[Bug 1950683] Re: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality

2021-11-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
The problem is discussed in https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/4698 which in turn is marked as a duplicate of https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/3219 The patch mentioned there solves the problem: $ diff /etc/firejail/firefox-common.profile.orig

[Bug 1950683] Re: firejail firefox is blocking website functionality

2021-11-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
Same problem here with https://maps.google.com. Works in /usr/bin/firefox but not in firejail /usr/bin/firefox. $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal $ apt-cache policy firejail

[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
> Then, either do this at the end after the installer has run, or boot into a live CD environment (e.g. Kubuntu) and do: The many steps given there are not really necessary. If you installed without downloading updates the following steps should be easier: 1. The first boot after the

[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
I have used the "cryptsetup luksOpen` work-around successfully already years ago. However, when installing 20.04 with the server installer it does no longer work. Installation aborts; in the log I found the cause to be raise ValueError("encryption key or keyfile must be specified") from

[Bug 1904270] Re: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS encrypted partitions

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
> I tried the xubuntu-20.04.2.0 Sorry, that should have been xubuntu-20.04.2.0 installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904270 Title: ubiquity does not support existing LUKS

[Bug 1745421] Re: [Archive removal] Error in 17.10: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

2018-02-08 Thread Uwe Geuder
Same problem on 16.04 LTS with HWE kernel. First error is in statement + /sbin/tc filter add dev enp30s0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip tos 0x10 0xff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1574278] Re: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text

2016-09-14 Thread Uwe Geuder
I wrote: I can confirm [...] the effectiveness of the work-around "GTK_THEME=adwaita abiword". With some more testing I have to qualify that statement a bit: With the adwaita theme the behaviour is clearly improved compared to the default. I have not seen text flickering so far. But the cursor

[Bug 1574278] Re: AbiWord text cursor starts to flicker after adding some text

2016-09-14 Thread Uwe Geuder
Using Xubuntu 16.04 with all updates here. I can confirm both the original flickering and the effectiveness of the work-around "GTK_THEME=adwaita abiword". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1562097] Re: mbrola crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2016-08-17 Thread Uwe Geuder
I have the same crash whenever mbrola is called in Xenial. (I use it via espeak). Debugging shows that the crash is in an exit handler. In Wily there was no crash. I looked at the source package and to my big surprise the program is delivered as a binary from upstream. (Yes, it is declared a

[Bug 1545330] Re: [wily][regression] systemtap script compilation broken by new kernels

2016-02-22 Thread Uwe Geuder
** Summary changed: - [wily][regression] completely broken by new kernels + [wily][regression] systemtap script compilation broken by new kernels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545330

[Bug 1429185] Re: Restart button in Additional Drivers does not restart Xubuntu

2015-12-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
Still the same problem on a fully updated xubuntu wily $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 15.10 Release:15.10 Codename: wily -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 140017] Re: tracker doesn't follow symlinks

2015-10-09 Thread Uwe Geuder
Old issue, but my favorite search engine seems to find this report more easily than this upstreaam report https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726264 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #726264 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726264 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else

2015-06-16 Thread Uwe Geuder
Now I came up with an idea how to investigate whether it is a deadlock between mkfs and the GUI. Under /proc/pid/stack one can see the call stack in the kernel space of the process. So if the mkfs process hung in some do_write call and the log capturing process in some do_read call that would

[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else

2015-06-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
I wrote: Obviously the installer cannot do very much if mkfs.ext4 never completes. And I intended to write: So the bug must be in e2fsprogs (or even in the kernel) However, thinking one more time I don't think either of those statements is necessarily true. The output of mkfs is somehow

[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else

2015-06-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
I get also bitten by this problem when trying to install ubuntu-15.04 -server-amd64.iso in a virtual machine. If I select LVM the installation hangs when it tries to format /boot as ext2 If I select full disk without LVM the installation hangs when it tries to format / (rootfs) as ext4 I can

