[Bug 1881969] Re: apparmor profile for libvirtd/libvirt-daemon needs fixing

2021-12-03 Thread costinel
what is the fix right now? I get this message only once per kernel lifetime, when libvirtd starts for the first time. If I stop and restart libvirtd, it never shows again. happens both with 20.04 lts kernel and hwe kernel (5.4 and 5.11) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1953084] [NEW] should depend on python3-future else doesn't run

2021-12-02 Thread costinel
Public bug reported: https://github.com/lpechacek/cpuset/issues/31#issuecomment-663839081 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: cpuset 1.6-3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-41.45~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-41-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs

[Bug 1896608] Re: [regression-in-stable] grub-multi-install fails with exit 1 when question grub-efi/install_devices_empty is skipped

2020-10-07 Thread costinel
I have upgrade the packages from the link provided (manual download since they're not yet accepted into focal-proposed) and grub-pc postinst script exits cleanly now. thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-10-05 Thread costinel
@juliank thank you. accordingly #1896608 shouldn't be listed as a blocker on https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-20-04-1-lts-point-release- status-tracking/17604 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-10-01 Thread costinel
manually installing grub works like this: # grub-install --force --removable --boot-directory=/boot /dev/sda Installing for i386-pc platform. Installation finished. No error reported. meanwhile as a workaround I have symlinked /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.postinst to /bin/true so other apt

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-10-01 Thread costinel
I have enabled debugging on /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.postinst when running dpkg --configure -a: https://termbin.com/7nh1 but I don't understand from the above output why it fails -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-10-01 Thread costinel
this bionic to focal upgrade still fails. not sure if this is the proper place to discuss. 18.04.5 installed minimal in vmware player then do-release-upgrade: https://i.imgur.com/YGLEWvy.png 18.04.5 setup deviations from defaults: root on thin lv created manually in terminal in live installer.

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-09-19 Thread costinel
ok, so now that this is fixed, why is ubuntu 18.04 to 20.04.1 still blocked? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891680 Title: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-09-09 Thread costinel
@vorlon, some of us here are innocent 18.04LTS users waiting for canonical to enable do-release-upgrade to focal, because this issue is blocking the LTS to LTS upgrade process (link in comment #9) with that in mind, how can we help testing without access to focal? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1891680] Re: grub-pc needs to detect when debconf points to invalid drive and stop in preinst, before unpacking files, and also treat this as a failure in postinst

2020-09-09 Thread costinel
@ded, the bug says for groovy Started work: 2020-08-18 Completed: 2020-09-02 for focal, Started work: 2020-09-08 so one can only guess it would take another two weeks, if the same work conditions apply -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

2020-09-08 Thread costinel
does anyone from canonical read or care about this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686859 Title: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed To manage notifications about

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

2020-09-08 Thread costinel
because if not, just fucking tell us or fucking write a faq entry on installation wiki -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686859 Title: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed To

[Bug 686859] Re: "Bootloader install failed" cannot be closed

2020-09-08 Thread costinel
still ocurring in 20.04.1 - I needed to install ubuntu alongside an existing partitioned gpt lvm thin pool disk. could not install grub on selected disk, now I can't get past the error, as I can't select any other disk nor choose "continue without a bootloader" because the OK button does

[Bug 1855747] Re: systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules in a tight loop

2020-06-30 Thread costinel
also other people complained https://www.reddit.com/r/VFIO/comments/90tg4h/after_loading_vfiopci_instead_of_nvidia_my_dmesg/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855747 Title:

[Bug 1855747] Re: systemd-udevd appears to be attempting to load Nvidia kernel modules in a tight loop

2020-06-30 Thread costinel
>Kai-Heng Feng (kaihengfeng) wrote on 2019-12-11: #4 > Can you please run `sudo update-initramfs -u -k all` and see if the issue still happens? yes this persists even after that. I have a nvidia card but I want to blacklist it. even blacklisted, the systemd-udevd

[Bug 1643706] Re: snap apps need to be able to browse outside of user $HOME dir. for Desktop installs

2019-12-14 Thread costinel
>Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote on 2016-11-22: #2 > >Thank you for your bug report, the confinement restriction is a feature >though. Where do you want to play videos from? Reading from another location >than your userdir or removable media or remote shares is probably something >most

