[Bug 2067377] [NEW] unable to export pool

2024-05-28 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: I installed version 24.04 in a ZFS partition I noticed that the software used comes from the ZFS-ZED package. I now do another 24.04 installation in another EXT4 partition, I add the missing packages. I can then easily access the data contained in the ZFS partition. I now

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-12 Thread geole0
Good morning. During the first try, I made a mistake in using it. I just started again under the same conditions and persistence works well. With my regrets. df -htext4 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/disk/by-label/casper-rw 636M 4.8M 585M 1% /var/log

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-11 Thread geole0
Hello It is now good with this order. ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.65 GiB, 1572864 bytes, 3072 sectors Disk model: DataTraveler 3.0 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-10 Thread geole0
Good morning I was worried because I read Unknown kernel command line parameters "persistent splash BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz", will be passed to user space. May 09 13:42:42 ubuntu kernel: persistent My live USB is like that a@b:~$ lsblk -fe7 /dev/sdd NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 20.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-09 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "journalctl -p err" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2065315/+attachment/5776699/+files/journal.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065315

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 20.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-09 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "journalctl -g persis" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2065315/+attachment/5776698/+files/Persist.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2065315] Re: NOBLE 20.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-09 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "journalctl" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2065315/+attachment/5776700/+files/Trace.log ** Summary changed: - NOBLE 20.04 Persistence is not enabled + NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2065315] [NEW] NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled

2024-05-09 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: I'm trying to make persistence work in an installation boot without success. I suspect that the "persistence" parameter which is no longer recognized may be the cause. However, it is possible that with this version there is a new technique to enable persistence. But I

[Bug 2063209] Re: FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected (NFS)

2024-04-23 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "FS-Cache.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2063209/+attachment/5769692/+files/FS-Cache.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063209

[Bug 2063209] [NEW] FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected (NFS)

2024-04-23 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Good morning I think it's the same problem as bug 19223670. But it's in NFS. I actually have two mounts in the fstab lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS grep nfs /etc/fstab 192.168.1.22:/media/NosDonnees /media/NosDonneesBureau nfs

[Bug 1927807] Re: "https" address causes zsync download to fail with error 'could not read control file from URL'

2024-04-15 Thread geole0
Hello lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu Noble Numbat (development branch) Release:24.04 Codename: noble sudo zsync https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/noble-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync failed on url

[Bug 2059846] Re: The canary thread is apparently starving. Taking actiont

2024-04-01 Thread geole0
Hello My iPad can be used correctly with a live USB 24.04 and I systematically use it in 22.04 to ensure the internet connection in the absence of a box. For troubleshooting, I used an iPhone -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2059846] Re: The canary thread is apparently starving. Taking actiont

2024-03-30 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "journalctl" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2059846/+attachment/5760867/+files/a.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059846 Title: The

[Bug 2059846] [NEW] The canary thread is apparently starving. Taking actiont

2024-03-30 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello It is when i want connect mu iPAD ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059846 Title:

[Bug 2049578] Re: Not loading module "atk-bridge": The functionality is provided by GTK natively. Please try to not load it.

2024-03-30 Thread geole0
a@localhost:~$ ubuntu-bug linux-base REDACTED config part /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/90-installer-network.cfg, insufficient permissions a@localhost:~$ Gtk-Message: 19:31:45.720: Not loading module "atk-bridge": The functionality is provided by GTK natively. Please try to not load it.