[Bug 1447600] Re: 15.04 installer hangs in partitioner during something else

2015-06-15 Thread Uwe Geuder
I cross-checked that the problem does not occur with ubuntu-14.04 -server-amd64.iso (same VM, excactly same virtual disk) I also found a work-around: 1. When mkfs hangs open a console on virtual console 2 2. Use ps to see how mkfs was called exactly and what's the pid 3. kill -9 pid 4. call the

[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel

2014-02-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Above mentioned patch is not enough. More build errors after this. Looks like they might have been addressed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717165 but they are based on a newer ltt version. I will look into when I have time, no promises... ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug

[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel

2014-02-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
After applying 7 patches I got it built and lttng seems to work at least for some basic tests. My build area is a complete mess, because of course the final 7 patches were not the first ones I tried. Hope I will soon have time to clean it up and post the correct patches here. -- You received

[Bug 1222021] Re: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events

2014-02-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
Hmm, downgraded xfce-power-manager to the previously installed version, didn't help. Same exercise for gnome-settings-manager (which updated at the same time), did not help. Well, because downgrading did not help, I upgraded both of them to the current version again. Result: everything works fine.

[Bug 1265720] Re: lttng-modules-dkms 2.1.0-2: lttng-modules kernel module failed to build : This bug occurs after each upgrade of Linux Kernel

2014-02-05 Thread Uwe Geuder
It appears that the problem has already been fixed once in http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- saucy.git;a=commit;h=984a2d4fe44738ee6fa69d54d418429b52fea991 But maybe the package lttng-modules-dkms is not build from that source? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1222021] Re: [SRU] xfce4-power-manager does not inhibit systemd from handling buttons and lid events

2014-02-05 Thread Uwe Geuder
After installing update xfce4-power-manager (1.2.0-2ubuntu1.1) my screen brightness control is broken. (Well, I installed several updates, but this one seems to be the most likely culprit to me). I'll try to downgrade the package again to verify my suspicion. Right now I'm running on battery, so I

[Bug 521533] Re: Bad data handling - Security Hole

2012-10-12 Thread Uwe Geuder
** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #267350 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350 ** Also affects: kdegraphics via https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267350 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 521533] Re: Okular stores form data in a different directory (possible leak of private data)

2012-10-12 Thread Uwe Geuder
** Summary changed: - Bad data handling - Security Hole + Okular stores form data in a different directory (possible leak of private data) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 1026858] Re: flashplugin-installer can't find adobe-flashplugin_11.2.202.233.orig.tar.gz

2012-08-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
This happens typically if your package index files are not up to date. I have the feeling that flashplugin-installer is particular sensitive to this issue, maybe because the code is dowloaded from a different site or just because it used to be updated more often than many other packages. Can you

[Bug 1020196] Re: Flash videos in browser play at several times normal speed

2012-08-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
Hmm, fix commited, but what version? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020196 Title: Flash videos in browser play at several times normal speed To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 738964] Re: update-manager crashed with NotAuthorizedError in _run(): org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.Error.NotAuthorized: ('system-bus-name', {'name': ':1.57'}): org.debian.apt.upgrade-packages

2011-03-20 Thread Uwe Geuder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 704667 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704667 ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 704667 Update-manager crashes on fresh natty installs-- NotAuthorizedError: org.freedesktop.PolicyKit.Error.NotAuthorized:

[Bug 721771] [NEW] natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Uwe Geuder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: systemtap Systemtap module compilation fails with error: ‘param_ops_int64_t’ undeclared here (not in a function) This has been reported and also fixed upstream: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11940 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease:

[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Uwe Geuder
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721771 Title: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Uwe Geuder
Because systemtap package does not declare the dependecy on the kernel debug info correctly, obviously apport-bug has not included the relevant info either. But yes I have correct kernel debug info installed: ii linux-image-2.6.38-4-generic-dbgsym 2.6.38-4.31 Linux kernel debug image for

