq=None and args=[] 2012-03-14 18:11:00,721 - cc_resizefs.py[DEBUG]: resizing root filesystem (type=ext4, maj=253, min=1) 2012-03-14 18:14:04,588 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: Failed to resize filesystem

[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks

2012-03-14 Thread Neil Wilson
From https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/656115 Note that we reserve enough GDT blocks so you can grow the filesystem by a factor of 1024 of the initial size. The source image is a 1G partition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 937799] [NEW] ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise

2012-02-21 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: ruby1.8 is the default ruby for precise at the moment. 1.8.7 is supposed to drop out of support by the middle of 2013, and security updates are not going to happen. Which is a bit of a problem for a platform that is supposed to be supported through to 2017. Is there a way

[Bug 937799] Re: ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise

2012-02-21 Thread Neil Wilson
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937799 Title: ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2012-01-05 Thread Neil Wilson
Confirmed fixed on i686 with kernel 2.6.32-38-generic-pae #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 12:11:13 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux Confirmed fixed on x86_64 with kernel 2.6.32-38-server #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 11:26:59 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Many thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid **

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-12-16 Thread Neil Wilson
Confirmed fixed on i386. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-12-16 Thread Neil Wilson
Confirmed fixed on amd64 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-13 Thread Neil Wilson
Confirmed the package corrects the initial wizard failure allowing the program to start up correctly. Package purges and reinstalls correctly. Package upgrades from previous version correctly. Rerunning wizard from within the program works correctly. Good to go from my point of view. -- You

[Bug 900234] [NEW] dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise

2011-12-05 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: Getting errors similar to the following in the syslog on Precise: Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 10.251.70.10 on eth0 to 10.251.70.9 port 67 Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: DHCPACK of 10.251.70.10 from 10.251.70.9 Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient:

[Bug 900234] Re: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise

2011-12-05 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900234 Title: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 900234] Re: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise

2011-12-05 Thread Neil Wilson
The error is triggered due to the presence of the file '/sbin/dhclient3' and the lack of the directory '/var/lib/dhcp3'. So either we need to get rid of /sbin/dhclient3 or link /var/lib/dhcp3' to '/var/lib/dhcp'. Did this every get decided? ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-05 Thread Neil Wilson
No Precise desktop equipment at the moment, but I do have Brightbox cloud which has a proper graphical console. One quick upgrade to 'ubuntu-desktop' later and I can confirm that kdenlive Config wizard works fine in Precise at the moment. Setting Precise task to invalid. This is an Oneiric only

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-04 Thread Neil Wilson
** Patch added: kdenlive-newmlt.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+attachment/2618743/+files/kdenlive-newmlt.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-04 Thread Neil Wilson
j^ Are you able to follow the process in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix I'm struggling for time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: MLT's SDL module not found on

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-04 Thread Neil Wilson
SRU required in Oneiric. the package in the archive fails on start with a fresh install. See reviews in Software manager for user bad experience. The patch fixes the Config wizard so that the program will start properly from a fresh install. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 899580] [NEW] MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: On a fresh install of kdenlive the configuration wizard will fail with MLT's SDL module not found. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: kdenlive 0.8-4build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
This is due to compatibility error in with the MLT library in Oneiric You can workaround the problem by creating the file ~/.kde/share/config/kdenliverc with the contents [version] version=0.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 894840] Re: kdenlive does not start

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 889788] Re: Kdenlive MTL SDL module not found

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 877311] Re: kdenlive does not runs

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 363430] Re: error, couldn't find SDL module from MLT, Kdenlive will not start untill you fix this

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 899580] Re: MLT's SDL module not found on fresh install in Oneiric

2011-12-03 Thread Neil Wilson
Creating the file above simply skips the config wizard. It doesn't fix the config wizard. Settings - Run Config Wizard will still fail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title:

[Bug 893614] [NEW] grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing

2011-11-22 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: grub-probe can fail with 'grub-probe: error: cannot stat `/dev/disk/by- uuid/`' if the mounted disk has had its UUID changed via 'tune2fs'. tune2fs caused the /dev/disk/by-uuid directory to update and the old link to be removed, but the entries in /proc/self/mountinfo

[Bug 893614] Re: grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing

2011-11-22 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893614 Title: grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 674297] Re: gvim menus don't work properly on unity

2011-11-18 Thread Neil Wilson
I've got absolutely no menus having upgraded to Oneiric. Pointing at the top bar gives nothing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674297 Title: gvim menus don't work properly on unity

[Bug 674297] Re: gvim menus don't work properly on unity

2011-11-18 Thread Neil Wilson
After a while you get WARNING **: Unable to register window with path '/com/canonical/menu/4200024': Timeout was reached -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674297 Title: gvim menus

[Bug 890250] [NEW] Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package

2011-11-14 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: This report is about the Maverick version of tasksel It looks like the Server task contains a package 'ubuntu-serverguide' which is ceased to exist after Lucid. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 14 14:22:44 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala

[Bug 890250] Re: Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package

2011-11-14 Thread Neil Wilson
** Description changed: This report is about the Maverick version of tasksel It looks like the Server task contains a package 'ubuntu-serverguide' which is ceased to exist after Lucid. ProblemType: Bug - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 - Package: tasksel 2.88ubuntu3 -

