Confirmed on Lucid. I have ltsp-server 5.2.1-0ubuntu9 with 33
workstations working with an external DHCP service. We use dnsmasq
(backported from Maverick because of the udhcpc bug). Two to three
accounts end up not being able ot log in every time the lab is full.
Updating the keys did not help.
After mucking around with Jaunty LTSP with Karmic LTSP PPA, initramfs,
etc. I decided to jump into Karmic Beta itself. Our LTSP server has two
drives, so I can afford to experiment with an alternative setup while
keeping the working one (LTSP 8.10) on the other drive.
Karmic LTSP based on the
Hi Oli,
I tried ip=:eth0 after the splash in
/var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/i386/pxelinux.cfg/default and ltsp-update-image
but that doesn't help. The boot hangs for a bit longer, but I still get
the same message.
I've verified the driver to be tg3 and that seems to be loaded. It seems
suspicious of
Increasing the pool didn't help. Its currently at 192.168.0.20 to
192.168.0.250
When this specific thin client boots up, it gets 192.168.0.210 So, if I
edit /var/lib/tftpboot/i386/pxelinux.cfg/default and add
ip=192.168.0.210:eth0 then the machine still hangs at the same
point, but doesn't
We have Dell Optiplex 745 as thin clients for a Jaunty LTSP setup.
Everything works well on 8.10 LTSP, but on jaunty, on the client side I
see (I am typing what I see):
tg3: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex.
tg3: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE):
I disagree that this is not a bug. Its a bug just like Bug #1 is a bug.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 Branding makes an impact, and
adoption depends on it.
--
Wallpapers lack branding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
All four wallpapers that come with Hardy Heron (as seen in the Beta
release) do not have any Ubuntu branding. Wallpapers from the Warty
days had Ubuntu on the lower right corner. This is very important. One
of the most influential variables on the adoption of any new
** Attachment added: an example
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12851516/Ubuntu-Simple_Human_1600x1200.png
--
Wallpapers lack branding
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206375
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: update-manager
The orange icon in the notification area which indicates new updates
looks good when the panel is set at a width of 24, but blurs out when
you expand its thickness. I use a width of 48. All other icons in the
- notification
** Attachment added: screenshot of notification area
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10251920/Screenshot-1.png
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: update-manager
The orange icon in the notification area which indicates new updates
looks good when the panel is set at a width
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
The orange icon in the notification area which indicates new updates
looks good when the panel is set at a width of 24, but blurs out when
you expand its thickness. I use a width of 48. All other icons in the
notification area scale up
The author (Arnaud Kyheng) mentions that the original goal of the
package was to deal with large packages. I would go beyond that though,
to simply see this as a network alleviation approach to the burst of
traffic that Ubuntu mirrors would see in October and April.
Considering that torrent will
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
From the Attached Crash Report:
Distro Release: Ubuntu 6.10
System Arch: i686
Package (version): firefox (2.0.0.2+0dfsg-0ubuntu0.6.10)
Source Package: firefox
Original Description:
Firefox crashes when Save as dialog box appears
Firefox2 on Edgy
crash report attached
** Attachment added: report from /var/crash
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7045515/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash
--
[edgy] firefox crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98696
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Upgrading to 2.6.17-11-386 breaks X when using nvidia driver. Works ok
if I boot up with 2.6.17-10-386.
** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Upgrade to kernel 2.6.17-11-386 breaks X/NVidia
15 matches
Mail list logo
