[Bug 875030] Re: Unable to open stream [Unable to create io-slave]

2011-10-30 Thread SeanTater
I'm not exactly sure where to submit the code (or even if it's really just a kludge) but adding imagedisplay-update(); in updateimagedisplay() of dvbcut.cpp on line 1586 seems to fix the problem. I suspect that setPixmap might not imply update() in QT4. I included a patch for git in case that

[Bug 741230] Re: Installet crashed Kubuntu 10.10

2011-03-26 Thread SeanTater
I'm having the same problem. Looking to line 317 in ubi_prepare, I see that parted_devices is bring called. I have plenty of devices, some of which are indeed large enough to install (k)ubuntu on. But when I run parted_devices in the command line, I get nothing, just a newline. It's a shot in the

[Bug 741230] Re: Installet crashed Kubuntu 10.10

2011-03-26 Thread SeanTater
Oops, forgot to mention, I'm running the March 26, 2011 daily build of Kubuntu Natty with Ubiquity 2.5.29 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741230 Title: Installet crashed Kubuntu 10.10

[Bug 595396] Re: boincmgr crashes in Lucid 1st time its run, when trying to attach to a project

2011-02-11 Thread SeanTater
I'm also having this same problem when I click attach to project. The package version is 6.10.58+dfsg-3 and I'm using Maverick. I doubt this helps much but this is the output of boincmgr with no options, up to the button press : 10:05:14 PM: Error: Memory VFS already contains file

[Bug 176268] Re: [apport] sonata crashed with timeout in readline()

2009-10-14 Thread SeanTater
Sorry, but we don't use that computer anymore. However, the problem has not reappeared elsewhere. Thanks for your effort and have a good day! ** Changed in: sonata (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- [apport] sonata crashed with timeout in readline()

[Bug 329217] [NEW] Process immune to SIGKILL

2009-02-13 Thread SeanTater
Public bug reported: I used mogrify to scale a bunch of images on an SD card. The command I used was: mogrify -monitor -scale 800 VERY long file list ps aux | grep mogrify reports: sean 25292 59.0 0.0 17684 1328 ?RFeb06 5954:27 mogrify -monitor -scale 800 VERY long file

[Bug 303656] Re: Excessive memory usage: probably memory leak

2009-01-30 Thread SeanTater
This memory leak happens for me too. knetworkmanager is consistently the largest process by memory at 105MB res and growing. My laptop is often in suspend and I've restarted knetworkmanager several times (to free memory), so I cannot say how long it took to consume this much memory. ** Changed

[Bug 303656] Re: Excessive memory usage: probably memory leak

2009-01-30 Thread SeanTater
In case this information makes a difference $ uptime 10:04:48 up 8 days, 16:26, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.28, 0.75 $ apt-cache policy network-manager-kde network-manager-kde: Installed: 1:0.7svn864988-0ubuntu1.8.10.3 Candidate: 1:0.7svn864988-0ubuntu1.8.10.3 Version table: ***

[Bug 304145] Re: typo in package description: hHz

2009-01-01 Thread SeanTater
Glad to help! I'll be sure to continue to submit bugs should I find more. Thanks! -- typo in package description: hHz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 304145] Re: typo in package description: hHz

2008-12-02 Thread SeanTater
I don't see a way to set any version in the bug so I'll just write a comment. The version of the package is: 0.1.1~build726-0ubuntu1: all And it's in both Intrepid and Jaunty, which is to say that it's existed since the package was added to Ubuntu. -- typo in package description: hHz

[Bug 304145] [NEW] typo in package description: hHz

2008-12-01 Thread SeanTater
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: julius-voxforge The package description has an incorrectly spelled unit: 16hHz where it should read 16kHz. ** Affects: julius-voxforge (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- typo in package description: hHz

[Bug 176268] Re: [apport] sonata crashed with timeout in readline()

2008-11-19 Thread SeanTater
[I'm another user of the same computer] Honestly I don't know if it is still reproducible because I only used sonata for a few weeks. (I use KDE now, and so also Amarok). I apologize for the inconvenience. -- [apport] sonata crashed with timeout in readline()

[Bug 139631] Re: Multithreading not utilizing both cores

2008-08-27 Thread SeanTater
This is what that same code does now: b a b a a a b a b a a a b a b a a b b a b a a b a b b a a b b a a b a b b b b b Which is just what it should do. I am using the same hardware, but I upgraded to Hardy. Works just fine now. Thanks! -- Multithreading

[Bug 139631] Re: Multithreading not utilizing both cores

2008-08-27 Thread SeanTater
One more thing: another excerpt from top: Cpu0 : 44.7%us, 55.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 41.9%us, 57.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2074408k total, 1798304k used, 276104k free, 109520k buffers Swap: 1052248k total,

[Bug 139631] Re: Multithreading not utilizing both cores

2008-08-27 Thread SeanTater
Okay -- I see that's system%. That probably means this bug is fixed. Thanks. -- Multithreading not utilizing both cores https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 139631] Re: Multithreading not utilizing both cores

2007-10-24 Thread SeanTater
This is precisely my CPU: model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ stepping: 1 cpu MHz : 2505.321 cache size : 512 KB Unfortunately, I think this is the newest for feisty. I have not yet upgraded to gutsy, and it does mix if I use this exact same code

[Bug 139631] Multithreading not utilizing both cores

2007-09-14 Thread SeanTater
Public bug reported: Multithreading simply is not working on my computer, as it is not only using only one processor, the threads are not switching. One completes and then another completes, even though the two are independent and take 20 seconds of cpu time each. The code is here:

[Bug 50721] Re: [Bug 50721] Re: memory error

2006-06-28 Thread SeanTater
nope -- sorry, that's all I knew of it, honestly I feel kind-of dumb even posting something I know nothing about.. The bug is probably as good as deleted at this point. Sorry. On 6/27/06, Adam Buchbinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The link is broken; do you have any more details, or can you

[Bug 50721] memory error

2006-06-22 Thread SeanTater
Public bug reported: Sorry. don't know much about it, but here's the info: http://rafb.net/paste/results/u5d5hM97.html ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- memory error https://launchpad.net/bugs/50721 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list