[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2019-11-03 Thread gustavo panizzo
** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset To

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2018-11-07 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Debian) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset To

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2018-09-22 Thread gustavo panizzo
Latest version in Debian has support to save/restore ipsets, please test and report any bugs! thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2017-06-25 Thread Martin PANEL
A good ipset plugin for netfilter-persistent : https://github.com/jordanrinke/ipsets-persistent -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support for

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2016-01-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Debian) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset To manage

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2015-09-04 Thread Realgo Sysadmin
Unfortunately, this isn't as easy as it seems. iptables save/restore have very different semantics from ipset save/restore. iptables starts from an empty state and loads the specified rules. ipset on the other hand starts from the *CURRENT* state. At system boot time, this will be empty, so

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2015-09-04 Thread Realgo Sysadmin
FYI: Here's what I've ended up doing, and I create files for "00-flush", 2 files that are "01-create-servers.ignore" and "01-create-x-servers.ignore", then a "50-rules" that populates "x-servers" and swaps it to "servers", then destroys x-servers. ** Attachment added: "upstart file for loading

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2015-07-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2014-12-27 Thread Andreas Rütten
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #693177 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693177 ** Also affects: iptables-persistent (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693177 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug

[Bug 1405670] Re: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset

2014-12-27 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405670 Title: iptables-persistent lacks support for ipset To manage