[Bug 2056575] [NEW] tracker-extract-3 crashed with SIGSYS in epoll_wait()

2024-03-08 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Daily 20240308 ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: tracker-extract 3.4.6-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 2056053] [NEW] tracker-extract-3 crashed with SIGSYS in epoll_wait()

2024-03-04 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello it is Daily 2024/03/04 ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: tracker-extract 3.4.6-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture:

[Bug 1973126] [NEW] crash ubiquity during installing Lubuntu 22.04

2022-05-12 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: option ubiquity -b is used because normal installation of grub want modify NVRAM and the computer does not accept. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: ubiquity 22.04.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic

[Bug 1972099] [NEW] computer startup crashes when NFS partition is inaccessible

2022-05-08 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello. When the NFS partition described in the /etc/fstab file is not accessible (The server is down) starting the computer in version 22.04 is impossible. Message: "you are in emergency mode. After logging, type "journal -xb to view system log This was not the case in

[Bug 1969579] Re: Ubuntu Advantage is available only for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 14.04 ESM.

2022-05-01 Thread geole0
you wrote Ubuntu LTSbut not Lubuntu LTS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969579 Title: Ubuntu Advantage is available only for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 14.04

Re: [Bug 1969579] Re: Ubuntu Advantage is available only for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 14.04 ESM.

2022-04-29 Thread geole0
Hello Thank you for your reply. In fact my real question is whether *L*ubuntu can also take advantage of ESM thank you Le 28/04/2022 à 17:16, Ivo Jansky a écrit : > Workaround: > Until the issue gets fixed, you should be able to use the "Buy now" button > instead of pressing the enter key in

[Bug 1969579] [NEW] Ubuntu Advantage is available only for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 14.04 ESM.

2022-04-20 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello. I want to install "Extended Security Maintenance" in my computer which has a 20.04 version of ubuntu. He doesn't seem to recognize her. The error message is: "Other versions? Ubuntu Advantage is available only for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, 18.04 LTS, 16.04 LTS, and 14.04

[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point

2022-04-11 Thread geole0
Hello. I just found the reason. The receiving partition was formatted in FAT32 sorry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728354 Title: ntfs: unsupported reparse point To manage

[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point

2022-04-11 Thread geole0
Hello there are at least all files ending with .mui getfattr -h -n system.ntfs_reparse_data -e hex "/media/a/W21H2B/Program Files/WindowsApps/Microsoft.LanguageExperiencePackfr-FR_19041.40.124.0_neutral__8wekyb3d8bbwe/Windows/System32/fr-FR/CompMgmtLauncher.exe.mui" getfattr : Suppression des « 

[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point

2022-04-07 Thread geole0
Hello Same problème with 22.04 Beta Jammy "time sudo rsync -av --del --exclude=pagefile.sys --exclude=OneDrive --exclude=Edge* /media/$USER/$PART/* /media/$USER/$PART-SAVE >résultat-$PART" ** Attachment added: "list of errors"

[Bug 1967748] [NEW] kswapd0 take 100% processor

2022-04-04 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I don't know if this is normal operation or if it is possible to configure KSWAPD0. I installed version 22.04 (jammy) choosing encrypted ZFS partitioning in an external disk. The installation chose to assign the swap partition to SDC2. On reboot, this partition does

[Bug 1962409] Re: ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad

2022-04-04 Thread geole0
Hello Same problem withe beta jammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962409 Title: ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1859899] Re: Please add a ZFS gui

2022-03-24 Thread geole0
Hello Hello With the arrival of version 22.04, it is now certain that ZFS is a way to do an installation. It seems abnormal to me that gnome-disks keeps saying that ZFS is an unknown system and doesn't know how to mount it. Please do the needful quickly. Do not forget that the partition can be

[Bug 1965961] Re: gjs and mount.ntfs loop together with 150 processeor and errors

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
lines 68-111 a@a:~$ journalctl -b -p err mars 22 16:11:38 a kernel: Bluetooth: Patch file not found ar3k/AthrBT_0x3101.dfu mars 22 16:11:38 a kernel: Bluetooth: Loading patch file failed mars 22 16:11:49 a gpod[1414]: No device found with uuid bd21926a45c292c575869dffe91ae2b1458bfb40, is it

[Bug 1965961] [NEW] gjs and mount.ntfs loop together with 150 processeor and errors