[Bug 1854583] [NEW] [ProLiant MicroServer Gen8, Nvidia GPU 81 HDMI/DP, Digital Out, HDMI] Sound is distorted

2019-11-30 Thread costinel
Public bug reported: this works ok with latest 5.3.x kernel but not with 4.15 kernel kernel 5.0.0 does not work ok with zfs so I can't confirm it is fixed or not in 5.0.0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: alsa-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 149987] Re: CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD is not set

2019-02-28 Thread costinel
I also need to force remove a module. It is unacceptable to have to reboot when I know for sure that removing the module will not affect the system stability. It is also difficult to keep rebuilding kernel just to have this feature. Please reconsider. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1784152] Re: i2c_hid_get_input floods system logs

2018-12-29 Thread costinel
changing dev_err to dev_err_once like suggested in comment 35 worked for me, thank you! probably this hides the cause but at least I'm no longer being hit with tons of messages in syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1794522] [NEW] Feature request: able to choose split placement

2018-09-26 Thread costinel
Public bug reported: split is awesome but I find myself many times in need to choose where the new terminal is created. default is below and on right, but sometimes I need also above and on left Please add ability to choose split placement (above/below; left/right) Thanks. ** Affects:

[Bug 1794522] Re: Feature request: able to choose split placement

2018-09-26 Thread costinel
suggestions how could it be done for mouse: - if mouse is in the lower half, place split below. if mouse is in the upper half, when I right-click and split, split above - if shift or ctrl is held when clicking split, invert split placement - additional split items in the menu for keyboard: add a

[Bug 1729000] Re: iSCSI Connection abruptly dies writing to Windows Server 2016 Target

2018-02-16 Thread costinel
I am getting similar message at boot but not to Windows target, instead to a DELL EQUALOGIC 100E Symptom is system hang for a few seconds during boot then it works ok [ 56.363592] [ cut here ] [ 56.363604] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 415 at

[Bug 1547332] Re: [Feature Request] Provide option to install root to a ZFS formatted disk

2018-02-04 Thread costinel
Is anyone at Canonical actually discussing this internally? If yes, what are the key subjects? Filesystem layout (what dirs go into what datasets, personalized parameters like excluding /tmp from being auto snapshotted etc)? developer time to code the feature into the installer? what else is

[Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

2018-02-04 Thread costinel
@ comment #9, it has landed into proposed, not into main! this means xenial won't get 0.7 via hwe... :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734172 Title: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3 To manage

[Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

2018-01-26 Thread costinel
this is really worrying. we chose ubuntu for native zfs but it is such a dissapointment to not provide at least a ppa with updated zfs 0.7 for xenial. if next LTS comes without 0.7 we will switch back to centos that has almost immediate release packages after official release. -- You received

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

2017-02-02 Thread costinel
this is workaround for me that runs correctly: in rc.local: (systemctl stop networking.service; systemctl start networking.service; systemctl restart networking.service; true) & if i put the commands one by one, rc.local unit will fail because systemctl start exits non-zero. notice the

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

2017-02-02 Thread costinel
** Attachment added: "dpkg-l.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1551415/+attachment/4812135/+files/dpkg-l.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551415

[Bug 1551415] Re: systemctl stop networking hang / timeout

2017-02-02 Thread costinel
how do I debug this? if i manually run 'ifup -a --read-environment' or 'systemctl start networking' it brings all stuff up cleanly. by 'debug' i mean more than just looking at journalctl -u networking below contents of network/interfaces, journalctl -u networking and contents of netwroking unit

[Bug 1403152] Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count

2016-11-15 Thread costinel
seeing this on xenial after this sequence of operations: lxc stop run2 lxc delete run2 lxc copy run1 run2 lxc start run2 <- hangs here, with later dmesg [337766.146479] unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free. Usage count = 1 [337772.435786] INFO: task lxd:20665 blocked for more

[Bug 1604010] Re: sntp missing

2016-10-31 Thread costinel
workaround for ubuntu 16.04 lts is to install the deprecated ntpdate that still works ok: ntpdate:amd64/xenial-security 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.3 uptodate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
and #1544942 does not say dry-run removes packages, but says the output is different between with and without dry-run (which is something I also observed but only the first run after the upgrade to latest precise version of unattended-upgrades) -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> the --dry-run removes the packages no, it doesn't. #1544942 affects only one person, and in comment #64 you can see that files on /boot are not removed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? also, if you pay attention to my pasted logs, THE FIRST TIME the updated version is run with -d --dry-run, it DOES mention wanting to remove kernels. however the second time I run it, without --dry-run, it NO LONGER mentions removing

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
here is another box oot@wifi:~# eatmydata apt-get install unattended-upgrades Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: bsd-mailx The following packages will be upgraded: unattended-upgrades 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
> have you made sure you manually set that option to 'true'? It's 'false' by default. yes, root@mailhost:~# grep Dependencies /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true"; root@mailhost:~# ls -lht /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
worse, before running unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove showed lots of kernels good for removal. after upgrading and running the new unattended-upgrades, apt-get autoremove no longer lists these kernels at fit for autoremove. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-03-03 Thread costinel
this bugs says "Precise Fix Released Medium  Brian Murray Edit" apt-listchanges -a /var/cache/apt/archives/unattended- upgrades_0.76ubuntu1.2_all.deb says " unattended-upgrades (0.76ubuntu1.2) precise-proposed; urgency=medium * cherry pick fix for unused-dependencies removal. (LP:

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

2016-02-18 Thread costinel
Can you file it against initramfs-tools-core please? the init file comes from that package. ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init initramfs-tools-core: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

2016-02-18 Thread costinel
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -C2 hostname /usr/share/initramfs- tools/init # mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules are called! if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then /bin/hostname -b -F /etc/hostname 2>&1 1>/dev/null fi -- You received this bug

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

2016-02-18 Thread costinel
ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ zcat /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-4-generic | cpio -i 192905 blocks ubuntu@ubuntu-mate:/tmp/test$ grep -n -C2 hostname init64- 65- 66:# mdadm needs hostname to be set. This has to be done before the udev rules are called! 67:if [ -f "/etc/hostname" ]; then 68:

[Bug 1545297] Re: hostname: invalid option -- '-b' displayed during boot

2016-02-18 Thread costinel
** Attachment added: "hostname.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1545297/+attachment/4574658/+files/hostname.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1241376] Re: procps (1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.1) upgrade error

2014-02-02 Thread costinel
I don't think procps should return an error when one of the sysctl.d/ files contains incorrect data. Printing the error would be useful especially if the exact file and value is mentioned, otherwise saying oh, we failed when in fact only one attribute failed to load is cumbersome. Just because

[Bug 780513] [NEW] package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

2011-05-10 Thread costinel
Public bug reported: Cursors ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 10 02:28:13 2011 ErrorMessage:

[Bug 780513] Re: package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat starea de eroare la ieșire 2

2011-05-10 Thread costinel
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780513 Title: package oxygen-cursor-theme-extra (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul script post-installation instalat a returnat

[Bug 202952] Re: Add native ZFS to Ubuntu

2009-12-20 Thread costinel
it is a non-starter due to litigation and patent licensing. - are you saying that it is PROHIBITED BY LICENSE to publish source code that makes a GPL source code interface with a CDDL source code, once compiled IN PRIVATE following PUBLIC COMPILATION INSTRUCTIONS ? -- Add native ZFS to Ubuntu

[Bug 217311] Re: Unable to run Virtual Machine

2009-12-18 Thread costinel
Julián - from the host GUI. -- Unable to run Virtual Machine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 217311] Re: Unable to run Virtual Machine

2009-09-18 Thread costinel
I can confirm this on ubuntu 9.04 Linux desktop 2.6.28-15-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 18:40:08 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux ii kvm1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3 Full virtualization on i386 and amd64 hardwa ii kvm-pxe

Re: [Bug 108711] Re: [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV in XRRGetScreenInfo()

2007-06-21 Thread costinel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91545 how do i get rid of receiving these emails? On 6/18/07, Apport retracing service [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91545 **

[Bug 99462] Re: [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-03-31 Thread costinel
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094065/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094066/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7094067/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 99462] [apport] displayconfig-restore.py crashed with SIGSEGV

2007-03-31 Thread costinel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kde-guidance i don;t know; this window has appeared when i tried to use two monitors on my toshiba satellite 1900-101 ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 31 18:21:12 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: