),20(dialout),24(cdrom),46(plugdev),111(lpadmin),119(admin),122(sambashare),123(vboxusers)
grep administ /etc/group prints:
admin:x:119:administ,ray,rnsc,rnscadm
ls -l passwd shadow group gshadow
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1662 2011-01-16 14:19 group
-rw-r- 1 root shadow 1441 2011-01-16 14:19
Per your request / suggestion:
sudo /usr/sbin/adduser --gecos --disabled-password bugta
[sudo] password for administ:
Adding user `bugta' ...
Adding new group `bugta' (1001) ...
Adding new user `bugta' (1001) with group `bugta' ...
Creating home directory `/home/bugta' ...
Stopped: Couldn't
Following up, new system. Gave up on getting 10.04 video to work on my
system (another story), switched to 10.10.
Created a user named bugta, user 1001, group 1001.
Tried to use System / Administration / Users and Groups to change the
home directory of bugta from /home to /lhome. lhome
Trying to understand the status and what to do.
Is Andreas still working on it? I used his last version on lucid.
Can the lucid version (Assume that is what is at
https://launchpad.net/~aheck/+archive/ppa) be used on Maverick?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
sudo /usr/sbin/usermod -d /newdir/administ -g 1000 -l administ -s
/bin/bash -u 1000 administ 2010-11-14-1455.log 21
Nothing comes out on stdout, the following comes out on stderr:
usermod: user administ is currently logged in
So perhaps that is the problem. It did work in 0810, even when I
Sorry for the delay. Boy, that was easy. I did the following:
Started the two processes in the two consoles, per the directions.
mkdir /newdir
Selected the administ account
Pressed the [Advanced Settings] button
Selected the Advanced tab
Change the home directory from /lhome/administ to
users-admin.log is zero length. There is no mistake here.
--
users and groups home directory change does not take
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
It will not let me upload an empty file, it removed it and posted the
comment without an attachement. (Probably not news to you, but thought
I should clearly document what is going on here). Thanks.
--
users and groups home directory change does not take
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666555
Will try to do tonight, may be a few days. I have fiddled with 10.04 before
also. This is at least the second, perhaps the third or fourth clean install
with this behavior. I just shrugged it off that I must have done something
wrong in the past, but this time I was prepared and very
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
May be same root cause as 659758, but symptoms are a little different.
Clean 10.04 LTS desktop install.
Console login to account created during install, create /lhome, logoff
Desktop login to account created during install
System /
Surbhi,
Please interpret - Fix Released
Does that mean that for some versions of Ubuntu that when I run the package
manager that mdadm 3.1.4 will show up as the latest available!? What
version(s)?
--
Please merge mdadm 3.1.4-1 (main) from Debian stable (main)
Surbhi, Because of your interest, I assume that you follow 495370, and
jools' work? I don't know how to evaluate your work vs. his. I will be
rebuilding an 0810 machine into 1004 within the next week (I hope) and
really don't want to go with the old version if there is, by any
reasonable
Jools,
I am trying to sort this out, and another similar thread came to life
today - 603582. It looks like you have both done the same work. Are
you aware of his work, what is the difference? Is this duplicated
effort?
It seems like it would be better for our cause (and admittedly any pre-
Jools, I think I about to take the plunge, but would like to ask a few
questions first. I have been reading all of the mdadm wiki doc,
manpages, scripts, rules, etc. until I am just beginning to *think* that
I understand the problem somewhat, and am coming back around to the fact
that you have
Re Benjamin Drung's note Please unassign yourself if the bug is ready
for sponsoring. I do not understand who this comment is directed to
(Presumably anyone reading?) nor what action is required. I am ready to
do anything required by the process to move a superior AND known
reliable (stable)
I plan on running 10.04 until a few months after the *next* LTS is
released. I don't know how to interpret what I see here. Will the
process result in a newer/better stable mdadm being released for 10.04
at some point? If so or if maybe, how far out is that likely to be?
Thanks.
--
Please
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mdadm
Reported last night, cannot find in launchpad (!?). If 9/5 version
appears, use THIS report. Included more information.
Other mdadm segfaults seem to be different conditions, many are closed,
some long ago. Hence new report.
9.04 desktop CD.
** Attachment added: Various logs, listings capturing configuration and error
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31392356/md_bug_files.tgz
--
mdadm segfault when OTHER fs data= in fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425213
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Using the skip= option on dd does not help. It seems to take just as
much time as writing zeros to the whole disk. It must skip by reading
them, as opposed to issueing an appropriate command to the device.
Instead I have started using the rev 1.2 SuperBlock for mdadm. This
places the
I did not go with Ubuntu in the 2007 time frame, instead staying with
Suse which I had used for years. However I have recently switched to
Ubuntu.
I don't recall where the LVM configuration WAS, but with 8.10 and 9.04 I
don't see any way to do MD or LVM through the install CD. This is very
Continuing with my 8/31 2009 post, I erased the disks and reinstalled
9.04. Still had problem. Reading the mdadm wiki, kernel detection and
assembly of arrays is considered deprecated, and only works with version
0.9 superblocks anyway. I use version 1.2 superblocks so that they are
near the
The title definitely happened to me.
System boots off of a simple, separate disk.
Two 500GB disks (sdb, sdc) were mirrored with md, then a VG created, a LV, and
ext3 on top. Simple, worked great. /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf did NOT list the
configuration, but rather depended on a scan to figure it
The title definitely happened to me.
System boots off of a simple, separate disk.
Two 500GB disks (sdb, sdc) were mirrored with md, then a VG created, a LV, and
ext3 on top. Simple, worked great. /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf did NOT list the
configuration, but rather depended on a scan to figure it
Same problem, but I can provide more detail.
New (Clean) install, first boot, first logon, first action on desktop.
Appearance Preferences was installed as None.
System / Preferences / Appearance / Visual Effects
Select Extra.
Searches and says that it must download a proprietary driver.
NVidia
RnSC Post a minute ago...
I neglected to say that this occurred on the just-released 0904 desktop,
Thursday, April 23.
--
jockey backend crashed when trying to install nvidia driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350776
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Alternate CD install with RAID1, then LVM on top. Problem is with LVM
configuration program.
LVM configutor reports freespace in terms of 10**6 bytes, in my example it
report 252834MB.
Switching to a busybox vgdisplay reports
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Situation: Doing an identical re-install. I am learning, or I don't
trust the system and so something could be corrupted. Usually operator
error (me), but has also been bad hardware. I ant a TRUELY clean slate.
First I zero the MBR
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Create partitions.
Work down through list, specifying file system, mount points, names, etc.
Make some Linux RAID.
Enter RAID configuration.
When you return, all of the OTHER partition information is GONE!
Do it again, plus an MD
28 matches
Mail list logo