[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Uwe Geuder
Commit 75a48ca3 mentioned in the upstream bug report applies cleanly to the systemtap source in natty and solves the problem with error: ‘param_ops_int64_t’ undeclared here (not in a function) I tried 2 simple system tap scripts: 1 succeeded and 1 failed. The new error is: error:

[Bug 721771] Re: natty: systemtap incompatible with kernel

2011-02-19 Thread Uwe Geuder
The second problem error: 'CLONE_STOPPED’ undeclared here (not in a function) is fixed by upstream commit b30b7ed1. All my tests are successful for the moment (that doesn't tell much, I have used only very simple scripts) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 594966] Re: [Kubuntu Lucid] Very noisy playback of AAC streams in FLV container

2011-01-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Problem still exists even after the KDE upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691068 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594966 Title: [Kubuntu Lucid] Very noisy playback of AAC streams

[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification

2010-12-03 Thread Uwe Geuder
Short answer: no experience with Maverick 10.10 (long explanation: I stick to LTS for most work. I do have a 1 Kubuntu 10.10 installation but it is very instable (probably because of some nouveau display driver issue) so I have not used it very much and not paid attention to kpackagekit's

[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-16 Thread Uwe Geuder
Excellent!!! After git checkout 6936fb and building and starting applications as in comment #42 the problem is gone. Tested with running stellarium and resizing glxgears. -- [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-16 Thread Uwe Geuder
To clarify: I have only built and tested r200_dri.so on 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] (rev 02) The comment says that the fix is for r200. No idea whether it helps also for the different card driver mentioned in #45 --

[Bug 656100] Re: [radeon][r200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-16 Thread Uwe Geuder
Now I've built both radeon_dri.so and r200_dri.so for the benfit of those who are not so familiar with git and building. (or those who just want to save the time to do it) 1. Extract the attached file. tar xf mesafix-6936fb.tbz 2, go to the newly created directory cd mesafix-6936fb 3. run

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-10 Thread Uwe Geuder
The problem also affects this card ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] which uses /usr/lib/dri/radeon_dri.so -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-09 Thread Uwe Geuder
As already mentioned in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29367#c5 the patch in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21374#c5 does not apply to current mesa. I searched a bit in the git history and it applies cleanly e. g. to commit 57f55a. However, this commit is 150 commits

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-08 Thread Uwe Geuder
Before reporting upstream, we probably have to try their newest version. In order to get at all started with that code I first built the Ubuntu source. The Maverick debian package builds mesa obviously in 9 configurations mesa-7.9~git20100924/build/osmesa32-static/config.status

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-08 Thread Uwe Geuder
Oops, my investigations obviously took some time. So I posted #39 without reading #38, which had come in the meantime. -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received this bug

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-08 Thread Uwe Geuder
I built the latest libdrm from git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/mesa/drm with these options: ./autogen.sh \ '--build=i686-linux-gnu' \ '--enable-udev' \ '--enable-libkms' \ '--enable-vmwgfx-experimental-api' \ '--enable-nouveau-experimental-api' \ '--enable-radeon' \

[Bug 645377] Re: [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
oops sorry: I meant it works on my ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] rev 2, cannot speak for others. -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645377 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt)

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: 1.) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release:10.04 2.) $ apt-cache policy openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre: Installed: 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1 Candidate:

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt)

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Also Maverick is still affected. (I tried to apport-collect this report but it fails: Package openjdk-6 not installed and no hook available, ignoring -- Lucid openjdk cannot verify applet signature (certificate chain not rebuilt) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug

[Bug 645377] Re: [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various radeon cards

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Yes, it works after applying the latest updates. There was no update to xorg-xserver-video-ati though, so it must have been a bug somewhere else. I had too many updates at once, cannot guess which one could have fixed this issue. -- [M7 LW] [RV250] resolution incorrectly detected on various

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
I get the same assertio on i386 with ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250 [Mobility FireGL 9000] (rev 02) when trying to start stellar ** Summary changed: - [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. + [R200] [RV250]