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: a@a:~$ journalctl -g finalized mars 22 15:27:05 a gnome-shell[4162]: Object 0x5574e1359b30 of type IBusText has been finalized while it was still owned by gjs, this is due to invalid memory manageme> mars 22 15:27:05 a gnome-shell[4162]: Object 0x7ff0e0025d70 of type

[Bug 1962409] Re: ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello Same problem with this version jammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-03-21 08:38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962409 Title: ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad To

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello This version is now good. jammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-03-21 08:38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962061 Title: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No

[Bug 1962387] Re: EFI is not on the drive

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello Same problem with this version jammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-03-21 08:38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962387 Title: EFI is not on the drive To manage notifications about

[Bug 1960083] Re: dirname applet missing from initramfs

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello This version is goodjammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-03-21 08:38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960083 Title: dirname applet missing from initramfs To manage notifications

[Bug 1961055] Re: Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello This version in now goodjammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-03-21 08:38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961055 Title: Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No

[Bug 1927071] Re: Fresh install of chromium-browser during installer-like process, in a chroot fails (when preparing machines prior to first boot)

2022-03-22 Thread geole0
Hello. with Daily ubuntu. with snap firefox_1%3a The message is. still unable to contact the Store. Trying for another 20 minutes. after a message for continue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1963902] [NEW] xdg-user-dirs-gtk-update not working properly

2022-03-07 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello. It seems to me that the xdg-user-dirs-gtk-update command does nothing at all. I want to change the location of the download directory. So I move the directory with this command: "mv -v /media/Common/a/Downloads /media/Common/a/BisDownloads" Then I update my

[Bug 1962409] Re: ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad

2022-02-27 Thread geole0
** Description changed: Hello I just installed the zfs 22.04 encrypted version on an external drive. When I launch the installed software, there is a loss of time of 90 seconds looking for the partition containing the swap. Would it be possible to replace the device name with a UUID name

[Bug 1962409] [NEW] ZFS: The content of the /etc/crypttab file is bad

2022-02-27 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I just installed the zfs 22.04 encrypted version on an external drive. When I launch the installed software, there is a loss of time of 90 seconds looking for the partition containing the swap. Would it be possible to replace the device name with a UUID name in the

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-27 Thread geole0
Hello SOLVED with new Daily jammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-02-26 08:21 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962061 Title: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file

[Bug 1962387] [NEW] EFI is not on the drive

2022-02-27 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I just installed the latest release jammy made on Feb 26 in an ZFS external hard drive. I would have liked the part of BOOT EFI to also go to the external hard drive and not to the internal hard drive. It is true that it is an error which certainly dates from the

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-26 Thread geole0
The little script that makes ZFS booting impossible. sudo -i #1) Montage des partitions contenant le logiciel rmdir /ZFS zpool import -N -R /ZFS rpool && sleep 5 zfs set canmount=on rpool && zfs mount -v rpool for var in $(zfs list | grep ROOT/ubuntu|cut -d" " -f1) do echo $var zfs

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-26 Thread geole0
Hello. To advance this problem, I decided to redo a brand new installation without using encryption. I can also boot several times without any difficulty. With another O.S. in version 22.04 installed in an EXT4 partition, I launched the script to access this ZFS partition. The problem is

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-26 Thread geole0
The little script that makes ZFS booting impossible. ** Attachment added: "The little script that makes ZFS booting impossible." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1962061/+attachment/5563869/+files/CHROOTchiffr%C3%A9.txt -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1961910] Re: Ubuntu 22 crash when updating, broken network manager and cannot report bug

2022-02-24 Thread geole0
Hello. Hello Not exactly the same. it processes a few files and the toshiba boot screen is offered. I can only press the restart button on the lap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1962061] Re: ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-24 Thread geole0
Helle Hello Here is the access sequence to the encrypted partition from another O.S. zpool import -N -R /ZFS rpool && sleep 10 if [ -e /dev/zvol/rpool/keystore ] ; then cryptsetup -v open /dev/zvol/rpool/keystore keystore-rpool && sleep 10 mkdir -p /run/keystore/rpool mount -v

