[Bug 1352255] [NEW] Impossible to configure network interface with only IPv6 address

2014-08-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: As it says on the tin. I'm unable to configure my Ubuntu 14.04 VM to have only an IPv6 address on boot-up. Dual stack works fine. My /etc/networking/interfaces looks like this: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate

[Bug 1352255] Re: Impossible to configure network interface with only IPv6 address

2014-08-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
The workaround for now is to configure an IPv4 address: auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 169.254.199.199 netmask 255.255.0.0 iface eth0 inet6 static address 2001:610:188:444::55 netmask 64 gateway 2001:610:188:444::1 autoconf 0

[Bug 1013224] Re: Ubuntu must automatically install more sane backends for the right support of scanners(Canon Pixma MX360 isn't recognized)

2014-02-18 Thread usr
The problem is with Sane, not with Simple-Scan. This scanner isn't supported by default in Sane. Simple-Scan is only a front-end. According to the page http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html , Canon Pixma MX360 is supported on Pixma 0.17.4 backend. Currently I'm not an Ubuntu user, but You

[Bug 1013224] Re: Ubuntu must automatically install more sane backends for the right support of scanners (Canon Pixma MX360 and others aren't recognized)

2014-02-18 Thread usr
In the future consider to buy HP printers, it has the best Linux support (HPLIP). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013224 Title: Ubuntu must automatically install more sane backends

[Bug 1013224] Re: Ubuntu must automatically install more Sane backends for the right support of scanners (Canon Pixma MX360 and others aren't recognized)

2014-02-18 Thread usr
** Summary changed: - Ubuntu must automatically install more sane backends for the right support of scanners (Canon Pixma MX360 and others aren't recognized) + Ubuntu must automatically install more Sane backends for the right support of scanners (Canon Pixma MX360 and others aren't recognized)

[Bug 1252027] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u25-2.3.10-1ubuntu0.12.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/java-7-openjdk/swing.properties' is not in sync with other instances of the sam

2014-01-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
I removed all of the opendk-7 stuff and installed the openjdk-6 equivalents. My app (Wowza streaming media server) was able to use that fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252027

[Bug 1252027] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u25-2.3.10-1ubuntu0.12.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/java-7-openjdk/swing.properties' is not in sync with other instances of the sam

2014-01-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
My java install is also b0rked by this, see attached upgrade log. ** Attachment added: unattended-upgrades-dpkg_2014-01-24_06%3A48%3A07.197392.log

[Bug 1094073] Re: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2013-01-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Changed in: tinyproxy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094073 Title: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time To manage

[Bug 1094073] Re: Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2013-01-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
It seems tinyproxy does listen to both protocols, I didn't test properly. I assumed that this result: netstat -tlnpvw | grep tinyproxy tcp6 0 0 ::: :::*LISTEN 3946/tinyproxy meant that it didn't listen on v4... but I was wrong. Listen ::

[Bug 1094073] [NEW] Tinyproxy won't listen to IPv6 and IPv4 at the same time

2012-12-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: I'm trying to set up Tinyproxy on a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04 server system, and I'm using the packaged version 1.8.3. The system has fully working dual stack network connectivity. According to the inline docs in the configuration file /etc/tinyproxy.conf: # Listen: If you have

[Bug 1029361] [NEW] 'attempts' DNS option has no effect

2012-07-26 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: From man(8) resolvconf: /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail File to be appended to the dynamically generated resolver con‐ figuration file. To append nothing, make this an empty file. This file is a good place to put a

[Bug 998223] Re: Turns on IPv6 privacy extensions regardless of settings in 10-ipv6-privacy.conf

2012-06-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
The same applies to Ubuntu 12.04 server. Despite what interfaces(5) says: privext int Privacy extensions (RFC3041) (0=off, 1=assign, 2=prefer) That statement does not seem to get honoured. This entry in /etc/nework/interfaces worked fine at least in beta2, but

[Bug 978037] [NEW] Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Our 10.04 machines have this in /etc/network/interfaces: auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.87.30.54 netmask 255.255.255.192 gateway 192.87.30.1 iface eth0 inet6 static pre-up echo 0

[Bug 978037] Re: Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
This indeed was a case of RTFM. However, according to the default /etc/network/interfaces: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). But interfaces(5) does not tell you the whole story. The part

[Bug 978037] Re: Impossible to configure static IPv6 address

2012-04-10 Thread /usr/local/dick
Wasn't a bug, but merely a RTFM. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978037 Title: Impossible to configure

[Bug 567821] Re: data directory (distros.ini) is missing

2011-08-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Great to have it fixed in natty, but the package in lucid is still b0rked... Any reason why it was never fixed? Thanks!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567821 Title: data directory

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Hi I just ran into this bug. In hindsight a serious issue that started 3 days ago with one of our web apps seems to also be caused by this. Just tested Steve's patched packages (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.17~lp776642) on our dev server and I can confirm they fix the problems for us. Eagerly awaiting

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
I just went back the the previous version. Since I remove packages from /var/cache/apt after update, I had to dig them up online, from: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+archive/ppa/+buildjob/2165886 I downloaded these and installed them manually with dpkg:

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
I just went back the the previous version. Since I remove packages from /var/cache/apt after update, I had to dig them up online, from: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+archive/ppa/+buildjob/2165886 I downloaded these and installed them manually with dpkg:

[Bug 776642] Re: segfaults from 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.15

2011-05-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Hi I just ran into this bug. In hindsight a serious issue that started 3 days ago with one of our web apps seems to also be caused by this. Just tested Steve's patched packages (5.2.4-2ubuntu5.17~lp776642) on our dev server and I can confirm they fix the problems for us. Eagerly awaiting

[Bug 715152] Re: [SRU] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-04-20 Thread /usr/local/dick
Just installed ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 from lucid-proposed, and that seems to do the trick. Thanks for fixing this guys! And well in advance of 6-6, IPv6 day ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.

[Bug 715152] Re: [SRU] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-04-20 Thread /usr/local/dick
Just installed ntp 1:4.2.4p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 from lucid-proposed, and that seems to do the trick. Thanks for fixing this guys! And well in advance of 6-6, IPv6 day ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
new version in hardy-proposed 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu3 also works FINE. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
new version in hardy-proposed 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu3 also works FINE. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Should I test again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Should I test again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 729181] [NEW] Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives erreur LDAP: Can't contact master ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322. Net::LDAP in Lucid does support IPv6. However

[Bug 729181] Re: Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives erreur LDAP: Can't contact master ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322. Net::LDAP in Lucid does support

[Bug 729181] Re: Can't connect to IPv6 LDAP servers

2011-03-04 Thread /usr/local/dick
** Description changed: Binary package hint: smbldap-tools - Connecting to IPv6 LDAP servers gives erreur LDAP: Can't contact master - ldap server for writing (IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused) - at /usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 322. + Connecting to IPv6-only LDAP

[Bug 727114] [NEW] nmap only recognizes IPv6 resolvers by specifying --system-dns

2011-03-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nmap I recently configured our 10.04 LTS systems to use only IPv6 resolvers: root@cajones:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 2001:610:148:dead::4 nameserver 2001:610:158:98d::42 domain terena.org nmap complains since: root@cajones:~# nmap -sP

[Bug 727114] [NEW] nmap only recognizes IPv6 resolvers by specifying --system-dns

2011-03-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nmap I recently configured our 10.04 LTS systems to use only IPv6 resolvers: root@cajones:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 2001:610:148:dead::4 nameserver 2001:610:158:98d::42 domain terena.org nmap complains since: root@cajones:~# nmap -sP

[Bug 715152] Re: ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Ehm, well exactly like you did, I manually removed it, although it's done automatically from interfaces with 'pre-up'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715152 Title: ntp

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Pakcage from hardy-proposed works FINE. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 715152] Re: ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Ehm, well exactly like you did, I manually removed it, although it's done automatically from interfaces with 'pre-up'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715152 Title: ntp wont run on

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-11 Thread /usr/local/dick
Pakcage from hardy-proposed works FINE. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 715141] [NEW] ntp.ubuntu.com does not have AAAA record

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp When installing ntp on an IPv6 only host, the kindly provided ntp.ubuntu.com does not work, because it does not have a record. Please provide IPv6 connectivity for this host. This affects all releases. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu)