[Bug 656100] apport information

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Architecture: i386 DRM.card0.DVI.D.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x960 1280x854 1280x800 1280x720 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 848x480 720x480 640x480

[Bug 656100] BootDmesg.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676861/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] CurrentDmesg.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676862/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100

[Bug 656100] DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676863/+files/DRM.card0.SVIDEO.1.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

[Bug 656100] GdmLog.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676864/+files/GdmLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] GdmLog1.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676865/+files/GdmLog1.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] GdmLog2.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676866/+files/GdmLog2.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] Lspci.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676867/+files/Lspci.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] PciDisplay.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676868/+files/PciDisplay.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676869/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] ProcInterrupts.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676870/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

[Bug 656100] ProcModules.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676871/+files/ProcModules.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] RelatedPackageVersions.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676872/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

[Bug 656100] UdevDb.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676873/+files/UdevDb.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] UdevLog.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676874/+files/UdevLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] XorgLog.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676875/+files/XorgLog.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] XorgLogOld.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676876/+files/XorgLogOld.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] Xrandr.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676877/+files/Xrandr.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] peripherals.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: peripherals.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676878/+files/peripherals.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] setxkbmap.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676879/+files/setxkbmap.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] xdpyinfo.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676880/+files/xdpyinfo.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You

[Bug 656100] xkbcomp.txt

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656100/+attachment/1676881/+files/xkbcomp.txt -- [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656100 You received

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] [RV250] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Oops sorry, I start the program with stellarTAB, but it's of course called stellarium. ** Summary changed: - [R200] [RV250] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed. + [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion

[Bug 656100] Re: [R200] ../../radeon/radeon_cs_gem.c:181: cs_gem_write_reloc: Assertion `boi-space_accounted' failed.

2010-10-07 Thread Uwe Geuder
Sorry, I have no idea what is Gallium or the classic driver. Google lead me to http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature. I'm not sure whether I understand the page, but it appears to me that Gallium applies only to R300 or higher. (#602267 was on R300). However, here we are talking about R200. --

[Bug 463285] Re: Typing a keyboard layout to jump in the list shows the wrong selections on the right-hand side

2010-10-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
This affects also Maverick Release Candidate. Probably the bug is the same as before, but the effects are now much worse than before. The problem seems to occur whenever you change the selection in the left window (either by scrolling or typing starting letters) before the right window has been

[Bug 328437] Re: initramfs generated before removing casper

2010-10-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
The problem has now been fixed for the Lucid 10.04.1 Finnish Remix Desktop CD. The correct instructions are indeed at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomization sudo sed -i '/casper/d' extract-cd/casper/filesystem.manifest-desktop If I read the previous comments correctly, nobody has

[Bug 655979] [NEW] Maverick: ubiquity gtk front-end gets stuck in keyboard selection

2010-10-06 Thread Uwe Geuder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity If the user during keyboard selection double-clicks into the left list - the mouse cursor will change to the rotating symbol - Forward button will be greyed out - Backward button will be greyed out After that I did not find any way to complete

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
CA certificates obviously installed by this package ** Package changed: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) = ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
The CA certificates file exists twice on /usr/share/ca-certificates-java/cacerts /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts I have not added any certificate in any phase and both files have identical contents. (There is also a symbolic link /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/security/cacerts -

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
Tested today with $ apt-cache policy ca-certificates-javaca-certificates-java: Installed: 20100406ubuntu1 Candidate: 20100406ubuntu1 Version table: *** 20100406ubuntu1 0 500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Lucid

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
** Also affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
Sorry, my conclusions in #5 was incorrect. The root certificate is indeed in the certificate store. It is Owner: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O=VeriSign, Inc., C= US Issuer: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O=VeriSign, Inc., C =US Serial number:

