I'm using a firefox profile on a windows share mounted via pam_mount.
With Ubuntu 9.10 and using the nobrl option I could use the profile without
problems.
After upgrading to 10.04 firefox can't read the bookmarks, history etc..
--
cannot use sqlite3 on cifs mount
I'm using a firefox profile on a windows share mounted via pam_mount.
With Ubuntu 9.10 and using the nobrl option I could use the profile without
problems.
After upgrading to 10.04 firefox can't read the bookmarks, history etc..
--
cannot use sqlite3 on cifs mount
Just a short notice.
phcoder wrote in #477104 in Comment #77, that he committed a fix for grubs
ntfs.mod.
Hopefully that ends this discussion here.
--
Wubi/Karmic boot: kernel panic - not synching: VFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477169
You received this bug notification because you are a
I at first got Problem discribed in #477104 here. Now I'm stuck with the
described kernel panic.
Booting Windows and doing a clean shutdown as proposed by Agostino doesn't not
help.
boot.disk and root.disk are on hda5. So they reside on the windows boot
disk but not the boot partition (if that
** Changed in: wubi
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Wubi/Karmic boot: kernel panic - not synching: VFS
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477169
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Following situation here:
Karmic Installation with wubi
Kernel is 2.6.31-14 (no other installed)
After booting grub says error: file not found
grub.cfg looked like garbage
Booted Ubuntu from Live-CD
Grup.cfg looks fine here. I tried to rewrite it anyway by doing the following
steps:
- Mounted
Okay, I thought ufw was enable during the samba installed. I did not install or
activate it manual.
I think it would be to hard to figure out why it was enabled on my system.
I second, that a firewall should not open any ports automatically without user
interaction.
If samba does not activate
Okay, I thought ufw was enable during the samba installed. I did not install or
activate it manual.
I think it would be to hard to figure out why it was enabled on my system.
I second, that a firewall should not open any ports automatically without user
interaction.
If samba does not activate
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
I started with a karmic beta install and setup a samba server.
This was working for a fews days. After several updates samba stopped working.
Samba starts but the server is not visible in the networking in nautilus.
This applies to the samba
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850273/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850274/XsessionErrors.txt
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You
** Also affects: ufw
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Hi,
thank you for your answer. I think it is atleast an documentation issue then.
If I install samba and samba suggests ufw, which in fact blocks samba the
default configuration isn't working.
The samba ufw profile should be activated by default or the user should get an
info that he has to do
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
I started with a karmic beta install and setup a samba server.
This was working for a fews days. After several updates samba stopped working.
Samba starts but the server is not visible in the networking in nautilus.
This applies to the samba
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850273/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34850274/XsessionErrors.txt
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You
** Also affects: ufw
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ufw blocks samba in karmic default installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468197
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi,
thank you for your answer. I think it is atleast an documentation issue then.
If I install samba and samba suggests ufw, which in fact blocks samba the
default configuration isn't working.
The samba ufw profile should be activated by default or the user should get an
info that he has to do
** Changed in: nvidia-settings (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Sync to VBlank option does not work without Compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Same problem here
** Changed in: nvidia-settings (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
Sync to VBlank option does not work without Compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.out
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30273379/lspci-vvnn.out
--
Sync to VBlank option does not work without Compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30273419/Xorg.0.log
--
Sync to VBlank option does not work without Compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371385
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