[Bug 1962061] [NEW] ZFS Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-23 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello The message is Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory Command: mount -o zfsutil -t zfs rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_ui69ph /root// Message: filesystem 'rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_ui69ph' can not be mounted: Permission denied filesystem

[Bug 1959194] Re: zfs mount is error free but no directory is present

2022-02-20 Thread geole0
Hello. i have solved the problem by writing zfs mount -v $(zfs list | grep ROOT/ubuntu | head -1 |cut -d" " -f1) zfs mount -v $(zfs list | grep BOOT/ubuntu | head -1 |cut -d" " -f1) But i don't kwnow if it is the goodQ- solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1961055] Re: Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-16 Thread geole0
Hello I worked around the problem by removing the words quiet splash from the entry menus of the /boot/grub/grub.cfg file so that I could enter the password. But the swap partition is not mounted. Probably because is name is now SDA2 and not SDC2 which was the name during installation on a

[Bug 1961055] Re: Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-16 Thread geole0
** Description changed: Hello This morning I downloaded the UBUNTU JAMMY version which had just been made an hour earlier. I installed it asking for encryption. When I boot, the password is asked. He is accepted. But root mount is denied. ... find: /dev/zvol: No such file or

[Bug 1961055] [NEW] Key load error: Failed to open key material file: No such file or directory

2022-02-16 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello This morning I downloaded the UBUNTU JAMMY version which had just been made an hour earlier. I installed it asking for encryption. When I boot, the password is asked. He is accepted. But root mount is denied. ... find: /dev/zvol: No such file or directory key load

[Bug 1960083] Re: dirname applet missing from initramfs

2022-02-16 Thread geole0
Hello Oh!!! jammy-desktop-amd64.iso 2022-02-16 08:353.1GDesktop image for 64-bit PC (AMD64) computers (standard download) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960083

[Bug 1960083] Re: dirname applet missing from initramfs

2022-02-15 Thread geole0
I just downloaded the iso today, then I redid an installation But it's still the version minus one I don't know how to update the ISO I just downloaded before installing it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1960083] Re: dirname applet missing from initramfs

2022-02-15 Thread geole0
Hello Are you sure? https://zupimages.net/viewer.php?id=22/07/fxcb.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960083 Title: dirname applet missing from initramfs To manage notifications

[Bug 1959194] [NEW] zfs mount is error free but no directory is present

2022-01-27 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello In a 22.04 version installed in an EXT4 partition, I am trying to watch the contents of a 22.04 version installed in a ZFS partition. I can't. However, I can easily access the "duplicate" of this partition which was created under ZFS. I think it certainly needs an

[Bug 1956160] Re: resize btrfs partition too much

2022-01-01 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "gparted_BTRFS1.htm" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1956160/+attachment/5550581/+files/gparted_BTRFS1.htm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1956160] Re: resize btrfs partition too much

2022-01-01 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1956160/+attachment/5550582/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956160 Title:

[Bug 1956160] Re: resize btrfs partition too much

2022-01-01 Thread geole0
** Attachment added: "gparted_BTRFS.htm" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1956160/+attachment/5550580/+files/gparted_BTRFS.htm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1956160] [NEW] resize btrfs partition too much

2022-01-01 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: it is possible to decrease the size of a btrfs partition. But not too much. It seems that there should be a minimum of 4 GB of free space? Is it possible to take it into account in the calculation of the reduction proposal? Thank you ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 1951578] Re: unable to install apt-offline

2021-11-21 Thread geole0
hello sudo apt update has bigs errors... => it was an error in the file/etc/apt/sources.list sorry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951578 Title: unable to install apt-offline To