[Bug 715152] [NEW] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp Lucid host running IPv6 only, with network configured like this: root@svn:~# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:86:00:15 inet6 addr: 2001:610:148:dead:cafe:babe:0:29/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr:

[Bug 715141] [NEW] ntp.ubuntu.com does not have AAAA record

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp When installing ntp on an IPv6 only host, the kindly provided ntp.ubuntu.com does not work, because it does not have a record. Please provide IPv6 connectivity for this host. This affects all releases. ** Affects: ntp (Ubuntu)

[Bug 715152] [NEW] ntp wont run on IPv6 only host unless lo has 127.0.0.1 address

2011-02-08 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ntp Lucid host running IPv6 only, with network configured like this: root@svn:~# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:86:00:15 inet6 addr: 2001:610:148:dead:cafe:babe:0:29/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr:

[Bug 241305] Re: security.ubuntu.com not accessible in IPv6 (AAAA record missing in the DNS)

2011-02-07 Thread /usr/local/dick
It is now February 2011 and still no IPv6 connectivity for security.ubuntu.com. For instance my code repository system svn.terena.org is complaining. I am planning to remove IPv4 from more systems, so +1 for some IPv6 connectivity. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Confirmed, the patched version works as expected, both options actually work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 --

[Bug 713002] Re: Impossible to disable IPv4

2011-02-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Confirmed, the patched version works as expected, both options actually work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713002 Title: Impossible to disable IPv4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 697545] [NEW] Backslashes from check_disk_smb output are removed in web interface

2011-01-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nagios3 One of my hosts has this check running against it, with result: nag...@expat:~$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk_smb -a grizzly.terena.org -H 'SAMBA' -s profile_backup -u nagios3 -p hackme -w 95 -c 99 Disk ok - 2.32G (14%) free on \\SAMBA

[Bug 697545] [NEW] Backslashes from check_disk_smb output are removed in web interface

2011-01-05 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nagios3 One of my hosts has this check running against it, with result: nag...@expat:~$ /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk_smb -a grizzly.terena.org -H 'SAMBA' -s profile_backup -u nagios3 -p hackme -w 95 -c 99 Disk ok - 2.32G (14%) free on \\SAMBA

[Bug 694707] [NEW] database doesn't get purged during purge

2010-12-27 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: When documenting the installation of slapd on Lucid, I often need to go back to a clean default install. I do this by: apt-get -y purge slapd apt-get install slapd It seems that purging does not remove /var/lib/ldap, so after re- installation old database stuff is hanging

[Bug 611644] Re: Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-08-16 Thread /usr/local/dick
Correction: copying modules does not work anymore on the latest kernel. -- Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611644 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 611644] [NEW] Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-07-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-vm-tools I recently upgraded from ESX4u2 to ESX4.1, and since then snapshots of Lucid VMs go wrong. This surfaced because we use VCB to make backups of our VMs, and this process includes making a quiesced snapshot. Done manually from the ESX console

[Bug 611644] Re: Snapshot with quiesce option fails and kills VM on ESXi 4.1

2010-07-30 Thread /usr/local/dick
FYI, it might be totally bad practise, but I just copied the kernel modules from the host that has the official tar installer, to the host with Ubuntu open-vm-tools (essentially replacing /lib/modules/2.6.32-24-server/updates/dkms/*.ko ), and after rebooting everything seems to work fine, i.e. I

[Bug 600704] Re: Please update k3b to version 2.0

2010-07-27 Thread usr
This is not professional. Don't be evil and update k3b 2 to the stable version for Ubuntu 10.04. -- Please update k3b to version 2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in ubuntu. --

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-04-02 Thread /usr/local/dick
Thanks, I already found out this was the case. I was a bit confused because the default did not work right away. On a clean system apt-get install --no-install-recommends linux-headers-`uname -r` open- vm-dkms open-vm-tools does the trick and everything seems to work just fine - the linux-

[Bug 553336] [NEW] server installer installs x11

2010-04-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: debian-installer Installing Lucid beta1 server, I selected only OpenSSH-server as feature. After installation it has installed all the X11 stuff as well. Tried again without selecting anything, still leads to X11 being installed... ** Affects:

