Desktop TPM FDE and edk2 intersect where it comes to testing the
implementation in VMs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037137
Title:
Enable NX support for ARM VMs
To manage
Since the tgt source package builds no architecture: all packages, and
there are no armhf packages published, I think there is a bug in
whatever is trying to trigger this test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Per https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/armhf/tgt the binaries were
removed because they depend on another package (ceph) that is not
portable to armhf. So a no-change rebuild is not appropriate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
> Steve, do you still have the crash file on your system?
No, but I have no trouble generating more of them on demand.
> If so, could you give us its mod and owner?
-rw-r- 1 vorlon vorlon 41580 Jun 3 17:51 /var/crash/_usr_bin_grep-
merges.1000.crash
--
You received this bug notifi
Nota-se que vc instalou o Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, uma versão de fa 4 anos. É
recomendável que instale a versão atual (i.e. o Ubuntu 24.04 LTS).
Além disso, não vejo aqui nada que descreva um falho no software de
Ubuntu. Se vc precisa de suporte técnico,
https://ubuntu.com/support#community tem uma
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
Title:
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk apps in X11 on Raspberry
My understanding is that while this bug manifests as graphical
corruption in the common case, when running on a RPi booted from an SSD
the memory map is permuted in such a way that it instead results in a
crash. Therefore raising the severity of the bug accordingly, in line
with duplicate LP:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2037015 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
My understanding is that it was determined this has the same root cause
as LP: #2037015. Marking it as a duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2037015
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk
I initially reassigned this from lxd to glibc on the basis that glibc is
responsible for deciding whether to use the 64-bit vs 32-bit time_t
variants for all the syscalls it wraps, and give preference to the
64-bit variants; HOWEVER,
Note: glibc provides no wrapper for futex(),
** Package changed: lxd (Ubuntu) => glibc (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062176
Title:
Cannot launch armhf containers on arm64 host under noble
To manage notifications
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064123
Title:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
Note for the record that this is now regressed in baseline (in the
release pocket) and therefore does not block migrations, which is why
the hint was dropped as no longer required. Fixing the tests so that
they pass is of course ideal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for distro-info has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
This was a result of an unfortunate out-of-order release of SRUs to
xenial-updates. distro-info 0.14ubuntu0.3 was present in xenial-
proposed waiting for release, but there was nothing in our process which
ensured they would be released in order.
As distro-info has also passed its SRU
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:22:48AM -, JakFrost wrote:
> After the fix, there is still a problem happening but I don't know if
> it's SystemD related or due to some of my Units that I created for a few
> services and auto-mount points.
> I did an upgrade from Ubuntu 23.10 to 24.04 also and
Ubuntu 24.04 internet upgrade from 23.10 Onboard worked prior to the
upgrade. Afterward the keyboard would display but instantly vanish when
any key was pressed, followed by a request to submit a report, which I
did. It fails in every attempt to use the keyboard.
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: aptdaemon
Assignee: Yam budhathoki (yam-8138) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Yam budhathoki (yam-8138) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Yam budhathoki (yam-8138) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug
+ * debian/netplan.io.preinst:
+- This preinst script is intended to cleanup the .pyc files from
+ share/netplan/netplan. This directory is supposed to be removed after
+ the upgrade from netplan.io 0.106.1 to 0.107, as the Python code
+ was moved to it's own python3-netplan
> The changes below though will cause backwards compatibility issues if the
> user upgrades to the new version of netplan.io, starts to use the new
> features and
> then decides to downgrade for some reason:
That's not a backwards-compatibility issue, please omit this in the
future.
**
Hello Phil, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libfilezilla into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfilezilla/0.46.0-3.1ubuntu0.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The bug task for bubblewrap was marked 'wontfix' on the basis that John
said it will not get an unconfined profile. But this is wrong; that is
saying only that a particular solution is rejected, not that we will not
be making changes to this package.
bubblewrap is part of the desktop and having
The proposed solution here deals with bubblewrap being broken by
apparmor in noble by altogether eliminating the intended security
benefits of the bubblewrap sandboxing of the thumbnailer.
I do not think this is an appropriate resolution of this issue. We need
to fix bubblewrap to work with
Hello Valentin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted shadow into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
+ * New patches:
+- d/p/0002-collect-refactor-_format_version.patch
+- d/p/0003-pacemaker-Use-pep440-formatted-version-on-comparison.patch
+- d/p/0004-cirrus-Run-tests-on-latest-daily-builds-for-ubuntu.patch
+- d/p/0005-processor-handle-msr-module-loading-via-predicate.patch
Why,
The proposed test case here involves a snap, not the deb which is being
SRUed. The test plan needs to provide a way for testing the .deb from
the noble-proposed pocket.
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Noble)
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064717
Title:
ceph-volume needs "packaging" and "ceph" modules
To
** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063456
Title:
package cephadm: dependency "cephadmlib" missing
To
Hello Sudip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted uhd into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uhd/4.4.0.0+ds1-4ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
An upload of quickml to mantic-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "includes changes rejected by
Debian maintainer".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
An upload of quickml to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "includes changes rejected by Debian
maintainer".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
An upload of quickml to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "includes changes rejected by Debian
maintainer".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
An upload of quickml to noble-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "includes changes rejected by Debian
maintainer".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
So effectively:
- the quickml package has been unusable out of the box for at least 4 years due
to a missing dependency
- a bug was filed 3 years ago, but no one cared enough about the impact to
escalate it before now
- the package also (apparently) depends on the existence of /etc/mailname at
Hello Sudip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted uhd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uhd/4.6.0.0+ds1-5.1ubuntu0.24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted graphviz into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphviz/2.42.2-6ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted graphviz into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphviz/2.42.2-9ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello David, or anyone else affected,
Accepted graphviz into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphviz/2.42.2-7ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Aaron, or anyone else affected,
Accepted edubuntu-artwork into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edubuntu-
artwork/24.04.26.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Your dpkg log shows the following prompt:
Configuring libpam-modules
you are using pam_tally or pam_tally2 in your configuration
The pam_tally and pam_tally2 modules have been removed from PAM. You are
using one of these modules in
your PAM configuration in /etc/pam.d. You
> Can you provide the journal log from during that time frame?
For what service? For whoopsie, I see:
May 23 13:58:13 homer systemd[1]: Started whoopsie.service - crash report
submission.
May 23 13:58:13 homer whoopsie[147832]: [13:58:13] Using lock path:
/var/lock/whoopsie/lock
May 23
> Did you remove the content there?
I did not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps prompting to report crashes in a loop
To manage notifications about
Public bug reported:
Running gourmand with a --database-url pointing to my postgres database
fails immediately with the following backtrace. It is generating SQL
that may be valid for sqlite but is not valid for postgresql.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gourmand
** Description changed:
-
[ Impact ]
The extruct package is a python module that cannot be used in noble because
it is incompatible with the lxml module that is shipped in noble.
[ Test plan ]
1. bad:
$ python3 -c 'import extruct'
Traceback (most recent call last):
- File "",
** Description changed:
- Well, for the fourth Ubuntu release running, gourmand is completely
- unusable.
+
+ [ Impact ]
+ The extruct package is a python module that cannot be used in noble because
it is incompatible with the lxml module that is shipped in noble.
+
+ [ Test plan ]
+ 1. bad:
+
Probably fixed by:
extruct (0.16.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add upstream patch to add support for python3 lxml >= 5.2.0 and
python3-lxml-html-clean to Depends.
-- Christian Marillat Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:44:13
+0200
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed
Public bug reported:
/var/crash has the following contents:
-rw-r- 1 vorlon vorlon 107490 May 23 16:05 _usr_bin_gourmand.1000.crash
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vorlon vorlon0 May 23 16:06 _usr_bin_gourmand.1000.upload
-rw--- 1 whoopsie whoopsie 5 May 23 16:07
Public bug reported:
after upgrade from mantic to noble, my laptop booted to the firmware
splash screen with Ubuntu logo, plus a mouse cursor. The gdm login
screen did not appear.
Switching to disable wayland (as in the attached modified config file)
fixed this so that the login screen appears.
Public bug reported:
I have a held package on my system (because the newer upstream version
available in newer Ubuntu releases is unusably broken). As a result,
update-manager presents me the option to upgrade:
The software on this computer is up to date.
However, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is now
Simon, I don't know if this is a regression in noble, but for sure it
shouldn't be needrestart telling us about kernel updates - we already
have update-notifier for this which, crucially, is livepatch aware.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Removing packages from oracular:
python3-genx 3.0.2-2 in oracular arm64
python3-genx 3.0.2-2 in oracular armhf
python3-genx 3.0.2-2 in oracular riscv64
python3-genx 3.0.2-2 in oracular s390x
Comment: ANAIS
4 packages successfully removed.
** Changed in: genx
Debian has dropped genx binaries in unstable on all archs except for
amd64 and ppc64el, we should do the same.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029427
Title:
proposed migration for
Benjamin, do you have any ideas what's going wrong here? Looking at the
test case in question, it uses subprocess.Popen() and
Popen.communicate() and poring over the subprocess documentation I can't
see any wrong assumptions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
roger-router 2.4.2-3build1 in oracular
Comment: Depends on removed librm, needs significant source fixes; LP: #1998219
1 package successfully removed.
And added to extra-removals.
** Changed in: roger-router (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix
> First time I've experienced broken --> fixed --> broken (in exact manner
> as pre-fix) of a STANDARD package from OFFICIAL sources.
That is not an accurate description of the events here. This was an issue
introduced in mutter 45.2-0ubuntu4 and 42.9-0ubuntu7. The only subsequent
versions of
Well good thing we have a rigorous SRU process, since I'm failing quite
badly at backporting.
v-failed, uploading new versions again.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-failed-mantic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hello Aaron, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntustudio-look into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-look/24.04.9 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Marek, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu5
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Marek, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
> which is also in package qemu 8.1.0
This is not an Ubuntu package.
** Changed in: edk2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065373
Title:
Your report shows you booted with 'persistent' as the parameter, which
is correct and is still supported. Why do you claim that it is "no
longer recognized"?
> LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64
(20240424)
This seems reasonable.
What media are you booting from, how
** Tags removed: regression-update
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065060
Title:
rsyslogd: file '/dev/console': open error: Permission denied
To
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045931 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045931
I think the correct state for this bug is to keep the regression-updates
and regression-security tags, because it is a functional regression, and
to mark it wontfix - which is the state of the bug this is a
** Tags added: regression-security regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045931
Title:
ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt
To manage notifications about
An upload of ubuntustudio-default-settings to noble-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "packages must
not edit conffiles in maintainer scripts".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
So, I overlooked this earlier:
# There has got to be a better way to do this.
if [ "$(grep -Fx 'EXTRA_GROUPS="audio' /etc/adduser.conf)" = "" ]; then
echo -e "\n# Ubuntu Studio Configuration\n# Add other EXTRA_GROUPS
before this line" >> /etc/adduser.conf
echo
-_Title=Installing Updates...
-_SubTitle=Do not turn off your computer
+Title=Installing Updates...
+SubTitle=Do not turn off your computer
Can you explain the purpose of this change? A leading _ is usually a
marker that a string is to be translated. It doesn't seem like a change
we want to
+# Now, let's make sure we have the audio memlimits file in place
+if ! [ -e /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf ]; then
+cp /usr/share/ubuntustudio/audio.conf /etc/security/limits.d/
+fi
This results in an unowned file on the filesystem, and you don't remove
it again on package
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntustudio-installer into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-installer/1.18.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntustudio-installer into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-installer/1.18.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-installer (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063899
Title:
[SRU] Users are not initially
Hello Paolo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openafs into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openafs/1.8.10-2.1ubuntu3.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nautilus into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:46.1-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
this is marked 'fix committed' but there is no upload in oracular-
proposed. blocks SRU.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-installer (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
** Changed in: smifb2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063344
Title:
smifb2-dkms DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.8
To manage notifications about
missing corresponding oracular upload for SRU
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064170
Title:
Hello Paolo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted smifb2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smifb2/2.2.6.3.gbbd2e82-1ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
The edubuntu-artwork upload to noble includes a change to conf/edubuntu-
goa-firstrun.service which appears to be unrelated and not covered by an
SRU bug. If this is related to this bug, please explain how. Otherwise
this will need to be reuploaded to either drop that change, or link it
to
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal/1.18.4-1ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
In addition to Andreas's comments, this SRU bug references the MRE page,
but the SRU that's been uploaded (at least to noble) is not an upstream
microrelease, it's a patch added under debian/patches. So the MRE
exception does not apply here. How is this fix meant to be verified?
** Changed in:
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for distro-info-data has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Bryce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted runc-app into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc-
app/1.1.12-0ubuntu2~23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063128
Title:
Upgrade from mantic to noble shows a debconf prompt
openjdk-8-jre is now seeded for noble and later.
** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063834
Title:
The openjdk-8 i386 binaries have been restored in noble-updates. I am
working through the necessary changes so that this is properly
documented as a whitelisted package and will not be inadvertently
dropped going forward.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064539
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for ppc64el (remove
** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x (remove
Hello Chloé, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info-data into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info-data/0.52ubuntu0.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Chloé, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info-data into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info-data/0.43ubuntu1.16 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Chloé, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info-data into noble-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info-data/0.60ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Chloé, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info-data into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info-data/0.58ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Simon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-session into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
session/46.0-1ubuntu4.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
An upload of tzdata to mantic-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "to be reuploaded with better patch".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055718
Hello Helga, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
1 - 100 of 57414 matches
Mail list logo