[Bug 1951634] Re: package iotop missing

2021-11-21 Thread geole0
hello sudo apt update has bigs errors... => it was an error in the file/etc/apt/sources.list -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951634 Title: package iotop missing To manage

[Bug 1951634] [NEW] package iotop missing

2021-11-19 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello sudo apt full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu

[Bug 1951578] [NEW] unable to install apt-offline

2021-11-19 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: hello Installation off apt-offline impossible in ubuntu 20.04 apt-offline --help Command 'apt-offline' not found, but can be installed with: sudo apt install apt-offline sudo apt install apt-offline Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading

[Bug 1951416] [NEW] gparted fat32 mtools

2021-11-18 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: hello. gparted incorrectly indicates that all fat32 partitions are in trouble only because the mtools package is missing. Can you rectify in the right place: In the O.S. main or during the installation of gparted Thank you ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04

[Bug 1949355] [NEW] unity-tweak-tool

2021-11-01 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello it seems to me that the installation of unity-tweak-tool is going wrong Paramétrage de unity-tweak-tool (0.0.7+-0ubuntu9) ... /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/UnityTweakTool/__init__.py:136: SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="? assert id is not

[Bug 1945974] Re: systemctl hibernate not write the contents of the RAM into swap partition or swapfile. le

2021-10-04 Thread geole0
However sudo hibernate work correctly! ** Attachment added: "The journalct trace of sudo hibernate command" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hibernate/+bug/1945974/+attachment/5530464/+files/s2disk.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1945974] [NEW] systemctl hibernate not write the contents of the RAM into swap partition or swapfile. le

2021-10-04 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I see that the systemctl hibernate command does not write the contents of the nvram in the swap partition (or in the swap file). This is also true in version 21.04 There is therefore no restart with the recovered data. Worse, when restarting, the partition is not in

[Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-24 Thread geole0
hello a completely lost user => https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2066473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939238 Title: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. To

[Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-16 Thread geole0
Hello I still say that the action proposed by these lines " dev/XXX: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY ( i.e.. without -a or -p options) fsck existed with status code 4 The root file system on /dev/ requires a manual fsck" Is not easy to understand. So I suggested a change

[Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-15 Thread geole0
Hello "It asks me to do an fsk manually if I read between the lines, and I don't understand what that means or what to do." => https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=22480277#p22480277 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-10 Thread geole0
Hello Thanks for your answer but 99.999% of basic users are unable to answer repair software English questions other than "YES". However the sentence can become "EXECUTE THIS COMMAND 'fsck /dev/xx' to do a manual fsck on the root file system." If the answer "yes" completely destroys the

[Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-08 Thread geole0
https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2066134 https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2066096 https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=2066153 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1939238] [NEW] UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

2021-08-08 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello This problem did not occur on my computer. https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2021/08/07/210807015400327092.png It occurs in users who are not competent. This week, the French forum collapsed over this incident. I think changing the advice phrase might improve

[Bug 1926624] Re: failed to start commit a transient machine-id on disk

2021-04-29 Thread geole0
The journal log ** Attachment added: "T" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1926624/+attachment/5493340/+files/T -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926624 Title:

[Bug 1926624] [NEW] failed to start commit a transient machine-id on disk

2021-04-29 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello. I installed the Hirsute Hippo version (21.04) in a partition of a USB stick. The boot is slow. This is certainly normal. But a lot of "time-out" messages are reported in the log. The first one met is "failed to start commit a transient machine-id on disk". I do not

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-15 Thread geole0
Hello I solved the problem by not downloading the file "refind_0.13.2-1_amd64.deb" But the file "refind-bin-0.13.2.zip" Installation commands are now wget https://sourceforge.net/projects/refind/files/0.13.2/refind-bin-0.13.2.zip unzip refind-bin-0.13.2.zip 1>/dev/null