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-04-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Dependencies are still there in 2010.02.23-236320-1+ubuntu1. This will severely impact usability on all ESX systems...please fix so that this LTS will have non-crappy tools.. thanks -- Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418527 You received this bug

[Bug 418527] Re: Unnecessary dependencies in open-vm-tools

2010-03-20 Thread /usr/local/dick
Installing lucid beta1 today, 2009.11.16-210370-1+ubuntu2 seems to still want to install the entire X forest: r...@lucid-beta1:~# apt-get install open-vm-tools Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed:

[Bug 468566] [NEW] Plugins in subdirectories are not loaded

2009-11-01 Thread /usr/local/dick
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: open-vm-tools On a new Karmic server, after compiling modules with m-a, open-vm-tools works (i.e. Tools are OK in VMware VirtualCenter), but fails to report the IP address and host name. I turned on logging, and I see this:

[Bug 456020] [NEW] [Kubuntu 9.10] Update KPackageKit

2009-10-19 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kpackagekit KPackageKit 0.5 is out: http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=84745 ** Affects: kpackagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Kubuntu 9.10] Update KPackageKit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456020 You

[Bug 442560] Re: Installer crashes when trying to partition drive

2009-10-05 Thread usr
Same here, with Ubuntu 9.10 Beta. Ubiquity crashes when it is going to create partitions. Steps to reproduce it: 1.) Load the liveCD with the default option. 2.) Run ubiquity and go to the partitions step. 3.) Create partitions manually. 4.) Create one primary partition in ext4 with / mountpoint.

[Bug 31709] Re: Brasero, GNOME's burn:/// and K3b slow dvd burn speed

2009-09-02 Thread usr
The problem isn't in ext3 file system, I am in openSUSE also with ext3 file system and I can burn DVDs correctly with the same DVD burner that in Ubuntu I can't. I'm sorry, I want to say Mandriva Linux. I think this bug must have high or critical status +1. I am totally agree with you. --

[Bug 31709] Re: Brasero, GNOME's burn:/// and K3b slow dvd burn speed

2009-08-06 Thread usr
The problem isn't in ext3 file system, I am in openSUSE also with ext3 file system and I can burn DVDs correctly with the same DVD burner that in Ubuntu I can't. -- Brasero, GNOME's burn:/// and K3b slow dvd burn speed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31709 You received this bug notification

[Bug 31709] Re: Brasero, GNOME's burn:/// and K3b slow dvd burn speed

2009-07-29 Thread usr
This bug sucks. Since more than three years the Ubuntu users can't burn correctly. Are we supposed that a user does not need to burn DVDs? Ubuntu (and its derivatives) is the only one that has this bug. -- Brasero, GNOME's burn:/// and K3b slow dvd burn speed

[Bug 150333] Re: Kubuntu does not have the same magic than Ubuntu

2009-07-28 Thread usr
** Also affects: migration-assistant Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubufox Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: live-creator Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: baobab Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 150333] Re: Kubuntu does not have the same magic than Ubuntu

2009-07-28 Thread usr
@Harald Sitter: I am reading https://wiki.kubuntu.org/Kubuntu/Todo I read the previous comments but some months ago and the link had not any of the things that now are in this page. Excuse me, but with sarcasms is not going anywhere. -- Kubuntu does not have the same magic than Ubuntu

[Bug 349757] Re: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff

2009-07-24 Thread usr
Are you sure that it is not a Kubuntu's bug? In openSUSE they are showed. -- Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. --

[Bug 349757] Re: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff

2009-07-24 Thread usr
...and I think remember that the same in Mandriva Linux. -- Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs

[Bug 349757] Re: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff

2009-07-24 Thread usr
O.K. Thanks for your answer. ** Description changed: - Kubuntu 9.0 Beta: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff - + Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff - System - Places menu. 1. Open Dolphin. Local hard disk drives are show in Places menu. 2. Open

[Bug 185331] Re: Wifi does not work in MSI VR601-041 laptop (Atheros AR5007EG)

2009-07-09 Thread usr
Fixed at 9.04 (by default). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Wifi does not work in MSI VR601-041 laptop (Atheros AR5007EG) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 309626] Re: strigidaemon fails to start

