Just copying info from someone having this problem with no result.
Taken from http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2007-08/msg03497.html
I was upgrade our Linux Samba server (Fedora Core 4, kernel 2.6.17,
samba 3.0.23d) to Fedora 7, kernel 2.6.22.2-57.fc7, samba 3.0.25bb-2.fc7
(SELinux
This link suggest bug may have been introduced in samba 3.0.23:
http://lists.zerezo.com/samba/msg26421.html
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
A relatively good description of the bug:
http://www.nabble.com/segfault-with-failed-to-set-uid-td16137340.html
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Just to remember it was reported in Debian as (closed because not
reproductible) bug #501773:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501773
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I think I found:
o Andrew Tridgell
* Avoid a race condition in glibc between AIO and setresuid().
* Become root for AIO operations.
taken from the latest (3.0.34 samba changelog):
This would explain why
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/341816
say that Build the
Ok, I think this time I have found.
taken from 3.0.34 samba changelog (latest in 3.0):
http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.0.34.html
o Andrew Tridgell
* Avoid a race condition in glibc between AIO and setresuid().
* Become root for AIO operations.
This would explain why
I think you did the right thing by installing Samba 3.0.34.
Indeed the changelog suggest that it was fixed there:
http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.0.34.html
o Andrew Tridgell
* Avoid a race condition in glibc between AIO and setresuid().
* Become root for AIO operations.
In fact I believe it comes from that guy:
http://webui.sourcelabs.com/rhel/issues/459901
he seems to suggest that the real problem is with the kernel not exactly
implementing Posix correctly.
I still have a doubt because he speak of setresuid changing the value of AIO,
not changing the value
Yeah, I began to realise I was wrong before reading you comment.
I have a new, I hope better hypothesis now.
It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user.
For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the
nobody user (normally nobody have
id 65534
For Berni, I meant:
sudo cat /etc/group | grep 1001 of course.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Thank you for this bug report.
Many other similar bugs have been reported, some on Ubuntu, sometimes on
Fedora, or even in FreeBSD.
In Ubuntu I speak of bug #216358, bug #314657 and bug #229654.
Could you check if user ID 11789 really exist by doing:
sudo cat /etc/passwd | grep 11789
sudo cat
Yeah, I began to realise I was wrong before reading you comment.
I have a new, I hope better hypothesis now.
It look a bit stupid, but maybe it is trying to become a deleted user.
For ZDS (original poster) it would have means he would have deleted the
nobody user (normally nobody have
id 65534
For Berni, I meant:
sudo cat /etc/group | grep 1001 of course.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thank you for this bug report.
Many other similar bugs have been reported, some on Ubuntu, sometimes on
Fedora, or even in FreeBSD.
In Ubuntu I speak of bug #216358, bug #314657 and bug #229654.
Could you check if user ID 11789 really exist by doing:
sudo cat /etc/passwd | grep 11789
sudo cat
Thanks for this bug report.
As this was reported a long time ago, we would like to know: Is it still an
issue for you?
If so, could you give an exemple of acl permissions that generate this problem.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
An extra 'executable'
Still an issue in Jaunty.
Dépaquetage de samba (à partir de .../samba_2%3a3.3.1-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « man-db »...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « ufw »...
Paramétrage de samba (2:3.3.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Generating
Thanks you, for your comment.
Happy to see that you are there to answer more questions.
Then, looking the backtrace, I remark:
#2 0x00613c7b in smb_panic (why=value optimized out)
at lib/util.c:1639
#3 0x00618cf1 in assert_uid (ruid=4294967295, euid=10009)
at
BTW, I determined that user 0 is root, and -1 is used to say, do not change
this value (real user or effective user).
http://linux.die.net/man/2/setresuid
Now my very BIG GUESS is that it could be that the code in Samba use -1 without
a type cast to uid_t.
And that the code would be ok say, on
Seems in .orig of jaunty (lib/sec_util.c) the functions seems identical.
Oh well, seems there is enough info for at least let a developer verify my
hypothesis.
Confirming the bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
Well, at first glace it does seems my guess is right.
I have downloaded samba 3.0.28aorig.tar.gz (need to learn the command to
extract sources and apply ubuntu patches) and found this in util_sec.c:
void set_effective_gid(gid_t gid)
{
#if USE_SETRESUID
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
#endif
#if
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba#samba-server.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
We are closing this bug report because it seems to be caused by a bad
configuration value rather than being a true bug, as described in the
previous comments. Please reopen it if you think it is wrong, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click
We are closing this bug report as you requested in the previous comment.
Thanks again!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
8.10 system-config-printer lost SMB connection selection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311961
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you for giving the requested info.
Marking as Confirmed.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Copying from RISC OS to intrepid with Samba writes zeros ad infinitum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292130
You received this bug notification because you are
Seems complete enough for a developer to say, if it is true or not.
Confirming.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Winbind dont obey winbind use default domain = yes for getent group, wbinfo
-g work fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336796
You received this bug
I now tend to think this is caused by the -1 not being casted to appropriate
type in:
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
and in:
assert_uid(-1, uid);
in lib/sec_util.c as I said in bug #314657 causing problems on 64 bits machines.
But I am unsure.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
Still an issue in Jaunty.
Dépaquetage de samba (à partir de .../samba_2%3a3.3.1-1ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « man-db »...
Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour « ufw »...
Paramétrage de samba (2:3.3.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Generating
Thanks you, for your comment.
Happy to see that you are there to answer more questions.
Then, looking the backtrace, I remark:
#2 0x00613c7b in smb_panic (why=value optimized out)
at lib/util.c:1639
#3 0x00618cf1 in assert_uid (ruid=4294967295, euid=10009)
at
BTW, I determined that user 0 is root, and -1 is used to say, do not change
this value (real user or effective user).
http://linux.die.net/man/2/setresuid
Now my very BIG GUESS is that it could be that the code in Samba use -1 without
a type cast to uid_t.
And that the code would be ok say, on
Seems in .orig of jaunty (lib/sec_util.c) the functions seems identical.
Oh well, seems there is enough info for at least let a developer verify my
hypothesis.
Confirming the bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
Well, at first glace it does seems my guess is right.
I have downloaded samba 3.0.28aorig.tar.gz (need to learn the command to
extract sources and apply ubuntu patches) and found this in util_sec.c:
void set_effective_gid(gid_t gid)
{
#if USE_SETRESUID
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
#endif
#if
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information.
Please include the information requested at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingSamba#samba-server.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
We are closing this bug report because it seems to be caused by a bad
configuration value rather than being a true bug, as described in the
previous comments. Please reopen it if you think it is wrong, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click
I now tend to think this is caused by the -1 not being casted to appropriate
type in:
setresgid(-1,gid,-1);
and in:
assert_uid(-1, uid);
in lib/sec_util.c as I said in bug #314657 causing problems on 64 bits machines.
But I am unsure.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
We are closing this bug report as you requested in the previous comment.
Thanks again!
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
8.10 system-config-printer lost SMB connection selection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311961
You received this bug notification because you are
Seems complete enough for a developer to say, if it is true or not.
Confirming.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Winbind dont obey winbind use default domain = yes for getent group, wbinfo
-g work fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336796
You received this bug
Thank you for giving the requested info.
Marking as Confirmed.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Copying from RISC OS to intrepid with Samba writes zeros ad infinitum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292130
You received this bug notification because you are
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 314657 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 314657
smbd segfault in assert_uid
--
Segfault in Samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264982
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Marking bug #264982 as a duplicate of this one, because it does hang on
assert_uid too, although from a totally different backtrace. Not sure if
it is really same cause, but since there is no answer on that bug, seems
a better end, than marking it invalid for no answer.