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-14 Thread geole0
the actual script ** Attachment added: "installation script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/refind/+bug/1922780/+attachment/5487778/+files/refind2104-v3.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-08 Thread geole0
Hello With debug trace level 4 ... --Next loader-- 17:12:46 - Starting ext4_x64.efi 17:12:46 - Using load options '' 17:12:46 - Note: ext4_x64.efi is a driver 17:12:46 - 'EFI\refind\drivers_x64\ext4_x64.efi' is a valid loader 17:12:47 - Getting EFI variable 'SecureBoot' from

[Bug 1913576] Re: Fsck with recovery mode

2021-04-08 Thread geole0
Remenber ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ Temp=$(diskutil list | grep -i '0FC63DAF-8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4\|BC13C2FF-59E6-4262-A352-B275FD6F7172\|933AC7E1-2EB4-4F13-B844-0E14E2AEF915\|E6D6D379-F507-44C2-A23C-238F2A3DF928\|A19D880F-05FC-4D3B-A006-743F0F84911E\|0657FD6D-A4AB-43C4-84E5-0933C84B4F4F\|Linux')

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-08 Thread geole0
Hello Same problem in Legacy version It is necessary to tinker with the installation of what is missing! My script is as follows PDM="/boot/efi" # définir le point de montage echo Refind est absent. Installation de refind fourni par UBUNTU lancée. add-apt-repository universe && apt

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-08 Thread geole0
Hello My script of installation under ubuntu 21..04. The ubuntu are still not detected at the time of the reboot. PDM="/boot/efi" # définir le point de montage Shim="shimx64.efi" ## Le fichier de boot sécurisé à utiliser sachant que shimx64.efi.dual.signed est actuellement refusé par le script

[Bug 1922780] Re: refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-07 Thread geole0
Hello I started again, staying very close to the documentation I am enclosing all the excerpts for you. The ubuntu are still not detected at the time of the reboot. I specify that I am running from a so-called "live-usb" session. I want to clarify that in the command line, the two signed files

[Bug 1922780] [NEW] refind in secure mode forget to look in ext4 partitions

2021-04-06 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I have been using refind in insecure mode for many years. I just decided to put a computer in secure mode. Apart from the difficulty of booting, I can no longer directly choose the various ubuntu on ext4 partitions, it just displays the grub present in the boot

[Bug 1922380] Re: remove shim-signed very difficult

2021-04-03 Thread geole0
Hello. I'm confused. When I type the words correctly, it works. Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour man-db (2.9.4-2) ... root@a:~# apt purge shim-signed Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait Lecture des informations d'état... Fait

[Bug 1922380] [NEW] remove shim-signed very difficult

2021-04-02 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I don't want the shim-signed anymore, but I need an additional password to remove it. This error is for all version of ubuntu. I am sure I am entering the correct one because I entered it using a copy paste technique. Have pity on those who do not know English well

[Bug 1917174] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.4+2.04-1ubuntu35.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-03-11 Thread geole0
Hello It seeems that it is the same thing with hirsute! https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=22427092#p22427092 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917174 Title: package

[Bug 1917174] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.4+2.04-1ubuntu35.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-03-03 Thread geole0
Under liveusb and during installation ubuntu@ubuntu:journalctl -g attention -- Logs begin at Tue 2021-03-02 19:51:25 CET, end at Wed 2021-03-03 10:34:34 CET. -- mars 03 00:41:32 ubuntu ubiquity[59340]: grub-install : attention : Cannot read EFI Boot* variables. mars 03 00:41:32 ubuntu

[Bug 1917174] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.155.4+2.04-1ubuntu35.4 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit stat

2021-03-02 Thread geole0
Hello So, in chroot mode root@ubuntu:/# grub-install - Installation pour la plate-forme x86_64-efi. grub-install : attention : Cannot read EFI Boot* variables. grub-install : attention : read_file: could not read from file: Erreur d'entrée/sortie. grub-install : attention : vars_get_variable:

[Bug 1916019] [NEW] speed of execution of reshape and chunk.