2009-07-05 Thread usr
The same for me at Kubuntu 9.04: Strigi service failed to initialize, most likely due to an installation problem. ** Changed in: strigi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- strigidaemon fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309626 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 178442] Re: Pulseaudio fails to initialize Audiophile 2496

2009-06-19 Thread usr
Hi, Florian. You're right, the problem is still alive! Kubuntu 9.04 doesn't do the bug because this version doesn't install pulseaudio, but when you install totem (for example) pulseaudio is installed, and when your are listening a song with a KDE app, GTK+ apps can't play any audio. --

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
The patch doesn't fix the bug. Go to Third-Party software, and write a description with non standard characters. For example, the ó of Código fuente (source code) doesn't appear, a rare character appears instead of it. I think the bug comes from above and should be resolved in the way to serve

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
1. I am using the patch that Kubuntu 9.04 includes (I don't know what patch is). 2. At the moment, no. 3. In software-properties-gtk, no problem. -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
** Attachment added: spk-0.71.5-01.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27595616/spk-0.71.5-01.png -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
** Attachment added: spk-0.71.5-02.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27595639/spk-0.71.5-02.png -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
Where are the deb packages? -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
O.K. I just downloaded and installed the deb packages. The result: - The bug of my first snapshot is still present. - The bug of my second snapshot was solved. u...@machine:~$ apt-cache policy software-properties-kde software-properties-kde: Instalados: 0.72~ppajaunty1 Candidato:

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
...and, in software-properties-gtk, no problem (like ever). -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
Yeah. I said O.K. I just downloaded and installed the deb packages. Thank you anyway. :-) -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
I don't know programming, but... Don't it would be easier to make a general patch for the application instead of a patch for each area? Every time you create a new section will have to be patched? -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-06-06 Thread usr
In software-properties-kde, no. -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 351874] Re: [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed

2009-05-25 Thread usr
Unacceptable. kademar Linux (it's based on Debian testing) can do this. http://www.kademar.org/ ** Changed in: kubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix = Confirmed -- [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351874 You received this

[Bug 148715] Re: ubiquity-kde does not close installer's main window when it is installing the OS

2009-05-11 Thread usr
** Description changed: ubiquity-frontend-kde does not close installer's main window when it is - installing the OS. + installing the OS. It works O.K. at ubiquity-frontend-gtk. -- ubiquity-kde does not close installer's main window when it is installing the OS

[Bug 366076] Re: DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.Failed: An operation is already pending on CD eject attempt

2009-05-04 Thread usr
The same for me, with a clean installation of Ubuntu 9.04, after I canceled a dvd-burn simulation. DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.Failed: An operation is already pending -- DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.Failed: An operation is already pending on CD eject

[Bug 31709] Re: K3b slow dvd burn speed

2009-05-04 Thread usr
The same bug in Ubuntu 9.04, with the GNOME's burn:/// dvd writer. ** Summary changed: - K3b slow dvd burn speed + K3b and GNOME's burn:/// slow dvd burn speed ** Package changed: k3b (Ubuntu) = libatasmart (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu) Assignee: Kubuntu Bugs (kubuntu-bugs)

[Bug 178442] Re: Pulseaudio fails to initialize Audiophile 2496

2009-04-27 Thread usr
Fixed on Ubuntu 9.04. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Pulseaudio fails to initialize Audiophile 2496 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 366696] [NEW] Can't play DVDs

2009-04-25 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.04. I installed all the codecs that the system have requested in a notifier, but Dragon Player doesn't can play DVDs. ** Affects: dragonplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't play DVDs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366696 You

[Bug 366696] Re: Can't play DVDs

2009-04-25 Thread usr
** Description changed: - Kubuntu 9.04. The system has installed all the codecs, but Dragon Player - can't play DVDs. + Kubuntu 9.04. I installed all the codecs that the system have requested + in a notifier, but Dragon Player doesn't can play DVDs. -- Can't play DVDs

[Bug 268617] Re: Reimplement automatic codec installation prompt

2009-04-24 Thread usr
... but not with streaming media. ** Changed in: phonon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Reimplement automatic codec installation prompt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 268617] Re: Reimplement automatic codec installation prompt