[Bug 566317] Re: Lucid openjdk/icedtea cannot verify applet signature

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
For comparison the certificate chain as built by Sun's Java (also on Lucid) (Sorry, I wasn't able to resize the dialog to show more info) ** Attachment added: cert chain in Sun Java https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/566317/+attachment/1651116/+files/sampo-cert-sun.png

[Bug 310329] Re: apt-get install option --[no]-install-recommends should be documented

2010-09-28 Thread Uwe Geuder
Options are documented in Lucid at least. (I think it happened already earlier) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- apt-get install option --[no]-install-recommends should be documented https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310329 You received this bug notification

[Bug 528679] Re: Kpackedkit update details inform that there are no update descriptions

2010-09-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
Yes, this happens from time to time lin Lucid. It looks like a network error (I guess it fetches the description from a Canonical server). But it happens at least 10 times more frequently than network errors in other programs, e.g. Browser. So I'm sure this could be somehow improved in

[Bug 649284] [NEW] kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification

2010-09-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kpackagekit In Lucid kpackagekit shows a fix in the wrong group from time to time. This is difficult to reproduce, because it depends on the package versions installed and on the package versions available from the repos. So in normal usage (i.e. if you

[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classifiaction

2010-09-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
** Attachment added: screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649284/+attachment/1645815/+files/kpackagekit.png ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: kpackagekit In Lucid kpackagekit shows a fix in the wrong group from time to time. This is

[Bug 649284] Dependencies.txt

2010-09-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/649284/+attachment/1645860/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Summary changed: - kpackagekit shows incorrect security classifiaction + kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification -- kpackagekit

[Bug 649284] Re: kpackagekit shows incorrect security classification

2010-09-27 Thread Uwe Geuder
Because the linux-generic fix in question was an ABI change, a new package not previously installed was pulled. However, it was not from security either: $ apt-cache policy linux-image-generic linux-image-generic: Installed: 2.6.32.25.27 Candidate: 2.6.32.25.27 Version table: ***

[Bug 549801] Re: USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect

2010-09-25 Thread Uwe Geuder
Please ignore comment #33. It turned out that my device (D-Link DWA-140 B2) contains an RT3070, not an RT2870. Getting the driver source from Ralink and building makes it work on Lucid; Maverick not yet tested Sorry about the noise. -- USB WiFi adapter with rt2870 chipset won't connect

[Bug 573905] Re: Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect

2010-09-25 Thread Uwe Geuder
I just learned that there is an important difference between a DWA-140 and a DWA-140 ver. B2. The DWA-140 contains an RT2870, the DWA-140 B2 contains an RT3070. The device I have borrowed is a B2, so the apport logs above apply to RT3070 only. In Lucid downloading and building the RT3070 driver

[Bug 573905] Re: Lucid: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
Tested as advised by comment #6 (daily build of Sep. 24). It still doesn't work in Maverick. I'll try to collect some logs. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New ** Summary changed: - Lucid: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect + Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink

[Bug 573905] Re: Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: Cannot stat file /proc/4088/fd/40: Stale NFS file handle USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ubuntu 2612 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2]

[Bug 573905] AcpiTables.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: AcpiTables.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632480/+files/AcpiTables.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 573905] AlsaDevices.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632481/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 573905] AplayDevices.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632482/+files/AplayDevices.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 573905] ArecordDevices.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632483/+files/ArecordDevices.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification

[Bug 573905] BootDmesg.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632484/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 573905] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632486/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You

[Bug 573905] Card0.Amixer.values.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632485/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug

[Bug 573905] CurrentDmesg.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632490/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 573905] Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632487/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec97.0.ac97.0.0.regs.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect

[Bug 573905] Lspci.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632492/+files/Lspci.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 573905] Lsusb.txt

2010-09-24 Thread Uwe Geuder
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/573905/+attachment/1632493/+files/Lsusb.txt -- Lucid/Maverick: Wireless USB DLink DWA-140 does not connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573905 You received this bug notification because you are a

  1   2   3   >