2021-02-18 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello speed of execution of reshape and chunk under Ubuntu version 20.04.2. The execution speed of the "reshape" and "chunk" actions of the MDADM command is much too slow :(speed = 288K / sec). The IOTOP command also indicates that the flow is very low. There is nothing

[Bug 1915860] [NEW] The function 'bd_md_examine' called, but not implemented

2021-02-16 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello Under ubuntu 20.04 version, I am reorganizing some RAIDS I come across a message that I cannot understand. Is something missing in the software? It seems to be written every second journalctl -b -g "The function 'bd_md_examine' called, but not implemented" >T.txt &&

[Bug 1826703] Re: Could not prepare Boot variable: Function not implemented

2021-02-12 Thread geole0
Hello I encounter a similar incident a@a:~$ sudo efibootmgr --create --disk /dev/sdb --part 7 --label "grububuntu" --loader "\efi\ubuntu\grubx64.efi" --verbose Could not prepare Boot variable: Function not implemented a@a:~$ a@a:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu

[Bug 1912044] Re: invalid arch-independant ELF magic

2021-02-09 Thread geole0
So under grub rescue, with four commands lines set root=(hd0,gpt3) set prefix=(hd0,gpt3)/usr/lib/grub insmod nornal normal then under grub, with three commands lines linux /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sdd3 ro initrd /boot/initrd.img boot This troubleshooting works but it is not normal to have

[Bug 1912044] Re: invalid arch-independant ELF magic

2021-02-09 Thread geole0
Hello Today I downloaded the new DAILY version again I see the same problem again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912044 Title: invalid arch-independant ELF magic To manage

[Bug 1914599] Re: efi: Froze efi_rts_wq and disabled EFI Runtime Services

2021-02-04 Thread geole0
Hello I remind you that at startup, the EFI computer is not in SECURE mode. There is therefore no reason to require that the secure mode be installed. There is an installation option --n0-nvram Use it! It is easy to do a read command of the NVRAM to see that it is refused in

[Bug 1914599] [NEW] efi: Froze efi_rts_wq and disabled EFI Runtime Services

2021-02-04 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I think this problem has been around for many years. For ubuntu, I only found this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1777228) which was closed. I chose to open a new one. The context is an ubuntu 20.04 installation ": Ign: 1 cdrom: //

[Bug 1914264] [NEW] Unlisted SSD Partitions

2021-02-02 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I did an install of ubuntu 20.04 in legacy mode in an SSD. Everything works perfectly fine. For the sake of helping people, I decided to make an error in the /boot directory.( mv grub burg) Unsurprisingly, the boot does not work. The error indicated is: ERROR: file

[Bug 1912044] Re: invalid arch-independant ELF magic

2021-01-29 Thread geole0
Hello This "legacy only" computer is old. It now contains an SSD disk composed of four partitions including windows 10 and ubuntu 20.04. Another disk containing windows XP and windows 7. A third larger disc containing the duplications of the two preceding discs. I know the ubuntu boots fairly

[Bug 1913576] [NEW] Fsck with recovery mode

2021-01-28 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello Today, to please myself, I decided to boot in recovery mode. A nice grid of choices is displayed. I choose the fourth line titled: fsck check all filesystems The following warning message is displayed: Continuing will remount your filesystem / in read/write mode and

[Bug 1912044] Re: invalid arch-independant ELF magic

2021-01-17 Thread geole0
** Also affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912044 Title: invalid arch-independant ELF magic To manage

[Bug 1912044] [NEW] invalid arch-independant ELF magic

2021-01-16 Thread geole0
Public bug reported: Hello I decide to install the DAILY version of Hirsute Hippo using a "legacy only" computer. I choose to install on the whole disk. As a result: The msdos partition table is destroyed and replaced with a GPT partition table. A 32 MiB bios_grub partition is created, A 512

  1   2   >