Re: [Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-11-08 Thread Neil Wilson
oneiric. -- Neil Wilson -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about

Re: [Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3

2011-11-07 Thread Neil Wilson
On 4 November 2011 16:34, Scott Moser smo...@canonical.com wrote: 1.14.1-1 built in the archive for i386 and amd64 ** Changed in: libguestfs (Ubuntu)       Status: Confirmed = Fix Released 1.14.1-2 supposedly fixes the python 3 bindings. Going to try a test build -- Neil Wilson -- You

Re: [Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3

2011-11-07 Thread Neil Wilson
Test build completed successfully. https://launchpad.net/~brightbox/+archive/experimental/+build/2906561 Can you sync 1.14.1-2 from Debian unstable which will give python3 bindings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3

2011-11-03 Thread Neil Wilson
Upstream have some patches for Python 3. Hopefully Hilko can get those into the Debian package before Freeze. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBFS with

[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-11-02 Thread Neil Wilson
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #647402 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647402 ** Also affects: live-build (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647402 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBS with python 3

2011-11-02 Thread Neil Wilson
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #750889 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750889 ** Also affects: libguestfs (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750889 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - python bindings FTBS with python

[Bug 884162] [NEW] missing dependency - requires virtio_blk kernel module

2011-10-31 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: libguestfs depends upon the virtio_blk kernel module to provide access to the underlying filesystems. This is only available in the 'linux- image-generic' image (or possibly linux-image-server on precise). It fails completely under 'linux-image-virtual' ** Affects:

[Bug 884167] Re: All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image

2011-10-31 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884167 Title: All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 884167] [NEW] All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image

2011-10-31 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: The server and virtual images appear to be missing the 'virtio_blk' and virtio_net' kernel modules. This breaks packages like 'libguestfs' which depend upon them to work. I can sort of understand virtual - not many people are nesting virtualisation, but server seems a bit

[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-10-28 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version

[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-10-28 Thread Neil Wilson
** Patch added: ubuntu-check-dpkg-version.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+attachment/2576453/+files/ubuntu-check-dpkg-version.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-10-28 Thread Neil Wilson
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu) Assignee: Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version

[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-10-27 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 882670] [NEW] lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option

2011-10-27 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: The dpkg in the chroot (on a lucid build for example) might not be new enough to handle the 'unsafe-io' option set in the configuration file. lb_chroot_dpkg should check the chroot's dpkg capability first, e.g. Chroot chroot dpkg --force-help | grep -q unsafe-io

[Bug 880386] [NEW] python bindings don't work with python 3

2011-10-23 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: From ubuntu ppa build (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/83488108 /buildlog_ubuntu-natty- amd64.libguestfs_1.12.8-1~natty1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) Function `PyString_AsString' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py.c:56 Function `PyInt_FromLong'

[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBS with python 3

2011-10-23 Thread Neil Wilson
** Summary changed: - python bindings don't work with python 3 + python bindings FTBS with python 3 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #646360 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646360 ** Also affects: libguestfs (Debian) via

[Bug 667346] Re: [needs-packaging] sync package libguestfs from debian unstable

2011-10-20 Thread Neil Wilson
This package is now in Debian testing and Debian unstable, yet isn't in the Precise library yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667346 Title: [needs-packaging] sync package

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-10-04 Thread Neil Wilson
Fixes backported to 2.6.32 ** Patch added: 0001-addrconf.c-Prevent-missing-IPv6-addresses.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2508136/+files/0001-addrconf.c-Prevent-missing-IPv6-addresses.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-10-04 Thread Neil Wilson
Fault has been introduced by commit 5d5619b40c2474de01c64bdf6bb9f1211d3e967a https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/commit/5d5619b40c2474de01c64bdf6bb9f1211d3e967a which fails to check the return value of 'err' and break out of the enclosing for loop. The fault is corrected during the refactoring

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-10-03 Thread Neil Wilson
This fault can be shown more simply with the attached create dummies ruby script, which simply adds 16 IPv6 addresses to dummy interfaces. Running ./create-dummies.rb creates five dummy interfaces 'dummy01' to 'dummy05' each with 16 IPv6 addresses on them. Running 'ip addr show dev dummy04' and

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-10-03 Thread Neil Wilson
Running 'ip link del dummy01' moves the problem from dummy04 to dummy05 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage

[Bug 863394] [NEW] kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
Public bug reported: 2.6.32 has a problem with allocating IPv6 addresses that shows up using later versions of libvirt, or if you create lots of IPv6 addresses manually. What happens is that 'ip addr show dev' for a particular device fails to show the ipv6 addresses on them, yet they are there

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
ip -o -6 addr show dev br25006e Will then return no entry, but ifconfig br25006e shows the ipv6 addresses as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
Later kernels don't appear to suffer this fault, but it is replicable on RHEL 6.x and derivatives, which uses the 2.6.32 kernel similarly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title:

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
Steps to replicate From a clean booted Lucid server (cloud image or otherwise). sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade sudo apt-get install bridge-utils dnsmasq-base ruby Install the attached files (bradd.sh, create-bridges.rb) in the home directory and run sudo ./create-bridges.rb 25

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
** Attachment added: Looped bridge creator https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2487354/+files/create-bridges.rb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.

2011-09-30 Thread Neil Wilson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742588 RHEL Bug ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #742588 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742588 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >