[Bug 768786] Re: Accumulating kernels is cruel and unusual punishment

2019-11-15 Thread VanillaMozilla
I note that although this bug is marked as "opinion", it finally got fixed some years later. You're welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768786 Title: Accumulating kernels is

[Bug 1809269] Re: usbguard-applet-qt: started immediately leaving the user without mouse or keyboard

2019-11-14 Thread VanillaMozilla
This appears to be fixed for usbguard/0.7.4+ds-1, but not for earlier versions, including Bionic (see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbguard ). If necessary, as it appears to be, I request a backport to Bionic. If I'm not mistaken, it looks like a simple fix. -- You received this bug

[Bug 782406] Re: LibreOffice Writer Document Compare (regression)

2018-12-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have a 642 word document with 4 changes totalling 6 words, and yet the whole document is marked as changed, until I changed the Comparison option. I even changed the two documents to plain text, and it still marked the whole document as changed. -- You received

[Bug 782406] Re: LibreOffice Writer Document Compare (regression)

2018-12-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
This problem occurs on some documents but not others. I had success in fixing the problem (I have tried it on only one document) by changing Tools > Options > LibreOffice Writer > Comparison from "Auto" to "By word". That may narrow the bug down a bit. I can supply an example privately and file

[Bug 730159] Re: ffmpeg library configuration mismatch

2017-12-17 Thread VanillaMozilla
Please, I hope you DO fix it. I understand the reluctance to remove a needed message, but I would hope the spuriousness could be removed. Programs like ffmpeg and avconv are used simply because they are darned useful. They often accomplish in seconds what front end apps can't do at all.

[Bug 1577168] Re: Browser hangs Ubuntu 16.04

2017-12-14 Thread VanillaMozilla
"@Roberto: can you please run webbrowser-app in a terminal and paste here the output? Is the application crashing, or hanging?" No, he can't get the output, because the system is completely unresponsive. I tried to redirect terminal output to a file, but the file was empty. I did, however, take

[Bug 1556997] Re: JAVA_HOME auto-detection fails due to whitespace in update-java-alternatives output

2016-10-29 Thread VanillaMozilla
Éric Piel (Delmic) (piel) wrote: - JAVA_HOME=$(/usr/sbin/update-java-alternatives -l | grep openjdk | sort | tail -1 | cut -d' ' -f 3) + JAVA_HOME=$(/usr/sbin/update-java-alternatives -l | grep openjdk | sort | tail -1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -d' ' -f 3) Confirming that this works on my Ubuntu 16.04

[Bug 611033] Re: Bad text overlap in DVD menu

2016-06-15 Thread VanillaMozilla
Still not confirmed? It's been this way for years and years. Is anybody maintaining the program? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611033 Title: Bad text overlap in DVD menu To

[Bug 1533561] Re: wording on first run of twinkle-console could be improved

2016-03-12 Thread VanillaMozilla
Just for the record, "Twinkle not working" is a duplicate of this bug. This is quite a bit more important than "wording on first run of twinkle-console could be improved". I can confirm that it doesn't work at all, even with a valid profile. Opinions may vary, I would call that a critical bug.

[Bug 1477364] Re: musescrore version 2.0.2 not installed on ubuntu 14.04

2015-08-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
As a matter of policy, the Ubuntu repository provides only security updates within a Ubuntu version. Thus, you will not see version 2 in the Ubuntu repositories. However, you can get version 2.0.0 by adding a PPA. https://launchpad.net/~mscore-ubuntu/+archive/ubuntu/mscore-stable . There may

[Bug 1320560] Re: Removal of gdmflexiserver breaks user switching

2015-05-19 Thread VanillaMozilla
For what it's worth, this also affects Ubuntu 14.04 with the classic metacity desktop. Anton Asche's workaround (comment 4) solved the problem for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1217004] Re: HP driver prints incorrect margins on CD

2014-02-05 Thread VanillaMozilla
It might be worth mentioning a trick that can be used to check this out without consuming CDs. If you use an ordinary non-printable CD, the ink washes off very easily, and you can do many tests without cost. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1217004] [NEW] HP driver prints incorrect margins on CD

2013-08-26 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: I have an HP C309a, which will print on CDs. This works well under Windows but the margins are NEVER correct on a CD under Linux. The image is always offset by about 3 to 8 mm (and sometimes resized), which is very considerable if you see it. The problem occurs printing

[Bug 1052453] Re: Cannot click other sessions in unity-greeter

2013-01-18 Thread VanillaMozilla
This is definitely not fixed in unity-greeter 12.10.4-0ubuntu5. I absolutely cannot select desktops. Do we need to start over with another bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 230102]

2012-12-14 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** Bug 709579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230102 Title: No warning when closing multiple tabs To manage notifications about this

[Bug 948104] Re: Audacity menus and dialogs open behind other windows

2012-11-09 Thread VanillaMozilla
This has not happened for a long time. It seems to have been fixed somehow. I would close it if I could. It's not Invalid. I can't mark it Fix Released. It should be marked Works for Me, but that option doesn't seem to be available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1074715] Re: Failed upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10

2012-11-09 Thread VanillaMozilla
I have more information. At least the problems appear to be minor, since nothing melted. The problem occurred on a second computer. Both computers evidently repaired themselves so they were left in a bootable state. On the second computer the command dpkg --configure -a was issued. Error

[Bug 1074715] [NEW] Failed upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10

2012-11-03 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Ubuntu system, starting from LUbuntu desktop. Packages could not be upgraded. Samba could not be updated. Finally, updater told me upgrade had failed and system was in unstable state. It told me to file a bug report and include file /var/log/dist-update. That file

[Bug 1074715] Re: Failed upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10

2012-11-03 Thread VanillaMozilla
OK, one file was attached automatically. I can supply others on request. I have /tmp/apport.update-manager.1jguAX.apport as well as /var/log/dist-upgrade/*. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1045196] Re: Thunderbird menu item Move To under Message missing items

2012-09-07 Thread VanillaMozilla
There's another problem. Apport captures crashes. Just how does one use it to report a broken menu or some other bug that does not result in a crash? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1045196] Re: Thunderbird menu item Move To under Message missing items

2012-09-07 Thread VanillaMozilla
For the record, the bug reporting procedure is ubuntu-bug -w (then click on the application window) or ubuntu-bug thunderbird or ubuntu-bug thunderbird-globalmenu Sorry, I missed that in the instructions. However, do note that there is no link to this procedure if you report the bug from

[Bug 1046854] [NEW] Test report--ignore

2012-09-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Ignore this report. Just testing the Launchpad system, and I may not be able to back out without posting a bug report. Sorry for the inconvenience. Will close it if I can. ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Changed in:

[Bug 1045196] Re: Thunderbird menu item Move To under Message missing items

2012-09-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
The guidelines aren't that hard to find. There is a link to them on the form you use to submit Firefox or Thunderbird bugs in Launchpad. I think we're getting somewhere. There's no link if you submit a question from the Answers tab. It's usually considered a good idea to discuss a problem

[Bug 1045196] Re: Thunderbird menu item Move To under Message missing items

2012-09-05 Thread VanillaMozilla
Yes, thanks for doing that. I appreciate your response and the fact that it was fixed. I really do. My comment was referring to the fact that this bug was marked invalid first and THEN verified. If you read your link, you will see that it says Please don't waste developers or bug triagers time

[Bug 1045816] [NEW] Broken menus

2012-09-04 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Many of the menu items have a '' symbol that indicates that they expand when selected. Several menu entries have stopped doing that. For example, Message. Move to and Message. Copy to no longer work. That means that I cannot move messages to local folders. The

[Bug 1045196] Re: Thunderbird menu item Move To under Message missing items

2012-09-04 Thread VanillaMozilla
If you actually want bugs to be reported, please don't be so hasty to mark them invalid. This is extraordinarily insulting to people who spend their time to report bugs. If you can't duplicate the problem, you can ask for more information. The article you linked says not to use Launchpad to

[Bug 948104] [NEW] Audacity menus and dialogs open behind other windows

2012-03-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: The dialog windows (e.g., the File menu) will often open behind the Audacity window or behind windows from other programs. It can be quite a challenge to get to a menu. For example, if you activate the file menu either with the mouse or keyboard, you cannot select Exit. For a

[Bug 488746] Re: Screensaver freezes computer

2012-02-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 424782 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424782 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 424782 drempels screensaver won't stop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 763775] Re: Simple Scan apparently creates bad .png file, causes memory leak

2011-12-12 Thread VanillaMozilla
1. No 2. It was. 3. Not now. Besides, there's no obvious way to attach a file. 4. Yes. Everything seems to work correctly now in Ubuntu 11.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763775

[Bug 763775] Re: Simple Scan apparently creates bad .png file, causes memory leak

2011-12-12 Thread VanillaMozilla
I would change the bug status, but there's no category for works in current versions or works for me. Fix committed or released is not correct, since we have no idea what fixed it. The bug is/was valid, so invalid is not correct. And incomplete seems a little hasty after 8 months without a

[Bug 840031] Re: Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-15 Thread VanillaMozilla
I think the key to reproducing this must be step 5. I think they may have recently published or revised instructions on how to use the contour editor. In any case, to reproduce this, do not double click at step 4. And it would be REALLY helpful if someone would try this and actually reply. --

[Bug 840031] Re: Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
Are you sure it has to be xorg? It could be that LibreOffice calls an xorg method, which performs an illegal operation. But how can you be sure that LibreOffice did not attempt to write to an illegal memory location? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 840031] [NEW] Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-02 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Please do not close this the way bug 792841 was closed. It's a bad crash, even if it does not generate a crash report. The bug also occurs in Ooo. This bug could not be duplicated with the LibreOffice debugging files installed, or even after the debugging files are

[Bug 840031] Re: Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-02 Thread VanillaMozilla
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840031 Title: Contour Editor crashes login session To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 840031] Re: Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-02 Thread VanillaMozilla
Sorry, I should add that the automatically generated information may not be applicable, since I filed this report from an installed Natty. As I wrote before, LibreOffice no longer crashes in this configuration, but it will crash on the same computer when booted and run from a CD. The CD was made

[Bug 840031] Re: Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-09-02 Thread VanillaMozilla
Ignore the previous comment. It just crashed from the installed version of Natty. It will also crash from the CD. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840031 Title: Contour Editor

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
Any clue where to find debugging information and what the packages are called? This is a nontrivial question. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792841 Title: OpenOffice.org Contour

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-09 Thread VanillaMozilla
I'll be happy to submit a crash report as soon as I can get more guidance on this. Searching blindly for crash reports is a fool's errand. Meanwhile, I've upped the status, in hopes of getting a response. Crash report or not, it's still a nasty crash, and probably a valid bug. ** Changed in:

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-07 Thread VanillaMozilla
There is no /var/crash/ directory. There is no /var/log/crash/. There is no *.crash file on the computer. Any other ideas? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792841 Title:

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
I'm not surprised. Crashes are often capricious. I can't even reproduce this on other computers, although this one otherwise seems to be in perfect order. Is there a log or something I can post? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-05 Thread VanillaMozilla
Apparently it does not work with all image files. A file created and cropped by SimpleScan seems to cause failure. File attached. I'm a little reluctant run the commands to try it yet with LibreOffice. Does the command apt-get -y upgrade also upgrade the OS to Natty? I'm not quite ready to

[Bug 792841] Re: OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-04 Thread VanillaMozilla
** Attachment added: Version information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792841/+attachment/2154878/+files/VerInfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792841 Title: OpenOffice.org

[Bug 792841] [NEW] OpenOffice.org Contour Editor crashes login session

2011-06-04 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Steps to duplicate 1. Start OpenOffice.org Writer. 2. Insert picture from file (I used a .jpg). 3. Right click on picture. Wrap Edit contour... 4. Select polygon tool and enter several points. 5. Notice that you can't finish the frikkin

[Bug 768786] Re: Accumulating kernels is cruel and unusual punishment

2011-04-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
Of course, there could always be a non-default option not to remove kernels, for the rare person who needs an old one. And currently, Synaptic shows 6 versions, so you can always reinstall. But from what you say, apparently this bug is already fixed, i.e. shoved under the rug, leaving kernels to

[Bug 768786] Re: Accumulating kernels is cruel and unusual punishment

2011-04-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
P.S. What on earth are you talking about? Other components get purged on update, and you already get confirmation before any update. And unlike other components, kernels already received golden treatment, by (1) leaving them installed indefinitely; and (2) leaving several previous versions in

[Bug 768786] Re: Accumulating kernels is cruel and unusual punishment

2011-04-22 Thread VanillaMozilla
In case it needs to be spelled out in dry, explicit terms, this bug report is about removing all but the current kernel and the previous one on updating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 768786] [NEW] Accumulating kernels is cruel and unusual punishment

2011-04-21 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: It's time to purge old kernels. They have sex and multiply. There's no reason why ordinary users need more than the two most recent kernels installed. Granny doesn't appreciate a grub list that extends to several pages and grows without limit. Old kernels clutter Synaptic

[Bug 763775] [NEW] Simple Scan apparently creates bad .png file, causes memory leak

2011-04-17 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Steps to duplicate: 1. Scan a CD at 1200 dpi resolution. 2. Stop the scan when it has covered the CD, by pressing the button. 3. Crop the image. 4. Save as a .png file. Results: 1. .png file is 19.7 MB. 2. ImageJ (v. 1.44c) gives out of memory message. (Default memory on