--
smbd segfault in
A closed (not because fixed) Debian bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296
suggests that this could be linked with roaming profiles:
Problem resolved, the workstation is not using roaming profiles anymore.
Probably this was due to misconfigured (better: unconfigured) profile
Bug #314657 and bug #229654 seems to be duplicates.
Well, I would make them duplicates of this one, but, as it was marked invalid...
hum, in fact looks more like Steve thinks his explanation for invaliding is
doubtful.
Guess I'll mark those duplicate of this one, and change to Incomplete.
**
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296 suggests it
could be linked to roaming profiles.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Clear enough for a developer to check and decide, so I Confirm this bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
winbind is not started before samba, but should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Fixed upstream in 3.3.2 http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.3.2.html:
* Fix saving of files on Samba share using MS Office 2007 (bug #6160).
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
Importance: Unknown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 100019 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/100019
By the backtrace, I conclude this is a duplicate of fixed bug #100019,
marking so.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 100019
Segfault in Samba
--
Segfault in Samba
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 314657 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 314657
smbd segfault in assert_uid
--
Segfault in Samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264982
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Marking bug #264982 as a duplicate of this one, because it does hang on
assert_uid too, although from a totally different backtrace. Not sure if
it is really same cause, but since there is no answer on that bug, seems
a better end, than marking it invalid for no answer.
--
smbd segfault in
A closed (not because fixed) Debian bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296
suggests that this could be linked with roaming profiles:
Problem resolved, the workstation is not using roaming profiles anymore.
Probably this was due to misconfigured (better: unconfigured) profile
Looks like a dup of bug #216358.
--
muliples crashes after 6.06 to 8.04 x64 upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Bug #314657 and bug #229654 seems to be duplicates.
Well, I would make them duplicates of this one, but, as it was marked invalid...
hum, in fact looks more like Steve thinks his explanation for invaliding is
doubtful.
Guess I'll mark those duplicate of this one, and change to Incomplete.
**
Looks like a dup of bug #216358.
Posting the result of 'ulimit -S -u' could be usefull.
--
smbd segfault in assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468296 suggests it
could be linked to roaming profiles.
--
Samba crashes repeatedly to assert_uid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Clear enough for a developer to check and decide, so I Confirm this bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
winbind is not started before samba, but should
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315427
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Fixed upstream in 3.3.2 http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.3.2.html:
* Fix saving of files on Samba share using MS Office 2007 (bug #6160).
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6160
Importance: Unknown
Thanks for this bug report.
As this was reported a long time ago, we would like to know: Is it still an
issue for you?
If so, could you give an exemple of acl permissions that generate this problem.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
An extra 'executable'
Well, as I remember, it have been just a temporarily issue.
But I can't comment much because I am trying an other distribution right now.
If someone still encounter this, feel free to reopen.
** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
package
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Paul Dufresne (dufresnep) = (unassigned)
--
usb-storage devices break the install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu
Thank you for taking the time, 3rods, to report this bug and helping to
make Ubuntu better.
Please open a new bug, indicating the bug number of this one in it.
The hard part is to get the crash info. KernelTeamBugPolicie suggest:
If the bug report involves a crash, it is hoped that a kernel
hum, well, I'll confirm the bug and see what a network-manager developer
will say.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Paul Dufresne (dufresnep) = (unassigned)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
error getting ESSID for device eth1: Resource temporarily unavailable
There was https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/WPAHowTo but it seems
outdated.
I suggest you ask at:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+addquestion
--
error getting ESSID for device eth1: Resource temporarily unavailable [IPW3945]
I should probably say that I cannot give more info for this because I
am trying an other distribution.
--
[hardy]scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:1315: parser error : Premature end of data
in tag tocsect2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181424
You received this bug notification because you are a
289mm x 21mm
Jacques, could you attached /var/log/Xorg.0.log file, please?