2009-04-24 Thread usr
Fixed at Kubuntu 9.04. ** Changed in: phonon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Reimplement automatic codec installation prompt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268617 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349740] Re: Firefox doesn't remember the size and position of the windows

2009-04-24 Thread usr
Now, I can confirm this bug with Kubuntu 9.04, KDE 4.2.2, and Mozilla Firefox 3.0.9. In Ubuntu 9.04, with GNOME 2.26.1 and the same Firefox version, no problem. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Firefox doesn't remember the size and position of the

[Bug 353894] [NEW] Problem with non standard characters

2009-04-02 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: When I add a download with á, é, í, ó, ú or ñ character in their name, KTorrent renames this character to �. ** Affects: ktorrent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - When I add a download with á, é, í, ó, ú

[Bug 350414] Re: Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop

2009-04-01 Thread usr
Then, fixed. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Fix Released -- Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 352358] [NEW] Configure file sharing button doesn't do anything

2009-03-31 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Configure file sharing button doesn't do anything. 1.) Open Dolphin. 2.) Select a folder - mouse's second button - Properties - Share. 3.) Click on Configure file sharing. It doesn't do anything (it try call to kcm shell fileshare, but it isn't installed). In the fisrt

[Bug 352358] Re: Configure file sharing button doesn't do anything

2009-03-31 Thread usr
** Description changed: - Configure file sharing button doesn't do anything. + Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: Configure file sharing button doesn't do anything. 1.) Open Dolphin. - 2.) Select a folder - mouse's second button - Properties - Share. - 3.) Click on Configure file sharing. It doesn't do

[Bug 351874] Re: [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed

2009-03-31 Thread usr
Mandriva Linux's tools are GTK+, and this distribution doesn't have this problem. In any case, although this can not be solved now, I think this bug should be marked as confirmed. It is a significant weakness in the consistency of appearance. -- [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are

[Bug 349740] Re: Firefox doesn't remember the size and position of the windows

2009-03-30 Thread usr
Yes, in sometimes Firefox remembers the window, but in sometimes, not (I updating the system every day). I will also try it with RC1 as soon as possible. -- Firefox doesn't remember the size and position of the windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349740 You received this bug notification

[Bug 351866] [NEW] KPackageKit calls to PoliciKit-GTK

2009-03-30 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: KPackageKit calls to PoliciKit-GTK (instead of to PoliciKit-Qt) if PoliciKit-GTK is installed. ** Affects: kpackagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - KPackageKit calls to PoliciKit-GTK (instead of to

[Bug 351874] [NEW] [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed

2009-03-30 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed. Screenshot: http://imagebin.ca/view/mHAgvzy.html ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Kubuntu] GTK apps launched as superuser are unthemed

[Bug 350414] Re: Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop

2009-03-30 Thread usr
Do you check CD for defects? ( http://home.online.no/~osmoma/hardy/images/picture3a.jpg ) -- Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 350414] Re: Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop

2009-03-30 Thread usr
I have had problems in the past with AHCI in a laptop. I know that this does not solve bug, but... Have you tried install with AHCI disabled? -- Installation fails Kubuntu 9.04 BETA AMD64 Desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350414 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 349728] [NEW] Adobe Flash Player installer doesn't refresh Konqueror's plugins

2009-03-27 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.04 Beta: Adobe Flash Player installer doesn't refresh Konqueror's plugins. After install Abode Flash Player, you need do manually, in Konqueror: Settings - Configure Konqueror - Plugins - Plugins - Scan for plugins - OK. Restart Konqueror. ** Affects:

[Bug 349740] [NEW] Kubuntu doesn't remember the size and position of the windows

2009-03-27 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kwin Kubuntu doesn't remember the size and position of the windows. 1. Open Dolphin, maximize it, and close it. 2. Open Dolphin. It isn't maximized. ** Affects: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kubuntu

[Bug 349757] [NEW] Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff

2009-03-27 Thread usr
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 9.0 Beta: Local hard disk drives aren't show in Kickoff - System - Places menu. 1. Open Dolphin. Local hard disk drives are show in Places menu. 2. Open Kickoff. Local hard disk drives aren't in show in System - Places menu. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >