Is this issue still be present in the very newest Xiphos release for
Debian and Ubuntu of 2020?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Is this issue still present in the very newest Xiphos release of 2020?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
The place for adding bug reports is here:
https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137716
Title:
Please implement the ability to add bug reports
To manage
The place for adding bug reports is here:
https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos
Do you still need more than this place?
If you need more than this, could you please open an issue at
https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos, the issues tracker there?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Status:
This bug report occurred in 2011. It is now 2020.
New versions of Xiphos have been released.
Does the bug still occur in the newest Xiphos?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Converted to question:
In the current version of 2020 can you still see the empty label?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xiphos/+question/691947
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This bug is from 2013, and it is now 2020.
New versions for Xiphos have been released during that time.
Are you still finding this bug in the newest Xiphos release?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Converted to question:
This bug is from 2013, and it is now 2020.
New versions for Xiphos have been released during that time.
Are you still finding this bug in the newest Xiphos release?
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
--
You received this bug notificat
Ah okay, thank you.
I would say, let the holder of the copyright come up with a claim, and then it
can be looked into.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089053
Title:
UK copyright
The text in Ubuntu and in Debian comes from the original texts at
crossfire.org.
They have a bug trackers where bugs like this may be reported.
They are the ones who will be able to fix this bug.
The Ubuntu and Debian developers cannot fix it.
May you please forward this bug to the Crosswire
The original text comes from Crosswire at crossfire.org.
If this is a bug, they have a bug tracker at
http://tracker.crosswire.org/
They will be the ones who most likely have already looked into this,
because they are distributing this module. If they have not yet looked
into this, they will be
The newly packaged and patched Xiphos is now available in Debian sid. It
will soon move to Debian Testing. Eventually it will end up in Ubuntu
also. This means that this bug is fixed.
** Changed in: xiphos (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
** Changed in: xip
** No longer affects: bibledit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413930
Title:
Please sync bibledit 3.8-1 from debian unstable main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: bibledit (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
** Changed in: bibledit (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
** Changed in: bibledit (Debian)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
** Changed in: bibledit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned
** Changed in: bibledit (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: bibledit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Teus Benschop (teusbenschop)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
I tried the alternate installer CD for Lucid on a HP 2510p. The bug is
present there. I ended up using the standard installer DVD. But we have
several older laptops in the department that would not take the standard
installer CD because of limited memory. For such laptops the alternate
installer
The progress bar no longer is in the newer versions of Bibledit. Version
2.2 of Bibledit is old, these days it is at version 4.0. If this bug
could be closed, that would help. Thanks, Teus (bibledit developer).
--
Bible edit hangs a little more than halfway thru startup.
The patch, actually something similar to it, has been applied upstream
by the developer.
--
SEGV when stylesheet.xml can't be found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
It also occurs on karmic. I have build-essential and libgtk2.0-dev
installed, but the problem keeps occurring.
--
gtktextview.c reports GtkWarning related to screen drawing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365725
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The new libenchant with the fix works well for me.
The previous library emptied out the user dictionary. The new library,
with the fix, keeps the user dictionary.
--
enchant custom words are not being used
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446230
You received this bug notification because you
I tried the released version of Ubuntu 9.10 on a hp elitebook 2710p.
This notebook needed the fb=false switch when booting from the
alternate cd with previous released. However with the newest release of
karmic this is no longer needed. This means to me that this bug appears
to have been fixed.
Our version of Ubuntu 9.04 is always kept up to date, and it has worked
well in the past, but one day, after updating the packages, it gave this
error. It seems to have been working well at the time of release, but
updates introduced this regression.
--
package wu-ftpd 2.6.2-30ubuntu1 failed to
The bug is confirmed. and its work-around (fb=false) on the alternate
install Cd of Jaunty beta. Tested on HP Compaq 2510p.
--
Alternate install CD (both x86, AMD64) not booting on HP NX6325, HP 6510b and
HP 2510p
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147250
You received this bug notification because
23 matches
Mail list logo