--
DDC report some ridiculous physical screen size (Mostly on Intel driver, and
some ATI)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Jacues have (II) intel(0): EDID vendor LPL, prod id 0 in Xorg.0.log for
following version:
Build Operating System: Linux Ubuntu (xorg-server 2:1.4.1~git20080105-1ubuntu1)
Current Operating System: Linux jack-laptop 2.6.24-4-generic #1 SMP Mon Jan 14
17:30:39 UTC 2008 i686
Build Date: 08 January
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Paul Dufresne (dufresnep) = (unassigned)
--
Inconsistent modality of the about dialog box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48664
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu
Sorry Leann, we edited this bug status on 2.6.22 at the same time, and your
won't fix status have disappear.
And I can't set to won't fix so you will have to reedit yourself.
--
Fails to logon (freezes) and cannot use terminal as it freezes as well if i try
running any commands.
Thanks David!
You already made what was needed, testing Hardy Heron Alpha3, it should be
enough.
I have just marked this bug as confirmed on linux (Hardy alpha 2 and more
kernel version).
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
I note from .xsession-errors:
/bin/sh: /usr/bin/esd: not found
[I know we have the pulseaudio-esound-compat package for that, not sure when it
is necessary or not]
...
** Message: don't know how to handle audio/mpeg, mpegversion=(int)1,
layer=(int)3
[You tried to play an MP3 song, or movie with
Well, I am not an expert, but my understanding it that some IRQ stuff is handle
by APIC and since initial bug description shows that 'pin D routed to IRQ19'
then I would not say that it has *nothing* to do.
So I still would like to know if pci=routeirq helps, even if I agree I doubt
so.
I
Thanks Sam. I am marking this bug as 'Fix released' on linux package, to show
that it is not affecting Hardy Alpha 3.
Xdevent, if you open a new bug, it would be cool to leave a small comment in
this bug with the number of the newly opened bug.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status:
Xdevent, what you said in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/144030/comments/25 that it
is a bug in the kernel. But likely a different one than this one.
You may read
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies#head-895899d229ab9dbf5d40d51021fb6d497b094995
to help you get
I note the following line from your dmesg file:
[ 13.068000] hda_codec: Unknown model for ALC882, trying auto-probe from
BIOS...
I note that similar (well, for me all the macs seems the same ;-) ) hardware
have same problem on:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=474144
well, with 38
About Unknown model for ALC882, that was discussed a bit at:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-07/msg05950.html
An arch linux user with mac and similar problem:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=36215p=2
in which the last message he/she says:
Kernel 2.6.23 as well as
In a bug with similar symptom but on very different hardware (bug
#137474), bug reporter say that using driver from
http://www.opensound.com/oss.html made it have sound.
But my warning apply:
As far as I know, drivers from http://www.opensound.com/oss.html are not
expected to go in a future
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
VIA HD Audio Codec VT8237A - no sound
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137474
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I do find it a bit strange too.
Well, I doubt this is really a bug bug I'll confirm it anyway and see what a
developer will say.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Paul Dufresne (dufresnep) = (unassigned
Then adding bug on linux package (Hardy kernel) and confirming.
Thanks a lot for this new information.
As far as I know, drivers from http://www.opensound.com/oss.html are not
expected to go in a future version of the kernel.
They were close source for the last 10 years, and only recently been
You have to understand that we normally don't fix bugs in a version that was
released.
Only in exceptional case this is done, and the conditions for doing so are
described at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
Among the conditions, the following:
An explanation of how the bug has
The dmesg log of Vincenzo (initial bug reporter) have this:
PCI: If a device doesn't work, try pci=routeirq. If it helps, post a report
Vincenzo, have you tried that as a boot option?
I am totally unsure this is linked.
Wondering if others have also: 'APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)' like you.
--
Developers: according to http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=659996, bug
have appear on 2.20.16 and was not in 2.20.15.
I know, it won't be fixed if Feisty.
Krychek, I think 1708 refer to the chip that deals with sound on your
motherboard, after all your bug report had in it:
List of
PJSingh5000, this previous comment seems to be an other bug to me.