[Bug 392579] Re: Update service terminated Firefox

2011-03-24 Thread VanillaMozilla
This bug is almost two years old, and so much code has been replaced since then. There's no way I can duplicate it now; it would have been difficult to duplicate even then. Besides, I'm not even sure I've got the right component. Why don't you just mark it Works for me? -- You received this

[Bug 730159] [NEW] ffmpeg library configuration mismatch

2011-03-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: When running ffmpeg I get a message WARNING: library configuration mismatch. Verified with a second computer (which had not previously had video software added). I installed ffmpeg from Synaptic on an older computer. Same problem. ** Affects: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)

[Bug 730159] Re: ffmpeg library configuration mismatch

2011-03-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
The error is shown a few lines from the top. ** Attachment added: ffmpeg output https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ffmpeg/+bug/730159/+attachment/1889770/+files/Temp.ffmpegoutput.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 730159] Re: ffmpeg library configuration mismatch

2011-03-06 Thread VanillaMozilla
Huh? I have no idea if there's any harm, but it sounds very much like a broken program. It may not seem important, but video editing software is riddled with problems, and this adds to the already considerable noise. Among other problems, ffmpeg failed to convert files from Ogg Theora, but the

[Bug 681048] Re: After modifying an image it is impossible to quit ImageJ

2010-12-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 638134 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638134 This is Debian bug 592381, which has been closed. Reportedly, the bug does not occur with Sun Java, or with ImageJ version 1.44c-3 (sic). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 681048] Re: After modifying an image it is impossible to quit ImageJ

2010-12-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 638134 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638134 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 638134 imagej doesn't close with openjdk * You can subscribe to bug 638134 by following this link:

[Bug 484718] Re: GNOME Search Doesn't Search

2010-12-13 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 506219 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506219 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 506219 Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System * You can subscribe to bug 506219 by following this link:

[Bug 621879] Re: Ubuntu Firefox handles DNS failure poorly

2010-10-23 Thread VanillaMozilla
Ubuntu Firefox appears to be using different timeout or retry options than the other browser/OS combinations. I can post logs if anyone wants, but a summary should suffice. If the primary server is 192.68.0.1 (wrong) but the secondary server is correct, nslookup -d2 www.google.com shows that it

[Bug 621879] [NEW] Ubuntu Firefox handles DNS failure poorly

2010-08-21 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox When the primary DNS server is set to the wrong address, Ubuntu Firefox takes 10 to 15 seconds to look up URLs. The problem does not occur with Firefox on Windows XP, and appears to be much less severe with Firefox on Fedora 13 or with Google

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-05-05 Thread VanillaMozilla
What? Things that don't work don't affect usability? If they don't want bug reports, then they need to be clear about the criteria. I have to say, some of the things that were cited as great paper-cut bugs, and have patches, seem pretty darned trivial. But on rereading my comments, I see it's

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-04-29 Thread VanillaMozilla
Actually, I think this might really be a Ubuntu bug. The bug can be fixed with a simple change of defaults. Does that make it Gnome or Ubuntu? Either way, this really needs to get fixed. Nominating it for One Hundred Paper Cuts because it's trivial to fix, but unacceptable that Find Files...

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-04-14 Thread VanillaMozilla
How would I do that? The patch is a simple change of a default value. From comment 3, quick_search_second_scan_excluded_paths is set by default to / , which excludes the entire disk from the find scan. But finding and patching the relevant code is something else. -- Gnome search tool (Search

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-04-05 Thread VanillaMozilla
I would not ordinarily do that, except that for some reason it appeared to be closed to comments until I changed it. This is no longer the case. Incidentally, I am always astonished at the slow response of large software systems to bug reports. Here's a major bug (file search fails to find

[Bug 524569] Re: Move Disk Usage Analyzer to SystemAdministration

2010-02-22 Thread VanillaMozilla
So what? Several of the tools in SystemAdministration do not require administrative access for any function. These include Network Tools, System Testing, and probably Printing. The menus are organized by function, not access requirements. Please reopen. -- Move Disk Usage Analyzer to

[Bug 524569] [NEW] Move Disk Usage Analyzer to SystemAdministration

2010-02-19 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel The Disk Usage Analyzer can be quite hard to find in its current default menu location in the accessories. Accessories are mainly programs for daily use, but Disk Usage Analyzer is better categorized as a system administration tool. I know

[Bug 484718] Re: GNOME Search Doesn't Search

2010-02-19 Thread VanillaMozilla
Probably a duplicate of bug 506219. -- GNOME Search Doesn't Search https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 524569] Re: Move Disk Usage Analyzer to SystemAdministration

2010-02-19 Thread VanillaMozilla
Er, are you sure about that package assignment? Should we just it open? -- Move Disk Usage Analyzer to SystemAdministration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524569 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-02-12 Thread VanillaMozilla
Never mind. Done. -- Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506219 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-02-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
OK, I've got it, almost. Can someone comment here before I take this back to Gnome? I've already made two small errors in posts over there-- once omitting a not that makes it look like not a bug--and I don't want to look like a fool and jeopardize this bug. And it is a bug, although I'm afraid

[Bug 341657] Re: [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces

2010-01-18 Thread VanillaMozilla
Let's see if we can't get this bug report closed. Damiano, you can use \040 for a space. Example: My\040Disk Can you try either that or the ntfs-config tool and report back? -- [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341657 You received this bug

[Bug 341657] Re: [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces

2010-01-18 Thread VanillaMozilla
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions

2010-01-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
Hi, touristguy87, not sure what you mean by this But I just checked, using Ubuntu for a proper view of the files. The Windows XP Recycler folder does indeed use different subdirectories for different logon users. So if I'm not mistaken, there appears to be a LOGICAL reason, and not just a

[Bug 506219] [NEW] Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-01-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: The Gnome search tool fails to find a newly created file in the home directory, if you search in File System. Steps to duplicate: 1. Create a text file 'sqw.txt' in your home directory. (The name is not essential, but simplifies finding the problem.) 2. Places Computer

[Bug 506219] Re: Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File System

2010-01-11 Thread VanillaMozilla
I hope gnome-utils is the right package for gnome-search-tool. I spent an hour or two on this with launchpad and Google. This bug was originally (mis?)filed under yelp. ** Package changed: yelp (Ubuntu) = gnome-utils (Ubuntu) -- Gnome search tool (Search for Files...) fails if searching File

[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions

2010-01-04 Thread VanillaMozilla
Since this bug is long since triaged, another bit of bug spam probably won't hurt. This bug report is a mess. I notice that the original report is about vfat. I missed that the first time, since many of the comments are about ntfs. Not the same animal. Ntfs has a recycle bin for each user in

[Bug 314860] Re: New timestamp when copying to NTFS partition

2009-12-09 Thread VanillaMozilla
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- New timestamp when copying to NTFS partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 314860] Re: New timestamp when copying to NTFS partition

2009-12-09 Thread VanillaMozilla
This is not a Nautilus bug, since it also applies to the cp -a command, with an error message: cp: preserving times for `/mnt/Windisk/Me/Bug311567Demo.gnumeric': Operation not permitted. See http://tuxera.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=2405 for details, especially my reply of Sat Dec 05, 2009

[Bug 488237] Re: ubuntu

2009-11-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 488236 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488236 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 488236 ubuntu -- ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488237 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 488236] Re: ubuntu

2009-11-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
Sorry, this Web page is not for user support. Try the support forum, http://ubuntuforums.org or https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5 . -- ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 488236] Re: ubuntu

2009-11-25 Thread VanillaMozilla
** Changed in: firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+question/91694 -- ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 341657] Re: [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces

2009-11-21 Thread VanillaMozilla
You have some underscores, but I don't see any spaces in the label names. There are several things that could go wrong. Install and run ntfs- config. That's a very easy way to set up fstab correctly. -- [Jaunty] Mounting by label fails when label has spaces

[Bug 192629] Re: Cannot move file to trash, do you want to delete immediately? on NTFS / VFAT partitions

2009-11-18 Thread VanillaMozilla
I have a suggestion that may help. Why not just inform users a little better. The error message could say something like, ...cannot move the file to the trash can for security reasons. Do you want to delete anyway? (Add the words for security reasons.) That would at least give the user an

[Bug 392579] [NEW] Update service terminated Firefox

2009-06-26 Thread VanillaMozilla
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Ubuntu updated, and the updated presumably finished. Some time later, perhaps after 1/2 hour or 1 hour, I was typing in a text form on Firefox. A notice popped up that a restart was required to complete the updates, and Firefox was

[Bug 392579] Re: Update service terminated Firefox

2009-06-26 Thread VanillaMozilla
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28418575/Dependencies.txt -- Update service terminated Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 392579] Re: Update service terminated Firefox

2009-06-26 Thread VanillaMozilla
Attempting to attach /var/log/apt/term.log but receive a message Cannot upload empty file. This is another error. The file is NOT empty. Will try again. -- Update service terminated Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 392579] Re: Update service terminated Firefox

2009-06-26 Thread VanillaMozilla
Success! Here is the update log. I won't report these as bugs unless advised to do so, but I think Launchpad could have been more helpful: 1. Incorrect message Cannot upload empty file. The file was not empty. Launchpad error, I think. 2. I had to start Firefox with gksudo to upload the