I suggest you open a new bug and that you copy the bug number here in a new
comment.
Please note that xrandr have an ---output parameter. (man xrandr)
I am quite lost as the status of this bug.
upstream bug 10304 is resolved,
Well, the update is a bit harder.
In summary: I don't have that with latest Hardy on 64 bits.
Longer info:
-When I reported this I was using x86-32 Hardy
-I had discovered that if I was deactivating DRI (in /etc/X11/xorg.conf I
presume), then I was able to open Blender without problem
I then
Works fine with 2.6.24-2 too.
So personally I consider this bug fixed, but if you want me to investigate more
on the live CD I can.
This is a 945GZ chipset computer.
** Attachment added: lspci.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11226605/lspci.log
** Changed in: blender (Ubuntu)
Hardy seems to support both drivers: ipw3945 and iwl3945.
Some bug info I read suggest that iwl3945 is also available on 7.10 (Gutsy).
Seems unlikely that ipw3945 will be fixed.
So I guess you could forget requested information.
What will really needed is to test latest Hardy.
A new test version
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
It may be quite hard to get this. You should try to Ctrl-Alt-F1 (the first one
is the console and should receive kernel errors), and try
to log on it. If a kernel crash (oops) happen, then it will give full info
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix = Incomplete
--
Fails to logon (freezes) and cannot use terminal as it freezes as well if i try
running any commands.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177820
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Well, in-built CD integrity fail to begin to test packages for me too (hang),
but I was able to use it and install from it without problems.
So you can test with it.
--
Kernel 2.6.22 prevents LiveCD load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159730
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. The Hardy Heron Alpha series was recently released. Alpha2 and
subsequent releases contain an updated version of the kernel. You can download
and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha release from
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The Hardy Heron Alpha series was recently released.
Alpha2 and subsequent releases contain an updated version of the kernel.
You can download and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha release from
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The Hardy Heron Alpha series was recently released.
Alpha2 and subsequent releases contain an updated version of the kernel.
You can download and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha release from
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Gutsy beta hang soon after boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The Hardy Heron Alpha series was recently released.
Alpha2 and subsequent releases contain an updated version of the kernel.
You can download and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha release from
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
installing the latest OSS driver?
I am just a bug triager, but that seems a bit hard, had to compile it?
The Hardy Heron Alpha series was recently released. Alpha2 and
subsequent releases contain an updated
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
What is incomplete about this? What more information do you need?
well, following xdevent's last comment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.22/+bug/144030/comments/25
made me choose to not mark it fix on linux
Pretty good bug report, thanks!
Seems to be in nvidia restricted module, which greatly limit what we can do
about it.
Confirming the bug as all normally needed info is here.
A kernel developer should be looking at it, hopefully soon.
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
I am closing this bug report because I have no feedback from bennyatc or Eric
Haslehurst
We don't have a oops trace.
And if they was to give answer I would ask them to try to boot with kernel
option: pci=assign-busses
And see if they can post /var/log/kernel.log.
To reopen the bug report you can
Reading syslog_small.txt, I find surprising the following:
Nov 27 21:11:02 localhost NetworkManager: info Activation (eth1) Stage 2 of
5 (Device Configure) complete.
Nov 27 21:11:02 localhost kernel: [ 2716.304000] ipw3945: Detected geography
ABG (13 802.11bg channels, 23 802.11a channels)
Nov
bug #139642 (state:new) may have some related info, notably links to
forums.
--
error getting ESSID for device eth1: Resource temporarily unavailable [IPW3945]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
Searching for bugs around ipw3945 show many:
Also bug #134915 have some strange tricks.
I don't understand much of that as a bug triager.
--
error getting ESSID for device eth1: Resource temporarily unavailable [IPW3945]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Possibly that bug #113645 is a duplicate.
--
error getting ESSID for device eth1: Resource temporarily unavailable [IPW3945]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
301 - 400 of 1636 matches
Mail list logo
